Skip to main content
Log in

Farmer Experience with Precision Agriculture in Denmark and the US Eastern Corn Belt

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Two mail surveys were carried out in Denmark and the Eastern Corn Belt, USA in 2002. Questionnaires were sent to 580 farmers who had used precision agriculture (PA) and 198 responses were received. The surveys focused on the current status of use of PA in both countries, including: PA practices, equipment and software, Internet and e-mail use, information sources for PA, satisfaction level from service providers, data handling, interpretation, storage and ownership, value of data for decision making, changes in management practices, desired information and services, and the next planned step in the practice of PA. The survey results showed more similarities in practicing PA between the two countries than differences. Time requirement and high cost of data handling were cited as the main problems. Survey respondents found soil maps to be more valuable than yield maps in management decisions. About 80% of the respondents would like to store the PA data themselves. The majority of the respondents indicated that they have changed their management practices due to PA, but not substantially. Some 90 of the respondents used the Internet and e-mail for agricultural purposes, but only a small number for PA websites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. Arnholt T. M. Batte S. Prochaska (2001) Adoption and use of precision farming technologies: A survey of Central Ohio precision farmers, AECE-RP-0011-01 Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, Ohio State University Columbus, USA 15

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Auernhammer (2001) ArticleTitlePrecision farming–the environmental challenge Computer and Electronics in Agriculture 30 31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Augsburger (2001) Concept of a Cost-Accounting System for the Interpretation of Spatially Variable Data G. Grenier S. Blackmore (Eds) Precision Agriculture 2001: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Precision Agriculture AgroMontpellier France 629–634

    Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Batte W. M. Arnholt (2003) ArticleTitlePrecision farming adoption and use in Ohio: Case studies of six leading-edge adopters Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 38 125–139

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Blackmore (2000) Developing the principles of Precision Farming China Agricultural University Beijing, China 11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Daberkow, S. G. and McBride, W. D. 2001. Farm and operator characteristics affecting the awareness and adoption of precision agricultural technologies in the U.S. In: Precision Agriculture 2001: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by G. Grenier and S. Blackmore (AgroMontpellier, France), pp. 509–519.

  • S. Daberkow J. Fernandez-Cornejo M. Padgitt (2002) Precision agriculture adoption continues to grow Agricultural Outlook Economic Research Service/USDA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameDanish Agricultural Council (2000) Facts & Figures—Agriculture in Denmark 2000 The Agricultural Council of Denmark Copenhagen, Denmark 32

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Fink J. Kosecoff (1998) How to conduct surveys: A Step-by-step Guide SAGE Publications Thousands Oaks, California, USA 107

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Lohr (1999) Sampling: Design and Analysis Duxbury Press Florense, KY, USA 450

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Lowenberg DeBoer (1998) Adoption Patterns for Precision Agriculture. SAE Technical Paper Series 982041 Society of Automotive Engineers St. Joseph, Michigan, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Lowenberg DeBoer K. Erickson (Eds) (2000) Precision Farming Profitability Purdue University AgCommunications, West Lafayette, IN, USA 132

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenberg DeBoer, J. and Boehlje M. 1996. Revolution, evolution or dead-end: Economic perspectives on precision agriculture. In: Precision Agriculture 1996: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, edited by P. C. Robert, R. H. Rust, W. E. Larson, (ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, USA), p. 923–944.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameNational Research Council–Board on Agriculture, Committee on Assessing Crop Yield (1997) Precision Agriculture in the 21st Century: Geospatial and Information Technologies in Crop Management National Academy Press Washington, D.C., USA 168

    Google Scholar 

  • S. M. Pedersen R. B. Ferguson M. Lark (2001) ArticleTitleA multinational survey of precision farming early adopters Farm management 11 IssueID3 147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • S. M. Pedersen S. Fountas B. S. Blackmore M. Gylling J. L. Pedersen (2004) ArticleTitleAdoption and perspectives of precision farming in Denmark Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Sect. B, Soil and Plant Science 54 IssueID1 2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • S. M. Pedersen (2003) Precision farming—Technology assessment of site-specific input allocation in cereals Department of Manufacturing and Management Technical University of Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. K. 2002. Does Off-farm work hinder “smart” farming? Agricultural Outlook, September 2002, pp. 28–30.

  • S.M. Swinton J. Lowenberg DeBoer (1998) ArticleTitleEvaluating the profitability of Site-specific Farming Journal of Production Agriculture 11 IssueID4 439–446

    Google Scholar 

  • A. A. Toure (1994) Economic Constraints to Rice Based Rotations in Niger MS Thesis Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUS Dept. of Agriculture (1997) US Census of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, P. 2000. Problems and Potential Economic Impact of Precision Farming. In: 7th ICCTA: Computer Technology in Agricultural Management and Risk Prevention: Proceedings of the 7th International Congress for Computer Technology in Agriculture, edited by C. Conese and A. M. Falci (Supplemento agli Atti dell’Accademia dei Georgofili, Florense, Italy), pp. 241–249.

  • D. L. Whipker J. T. Akridge (2001) Precision Agricultural Services and Enhanced Seed Dealership Survey Results Staff Paper No. 01–8 Center for Food and Agricultural Business. Purdue University USA

    Google Scholar 

  • L. D. Whipker J. T. Akridge (2002) Precision Agricultural Services Dealership Survey Results Staff Paper No. 02–02 CropLife Magazine and Center for Food and Agricultural Business, Purdue University USA

    Google Scholar 

  • L. D. Whipker J. T. Akridge (2003) Precision Agricultural Services Dealership Survey Results Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Fountas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fountas, S., Blackmore, S., Ess, D. et al. Farmer Experience with Precision Agriculture in Denmark and the US Eastern Corn Belt. Precision Agric 6, 121–141 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-004-1030-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-004-1030-z

Keywords

Navigation