Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the connections between national culture and student achievement. Using Hofstede’s six cultural dimensions and the two dimensions from the World Values survey, we conducted multiple regressions to determine the most significant predictors of student achievement as measured by the 2009 Program for International Student Assessment in reading, mathematics, and science. Our analyses found that the most significant predictors of student achievement on all three student outcome included the following cultural dimensions based on two different frameworks: (1) a culture’s focus on fostering long-term orientation to include emphasis on perseverance to achieve future-oriented results and (2) a culture’s focus on secular-rational values vs. traditional values. In addition, findings indicate that when mapped geographically, similar patterns emerge among the two cultural dimensions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. Available from McKinsey and Company at http://www.mckinsey.com/locations/ukireland/publications/pdf/Education_report.pdf.
Berry, H., Guillen, M. F., & Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480.
Bracey, G. W. (1992). Culture and achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(7), 568–571.
Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: a meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137.
Cheng, V. M. Y. (2004). Progress from traditional to creativity education in Chinese societies. In S. Lau, A. H. H. Hui, & G. Y. C. Ng (Eds.), Creativity: when east meets west (pp. 137–168). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publications.
Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W. Y. (2010). Culture, motivation, and reading achievement: High school students in 41 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 579–592.
Cohen, G. (1985). Culture and educational achievement. Harvard Educational Review, 51(2), 270–285.
Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: United States Printing Office.
Crossland, C., & Hambrick, D. C. (2007). How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: a study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 767–789.
de Mooij, M. (2004). Consumer behavior and culture: consequences for global marketing and advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ding, M., Li, Y., Li, X., & Kulm, G. (2008). Chinese teachers’ perceptions of students’ classroom misbehavior. Educational Psychology, 28(3), 305–324.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to student achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Helmreich, R. L., & Merritt, A. C. (1998). Culture at work in aviation and medicine: national, organizational and professional influences. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Ho, I. R. (2001). Are Chinese teachers authoritarian? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 99–114). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center.
Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences, international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (revised and expanded) (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Hoppe, M. H. (1990). A comparative study of country elites, international differences in work-related values and learning and their implications for management training and development. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Hoppe, M. H. (1998). Validating the masculinity/femininity dimensions on elites from nineteen countries. In G. Hofstede et al. (Eds.), Masculinity and femininity: the taboo dimension of national cultures (pp. 29–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Husen, T. (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics, volume I. New York, NY: Wiley.
Inglehart, R., & Oyserman, D. (2004). Individualism, autonomy, self-expression: The human development syndrome. International Studies in Sociology and Social Anthropology, pp. 74–96.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (2006). Changing practices in Chinese cultures of learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 5–20.
Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A quarter century of culture’s consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285–320.
Kluckhohn, F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
Lapointe, A., Mead, N., & Askew, J. (1992). Learning mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Leung, F. K. S. (1995). The mathematics classroom in Beijing, Hong Kong and London. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 297–325.
Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: east and west. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Li, L., & Bond, M. (2010). Value change: analyzing national change in citizen secularism across four time periods in the World Values Survey. The Social Science Journal, 47(2), 294–306.
Li, Y., & Shimizu, Y. (2009). Exemplary mathematics instruction and its development in selected education systems in East Asia. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(3), 257–262.
Licht, M. H. (2008). Multiple regression and correlation. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 19–64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G. D., & Kun, T. L. (1996). Memorizing and understanding the keys to the paradox? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological, and contextual influences (pp. 69–83). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Maxwell, S. E. (2000). Sample size and multiple regression analysis. Psychological Methods, 5(4), 434–458.
Merritt, A. (2000). Culture in the cockpit: do Hofstede’s dimensions replicate? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(3), 283–301.
Mendro, R. L. (1998). Student achievement and school and teacher accountability. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 257–267.
Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2012). Hofstede’s fifth dimension: new evidence from the world values survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 3–14.
Mouritzen, P. E., & Svara, J. H. (2002). Leadership at the apex: politicians and administrators in western local governments. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Munoz, M. A., Prather, J. R., & Stronge, J. H. (2011). Exploring teacher effectiveness using hierarchical linear models: student- and classroom-level predictors and cross-year stability in elementary school reading. Planning and Changing, 42(3/4), 241–273.
National Center of Education Statistics (NCES) (2013). Program for international student assessment overview. Available from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/. Accessed 17 March 2013
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257.
OECD. (2009). Database-PISA 2009, Retrieved September 15, 2012 from http://pisa2009.acer.edu.au/downloads.php
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: overcoming social background—equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (volume II). doi:10.1787/9789264091504-en
On, L. W. (1996). The cultural context for Chinese learners: conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological, and contextual influences (pp. 25–41). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center.
O’Neill, T. B. (2010). Fostering spaces of student ownership in middle school science. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 6–20.
Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in first grade: the importance of background qualifications, attitudes, and instructional practices for student learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 111–140.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.
Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1994). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): mixed-model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 299–311.
Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., Raizen, S., & collaboration with six others. (1996). A splintered vision: an investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education, executive summary. Lansing, MI: U.S. National Research Center for the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Michigan State University.
Shane, S. A. (1995). Uncertainty avoidance and the preference for innovation championing roles. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 47–68.
Shinn, R. (1971). Culture and school: socio-cultural significances. Scranton: Intext Educational Publishers.
Soh, C. K. (1999). East–west difference in views on creativity: is Howard Gardner correct? Yes, and no. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33(2), 112–125.
Stedman, L. C. (1997). International achievement differences: an assessment of a new perspective. Educational Researcher, 26(3), 4–15.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: Free Press.
Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2008). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(3–4), 165–184.
Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355.
Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89–99.
van Nimwegen, T. (2002). Global banking, global values: the in-house reception of the corporate values of ABN AMRO. Ph.D. dissertation, Nyenrode University. Delft: Eburon
Wampold, B. E., & Freund, R. D. (1987). Use of multiple regression in counseling psychology research: A flexible data-analytic strategy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 372–382.
Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York, NY: Scribner.
World Values Survey (WVS) (2008). National-level Value scores by country. Retrieved January 17, 2013 from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs/articles/folder_published/article_base_111
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Inglehart and Welzel (2005) who originally used the map approach in their publication which also involved the WVS data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, Z., Grant, L.W., Xu, X. et al. An international comparison investigating the relationship between national culture and student achievement. Educ Asse Eval Acc 25, 159–177 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9171-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9171-0