Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designing policy for the long term: agency, policy feedback and policy change

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Policy feedback research faces a potential pivot point owing to recent theoretical and substantive advances. Concerted attention now spans new scientific communities, such as climate focused socio-technical transitions literature, as well as reinvigorated attention to environmental politics or policy. Rather than being interested in abstractly explaining policy stability and change, this latest turn turns feedback theory in order to help find practical answers to long-term policy challenges. This introduction to our special issue of Policy Sciences aims to take stock of recent developments in policy feedback research and highlight some areas that could be addressed to move the field forward. We argue for taking seriously the original dictum of policy feedback as a loop in which policy is treated as both the start and end point of analysis. This requires integrating advances in policy design scholarship through shared conceptualizations of ‘policy,’ ‘actors’ and ‘agency’. Doing so, we posit, will champion more comprehensive understandings of the effectiveness of policy design choices in general, and long-term oriented policy change in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bali, A. S., Capano, G., & Ramesh, M. (2019). Anticipating and Designing for Policy Effectiveness. Policy and Society,38(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D. (2010). Reconsidering Policy Feedback. Administration & Society,42(5), 568–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). How Solutions Chase Problems: Instrument Constituencies in the Policy Process. Governance,29(3), 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D., Howlett, M., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2020). Designing Policy Resilience: Lessons from the Affordable Care Act. Policy Sciences,1, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2019). Policy Feedback and the Politics of the Affordable Care Act. Policy Studies Journal,47(2), 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béland, D., & Schlager, E. (2019). Varieties of Policy Feedback Research: Looking Backward, Moving Forward. Policy Studies Journal,47(2), 184–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S., Lebow, R. N., Stein, J. G., & Weber, S. (2000). God gave physics the easy problems: adapting social science to an unpredictable world. European Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. L. (2003). How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science,15(1), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G., & Galanti, M. T. (2018). Policy Dynamics and Types of Agency: From Individual to Collective Patterns of Action. European Policy Analysis,4(1), 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes. SAGE Open.

  • Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating Which Equilibrium? Understanding Thermostatic Policy Dynamics in Pacific Northwest Forestry. American Journal of Political Science,51(3), 532–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugbjerg, C., & Kay, A. (2019). Policy Feedback and Pathways: When Change Leads to Endurance and Continuity to Change. Policy Sciences,1, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. S. (2004). Review Article: Dismantling the Health Care State? Political Institutions, Public Policies and the Comparative Politics of Health Reform. British Journal of Political Science,34(4), 693–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2019). Policy Feedback in an Age of Polarization. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,685(1), 8–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haelg, L., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2019). The Role of Actors in the Policy Design Process: Introducing Design Coalitions to Explain Policy Output. Policy Sciences,1, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics,25(3), 275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. (2003). Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative research. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 373–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (2007). Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. Governance,20(1), 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The Dependent Variable Problem in the Study of Policy Change: Understanding Policy Change as a Methodological Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis,11(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P. (2012). Tales From the Crypt: The Rise and Fall (and Rebirth?) Of Policy Design. Administration & Society,45(3), 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. M., & Kent Weaver, R. (2015). When Policies Undo Themselves: Self-Undermining Feedback as a Source of Policy Change. Governance,28(4), 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in Climate Policy: The Politics of Invention, Diffusion, and Evaluation. Environmental Politics,4016, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., & Matt, E. (2014). Designing Policies That Intentionally Stick: Policy Feedback in a Changing Climate. Policy Sciences,47(3), 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. J., & Moore, B. (2020). Durable by Design? Policy Feedback in a Changing Climate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, F., & Rogge, K. S. (2017). Harnessing Theories of the Policy Process for Analysing the Politics of Sustainability Transitions: A Critical Survey. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.,27, 102–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, F., Rogge, K. S., & Howlett, M. (2019). Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions: New Approaches and Insights through Bridging Innovation and Policy Studies. Research Policy,48(10), 103832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., Schulze, K., & Tosun, J. (2012). Regulatory Policy Outputs and Impacts: Exploring a Complex Relationship. Regulation and Governance,6(4), 427–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipold, S., & Winkel, G. (2017). Discursive Agency: (Re-)Conceptualizing Actors and Practices in the Analysis of Discursive Policymaking. Policy Studies Journal,45(3), 510–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the Tragedy of Super Wicked Problems: Constraining Our Future Selves to Ameliorate Global Climate Change. Policy Sciences,45, 123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2009). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the Politics? Sustainable Development, Transition Management, and Long Term Energy Transitions. Policy Sciences,42(4), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the Politics of Sustainability Transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions,1(1), 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meckling, J., Kelsey, N., Biber, E., & Zysman, J. (2015). Winning Coalitions for Climate Policy. Science,349(6253), 1170–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meckling, J., Sterner, T., & Wagner, G. (2017). Policy Sequencing toward Decarbonization. Nature Energy,2, 918–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, S. (2005). Soldiers to Citizens: The GI Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B., & Jordan, A. J. (2020). Disaggregating the Dependent Variable in Policy Feedback Research: An Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading System. Policy Sciences,1, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, I., & Howlett, M. (2015). Who Is a Stream? Epistemic Communities, Instrument Constituencies and Advocacy Coalitions in Public Policy-Making. Politics and Governance,3(2), 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahle, M., et al. (2018). Sequencing to Ratchet up Climate Policy Stringency. Nature Climate Change.,8(10), 861–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patashnik, E. M. (2008). Reforms at Risk: What Happens After Major Policy Changes Are Enacted. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. Guy, et al. (2018). Elements in Public Policy Designing for Policy Effectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics,45(4), 595–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review,94(2), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. (2004). Politics in Time : History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pischke, E. C., & Wellstead, A. M. (2020). Reimagining Instrument Constituencies: The Case of Conservation Policy in Mexico. Policy Sciences.

  • Rosenbloom, D., Meadowcroft, J., & Cashore, B. (2019). Stability and Climate Policy? Harnessing Insights on Path Dependence, Policy Feedback, and Transition Pathways. Energy Research and Social Science,50, 168–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance—Odus V Elliott - Google Books. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S., & Seubert, S. (2014). The Innovativeness of National Policy Portfolios—Climate Policy Change in Austria, Germany, and the UK. Environmental Politics,23(5), 860–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S., & Seubert, S. (2015). Toward a Comparative Measure of Climate Policy Output. Policy Studies Journal,43(2), 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1935). Politics, Pressures and the Tariff: A Study of Free Private Enterprise in Pressure Politics, as Shown in the 1929-1930 Revision of the Tariff. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, N., Sewerin, S., & Schmidt, T. S. (2019). Explaining Advocacy Coalition Change with Policy Feedback. Policy Studies Journal,2, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, N., et al. (2020). Governing Complex Societal Problems: The Impact of Private on Public Regulation through Technological Change. Regulation & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T. S., & Sewerin, S. (2017). Technology as a Driver of Climate and Energy Politics. Nature Energy,2(6), 17084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T. S., & Sewerin, S. (2019). Measuring the Temporal Dynamics of Policy Mixes—An Empirical Analysis of Renewable Energy Policy Mixes’ Balance and Design Features in Nine Countries. Research Policy,48(10), 103557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T. S., Sewerin, S., & Bateson, B. (2018). Does Policy Design Predict a Policy Mix’s Future? A New Empirical Approach to Analysing Path-Dependency.

  • Skocpol, T. (1992). 22 Contemporary Sociology Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States.

  • Skogstad, G. (2017). Policy Feedback and Self-Reinforcing and Self-Undermining Processes in EU Biofuels Policy. Journal of European Public Policy,24(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skogstad, G. (2020). Mixed Feedback Dynamics and the USA Renewable Fuel Standard: The Roles of Policy Design and Administrative Agency. Policy Sciences,1, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soss, J., & Schram, S. F. (2007). A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback. American Political Science Review,101(1), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, L. C. (2016). Electoral Backlash against Climate Policy: A Natural Experiment on Retrospective Voting and Local Resistance to Public Policy. American Journal of Political Science,60(4), 958–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, L. C. (2020). Short Circuiting Policy: Interest Groups and the Battle Over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. (2003). How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (pp. 208–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Voß, J. P., & Simons, A. (2014). Instrument Constituencies and the Supply Side of Policy Innovation: The Social Life of Emissions Trading. Environmental Politics,23(5), 735–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. Kent. (2010). Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders?: Negative Feedbacks and Policy Regime Change. Journal of Public Policy,30(02), 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yona, L., Cashore, B., & Schmitz, O. J. (2019). Integrating policy and ecology systems to achieve path dependent climate solutions. Environmental Science & Policy, 98, 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zito, A. R. (2018). Instrument Constituencies and Epistemic Community Theory. Policy and Society,37(1), 36–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sebastian Sewerin gratefully acknowledges financial support provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Project number PYAPP1_166905).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Energy Politics Group, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland

    Sebastian Sewerin

  2. McGill Institute for the Study of Canada, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Daniel Béland

  3. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Benjamin Cashore

Authors
  1. Sebastian Sewerin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Béland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benjamin Cashore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Sewerin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sewerin, S., Béland, D. & Cashore, B. Designing policy for the long term: agency, policy feedback and policy change. Policy Sci 53, 243–252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09391-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09391-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation