Abstract
This paper considers the adaptive observer design problem for the Lur’e differential inclusion system with unknown parameters. Different from the current work, the proposed observer does not hold any set-valued mapping and the uncertain parameters can also be identified. Firstly, the adaptive observer is designed for the Lur’e differential inclusion system, and it is proved to be valid by Lyapunov stability theory. Then, based on the canonical form of the system matrix, the sufficient and necessary condition for one assumption is presented in both SISO and MIMO cases. Finally, numerical examples are simulated to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubin, J., Cellina, A.: Differential Inclusions: Set-valued Maps and Viability Theory. Springer, New York (1984)
Deimling, K.: Multivalued Differential Equations. De Gruyter Series in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications. De Gruyter, Berlin (1992)
Boyd, S., Ghaoui, L., Feron, E., Balakrishnan, V.: Linear Matrix Inequlities in System and Control Theory. SIAM, Philadelphia (1994)
Smirnov, G.: Introduction to the Theory of Differential Inclusions. Graduate Studies in Mathematics. SIAM, Phliadelphia (2002)
Agrawal, J., Moudgalya, K., Pani, A.: Sliding motion and stability of a class of discontinuous dynamical systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 37, 151–168 (2004)
Rakkiyappan, R., Velmurugan, G., Cao, J.: Finite-time stability analysis of fractional-order complex-valued memristor-based neural networks with time delays. Nonlinear Dyn. 78, 2823–2836 (2014)
Lur’e, A.: Some Nonlinear Problem in the Theory of Automatic Control. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London (1957)
Acary, V., Brogliato, B.: Numerical Methods for Nonsmooth Dynamical Systems,Applications in Mechanics and Electronics. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Leine, R., Van Campen, D., Van De Vrande, B.: Bifurcations in nonlinear discontinuous systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 23, 105–164 (2000)
Wouw, N., Leine, R.: Attractivity of equilibrium sets of systems with dry friction. Nonlinear Dyn. 35, 19–39 (2004)
Forti, M., Nistri, P., Papini, D.: Global exponential stability and global convergence in finite time of delayed neural networks with infinite gain. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 16, 1449–1463 (2005)
Duan, L., Huang, L., Guo, Z.: Stability and almost periodicity for delayed high-order Hopfield neural networks with discontinuous activations. Nonlinear Dyn. 77, 1469–1484 (2014)
Heemels, W., Schumacher, J., Weiland, S.: Well-posedness of linear complementarity systems. In: Proceedings of 38th IEEE CDC. Arizona, pp. 3037–3042 (1999)
Brogliato, B.: Some perspectives on the analysis and control of complementarity systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 48, 918–935 (2003)
Bruin, J., Doris, A., Wouw, N., Heemels, W., Nijmeijer, H.: Control of mechanical motion systems with non-collocation of actuation and friction: a Popov criterion approach for input-to-state stability and set-valued nonlinearities. Automatica 45, 405–415 (2009)
Jayawardhana, B., Logemann, H., Ryan, E.: Input-to-state stability of differential inclusions with applications to hysteretic and quantized feedback systems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 48, 1031–1054 (2009)
Osorio, M., Moreno, J.: Dissipative design of observers for multivalued nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of 45th IEEE CDC. San Diego, pp. 5400–5405 (2006)
Doris, A., Juloski, A., Mihajlovic, N., Heemels, W., Wouw, N., Nijmeijer, H.: Observer designs for experimental non-smooth and discontinuous systems. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 16, 1323–1332 (2008)
Brogliato, B., Heemels, W.: Observer design for Lur’e systems with multivalued mappings: a passivity approach. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 54, 1996–2001 (2009)
Brogliato, B., Goeleven, D.: Well-posedness, stability and invariance results for a class of multivalued Lur’e dynamical systems. Nonlinear Anal. Theor. 74, 195–212 (2011)
Huang, J., Han, Z., Cai, X.: Note on observer for Lur’e differential inclusion systems. IET Control Theory Appl. 5, 1939–1944 (2011)
Huang, J., Han, Z., Cai, X., Liu, L.: Adaptive full-order and reduced-order observers for the Lur’e differential inclusion system. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 16, 2869–2879 (2011)
Huang, J., Han, Z.: Adaptive non-fragile observer design for the uncertain Lur’e differential inclusion system. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 72–81 (2013)
Zhang, J., Han, Z., Zhu, F., Zhang, W.: Further results on adaptive full-order and reduced-order observers for Lur’e differential inclusions. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 19, 1582–1590 (2014)
Hu, T.: Nonlinear control design for linear differential inclusions via convex hull of quadratics. Automatica 43, 685–692 (2007)
Zhang, Q.: Adaptive observer for multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) linear time-varying systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 47, 525–529 (2002)
Rugh, W.: Linear System Theory. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1996)
Wolovich, W.: Linear Multivariable Systems. Springer, New York (1974)
Han, Z.: Adaptive Control. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (1995)
Acknowledgments
The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61403267,61503107), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20130322), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY16F030005), Natural Science Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (13KJB510032) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M530268).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
In this section, we present one method which can be used to determine whether one signal is persistently exciting.
Definition 5
Function \(u{:}[0,+\infty )\rightarrow R^{n}\) is called stationary signal if the following holds
The above limit is the function of t, and is called self-covariance matrix of u, denoted by \(R_{u}(t)\). Furthermore, the Fourier transformation of \(R_{u}(t)\) is defined by
which is spectral measure of u. A stationary signal is called k-th order multi-frequency if there exist at least k zeros of \(S_{u}(\omega )\) for \(\omega \in R\), and the nonzero real numbers are called subset of u.
Thus, we can obtain the following propositions. The proof is omitted.
Proposition 1
If \(u=c~(c\ne 0)\), then the subset contains only one element, i.e. it is first-order multi-frequency.
Proposition 2
If \(u=\sin \omega _{0}t~(\omega _{0}\ne 0)\), then the subset contains only two elements, i.e. it is second-order multi-frequency.
Proposition 3
If \(u=\sum \limits _{i=1}^{l}A_{i}\sin \omega _{i}t(A_{i}\ne 0,\omega _{i}\ne 0, \omega _{i}\ne \omega _{j},i\ne j)\), then the subset contains 2l elements, i.e. it is 2l-th order multi-frequency.
The following lemma is important, and it can be referred to [29].
Lemma 3
[29] Let \(y(s)=G(s)u(s)\), where \(G(s)\in R^{n\times l}\) is transfer function, then there exist n different real numbers \(\omega _{1},\omega _{2},\ldots , \omega _{n}\), such that \(G(j\omega _{1}),G(j\omega _{2}),\cdots ,G(j\omega _{n}) \) are linear independent, then y(t) is persistently exciting signal if and only if u is n-th order multi-frequency.
Thus, by Lemma 3, if f(y, u) in the system (3) is n-th order multi-frequency, then \(\xi (t)\) is persistently exciting.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, J., Zhang, J. & Han, Z. A note on adaptive observer for the Lur’e differential inclusion system. Nonlinear Dyn 86, 1227–1237 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2959-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-2959-y