Abstract
The present paper numerically and experimentally demonstrates that an extremely weak diffusive connection can induce a stable periodic orbit in coupled chaotic oscillators, where each individual oscillator has an unstable periodic orbit which dominates its chaotic attractor. The connection-induced stable periodic orbit is quite close to the unstable periodic orbit. The mechanism of this phenomenon is clarified on the basis of bifurcation analysis: When the coupling strength is varied from zero to an extremely small positive value, the unstable periodic orbit embedded within each individual chaotic attractor becomes stable via a period-doubling bifurcation and then disappears via a saddle-node bifurcation. These results are numerically observed in well-known chaotic oscillators, such as Rössler oscillators and logistic maps. Furthermore, an experimental verification of this phenomenon in coupled chaotic electronic circuits is presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
BunKi is an integrated environment dedicated to bifurcation analysis, such as for system biology [30].
More detailed simulations show that the Neimark-Sacker (NS) bifurcation (\(\varepsilon =0.0008170\)) occurs just before the SN bifurcation (\(\varepsilon =0.0008188\)). As they are extremely close, we cannot see the NS bifurcation.
References
Nishio, Y., Ushida, A.: Spatio-temporal chaos in simple coupled chaotic circuits. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 1(42), 678–686 (1995)
Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., Kurths, J.: Synchronization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Strogatz, S.H.: Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order. Hyperion Books, New York (2003)
Schimansky-Geier, L., Fiedler, B., Kurths, J., Schőll, E.: Analysis and Control of Complex Nonlinear Processes in Physics Chemistry and Biology. World Scientific, Singapore (2007)
Uwate, Y., Nishio, Y.: Synchronization in several types of coupled polygonal oscillatory networks. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 1(59), 1042–1050 (2012)
Flunkert, V., Fischer, I., Schőll, E.: Dynamics, control and information in delay-coupled systems: an overview. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20120465 (2008)
Michiels, W., Nijmeijer, H.: Synchronization of delay-coupled nonlinear oscillators: an approach based on the stability analysis of synchronized equilibria. Chaos 19, 033110 (2009)
Konishi, K., Hara, N.: Topology-free stability of a steady state in network systems with dynamic connections. Phys. Rev. E 83, 036204 (2011)
Saxena, G., Prasad, A., Ramaswamy, R.: Amplitude death: the emergence of stationarity in coupled nonlinear systems. Phys. Rep. 521, 205–228 (2012)
Koseska, A., Volkov, E., Kurths, J.: Oscillation quenching mechanisms: amplitude vs. oscillation death. Phys. Rep. 531, 173–199 (2013)
Strogatz, S.H., Mirollo, R.E.: Splay states in globally coupled Josephson arrays: analytical prediction of Floquet multipliers. Phys. Rev. E 47, 220–227 (1993)
Zou, W., Zhan, M.: Splay states in a ring of coupled oscillators: from local to global coupling. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 8, 1324–1340 (2009)
Hadley, P., Beasley, M.R.: Dynamical states and stability of linear arrays of Josephson junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 621–623 (1987)
Ashwin, P., King, G.P., Swift, J.W.: Three identical oscillators with symmetric coupling. Nonlinearity 3, 585–602 (1990)
Otsuka, K.: Winner-takes-all dynamics and antiphase states in modulated multimode lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1090–1093 (1991)
Tsukiji, M., Hara, N., Konishi, K.: Experimental Evaluation of Formation Control of Mobile Robot Group by Coupled Oscillators. SICE Annual Conference (2014)
Hu, G., Zhang, Y., Cerdeira, H.A., Chen, S.: From low-dimensional synchronous chaos to high-dimensional desynchronous spatiotemporal chaos in coupled systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3377–3380 (2000)
Yang, H.L.: Phase synchronization of diffusively coupled Rössler oscillators with funnel attractors. Phys. Rev. E 64, 026206 (2001)
Zhan, M., Hu, G., Zhang, Y., He, D.: Generalized splay state in coupled chaotic oscillators induced by weak mutual resonant interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1510–1513 (2001)
He, D.H., Hu, G., Zhan, M., Lu, H.P.: Periodic states with functional phase relation in weakly coupled chaotic Hindmarsh–Rose neurons. Phys. D 156, 314–324 (2001)
Zhigulin, V.P., Rabinovich, M.I.: Self-control of chaos in neural circuits with plastic electrical synapses. Radiophys. Quantum Electron. 47, 876–881 (2004)
Zhang, Y., Hu, G., Cerdeira, H.A., Chen, S., Braun, T., Yao, Y.: Partial synchronization and spontaneous spatial ordering in coupled chaotic systems. Phys. Rev. E 63, 026211 (2001)
de Oliveira, E.G., Braun, T.: Partial synchronization on a network with different classes of oscillators. Phys. Rev. E 76, 067201 (2007)
He, Z., Sun, Y., Zhan, M.: Intermittent and sustained periodic windows in networked chaotic Rössler oscillators. Chaos 23, 043139 (2013)
Shinriki, M., Yamamoto, M., Mori, S.: Multimode oscillations in a modified van der Pol oscillator containing a positive nonlinear conductance. Proc. IEEE 69, 394–395 (1981)
Uchitani, Y., Nishio, Y.: Synchronization patterns generated in a ring of cross-coupled chaotic circuits. In: Proc. of the Int. Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 3855–3860 (2008)
Uchitani, Y., Nishio, Y.: Synchronization of small oscillations in cross-coupled chaotic circuits. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 2629–2632 (2009)
Werner, J.P., Stemler, T., Benner, H.: Crisis and stochastic resonance in Shinriki’s circuit. Phys. D 237, 859–865 (2008)
Stemler, T., Werner, J.P., Benner, H., Just, W.: Stochastic modelling of intermittency. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 273–284 (2010)
Ghosh, S., Matsuoka, Y., Asai, Y., Hsin, K.Y., Kitano, H.: Software for systems biology: from tools to integrated platforms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 821–832 (2011)
Acknowledgments
This research was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (26289131).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Circuit implementation
This appendix provides detailed information on our circuit implementation. The nonlinear elements illustrated in Fig. 7 are implemented as diodes (1S1588). The inductor \(L\) is realized by the equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 13a: \(L=R_{1}R_{3}C_{4}R_{5}/R_{2}=10\,\mathrm{mH}\), where \(R_{1}=100\) \(\Omega \), \(R_{2}=100\) \(\Omega \), \(R_{3}=100\) \(\Omega \), \(C_{4}=100\) nF, \(R_{5}=1\) k\(\Omega \). This is because real inductors inevitably include a resistive component, which cannot be neglected. The negative conductance \(-g\) is realized as illustrated in Fig. 13b. The conductance \(g\) is adjusted by the variable resistor \(r\): \(g=1/r\). For accurate adjustment of the coupling strength and the negative conductance, 10-turn precision potentiometers (7274R) are used for \(R\) and \(r\).
Appendix B: Measurement procedure
This appendix presents our measurement procedure for the bifurcation points shown in Fig. 12. As illustrated in Fig. 9, the voltages \(v_{1,2}^{a}\) in our circuits powered by a DC voltage source (KENWOOD PW18-2) are measured by digital oscilloscopes (IWATSU DS-5314). The following steps allow us to obtain the bifurcation points.
For step (i), \(g\) in each individual oscillator (\(1/R=0\,\mathrm{mS}\)) is fixed at the PD bifurcation point (period \(3 \rightarrow 6\)): The fixed values for the oscillators 1 and 2 are denoted by \(g_\mathrm{1}\) and \(g_\mathrm{2}\), respectively. They are slightly different (\(g_{1} \ne g_{2}\)) due to errors in the circuit devices. This difference is denoted by \(\varDelta g:= g_{1} - g_{2}\), and their average \(g_\mathrm{ave}:=(g_{1} + g_{2})/2\) is recorded as \(g\). For step (ii), the coupling resistor \(R\) is carefully varied and then the lower and upper values of the dotted lines, wherein the connection-induced stable period-three orbit shown in Figs. 10b and 11b can be observed, are plotted. For step (iii), \(g_{1}\) and \(g_{2}\) are changed, but their difference \(\varDelta g\) is maintained. For step (iv), return to step (ii). These experimental data strongly depend on the experiment environment; thus, these are slightly different every time we measure. However, we always obtain the similar tendency as bifurcation points in Fig. 12. Remark that we experimentally found that some other attractors coexist with the orbit: There is room for further investigation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mizobata, K., Nakanishi, Y., Konishi, K. et al. Stable periodic orbits in a pair of chaotic oscillators coupled by an extremely weak diffusive connection. Nonlinear Dyn 79, 265–273 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1662-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1662-0