Ackrill, R., & Kay, A. (2014). The growth of biofuels in the 21st century: Policy drivers and market challenges. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Book
Google Scholar
Alliance of Energy Intensive Industries (2005). The impact of EU emission trading scheme (ETS) on power prices. Brussels: AEII.
Google Scholar
Alliance of Energy Intensive Industries (2012a). Position of the alliance of energy intensive industries on the commission proposal to back-load (set-aside) EU ETS allowances. Brussels: AEII.
Google Scholar
Alliance of Energy Intensive Industries (2012b). 7 March 2012: Statement of the European alliance of energy intensive industries. Brussels: AEII.
Google Scholar
Alliance of Energy Intensive Industries, Cefic, & International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers (2007). Contribution paper for the EU ETS review. Brussels: AEII, Cefic & IFIEC.
Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2010). Reconsidering policy feedback: How policies affect politics. Administration and Society,42(5), 568–590.
Article
Google Scholar
Béland, D., & Schlager, E. (2019). Varieties of policy feedback research: Looking backward, moving forward. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2), 184–205.
Article
Google Scholar
Béland, D., Howlett, M., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2020). Designing policy resilience: Lessons from the Affordable Care Act. Policy Sciences.
Béland, D., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2018). Policy feedback and the politics of the Affordable Care Act. Policy Studies Journal,47(2), 395–422.
Article
Google Scholar
Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (2015). Process tracing. In A. Bennett & J. T. Checkel (Eds.), Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Biber, E., Kelsey, N., & Meckling, J. (2017). The political economy of decarbonization: A research agenda. Brooklyn Law Review,82(2), 605–643.
Google Scholar
Burns, C., Tobin, P., & Sewerin, S. (Eds.). (2018). The impact of the economic crisis on European environmental policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Campbell, A. L. (2003). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Campbell, A. L. (2011). Policy feedbacks and the impact of policy designs on public opinion. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law,36(6), 961–973.
Article
Google Scholar
Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science,15(1), 333–351.
Article
Google Scholar
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open,10(1), 1–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Capoor, K., & Ambrosi, P. (2009). State and trends of the carbon market 2009. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar
Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forestry. American Journal of Political Science,51(3), 532–551.
Article
Google Scholar
Council, European. (2014). Presidency conclusions of the European Council—23/24 October 2014. Brussels: European Council.
Google Scholar
Dagan, D., & Teles, S. M. (2015). The social construction of policy feedback: Incarceration, conservatism, and ideological change. Studies in American Political Development,29(02), 127–153.
Article
Google Scholar
Daugbjerg, C. (1997). Policy networks and agricultural policy reforms: Explaining deregulation in Sweden and re-regulation in the European Community. Governance,10(2), 123–141.
Article
Google Scholar
Daugbjerg, C. (2003). Policy feedback and paradigm shift in EU agricultural policy: the effects of the MacSharry reform on future reform. Journal of European Public Policy,10(3), 421–437.
Article
Google Scholar
de Bruyn, S., Schep, E., & Cherif, S. (2016). Calculation of additional profits of sectors and firms from the EU ETS. Delft: CE Delft.
Google Scholar
DG Environment, & Ecofys (2006). Auctioning of CO2emission allowances in the EU ETS: Report under the project ‘Review of EU Emissions Trading Scheme’. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar
Dupuis, J., & Biesbroek, R. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: The dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Global Environmental Change,23(6), 1476–1487.
Article
Google Scholar
Eckstein, H. (1975). Case study and theory in political science. In F. Greenstein & N. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science (pp. 79–138). Addison Wesle: Reading.
Google Scholar
ENDS Report (2008). EU climate package is approved. Twickenham: Haymarket Media Group.
Google Scholar
Eurelectric (2001). Union of the electricity industry—EURELECTRIC position paper on emissions trading. Brussels: Eurelectric.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2001a). Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2001b). Green paper on greenhouse gas emissions trading within the European Union: Summary of submissions. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2012). The state of the European carbon market in 2012. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2013). Options for structural measures to strengthen the EU emissions trading system: Main outcomes of the public consultation. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2015). Impact assessment accompanying the document: Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council amending directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar
European Commission (2017). Analysis of the use of auction revenues by the member states. Brussels: European Commission.
Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. (2004). The dependent variable problem within the study of welfare state retrenchment: Defining the problem and looking for solutions. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice,6(1), 3–14.
Article
Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (1998). The historical logic of national health insurance: Structure and sequence in the development of British, Canadian, and US medical policy. Studies in American Political Development,12(1), 57–130.
Article
Google Scholar
Haelg, L., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2020). The role of actors in the policy design process: Introducing design coalitions to explain policy output. Policy Sciences.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics,25, 275–296.
Article
Google Scholar
Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis,11(1), 33–46.
Article
Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., & Weaver, R. K. (2015). When policies undo themselves: Self-undermining feedback as a source of policy change. Governance,28(4), 441–457.
Article
Google Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, H., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C., & Sabatier, P. A. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In P. A. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Google Scholar
Jevnaker, T., & Wettestad, J. (2017). Ratcheting up carbon trade: The politics of reforming EU emissions trading. Global Environmental Politics,17(2), 105–124.
Article
Google Scholar
Jordan, A., & Matt, E. (2014). Designing policies that intentionally stick: Policy feedback in a changing climate. Policy Sciences,47(3), 227–247.
Article
Google Scholar
Jordan, A., & Moore, B. (2020). Durable by design? Policy feedback in a changing climate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Koreh, M., Mandelkern, R., & Shpaizman, I. (2019). A dynamic theoretical framework of gradual institutional changes. Public Administration,97, 1–16.
Article
Google Scholar
Meckling, J. (2011). Carbon coalitions: Business, climate politics, and the rise of emissions trading. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Meckling, J. (2019). Governing renewables: Policy feedback in a global energy transition. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space,37(2), 317–338.
Google Scholar
Mettler, S. (2002). Bringing the state back into civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the GI Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review,96(2), 351–365.
Article
Google Scholar
Mettler, S., & SoRelle, M. (2014). Policy feedback theory. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar
Moore, B. (2018). The political effects of climate policy: Policy feedback from the European Union Emissions Trading System. Ph.D. thesis. University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Müller, P., & Slominski, P. (2013). Agree now—pay later: Escaping the joint decision trap in the evolution of the EU emission trading system. Journal of European Public Policy,20(10), 1425–1442.
Article
Google Scholar
Oberlander, J., & Weaver, R. K. (2015). Unraveling from within? The Affordable Care Act and self-undermining policy feedbacks. The Forum,13(1), 37–62.
Article
Google Scholar
Patashnik, E. M. (2008). Reforms at risk: What happens after major policy changes are enacted. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Phidd, R., & Doern, B. (1992). Canadian public policy. Toronto: Methuen.
Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics,45(4), 595–628.
Article
Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review,94(2), 251–267.
Article
Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Point Carbon (2018). Carbon market monitor: Decreased uncertainty as carbon market reforms conclude. Oslo: Point Carbon.
Google Scholar
Polish Electricity Association (2013). Response of the Polish Electricity Association (PKEE) concerning a public consultation on the EC Green Paper—A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies.
Sandbag (2019). Carbon price viewer. Retrieved May 15, 2019 from https://sandbag.org.uk/carbon-price-viewer.
Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S., & Seubert, S. (2015). Toward a comparative measure of climate policy output. Policy Studies Journal,43(2), 257–282.
Article
Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1935). Politics, pressures and the tariff: A study of free private enterprise in pressure politics, as shown in the 1929–1930 revision of the tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Sewerin, S., Béland, D., & Cashore, B. (2020). Designing policy for the long term: Integrating agency and policy feedback for uncovering durable pathways of change. Policy Sciences.
Sijm, J., Neuhoff, K., & Chen, Y. (2006). CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy,6(1), 49–72.
Article
Google Scholar
Simons, A., & Voß, J.-P. (2018). The concept of instrument constituencies: Accounting for dynamics and practices of knowing governance. Policy and Society,37(1), 14–35.
Article
Google Scholar
Skjærseth, J. B. (2018). Implementing EU climate and energy policies in Poland: Policy feedback and reform. Environmental Politics,27(3), 498–518.
Article
Google Scholar
Skjærseth, J. B., & Wettestad, J. (2008). EU emissions trading: Initiation, decision-making and implementation. Farnham: Ashgate.
Google Scholar
Skjærseth, J. B., & Wettestad, J. (2010). Fixing the EU emissions trading system? Understanding the post-2012 changes. Global Environmental Politics,10(4), 101–123.
Article
Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Google Scholar
Skogstad, G. (2017). Policy feedback and self-reinforcing and self-undermining processes in EU biofuels policy. Journal of European Public Policy,24(1), 21–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Tietenberg, T. H. (2006). Emissions trading: Principles and practice. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Google Scholar
Voß, J.-P., & Simons, A. (2014). Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics,23(5), 735–754.
Article
Google Scholar
Weaver, R. K. (2010). Paths and forks or chutes and ladders? Negative feedbacks and policy regime change. Journal of Public Policy,30(2), 137–162.
Article
Google Scholar
Wettestad, J. (2009). EU energy-intensive industries and emission trading: Losers becoming winners? Environmental Policy and Governance,19(5), 309–320.
Article
Google Scholar
Wettestad, J., & Jevnaker, T. (2016). Rescuing EU emissions trading: The climate policy flagship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Book
Google Scholar
Wettestad, J., & Jevnaker, T. (2019). Smokescreen politics? Ratcheting up EU emissions trading in 2017. Review of Policy Research,36(5), 635–659.
Article
Google Scholar