Skip to main content
Log in

Private labels and public quality standards: How can consumer trust be restored after the mad cow crisis?

  • Published:
Quantitative Marketing and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In those sectors faced with questions of food safety (meat, fruit, vegetables), new private labels have been set up in Europe in order to restore consumer trust. In this paper, we perform a theoretical analysis of these private labels. We propose an original model of vertical relationships between producers and retailers which takes into account two supply sources through (i) a competitive spot market on which the retailers buy a minimum quality standard product and (ii) supply contracts aimed at marketing higher quality private labels. We study how producers and retailers could cooperate in setting up these new labels. From a public point of view, we show the complementarity of a moderate increase in public quality standards and the creation of these new private labels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Besanko, D., Donnenfeld, S., & White, L. J. (1988). The multiproduct firm, quality choice and regulation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36, 411–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontems, P., Monier-Dilhan, S., & Réquillart, V. (1999). Strategic effects of private labels. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(2), 147–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, L., & Cook, R. (2001). US fresh fruit and vegetable marketing: Emerging trade practices, trends and issues. Agricultural Economic Report, 795, ERS—United State Department of Agriculture, Washington, 52 p.

  • Chardon, O., & Dumartin, S. (1998). Fidélité aux Enseignes, Fidélité aux Marques: Le choix des consommateurs. INSEE Première, Nb609, septembre 1998.

  • Codron, J. M., Grunert K., Giraud-Heraud, E., Soler, L. G., & Regmi A. (2003). Retail sector responses to changing consumer preferences: The european experience. In Mark Gehlhar and Anita Regmi (eds.), Global markets for high-value food. Agricultural Economic Report, ERS-USDA, Washington D.C.

  • Connor, J. M.,& Peterson, E. B., (1992). Market structure determinants of national brand—privalte label price differences of manufactured food products. Journal of Industrial Economics, 40, 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corstjens, M., & Lal R. (2000). Building store loyalty through store brands. Journal of Marketing Research, XXXVII, 281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, R.W., Dhar, R., & Putsis, W. (2000). Assessing the competitive interaction between private labels and national brands. Journal of Business, 73(1), 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampes, C., & Hollander, A. (1995). Duopoly and quality standards. European Economic Review, 39, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, D.L., & DeeVon Bailey (2002). Meat traceability: Are us consumers willing to pay for it?. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27(2), 348–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, D. (1999). Should grocery manufacturers supply private labels, Mimeo.

  • Dunne, D., & Narasimhan, C. (1999). The new world of private labels. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecchia G., & Lambertini L. (2001). Endogenous timing and quality standards in a vertically differenciated duopoly. Louvain Economic Review, 67(2), 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearne, A. (1998). The evolution of partnerships in the meat supply chain: Insights from the beef industry. supply Chain Management, 3, 214–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaucher, S. (2002). Organisation de filiére et politiques d'approvisionnement: Analyse appliquée au cas des filières agroalimentaires. Thèse de Doctorat de l'Ecole des Mines de Paris, 343 p.

  • Harris, J. M, Perloff, J. M., Shimshack, J. P., & Ward, M. B. (2000). Effects of the private label invasion in food industry. Agricultural Economic Report, ERS- United State Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.

  • Hoch, S. J., & Banerji, S. (1993). When do the private labels succeed? Sloan Management Review, 34, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, S. J. (1996). ‘How should national brands think about private labels?. Sloan Management Review, 37, Winter 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, R. H. (1957). Price discrimination at retail: The supermarket case. Journal of Industrial Economics, 6, 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latouche, K., Rainelli, P., & Vermersch, D. (2000). Quel prix pour la sécurité alimentaire? Une évaluation contingente suite à la crise européenne de la vache folle. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48, 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusk, J. L., Roosen, J., Fox, J.A. (2003). Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: A comparison of consumers in France, Germany, The United Kingdom and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, february, 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, S., Lyon T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2000). Quality leadership when regulatory standards are forthcoming. The Journal of Industrial Economics, XLVIII, 3, 331–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazé, A., (2002). Retailers' labeling strategies: Contract design, organisational change and learning. Chain and Network Science, 33–45.

  • Mills, D. E. (1995). Why retailers sell private labels. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 4(Nb 3), 509–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, D. E. (1999). Private labels and manufacturer counterstrategies. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(2), 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa, M., Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quelsh, J. A., & Hardy, D. (1996). Brands versus private labels: Fighting to win. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 99–111.

  • Ronen, U. (1991). “Minimum quality standards, fixed costs and competition. Rand Journal of Economics, 22(Nb4), 490–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.J., & Cmar, K. (1987). Private labels are back in fashion. Harvard Business Review, 99–106

  • Schmalensee, R. (1987). Competitive advantage and collusive optima. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 5, 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, M. E. (1995). Product rivalry with multiple strategic weapons: An analysis of price and advertising competition. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 4(3), 445–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju, J.S., Sethuraman, R., & Dhar, S.K. (1995). National brand-store brand price differential and store brand market share. Pricing Theory and Practice: An International Journal, 3(2), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, T., & Sexton, R. (2004). The competitive implications of top-of the-market and related contract-pricing clauses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 124–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis-Georges Soler.

Additional information

JEL Classification L22. L23. Q13. Q18

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giraud-Héraud, É., Rouached, L. & Soler, LG. Private labels and public quality standards: How can consumer trust be restored after the mad cow crisis?. Quant Market Econ 4, 31–55 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-006-2777-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-006-2777-5

Keywords

Navigation