Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Astin, A. W. (1982), Excellence and equity in American education. Washington, DC: National Commission on Excellence in Education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 227 098.

  • Bingham, R.D., Heywood, J.S., & White, S.B. (1991). Evaluating schools and teachers based on student performance.Evaluation Review, 15, 191–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harville, D.A. (1976). Extension of the Gauss-Markov theorem to include the estimation of random effects.Annals of Statistics, 4, 384–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C.R. (1973). Sire evaluation and genetic trends.Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetic Symposium in Honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush. Champaign, IL: ASAS and ADSA, pp. 10–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1984).Applications of linear models in animal breeding. Guelph, Canada: University of Guelph.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, R.A., Sanders, W.L. (1984),Objective component of teacher evaluation: A feasibility study (Working Paper No. 199). Knoxville: University of Tennessee, College of Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, R.A., Sanders, William L., & Stroup, Walter W. (1991). A unified approach to mixed linear models,American Statistician, 45, 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millman, J. (ed.), (1981).Handbook of teacher evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mood, A.M. (1950).Introduction to the theory of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W.L. (1989). A multivariate mixed model. InApplications of mixed models in agriculture and related disciplines. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin No. 343. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, pp. 138–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, W.L., et al. (1994). Effects of building change on indicators of student academic growth,Evaluation Perspectives, 4, 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, S.R. (1971).Linear models. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennessee State Board of Education. (1992).The Master Plan for Tennessee Schools 1993. Nashville: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, R.M.W. (1981). In J. Millmen (ed.),Handbook of teacher evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.L. (1989). Using customized standardized tests. Contract No. R-88-062003. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. ERIC Digest No. ED 314429.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center, University of Tennessee, P.O. Box 1071, 37901-1071, Knoxville, TN

    William L. Sanders (Professor and Director)

  2. University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center, Tennessee, USA

    Sandra P. Horn (Educational Consultant)

Authors
  1. William L. Sanders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandra P. Horn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanders, W.L., Horn, S.P. The tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment. J Pers Eval Educ 8, 299–311 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973726

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973726

Keywords

Search

Navigation