Abstract
The effectiveness of agrochemical products strongly depends on the capability of the atomized droplets to reach the target site in the desired amount. Spray drift is the movement of droplets downwind of the target area, and its minimization is a growing concern to ensure operator health, protect the environment, achieve efficient crop protection and transform the spraying of phytosanitary products into a sustainable activity. In this contribution, a coupled atomization-spray drift model suitable for different types of nozzles is developed and validated against experimental data. Particularly, the article focuses on providing a simple simulation tool, based on a minimum number of input data that are easily accessable to predict the ground deposition spray drift of a nozzle. It was found that the atomized droplets size distribution can be accurately predicted just as a function of the median volumetric diameter, which was successfully estimated as a function of spray pressure, nozzle nominal flowrate and spray angle (commonly known data). Besides, the proposed model, based on bivariate probability density functions, is able to accurately represent different physical phenomena using a low number of calculations. Its implementation is possible using low-resource computing systems as required for sprayer on-board software tools.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- \({a}_{ul}\) :
-
Parameter defined in Eq. 10 (–)
- \({A}_{n}\) :
-
Nozzle orifice area (m2)
- \(C\) :
-
Displacement of deposited droplets respect to \({x}_{0}\) (m)
- \({C}_{PH}\) :
-
Nozzle constant (m)
- \({C}_{d}\) :
-
Discharge coefficient (–)
- \(d\) :
-
Droplet diameter (m)
- \({d}_{0}\) :
-
Atomized droplet diameter (m)
- \({d}_{crit}\) :
-
Critical droplet diameter (m)
- \({d}_{dep}\) :
-
Deposited droplet diameter (m)
- \({d}_{max}\) :
-
Maximum diameter of atomized droplets (m)
- \({d}_{min}\) :
-
Minimum initial diameter of a droplet that reaches the soil surface (m)
- \({D}_{V10}\) :
-
Diameter where ten percent of the atomized droplets volume distribution has a smaller particle size (m)
- \({D}_{V50}\) :
-
Diameter where fifty percent of the atomized droplets volume distribution has a smaller particle size (m)
- \({D}_{V90}\) :
-
Diameter where ninety percent of the atomized droplets volume distribution has a smaller particle size (m)
- \({f}_{{x}_{0}}\) :
-
Volume distribution pattern of atomized droplets (1/m)
- \({f}_{d,{x}_{dep}}\) :
-
Density function of droplets with respect to the initial diameter and deposition distance (1/m)
- \({f}_{d}\) :
-
Density function of the atomized spray (1/m)
- \({f}_{dep}\) :
-
Density function of droplets with respect to the deposition distance (1/m)
- \({f}_{d\alpha }\) :
-
Bi-variate probability distribution (1/m rad)
- \({f}_{\alpha }\) :
-
Droplet trajectory angle distribution function (1/rad)
- \({F}_{d}\) :
-
Cumulative function of the atomized spray (–)
- \(F\) :
-
Desired applied dose (m3/m2)
- \(g\) :
-
Gravity acceleration constant (m/s2)
- \(H\) :
-
Nozzle height (m)
- \(k\) :
-
Constant defined in Eq. 23 (s/m2)
- \(Oh\) :
-
Ohnesorge number (–)
- \(P\) :
-
Atomization pressure (Pa)
- \({P}_{ref}\) :
-
Atomization pressure for which the nominal flowrate is specified (270 kPa for ISO 10625:2018 compliant nozzles) (Pa)
- \(Q\) :
-
Nozzle volumetric flowrate (m3/s)
- \(RH\) :
-
Relative humidity (%)
- \(t\) :
-
Time (s)
- \({t}_{dep}\) :
-
Deposition time of droplets (s)
- \({t}_{resp}\) :
-
Response time of a droplet (s)
- \(T\) :
-
Wet bulb temperature (K)
- \({T}_{bh}\) :
-
Dry bulb temperature (K)
- \(\overline{U }\) :
-
Representative wind speed of the total atomized droplets population (m/s)
- \(U\) :
-
Wind speed (m/s)
- \({U}_{0}\) :
-
Wind speed at the nozzle height \(H\) (m/s)
- \({v}_{A}\) :
-
Sprayer forward speed (m/s)
- \({v}_{T}\) :
-
Terminal velocity (m/s)
- \(w\) :
-
Nominal spray width of a nozzle
- \(x\) :
-
Spatial downwind coordinate (m)
- \({x}_{0}\) :
-
Spatial position of the volume distribution pattern (m)
- \(Y\) :
-
Spray drift (–)
- \(z\) :
-
Vertical co-ordinate (m)
- \(\alpha\) :
-
Initial path angle of a drop (rad)
- \(\gamma\) :
-
Wind speed constant (–)
- \(\delta\) :
-
Nominal density function of droplets with respect to the deposition distance (1/m)
- \(\Delta T\) :
-
Difference between dry and wet bulb temperatures (K)
- \(\epsilon\) :
-
Roughness of the terrain (m)
- \({\mu }_{g}\) :
-
Air viscosity (Pa s)
- \(\theta\) :
-
Spray angle (rad)
- \({\rho }_{d}\) :
-
Droplet density (kg/m3)
- \({\rho }_{g}\) :
-
Air density (kg/m3)
- \(\sigma\) :
-
Surface tension (N/m)
- \({\sigma }_{{\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}}\) :
-
Water surface tension (N/m)
- \({\sigma }_{s}\) :
-
Standard deviation of \({f}_{{x}_{0}}\) (m)
- \({\sigma }_{ul}\) :
-
Parameter defined in Eq. 9 (–)
- \(\Psi\) :
-
Nozzle parameter \(\left({\upmu}\text{m}{\left(\frac{{\mathrm{m}}^{3}}{\mathrm{s}}\right)}^{-\frac{1}{3}}{\left(\mathrm{Pa}\right)}^\frac{1}{3}{\left(^\circ \right)}^\frac{2}{3}\right)\)
References
ASABE. (2009). S572.1 droplet size classification. The American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
Ashgriz, N. (2011). Handbook of atomization and sprays. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7264-4
BCPC. (1986). Nozzle classification scheme. British Crop Protection Council.
Bish, M. D., & Bradley, K. W. (2017). Survey of Missouri pesticide applicator practices, knowledge, and perceptions. Weed Technology, 31(2), 165–177.
Bodnár, T., Galdi, G. P., & Nečasová, Š. (2017). Particles in flows. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60282-0
Butts, T. R., Luck, J. D., Fritz, B. K., Hoffmann, W. C., & Kruger, G. R. (2019). Evaluation of spray pattern uniformity using three unique analyses as impacted by nozzle, pressure, and pulse-width modulation duty cycle. Pest Management Science, 75(7), 1875–1886. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5352
Czaczyk, Z. (2012). Spray classification for selected flat fan nozzles. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 52(1), 180–183. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-012-0027-2
da Cunha, J. P., Reis, E. F. D., de Assunção, H. H., & Landim, T. N. (2019). Evaluation of droplet spectra of the spray tip ad 11002 using different techniques. Engenharia Agrícola, 39(4), 476–481. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v39n4p476-481/2019
EPA – USA Environmental Protection Agency. (2001). PRN 2001-X Draft: Spray and Dust Drift Label Statements for Pesticide Products. Retrieved March 29, 2022, from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/prn-2001-x-draft-spray-and-dust-drift-label-statements-pesticide-products
Gil, E., Balsari, P., Gallart, M., Llorens, J., Marucco, P., Andersen, P. G., Fàbregasa, X., & Llopa, J. (2014). Determination of drift potential of different flat fan nozzles on a boom sprayer using a test bench. Crop Protection, 56, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.10.018
Guler, H., Zhu, H., Ozkan, H. E., & Ling, P. (2012). Characterization of hydraulic nozzles for droplet size and spray coverage. Atomization and Sprays. https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.2012006181
Hong, S. W., Zhao, L., & Zhu, H. (2018). SAAS, a computer program for estimating pesticide spray efficiency and drift of air-assisted pesticide applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 155, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.09.031
Hughes, R. N. (Ed.). (2013). Behavioural mechanisms of food selection (Vol. 20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75118-9
International Organization for Standardization. (2008). ISO 22856, 2008: Equipment for crop protection-Laboratory measurement of spray drift-part 1: Wind tunnel. International Organization for Standardization.
Kluza, P. A., Kuna-Broniowska, I., & Parafiniuk, S. (2019). Modeling and prediction of the uniformity of spray liquid coverage from flat fan spray nozzles. Sustainability, 11(23), 6716. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236716
Lebeau, F., Verstraete, A., Stainier, C., & Destain, M. F. (2011). RTDrift: A real time model for estimating spray drift from ground applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 77(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.04.009
Lefebvre, A. H., & McDonell, V. G. (2017). Atomization and sprays. Taylor & Francis, CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315120911
Leunda, P., Debouche, C., & Caussin, R. (1990). Predicting the transverse volume distribution under an agricultural spray boom. Crop Protection, 9(2), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(90)90088-O
Løfstrøm, P., Bruus, M., Andersen, H. V., Kjær, C., Nuyttens, D., & Astrup, P. (2013). The OML-SprayDrift model for predicting pesticide drift and deposition from ground boom sprayers. Journal of Pesticide Science. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D12-064
Matthews, G., Bateman, R., & Miller, P. (2014). Pesticide application methods (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118351284
Mawer, C. J., & Miller, P. C. H. (1989). Effect of roll angle and nozzle spray pattern on the uniformity of spray volume distribution below a boom. Crop Protection, 8(3), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(89)90030-6
Nuyttens, D., Baetens, K., De Schampheleire, M., & Sonck, B. (2007). Effect of nozzle type, size and pressure on spray droplet characteristics. Biosystems Engineering, 97(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.03.001
Nuyttens, D., De Schampheleire, M., Verboven, P., Brusselman, E., & Dekeyser, D. (2009). Droplet size and velocity characteristics of agricultural sprays. Transactions of the ASABE, 52(5), 1471. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.29127
Onorato, A., & Tesouro, M. O. (2006). Pulverizaciones Agrícolas Terrestres (1ra ed.) (Ground Agricultural Spraying). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agrícola INTA.
Post, S. L., & Hewitt, A. J. (2018). Flat-fan spray atomization model. Transactions of the ASABE, 61(4), 1249–1256. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12572
Post, S. L., Roten, R. L., & Connell, R. J. (2017). Discharge coefficients of flat-fan nozzles. Transactions of the ASABE, 60(2), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12064
Pretty, J. (2008). (2008) Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1491), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
Pretty, J., & Bharucha, Z. P. (2014). Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. Annals of Botany, 114(8), 1571–1596. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu205
Renaudo, C. A. (2020) Modelo predictivo de la deriva de pulverización en aplicaciones agrícolas de botalón (Spray drift model for boom sprayers). Universidad Nacional del Sur. Retrieved March 29, 2022, from http://repositoriodigital.uns.edu.ar/handle/123456789/5147
Sijs, R., Kooij, S., Holterman, H. J., Van De Zande, J., & Bonn, D. (2021). Drop size measurement techniques for sprays: Comparison of image analysis, phase Doppler particle analysis, and laser diffraction. AIP Advances, 11(1), 015315. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0018667
Song, Y., Sun, H., Li, M., & Zhang, Q. (2015). Technology application of smart spray in agriculture: A review. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 21(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10798587.2015.1015781
Srivastava, S., Goyal, P., & Srivastava, M. M. (2009). Pesticides: Past, present, and future. In L. M. L. Nollet & H. S. Rathore (Eds.), Handbook of pesticides: Methods of pesticide residues analysis (p. 628). CRC Press.
Stainier, C., Robaye, V., Destain, M. F., Schiffers, B., & Lebeau, F. (2006). Experimental evaluation of a spray drift Gaussian tilting plume model. Aspects of Applied Biology, 77(2), 365–370.
Stallinga, H., van de Zande, J. C., Michielsen, J. G. P., & van Velde, P. (2014). (2014) Spray drift and spray distribution of end nozzles. International Advances in Pesticide Application, 122, 395–400.
Stull, R. (2011). Wet-bulb temperature from relative humidity and air temperature. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 50(11), 2267–2269. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0143.1
Tan, Z. (2014) Air pollution and greenhouse gases from basic concepts to engineering. In Applications for air emission control. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-212-8
Teske, M. E., Thistle, H. W., Riley, C. M., & Hewitt, A. J. (2016). Initial laboratory measurements of the evaporation rate of droplets inside a spray cloud. Transactions of the ASABE, 59(2), 487–493. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.59.11543
Teske, M. E., Thistle, H. W., Schou, W. C., Miller, P. C. H., Strager, J. M., Richardson, B., Butler Ellis, M. C., Barry, J. W., Twardus, D. B., & Thompson, D. G. (2011). A review of computer models for pesticide deposition prediction. Transactions of the ASABE, 54(3), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.37094
Van de Zande, J. C., Holterman, H. J., & Wenneker, M. (2008) Nozzle classification for drift reduction in orchard spraying: Identification of drift reduction class threshold nozzles. Agricultural Engineering International. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://www.wur.nl/en/Publication-details.htm?publicationId=publication-way-333738363536
Van De Zande, J. C., Porskamp, H. A. J., & Holterman, H. J. (2002). Influence of reference nozzle choice on spray drift classification. Aspects of Applied Biology, 66, 49–56.
van den Berg, F., Kubiak, R., Benjey, W. G., Majewski, M. S., Yates, S. R., Reeves, G. L., Smelt, J. H., & van der Linden, A. M. A. (1999). Emission of pesticides into the air. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 115(1), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005234329622
Villa-Henriksen, A., Edwards, G. T., Pesonen, L. A., Green, O., & Sørensen, C. A. G. (2020). Internet of Things in arable farming: Implementation, applications, challenges and potential. Biosystems Engineering, 191, 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.12.013
Wang, S. J., Dorr, G. J., Khashehchi, M., & He, X. (2015). Performance of selected agricultural spray nozzles using particle image velocimetry. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 17(3), 601–613.
Zannetti, P. (Ed.). (2013). Air pollution modeling: theories, computational methods and available software. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4465-1
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT) and the Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS) from Argentina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Renaudo, C.A., Bertin, D.E. & Bucalá, V. A coupled atomization-spray drift model as online support tool for boom spray applications. Precision Agric 23, 2345–2371 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09923-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09923-1