Skip to main content
Log in

Are the Responses of the U.S. Economy Asymmetric to Positive and Negative Money Supply Shocks?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Open Economies Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate whether the United States economy responds asymmetrically to positive and negative money supply shocks of different magnitude, using a test recently introduced by Kilian and Vigfusson (Quant Econ 2:419–453, 2011) based on impulse response functions. We use quarterly data, over the period from 1967:1 to 2014:1, and the new CFS Divisia monetary aggregates, making a comparison among the narrower monetary aggregates, M1, M2M, MZM, M2, and ALL, and the broad monetary aggregates, M4+, M4-, and M3. We show that there is no statistically significant evidence of asymmetry in the response of the U.S. economy to positive and negative money supply shocks of different magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson RG, Chauvet M, Jones B (2015) Nonlinear relationship between permanent and transitory components of monetary aggregates and the economy. Econ Rev 34:228–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett WA, Chauvet M (2009) International financial aggregation and index number theory: a chronological half-century empirical overview. Open Econ Rev 20:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett WA, Liu J, Mattson RS, van den Noort J (2013) The new CFS Divisia monetary aggregates: design, construction, and data sources. Open Econ Rev 24:101–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belongia MT, Ireland PN (2014) The Barnett critique after three decades: a new Keynesian analysis. J Econ 183:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belongia MT, Ireland PN (2015a) A ‘working’ solution to the question of nominal GDP targeting. Macroecon Dyn 9:508–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belongia MT, Ireland PN (2015b) Interest rates and money in the measurement of monetary policy. J Bus Econ Stat 33:255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrystal KA, MacDonald R (1994) Empirical evidence on the recent behavior and usefulness of simple-sum and weighted measures of the money stock. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Review 76:73–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Cover JP (1992) Asymmetric effects of positive and negative money-supply shocks. Q J Econ 107:1261–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong JB, Summers LH (1988) How does macroeconomic policy affect output? Brook Pap Econ Act 2:433–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florio A (2004) The asymmetric effects of monetary policy. J Econ Surv 18:409–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1960) A program for monetary stability. Fordham University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1968) The role of monetary policy. Am Econ Rev 58:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M, Schwartz A (1963) A monetary history of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (2003) What is an oil shock? J Econ 113:363–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson JR (2014) Redundancy or mismeasurement? A reappraisal of money. Macroecon Dyn 18:1437–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jadidzadeh A, Serletis A (2015) The demand for liquid assets and optimal monetary aggregation: evidence from a disaggregated demand system based on the NQ expenditure function. University of Calgary, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandil M (1995) Asymmetric nominal flexibility and economic fluctuations. South Econ J 61:674–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karras G (1996) Are the output effects of monetary policy asymmetric? Evidence from a sample of European Countries. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 58:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian L, Vigfusson RJ (2011) Are the responses of the U.S. economy asymmetric in energy price increases and decreases?. Quant Econ 2:419–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravn MO, Sola M (2004) Asymmetric effects of monetary policy in the United States. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Review:41–60

  • Serletis A, Gogas P (2014) Divisia monetary aggregates, the great ratios, and classical money demand functions. J Money Credit Bank 46:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serletis A, Koustas Z (2015) Monetary neutrality. Macroecon Dyn. forthcoming

  • Serletis A, Rahman S (2009) The output effects of money growth uncertainty: evidence from a multivariate GARCH-in-Mean VAR. Open Econ Rev 20:607–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serletis A, Rahman S (2015) On the output effects of monetary variability. Open Econ Rev 26:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons HC (1936) Rules versus authorities in monetary policy. J Polit Econ 44:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavlas GS (2015) In old Chicago: Simons, Friedman and the development of monetary policy rules. J Money Credit Bank 47:99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma MA (1994) Subsample instability and asymmetries in money-income causality. J Econ 64:279–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weise CL (1999) The asymmetric effects of monetary policy: a nonlinear vector autoregression approach. J Money Credit Bank 31:85–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apostolos Serletis.

Additional information

We would like to thank Lutz Kilian and a referee for useful comments and suggestions that greatly improved the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serletis, A., Istiak, K. Are the Responses of the U.S. Economy Asymmetric to Positive and Negative Money Supply Shocks?. Open Econ Rev 27, 303–316 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-015-9374-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-015-9374-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation