Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Frequency-specific phase synchronization analysis of a stall-induced aeroelastic system undergoing 2:1 internal resonance in a low-speed wind tunnel

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wind tunnel experiments are performed on a pitch-plunge aeroelastic system possessing structural nonlinearity in the stiffness and subjected to dynamic stall conditions. With an increase in the flow speed (U), we observe a well-expected transition from decaying responses to limit cycle oscillations wherein the flutter frequencies of pitch and plunge coalesce perfectly close to the pitch natural frequency, indicating the onset of stall flutter. Interestingly, a further increase in the U yields a secondary frequency peak, emerging approximately at half of the primary frequency peak, accompanied by an intermittent period-1–period-2 (P1–P2) behaviour. Another transition is observed as the flow speed is increased further—the pitch-plunge motion starts exhibiting a beat-like response. We demonstrate that this particular behaviour is ‘2:1 internal resonance (IR)’ and is attributed to a specific combination of structural parameters: the ratio (\({\bar{\omega }}\)) of natural frequencies of plunge and pitch (\(f_y\) and \(f_\alpha \), respectively) being 0.44, and the structure possessing quadratic nonlinearity, resulting as the aerodynamic loads tune the flutter frequencies to become commensurate for a 2:1 IR. We show that a typical phase synchronization analysis is inadequate to explain the atypical transitions. To that end, we resort to a frequency-specific synchronization analysis wherein the pitch and plunge time signals are decomposed into two signals of specific frequency range. This reveals that the higher frequency signal (HFS) is always perfectly synchronized. On contrary, the lower frequency signal (LFS) is asynchronous during the intermittent regime and has strong synchrony at the onset of beats. The physical insights presented in this study can be useful for the design of increasingly slender aeroelastic structures that are often subjected to dynamic stall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Barnes, A.E.: The calculation of instantaneous frequency and instantaneous bandwidth. Geophysics 57(11), 1520–1524 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benaissa, A., Biskri, S., Goyaniuk, L., Poirel, D., Bouda, N.N.: Beating phenomenon in frequency lock-in 2dof stall flutter. J. Fluids Struct. 100, 103176 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bethi, R.V., Gali, S.V., Venkatramani, J.: Response analysis of a pitch-plunge airfoil with structural and aerodynamic nonlinearities subjected to randomly fluctuating flows. J. Fluids Struct. 92, 102820 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowles, P.O., Corke, T.C., Coleman, D.G., Thomas, F.O., Wasikowski, M.: Improved understanding of aerodynamic damping through the hilbert transform. AIAA J. 52(11), 2384–2394 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cole, S.: Effects of spoiler surfaces on the aeroelastic behavior of a low-aspect-ratio rectangular wing. In: 31st Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, p. 981 (1990)

  6. Culler, E.C., Farnsworth, J.A.: Higher frequencies in stall flutter moment development. J. Fluids Struct. 85, 181–198 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Devathi, H., Sarkar, S.: Study of a stall induced dynamical system under gust using the probability density evolution technique. Comput. Struct. 162, 38–47 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dimitriadis, G.: Introduction to Nonlinear Aeroelasticity. Wiley, London (2017)

  9. Dimitriadis, G., Li, J.: Bifurcation behavior of airfoil undergoing stall flutter oscillations in low-speed wind tunnel. AIAA J. 47(11), 2577–2596 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. dos Santos, L., Marques, F., Vasconcellos, R.: Dynamical characterization of fully nonlinear, nonsmooth, stall fluttering airfoil systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 107(3), 2053–2074 (2022)

  11. Gilliatt, H., Strganac, T., Kurdila, A.: Nonlinear aeroelastic response of an airfoil. In: 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, p. 459 (1997)

  12. Gilliatt, H., Strganac, T., Kurdila, A.: On the presence of internal resonances in aeroelastic systems. In: 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, p. 1954 (1998)

  13. Gilliatt, H.C., Strganac, T.W., Kurdila, A.J.: An investigation of internal resonance in aeroelastic systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 31(1), 1–22 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Goyaniuk, L., Poirel, D., Benaissa, A.: Pitch-heave symmetric stall flutter of a NACA0012 at transitional Reynolds numbers. AIAA J. 58(8), 3286–3298 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalmár-Nagy, T., Csikja, R., Elgohary, T.A.: Nonlinear analysis of a 2-dof piecewise linear aeroelastic system. Nonlinear Dyn. 85(2), 739–750 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lachaux, J.P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., Varela, F.J.: Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8(4), 194–208 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, Y.S., Vakakis, A.F., Bergman, L.A., McFarland, D.M., Kerschen, G.T.: Triggering mechanisms of limit cycle oscillations in a two degree-of-freedom wing flutter model. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 47381, 1863–1872 (2005)

  18. Malatkar, P., Nayfeh, A.: Modal interactions in a cantilever plate: an experimental study. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, p. 1538 (2004)

  19. Mondal, S., Pawar, S., Sujith, R.: Synchronous behaviour of two interacting oscillatory systems undergoing quasiperiodic route to chaos. Chaos: Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 27(10), 103119 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, K.J., Mojahed, A., Bergman, L.A., Vakakis, A.F.: Local nonlinear stores induce global dynamical effects in an experimental model plane. AIAA J. 57(11), 4953–4965 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nayfeh, A.H., Mook, D.T.: Nonlinear Oscillations. Wiley, London (2008)

  22. Oh, K., Nayfeh, A.H., Mook, D.T.: Modal interactions in the forced vibration of a cantilever metallic plate. Nonlinear Stoch. Dyn. 192, 237–247 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olhede, S.C., Walden, A.T.: Generalized morse wavelets. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 50(11), 2661–2670 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Neil, T., Strganac, T.W.: Aeroelastic response of a rigid wing supported by nonlinear springs. J. Aircr. 35(4), 616–622 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Poirel, D., Mendes, F.: Experimental small-amplitude self-sustained pitch-heave oscillations at transitional Reynolds numbers. AIAA J. 52(8), 1581–1590 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Poirel, D., Goyaniuk, L., Benaissa, A.: Frequency lock-in in pitch-heave stall flutter. J. Fluids Struct. 79, 14–25 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Price, S., Keleris, J.: Non-linear dynamics of an air foil forced to oscillate in dynamic stall. J. Sound Vib. 194(2), 265–283 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raaj, A., Venkatramani, J., Mondal, S.: Synchronization of pitch and plunge motions during intermittency route to aeroelastic flutter. Chaos: Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 29(4), 043129 (2019)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Riso, C., Cesnik, C.E., Epureanu, B.I.: Output-based flutter bifurcation forecasting in nonlinear fluid-structural systems with multiple varying parameters. J. Fluids Struct. 101, 103201 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosenblum, M.G., Pikovsky, A.S., Kurths, J.: Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76(11), 1804 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarkar, S., Gupta, S., Rychlik, I.: Wiener chaos expansions for estimating rain-flow fatigue damage in randomly vibrating structures with uncertain parameters. Probab. Eng. Mech. 26(2), 387–398 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schijve, J.: Fatigue damage in aircraft structures, not wanted, but tolerated? Int. J. Fatigue 31(6), 998–1011 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Sethna, P.R., Bajaj, A.K.: Bifurcations in dynamical systems with internal resonance. J. Appl. Mech. 45, 895–902 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Šidlof, P., Vlček, V., Štěpán, M.: Experimental investigation of flow-induced vibration of a pitch-plunge naca 0015 airfoil under deep dynamic stall. J. Fluids Struct. 67, 48–59 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sweeney-Reed, C.M., Nasuto, S.J.: A novel approach to the detection of synchronisation in eeg based on empirical mode decomposition. J. Comput. Neurosci. 23(1), 79–111 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sweeney-Reed, C.M., Nasuto, S.J., Vieira, M.F., Andrade, A.O.: Empirical mode decomposition and its extensions applied to eeg analysis: a review. Adv. Data Sci. Adapt. Anal. 10(02), 1840001 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Tripathi, D., Shreenivas, R., Bose, C., Mondal, S., Venkatramani, J.: Experimental investigation on the synchronization characteristics of a pitch-plunge aeroelastic system exhibiting stall flutter. Chaos: Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 32(7), 073114 (2022)

  38. Tripathi, D., Vishal, S., Bose, C., Venkatramani, J.: Stall-induced fatigue damage in nonlinear aeroelastic systems under stochastic inflow: numerical and experimental analyses. Int. J. Non-linear Mech. 142, 104003 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Venkatesh, S., Sarkar, S., Rychlik, I.: Uncertainties in blade flutter damage prediction under random gust. Probab. Eng. Mech. 36, 45–55 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Venkatramani, J., Nair, V., Sujith, R., Gupta, S., Sarkar, S.: Precursors to flutter instability by an intermittency route: a model free approach. J. Fluids Struct. 61, 376–391 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Venkatramani, J., Kumar, S.K., Sarkar, S., Gupta, S.: Physical mechanism of intermittency route to aeroelastic flutter. J. Fluids Struct. 75, 9–26 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Venkatramani, J., Nair, V., Sujith, R., Gupta, S., Sarkar, S.: Multi-fractality in aeroelastic response as a precursor to flutter. J. Sound Vib. 386, 390–406 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Venkatramani, J., Sarkar, S., Gupta, S.: Intermittency in pitch-plunge aeroelastic systems explained through stochastic bifurcations. Nonlinear Dyn. 92(3), 1225–1241 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Venkatramani, J., Sarkar, S., Gupta, S.: Investigations on precursor measures for aeroelastic flutter. J. Sound Vib. 419, 318–336 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Verstraelen, E., Kerschen, G., Dimitriadis, G.: Internal resonance and stall flutter interactions in a pitch-flap wing in the wind-tunnel. In: Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 1, pp. 521–531. Springer (2016)

  46. Vishal, S., Raaj, A., Bose, C., Venkatramani, J., Dimitriadis, G.: Numerical investigation into discontinuity-induced bifurcations in an aeroelastic system with coupled non-smooth nonlinearities. Nonlinear Dyn., pp. 1–27 (2022)

  47. Vishal, S., Raaj, A., Bose, C., Venkatramani, J.: Routes to synchronization in a pitch-plunge aeroelastic system with coupled structural and aerodynamic nonlinearities. Int. J. Non-linear Mech., p. 103766 (2021)

  48. Xiong, L., Tang, L., Mace, B.R.: A comprehensive study of 2: 1 internal-resonance-based piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(3), 1817–1834 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Cao, S., Chen, J., Zhang, Z., Zhang, J.: Targeted energy transfer between 2-d wing and nonlinear energy sinks and their dynamic behaviors. Nonlinear Dyn. 90(3), 1841–1850 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Sunetra Sarkar (IIT Madras) and Dr. Chandan Bose (University of Edinburgh, UK) for many fruitful discussions regarding this work.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Venkatramani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Materials: A video file describing the transitions (see Table~\inlink{2}{trans}) in our wind tunnel experiments is appended. The video can be found in the online version. (MP4 1,18,647KB)

A effect of \({\bar{\omega }}\) on response dynamics

A effect of \({\bar{\omega }}\) on response dynamics

The experiments are performed to observe the change in stall flutter characteristics with frequency ratio. Four combinations of \({\bar{\omega }}\) (0.38, 0.44, 0.55, and 0.60) are considered by varying the plunge stiffness, keeping pitch stiffness the same. The natural frequencies of pitch and plunge modes are obtained from the free vibration test and are shown in Fig. 20a–d.

Fig. 20
figure 20

Determination of natural frequencies of plunge and pitch modes for different frequency ratios

Subsequently, the flutter experiments are carried out for each case by systematically increasing the flow speed. The frequency response for the same is plotted in the range 6–17 m/s and is shown in Fig. 21. For each case, we see that the oscillations are pitch dominant as the flutter frequency is close to \(f_{\alpha }\) for both pitch and plunge (see Fig. 21a–d). Upon increasing the flow speed, the dominant peaks remain almost stationary (albeit a slight shift not exceeding 0.2 Hz can be observed for higher speeds) for all but one case where \({\bar{\omega }} = 0.44\) (Fig. 21b). For this case, we observe a secondary peak emerging at higher speeds, approximately at half the frequency of the primary peak (and close to \(f_{y}\)). This secondary peak gradually gains strength and becomes dominant. For all other cases we observe period-1 stall flutter LCOs although, for the case \({\bar{\omega }} = 0.38\), there is a very small secondary peak (Fig. 21a) which may give raise to similar phenomena at much higher air-speeds which was not possible to achieve with the present experimental conditions. Interestingly, for both the cases (\({\bar{\omega }} =\) 0.38 and 0.44), the frequency ratio is below and close to 0.5, making a possibility of IR.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Variation of modal frequencies with flow speed for different frequency ratios

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tripathi, D., Mondal, S. & Venkatramani, J. Frequency-specific phase synchronization analysis of a stall-induced aeroelastic system undergoing 2:1 internal resonance in a low-speed wind tunnel. Nonlinear Dyn 111, 12899–12920 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08515-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08515-6

Keywords

Navigation