Abstract
Erosion of a hafnium cathode in Plasma Arc Cutting torch using oxygen as plasma gas is considered. It is shown that approximately 0.001 fraction of the evaporated particles participate in a net erosion, the rest of the evaporated particles return back to the cathode after spending some time in a near-cathode plasma. Along with erosion rate, the suggested equations allow one to the calculate current density at the cathode, the cathode temperature inside the arc attachment and the electron temperature at the cathode-plasma boundary. Comparison of the obtained values with the available information on these parameters shows a reasonable agreement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Variation of the ion fraction of the total current density do not change the results much.
In our previous paper [5], we explained the observed erosion rate dependence on the swirling of the plasma gas by moving of the point of no return away from the cathode. There is another, also important factor: high swirling squeezes the arc attachment. This increases the current density and cathode temperature, thus, increasing the erosion rate.
For example, if the arc attachment covers the most part of the insert surface, and the temperature of the emitter-holder boundary exceeds a certain limit (e.g. holder melting point), the thermal contact between the emitter and the holder deteriorates, cooling condition deteriorates as well, and this leads to a rapid insert erosion. Another explanation: loss of the thermal contact during switching arc on and off.
References
Nemchinsky VA (2003) Cyclic erosion of a cathode in high pressure arcs. J Phys D 36:1573–1576
Peters J, Yin F, Borges CFM, Heberlein J, Hackett C (2005) Erosion mechanisms of hafnium cathodes at high current. J Phys D Appl Phys 38:1781–1794
Nemchinsky VA (2002) Cathode erosion rate in high-pressure arcs: influence of swirling gas flow IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci 30(6):2113–2116
Nemchinsky VA, Severance WS (2006) What we know and what we do not know about plasma arc cutting. J Phys D Appl Phys 39:R423–R438
Nemchinsky VA (2012) Cathode erosion in a high-pressure high-current arc: calculations for tungsten cathode in a free-burning argon arc. J Phys D Appl Phys 45:135201
Nemchinsky VA, Showalter MS (2003) Cathode erosion in high-current high-pressure arc. J Phys D 36:704–712
Colombo V, Concetti A, Ghedini E, Dallavalle S, Vancini M (2008) Understanding plasma fluid dynamics inside plasma torches through advanced modeling. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 36(2):389–402
Guo S, Zhou Q, Guo W, Xu P (2010) Computational analysis of a double nozzle structure plasma cutting torch. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 30(1):121–140
Freton P, Gonzalez JJ, Gleizes A, Camy Peyret F, Caillibotte G, Delzenne M (2002) Numerical and experimental study of a plasma cutting torch. J Phys D 35(2):115–131
Fomenko VS, Podcherniaeva IA (1975) Emission and adsorption properties of substances and materials: Handbook. Atomizdat, Moscow (In Russian)
Harris WJ (2002) III A study of cathode erosion in high power arc jets, Ph.D.Thesis, Texas Tech University
Kearns RJ, Theibert LS (eds) (1988) Proc Ultra-High-Temperature composite materials workshop AFWAL-TR-87-4142
Vacuum Engineering and Materials Co. Thin film evaporating guide http://www.vacengmat.com/downloads/VEM_Thin_Film_Evaporation_Guide.pdf
Couch RW, Sanders NA, Luo L, Lu A, Backander P Electrode for high current density plasma arc torch. USA patent 5310988, May 1994
Colombo V, Concetti A, Ghedini E, Rotundo F, Dallavalle S (2010) Experimental analysis of the behavior of high current electrodes in plasma arc cutting during first cycles. PSST, 19 065023
Nemchinsky VA (2003) Current density at the refractory cathode of a high-current high-pressure arc (two modes of cathode spot attachment). J Phys D Appl Phys 36:3007–3013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nemchinsky, V. Cathode Erosion due to Evaporation in Plasma Arc Cutting Systems. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 33, 517–526 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-013-9440-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-013-9440-1