Plant and Soil

, Volume 266, Issue 1–2, pp 273–287 | Cite as

Biomass production, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and inorganic N use in dual and tri-component annual intercrops

  • Mette Klindt Andersen
  • Henrik Hauggaard-Nielsen
  • Per Ambus
  • Erik Steen Jensen


The interspecific complementary and competitive interactions between pea (Pisum sativum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.), grown as dual and tri-component intercrops were assessed in a field study in Denmark. Total biomass production and N use at two levels of N fertilisation (0.5 and 4.0 g N/m2), were measured at five harvests throughout a growing season. All intercrops displayed land equivalent ratio values close to or exceeding unity, indicating complementary use of growth resources. Whereas both rape and barley responded positively to increased N fertilisation, irrespective of whether they were grown as sole- or intercrops, pea was strongly suppressed when grown in intercrop. Of the three crops barley was the strongest competitor for both soil and fertiliser N, rape intermediate and pea the weakest. Faster initial growth of barley than pea and rape gave barley an initial competitive advantage, an advantage that in the two dual intercrops was strengthened by the addition of N. Apparently the competitive superiority of barley was less strong in the tri-component intercrop, indicating that the impact of the dominantmay, through improved growth of both rape and pea, have been diminished through indirect facilitation. Interspecific competition had a promoting effect on the percent of nitrogen derived from N2 fixation of pea, and most so at the low N fertilisation level. Results indicate that the benefits achieved from the association of a legume and nonlegume, in terms of N2 fixed were greatest when pea was grown in association with rape as opposed to barley which could indicate that the benefits achieved from the association of a legume and nonlegume are partly lost if the nonlegume is too strong a competitor.

Key words

barley competition complementarity diversity pea rape 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ae N, Arihara J, Okada K, Yoshihara T and Johansen C 1990 Phosphorus uptake by pigeon pea and its role in cropping systems of the Indian subcontinent. Science 248, 477–480.Google Scholar
  2. Anil L, Park R H P and Miller F A 1998 Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass Forage Sci. 53, 301–317.Google Scholar
  3. Carruthers K, Prithiviraj B, Fe Q, Cloutier D, Martin R C and Smith D L 2000 Intercropping corn with soybean, lupin and forages: Yield component responses. Eur. J. Agron. 12, 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiariello N, Hickman J C and Mooney H A 1982 Endomycorrhizal role for interspecific transfer of phosphorous in a community of annual plants. Science 217, 941–943.Google Scholar
  5. Fried M and Middelboe V 1977 Measurement of amount of nitrogen fixed by a legume crop. Plant Soil 47, 713–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fukai S and Trenbath B R 1993 Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops. Field Crop. Res. 34, 247–271.Google Scholar
  7. Ghanbari-Bonjar A and Lee H C 2002 Intercropped field beans (Vicia faba) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) for whole crop forage: effect of nitrogen on forage yield and quality. J. Agric. Sci. 138, 311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giller K E, Beare M H, Lavelle P, Izac A M N and Swift M J 1997 Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function. Appl. Soil Ecol. 6, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P and Jensen E S 2001a Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping. Field Crop. Res. 70, 101–109.Google Scholar
  10. Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P and Jensen E S 2001b Temporal and spatial distribution of roots and competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops - a field study employing P-32 technique. Plant Soil 236, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hauggaard-Nielsen H and Jensen E S 2001 Evaluating pea and barley cultivars for complementarity in intercropping at different levels of soil N availability. Field Crop. Res. 72, 185–196.Google Scholar
  12. Høgh-Jensen H and Schjøerring J K 1994 Measurement of biological dinitrogen fixation in grassland - comparison of the enriched N-15 dilution and the natural N-15 abundance methods at different nitrogen application rates and defoliation frequencies. Plant Soil 166, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horst W J and Waschkies C 1987 Phosphorus nutrition of spring wheat (triticum-aestivum L) in mixed culture with white lupin (lupinus-albus L). Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 150, 1–8.Google Scholar
  14. Jensen E S 1996 Grain yield, symbiotic N-2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant Soil 182, 25–38.Google Scholar
  15. Jensen E S 1997 The role of grain legume N2 fixation in the nitrogen cycling of temperate cropping systems. D. SC. Thesis Risø-R-885. Risø National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.Google Scholar
  16. Jensen E S, Andersen A J and Thomsen J D 1985 The Influence of seed-borne N in15N isotope dilution studies with legumes. Acta Agr. Scand. 35, 438–443.Google Scholar
  17. Johansen A and Jensen E S 1996 Transfer of N and P from intact or decomposing roots of pea to barley interconnected by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keating B A and Carberry P S 1993 Resource capture and use in intercropping - solar-radiation. Field Crop. Res. 34, 273–301.Google Scholar
  19. Li L, Yang S C, Li X L, Zhang F S and Christie P 1999 Interspecific complementary and competitive interactions between intercropped maize and faba bean. Plant Soil 212, 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marschner H, Romheld V, Horst W J and Martin P 1986 Rootinduced changes in the rhizosphere - importance for the mineral-nutrition of plants. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 149, 441–456.Google Scholar
  21. Midmore D J 1993 Agronomic modification of resource use and intercrop productivity. Field Crop. Res. 34, 357–380.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell C E, Tilman D and Groth J V 2002 Effects of grassland plant species diversity, abundance, and composition on foliar fungal disease. Ecology 83, 1713–1726.Google Scholar
  23. Naeem S, Hakansson K, Lawton J H, Crawley M J and Thompson L J 1996 Biodiversity and plant productivity in a model assemblage of plant species. Oikos 76, 259–264.Google Scholar
  24. Ofori F and Stern W R 1987 Cereal-legume intercropping systems. Adv. Agron. 41, 41–90.Google Scholar
  25. Peoples M B, Turner G L, Shah Z, Shah S H, Aslam M, Ali S, Maskey S L, Bhattarai S, Afandi F, Schwenke G D and Herridge D F 1997 Evaluation of the15N natural abundance technique to measure N2 fixation in experimental plots and farmers’ fields. In Proceedings of the international workshop on managing legume nitrogen fixation in the cropping systems of Asia, Hyderabad, India, ICRISAT. Eds. O P Rupela, C Johansen and D F Herridge. pp. 141–153.Google Scholar
  26. Radosevich S R and Roush M L 1990 The role of competition in agriculture. In Perspectives on competition. Eds. J Grace and D Tilman. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Rauber R, Schmidtke K and Kimpel-Freund H 2001 The performance of pea (pisum sativum L.) and its role in determining yield advantages in mixed stands of pea and oat (avena sativa L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 187, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rerkasem K, Stern W R and Goodchild N A 1980 Associated growth of wheat and annual ryegrass.3. Effects of early competition on wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 31, 1057–1067.Google Scholar
  29. Russell A E 2002 Relationships between crop-species diversity and soil characteristics in southwest Indian agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 92, 235–249.Google Scholar
  30. Searle S R 1971 Linear models. Willey and Sons, New York, USA. 532 p.Google Scholar
  31. Swift M J and Anderson J M 1993 Biodiversity and ecosystem function in agricultural systems. In Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Eds. E D Schulze and H P Mooney. pp. 15–41. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  32. Tilman D 1988 Plant strategies and the dynamics and function of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. 360 p.Google Scholar
  33. Tilman D and Downing J A 1994 Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367, 363–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tilman D, Wedin D and Knops J 1996 Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379, 718–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trenbath B R 1974 Biomass productivity of mixtures. Adv. Agron. 26, 177–210.Google Scholar
  36. Trenbath B R 1993 Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases. Field Crop. Res. 34, 381–405.Google Scholar
  37. Trenbath B R 1999 Multispecies cropping systems in India - Predictions of their productivity, stability, resilience and ecological sustainability. Agroforest. Syst. 45, 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vandermeer J, van Noordwijk M, Anderson J, Ong C and Perfecto I 1998 Global change and multi-species agroecosystems: Concepts and issues. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 67, 1–22.Google Scholar
  39. Vandermeer J H 1989 The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Great Britain. 237 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Vandermeer J H 1990 Intercropping. In Agroecology. Eds. C R Carrol, J H Vandermeer and P M Rosset. pp. 481–516. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Waterer J G, Vessey J K, Stobbe E H and Soper R J 1994 Yield and symbiotic nitrogen-fixation in a pea - mustard intercrop as influenced by N fertiliser addition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Willey R W 1979 Intercropping - its importance and research needs: Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstr. 32, 1–10.Google Scholar
  43. Willey R W, Natarajan M, Reddy M S, Rao M R, Nambiar P T C, Kannaiyan J and Bhatnagar V S 1983 Intercropping studies with annual crops. In Better crops for food, Ciba Foundation Symposia No. 97. Pitman, London, pp. 83–100.Google Scholar
  44. Willey R W and Osiru D S O 1972 Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (phaseolus-vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. J. Agric. Sci. 79, 517–529.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mette Klindt Andersen
    • 1
  • Henrik Hauggaard-Nielsen
    • 2
  • Per Ambus
    • 2
  • Erik Steen Jensen
    • 2
  1. 1.Organic Farming Unit, Department of Agricultural SciencesThe Royal Veterinary and Agricultural UniversityTaastrupDenmark
  2. 2.Plant Research DepartmentRISØ National LaboratoryRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations