Abstract
In this work, the discontinuous dynamic behavior of a 3-DOF (three-degree-of-freedom) friction collision system with dynamic vibration absorber is studied by the flow transformation theory. This paper aims to explore the conversion of movement in the friction collision system with discontinuous and non-smooth properties. The global dynamics of the 3-DOF system are reflected by separately studying the movement of each target. The different motion states and equations are defined by the force of each target and the mode of model connection. The flow barriers at the boundary/edge are defined by the characteristics of the friction model. The domains are divided in the two-dimensional phase space of each object, and the continuous vector field and G-function are defined in each domain. Based on this, the motion switching criteria at the separation boundary/edge are researched. Finally, some classical motion states and periodic phenomena are drawn by MATLAB software to simulate the global movement of the system. The study of the 3-DOF model enriches the theoretical basis for the mechanical devices with dynamic vibration absorbers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
References
Dowell, E.H., Schwartz, H.B.: Forced response of a cantilever beam with a dry friction damper attached, part I: theory. J. Sound Vib. 91(2), 255–267 (1983)
Karnopp, D.: Computer simulation of stick-slip friction in mechanical dynamic systems. J. Dyn. Syst. Trans. ASME 107(1), 100–103 (1985)
Shaw, S.W.: On the dynamic response of a system with dry friction. J. Sound Vib. 108(2), 305–325 (1986)
Feeny, B., Moon, F.C.: Chaos in a forced dry-friction oscillator: experiments and numerical modelling. J. Sound Vib. 170(3), 303–323 (1994)
Leine, R.I., Campen, D., Kraker, A.D., Steen, L.: Stick-slip vibrations induced by alternate friction models. Nonlinear Dyn. 16(1), 41–54 (1998)
Velex, P., Cahouet, V.: Experimental and numerical investigations on the influence of tooth friction in spur and helical gear dynamics. J. Mech. Des. 122, 515–522 (2000)
Kogut, L., Etsion, I.: A static friction model for elastic-plastic contacting rough surfaces. J. Tribol. Trans. ASME 126(1), 34–40 (2004)
Urbakh, M., Klafter, J., Gourdon, D., Israelachvili, J.: The nonlinear nature of friction. Nature 430, 525–528 (2004)
Luo, A., Gegg, B.C.: Periodic motions in a periodically forced oscillator moving on the oscillating belt with dry friction. ASME 66, 925–937 (2005)
ÖZel, T.: The influence of friction models on finite element simulations of machining. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 46(5), 518–530 (2006)
Andersson, S., Söerberg, A., Björklund, S.: Friction models for sliding dry, boundary and mixed lubricated contacts. Tribol. Int. 40(4), 580–587 (2007)
Graf, M., Ostermeyer, G.P.: Friction-induced vibration and dynamic friction laws: instability at positive friction-velocity-characteristic. Tribol. Int. 92, 255–258 (2015)
Zhang, Y., Fu, X.: Flow switchability of motions in a horizontal impact pair with dry friction. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 44, 89–107 (2017)
Niknam, A., Farhang, K.: Friction-induced vibration in a two-mass damped system. J. Sound Vib. 456, 454–475 (2019)
Zhang, Z., Duan, N., Lin, C., Hua, H.: Coupled dynamic analysis of a heavily-loaded propulsion shafting system with continuous bearing-shaft friction. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 172, 105431 (2020)
Yeh, G.: Forced vibrations of a two-degree-of-freedom system with combined coulomb and viscous damping. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39(1), 14–24 (1964)
Brockley, C.A., Cameron, R., Potter, A.F.: Friction-induced vibration. J. Lubr. Technol. 89(2), 101–107 (1967)
Shaw, S.W., Holmes, P.J.: A periodically forced piecewise linear oscillator. J. Sound Vib. 90(1), 129–155 (1983)
Khulief, Y.A., Shabana, A.A.: Impact responses of multi-body systems with consistent and lumped masses. J. Sound Vib. 104(2), 187–207 (1986)
Shaw, J., Shaw, S.W., Haddow, A.G.: On the response of the non-linear vibration absorbe. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 24(4), 281–293 (1989)
Tanaka, N., Kikushima, Y.: Impact vibration control using a semi-active damper. J. Sound Vib. 158(2), 277–292 (1992)
Luo, G., Zhang, Y.: Analyses of impact motions of harmonically excited systems having rigid amplitude constraints. Int. J. Impact Eng. 34(11), 1883–1905 (2007)
Flores, P., Koshy, C., Lankarani, H., Ambrsio, J., Claro, J.: Numerical and experimental investigation on multibody systems with revolute clearance joints. Nonlinear Dyn. 65(4), 383–398 (2011)
Flores, P., Leine, R., Glocker, C.: Application of the nonsmooth dynamics approach to model and analysis of the contact-impact events in cam-follower systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 69, 2117–2133 (2012)
Langley, R.S.: The analysis of impact forces in randomly vibrating elastic systems. J. Sound Vib. 331(16), 3738–3750 (2012)
Fu, X., Zhang, Y.: Stick motions and grazing flows in an inclined impact oscillator. Chaos Solitons Fract. 76, 218–230 (2015)
Luo, G.W., Shi, Y.Q., Zhu, X.F., Du, S.S.: Hunting patterns and bifurcation characteristics of a three-axle locomotive bogie system in the presence of the flange contact nonlinearity. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 136, 321–338 (2017)
Tao, H., Gibert, J.: Periodic orbits of a conservative 2-DOF vibro-impact system by piecewise continuation: bifurcations and fractals. Nonlinear Dyn. 95(4), 66 (2019)
Gu, X., Deng, Z., Hu, R.: Optimal bounded control of stochastically excited strongly nonlinear vibro-impact system. J. Vib. Control. 66, 1–10 (2020)
Xia, Y., Pang, J., Yang, L., Chu, Z.: Investigation on clearance-induced vibro-impacts of torsional system based on Hertz contact nonlinearity. Mech. Mach. Theory. 162(2), 104342 (2021)
Haug, E.J., Wu, S.C., Yang, S.M.: Dynamics of mechanical systems with Coulomb friction, stiction, impact and constraint addition–deletion—I theory. Mech. Mach. Theory. 21(5), 401–406 (1986)
Glocker, C., Pfeiffer, F.: Multiple impacts with friction in rigid multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 7(4), 471–497 (1995)
Blazejczyk-Okolewska, B., Kapitaniak, T.: Dynamics of impact oscillator with dry friction. Chaos Solitons Fract. 7(9), 1455–1459 (1996)
Begley, C.J., Virgin, L.N.: Impact response and the influence of friction. J. Sound Vib. 211(5), 801–818 (1998)
Vrande, B., Campen, D., Kraker, A.D.: An approximate analysis of dry-friction-induced stick-slip vibrations by a smoothing procedure. Nonlinear Dyn. 19(2), 157–169 (1999)
Sinou, J.J., Coudeyras, N., Nacivet, S.: Study of the nonlinear stationary dynamic of single and multi-instabilities for disk brake squeal. Int. J. Veh. Des. 51, 207–222 (2009)
Kurzeck, B.: Combined friction induced oscillations of wheelset and track during the curving of metros and their influence on corrugation. Wear 271(1), 299–310 (2011)
Ataei, M., Atai, A.A., Mirjavadi, S., Sahebnasagh, M., Nikkhah-Bahrami, M.: Application of impulse damper in control of a chaotic friction-induced vibration. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 25(2), 279–285 (2011)
Zhang, Z., Chen, F., Zhang, Z., Hua, H.: Analysis of friction-induced vibration in a propeller-shaft system with consideration of bearing-shaft friction. Proc. I Mech. E Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 228(8), 1311–1328 (2013)
Behzad, M., Alvandi, M., Mba, D., Jamali, J.: A finite element-based algorithm for rubbing induced vibration prediction in rotors. J. Sound Vib. 332(21), 5523–5542 (2013)
Kruse, S., Hoffmann, N.P.: On the robustness of instabilities in friction-induced vibration. J. Vib Acoust. 135(6), 061013.1–061013.8 (2013)
Gendelman, O., Kravetc, P., Rachinskii, D.: Mixed global dynamics of forced vibro-impact oscillator with Coulomb friction. Chaos 29, 113116 (2019)
Wang, X.C., Huang, B., Wang, R.L., Mo, J.L., Ouyang, H.: Friction-induced stick-slip vibration and its experimental validation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 142, 106705 (2020)
Luo, A., Gegg, B.C.: Grazing phenomena in a periodically forced, friction-induced, linear oscillator. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 11(7), 777–802 (2006)
Luo, A., Gegg, B.C.: Stick and non-stick periodic motions in periodically forced oscillators with dry friction. J. Sound Vib. 291, 132–168 (2006)
Luo, A.: On flow switching bifurcations in discontinuous dynamical systems. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 12(1), 100–116 (2007)
Luo, A.: Discontinuous Dynamical Systems. Beijing Higher Education Press (2012)
Luo, A., Faraji Mosadman, M.S.: Singularity, switchability and brfurcations in a 2-DOF, periodically forced, frictional oscillator. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 23(3), 1330009 (2013)
Luo, A., Guo, Y.: Discontinuous Dynamical Systems, Vibro-impact Dynamics, pp. 85–129. Wiley, New York (2013)
Li, L., Luo, A.: On periodic solutions of a second-order, time-delayed, discontinuous dynamical system. Chaos Solitons Fract. 114, 216–229 (2018)
Huang, J., Fu, X.: Complexity of dynamic system switching between two subsystems with cornered boundaries. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 228, 1385–1403 (2019)
Cao, J., Fan, J.: Discontinuous dynamical behaviors in a 2-DOF friction collision system with asymmetric damping. Chaos Solitons Fract. 142, 110405 (2021)
Gao, M., Fan, J., Li, C.: Analysis of discontinuous dynamics of a 2-DOF system with constrained spring cushions. Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 128, 103631 (2021)
Peng, Y., Fan, J., Gao, M., Li, J.: Discontinuous dynamics of an asymmetric 2-DOF friction oscillator with elastic and rigid impacts. Chaos Solitons Fract. 150, 111195 (2021)
Li, J., Fan, J.: Nonlinear dynamics for a class of 2-DOF systems with viscoelastic limit devices on a curved track. Nonlinear Dyn. 108, 3123–3156 (2022)
Cheng, X., Fan, J., Li, J.: Discontinuous dynamics of a 2-DOF friction oscillator with rigid and elastic composite constraints. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 6, 66 (2023)
Fu, X., Huang, J., Jing, Z.: Complex switching dynamics and chatter alarm for aerial agents with artificial potential field method. Appl. Math. Model. 107, 637–649 (2022)
Brogliato, B.: Nonsmooth Mechanics: Models, Dynamics and Control. Springer, Berlin (1996)
Brogliato, B.: Some perspectives on the analysis and control of complementarity systems. IEEE. Trans. Autom. Contr. 48(6), 918–935 (2003)
Bonetti, E., Frémond, M.: Analytical results on a model for damaging in domains and interfaces. ESAIM COCV 17, 955–974 (2011)
Rice, H.J., Mccraith, J.R.: Practical non-linear vibration absorber design. J. Sound Vib. 116(3), 545–559 (1987)
Hu, H.Y.: Detection of grazing orbits and incident bifurcations of a forced continuous, piecewise-linear oscillator. J. Sound Vib. 187(3), 485–493 (1995)
Agnes, G.S., Inman, D.J.: Performance of nonlinear vibration absorbers for multi-degrees-of-freedom systems using nonlinear normal modes. Nonlinear Dyn. 25, 275–292 (2001)
Mikhyeyev, O., Mori, H., Nagamine, T., Mori, M., Sato, Y.: Suppression of friction-induced vibration of glass plate by a dynamic absorber. J. Syst. Des. Dyn. 3(3), 380–390 (2009)
Gegg, B.C., Suh, S., Luo, A.: Modeling and theory of intermittent motions in a machine tool with a friction boundary. J. Manuf. Sci. E 132(4), 575–590 (2010)
Fu, X., Zheng, S.: New approach in dynamics of regenerative chatter research of turning. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 19(11), 4013–4023 (2014)
Liu, M., Gu, F., Huang, J., Wang, C., Cao, M.: Integration design and optimization control of a dynamic vibration absorber for electric wheels with in-wheel motor. Energies 10(12), 2069 (2017)
Sun, G., Fu, X.: Discontinuous dynamics of a class of oscillators with strongly nonlinear asymmetric damping under a periodic excitation. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 61, 230–247 (2018)
Wang, Q., Li, R., Zhu, Y., Du, X., Liu, Z.: Integration design and parameter optimization for a novel in-wheel motor with dynamic vibration absorbers. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. 42(9), 459 (2020)
Huang, J., Fu, X., Jing, Z.: Singular dynamics for morphing aircraft switching on the velocity boundary. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 95, 105625 (2021)
Asami, T., Yamada, K., Kawaguchi, N.: A quasi-optimal design formula of a parallel-type double-mass dynamic vibration absorber based on the stability criterion. Mech. Eng. 8(3), 66 (2021)
Tian, M., Gao, B.: Dynamics analysis of a novel in-wheel powertrain system combined with dynamic vibration absorber. Mech. Mach. Theory. 156, 104148 (2021)
Sun, Y., Zhou, J., Gong, D., Ji, Y.: Study on multi-degree-of-freedom dynamic vibration absorber of the carbody of high-speed trains. Res. Square 6, 66 (2021)
Kumbhar, M.B., Desavale, R.G., Kumbhar, S.G.: Dynamic characterization of MR fluid-based dynamic vibration absorber. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 6, 66 (2022)
Hrovat, D.: Influence of unsprung weight on vehicle ride quality. J. Sound. Vib. 124(3), 497–516 (1988)
Nagaya, G., Wakao, Y., Abe, A.: Development of an in-wheel drive with advanced dynamic-dampermechanism. JSAE Rev. 24, 477–481 (2003)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (No. ZR2019MA048) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11971275).
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
The specific division of the phase space of the three objects is as follows.
Firstly, the movement phase space partition of the object \(m _{a }\) in the absolute coordinates with its zero velocity as the boundary is expressed as
and the horizontal axis as the boundary of the two domains is interpreted as
The specific classification is shown in Fig. 13. The gray area \(D _{1}^{(a )}\) and the pink area \(D _{2}^{(a )}\) represent the areas of free motion where the object \(m _{a }\)’s velocity is positive and negative, respectively. The two areas are separated by a velocity boundary \(\partial D _{12}^{(a )}\) represented on a horizontal axis, which is depicted by a black dotted curve.
Secondly, the divisions of domains/boundaries/edges about the two objects \(m _{b }\) and \(m _{c }\) in the absolute coordinates are more complex than that of the object \(m _{a }\). For the two masses \(m _{b }\) and \(m _{c }\), the partial divisions are described in detail as
and
where \(\dot{u }_{i }^{(cr)}\) and \(u _{i }^{(cr)}\) \((i \in \{b , c \})\) are interpreted as the corresponding velocity and displacement of the object \(m _{i }\) at the time when stick motion occurs or disappears.
The phase space partitions of two masses \(m _{b }\) and \(m _{c }\) are shown in Fig. 14 under the precondition that collision is not considered. The non-stick free motion domains (\(D _{1}^{(i )}\), \(D _{2}^{(i )}\), \(i \in \{b , c \}\)) with positive and negative velocity values are also filled in gray and pink, respectively. The stick free motion domains (\(D _{3}^{(i )}\), \(D _{4}^{(i )}\), \(i \in \{b , c \}\)) are filled in blue and purple, respectively. The velocity boundaries without stick state (\(\partial D _{12}^{(b )}\), \(\partial D _{12}^{(c )}\)) and the velocity boundaries with stick state (\(\partial D _{34}^{(b )}\), \(\partial D _{34}^{(c )}\)) are depicted by black and green dotted curves, and the stick displacement boundaries (\(\partial D _{13}^{(b )}\), \(\partial D _{24}^{(b )}\), \(\partial D _{13}^{(c )}\) \(\partial D _{24}^{(c )}\)) are depicted by yellow dashed curves. The edges (\(\angle D _{5}^{(b )}\), \(\angle D _{5}^{(c )}\)) are marked with solid red dots.
Considering the collision of two objects \(m _{b }\) and \(m _{c }\) requires comparing the relative velocities and displacements of this two objects, so the following definitions are listed as
In order to facilitate the research of stick motion and collision motion, the relative coordinates of the object \(m _{b }\) are established for phase space division. The specific analysis is expressed as:
where \(\dot{z }_{b }^{(cr)}\) and \(z _{b }^{(cr)}\) are interpreted as the corresponding velocity and displacement of the object \(m _{b }\) at the time when stick motion occurs or disappears.
The partitioned phase space is shown in Fig. 15 for the object \(m _{b }\). The dashed black curve is interpreted as the negative of the velocity for the other object \(m _{c }\). After establishing coordinates with relative displacement \(z _{b }\) and relative velocity \(\dot{z }_{b }\) as horizontal and vertical axes, the non-stick free motion domains (\(D _{3}^{(b )}\), \(D _{4}^{(b )}\)) and related boundaries and edges (\(\partial D _{34}^{(b )}\), \(\partial D _{13}^{(b )}\), \(\partial D _{24}^{(b )}\), \(\angle D _{5}^{(b )}\)) can be marked with the same orange solid dot. The boundaries (\(\partial D _{1\infty }^{(b )}\), \(\partial D _{2\infty }^{(b )}\)) where the object \(m _{b }\) collides with \(m _{c }\) is depicted by a thick solid red line.
Appendix B
According to Luo [47] and the normal vectors in Eqs. (31) \(\sim \) (33), combined with the force and the derivative of the force in Sect. 3, the \(\textrm{G}\)-functions definitions and computational expressions are listed as follows.
The zero-order and first-order \(\textrm{G}\)-functions at the point \({\textbf{u}}_{i {} m }=(u _{i {} m },\,\dot{u }_{i {} m })\in \partial D _{\xi \sigma }^{(i )}\) are interpreted as
where \(\xi \ne \sigma \in \{1,2\},\,\,\,i \in \{a ,b ,c \},\,\,\,\eta \in \{1,2\}\);
where \(\xi \ne \sigma \in \{3,4\},\,\,\,i \in \{b ,c \},\,\,\,\eta \in \{3,4\}\).
The zero-order and first-order \(\textrm{G}\)-functions at the point \({\textbf{z}}_{b {} m }=(z _{b {} m },\,\dot{z }_{b {} m })\in \partial D _{\delta \tau }^{(b )}\,(\delta \ne \tau \in \{1,3\}\,\,\textrm{or}\,\,\delta \ne \tau \in \{2,4\})\) are interpreted as
where \((\eta ,\bar{\eta })=(1,3)\,\,\,\textrm{if}\,\,\,\delta \ne \tau \in \{1,3\},\,\,\,(\eta ,\bar{\eta })=(2,4)\,\,\,\textrm{if}\,\,\,\delta \ne \tau \in \{2,4\}\).
The zero-order and first-order \(\textrm{G}\)-functions at the point \({\textbf{u}}_{i {} m }=(u _{i {} m },\,\dot{u }_{i {} m })\in \partial D _{\xi \tau }^{(i )}\) where the flow barrier exists are defined as
where \(\xi \ne \sigma \in \{1,2\},\,\,\,i \in \{a ,b ,c \},\,\,\,\eta \in \{1,2\}\);
where \(\xi \ne \sigma \in \{3,4\},\,\,\,i \in \{b ,c \},\,\,\,\eta \in \{3,4\}\).
Appendix C
According to the description of the discontinuous boundary in Eq. (59), the two-dimensional transformation sets of the object \(m _{a }\) are expressed as
where \(u _{a {} k }=u _{a }(t _k )\) and \(\dot{u }_{a {} k }=\dot{u }_{a }(t _k )\) (\(k \in {\textbf{N}}\)) represent the transformation displacement and transformation velocity of the object \(m _{a }\) at the corresponding \(t _k \) moment, respectively.
Considering the stick motion and collision motion of the system, the two-dimensional transformation sets of the two objects \(m _{b }\) and \(m _{c }\) are denoted as
where \(u _{i {} k }=u _{i }(t _k )\) and \(\dot{u }_{i {} k }=\dot{u }_{i }(t _k )\) (\(i \in \{b ,c \}\),\(k \in {\textbf{N}}\)) represent the transformation displacement and transformation velocity of the object \(m _{i }\) (\(i \in \{b ,c \}\) at the corresponding \(t _k \) moment, respectively.
According to the above two-dimensional transformation sets, the four-dimensional transformation sets that treat the two objects \(m _{b }\) and \(m _{c }\) as a whole can be defined as
where \(\bigotimes \) represents the direct product of two transformation sets, the symbols \(\mu ,\nu ,\xi ,\zeta \in \{0,+,-\}\).
Appendix D
As shown in Fig. 16, the corresponding two-dimensional basic mappings of the object \(m _{a }\) are represented as
Based on the two-dimensional transformation sets in Eqs. (81)–(85), the corresponding two-dimensional basic mappings can be given. All two-dimensional mappings (including local mappings and global mappings) of two objects \(m _{i }\) \((i =b ,c )\) are
All the mapping structures of the two objects \(m _{i }\) \((i =b ,c )\) without taking collision into account are depicted in Fig. 17, and the mapping structures with collision are shown in Fig. 18.
Based on the four-dimensional transformation sets in Eqs. (86)–(90), the corresponding four-dimensional basic mappings can be given. All four-dimensional mappings (including local mappings and global mappings) of two objects \(m _{i }\) \((i =b ,c )\) are
where \(r =4\) corresponds to \(\mu =0\), \(r =5\) corresponds to \(\mu =+\), \(r =6\) corresponds to \(\mu =-\); \(s =4\) corresponds to \(\nu =0\), \(s =5\) corresponds to \(\nu =+\); \(s =6\) corresponds to \(\nu =-\); \(e =7\) corresponds to \(\xi =0\), \(e =8\) corresponds to \(\xi =+\), \(e =9\) corresponds to \(\xi =-\); \(q =10\) corresponds to \(\zeta =0\), \(q =11\) corresponds to \(\zeta =+\), \(q =12\) corresponds to \(\zeta =-\).
From the above analysis, the six-dimensional total mappings \(P_{\Delta }\) \((\Delta =\theta \tau ,\tau \in \{rs ,e ,q ,13,14,15,16,17,18, 19,20,21\})\) (including local mappings and global mappings) of the 3-DOF system can be obtained as
where the symbols \(\theta \in \{1,2,3\}\), \(\varepsilon \in \{0,+,-\}\). When \(\theta =1\), \(\varepsilon =0\); when \(\theta =2\), \(\varepsilon =+\); when \(\theta =3\), \(\varepsilon =-\).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, X., Fan, J. Analysis of discontinuous dynamical behaviors for a 3-DOF friction collision system with dynamic vibration absorber. Nonlinear Dyn 112, 5077–5107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09272-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09272-2