Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CO2 emissions accounting for the chemical industry: an empirical analysis for China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chemical industry is one of the most important industry sectors in terms of energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China. However, few studies have undertaken accounting of the CO2 emissions in the chemical industry. In addition, there are some shortcomings in the traditional accounting method as a result of poor data availability, such as the incomplete consideration of emission sources and overestimation of actual emissions. Based on the traditional accounting method and the actual situation of the chemical industry, this study proposes a method called the Emission Accounting Model in the Chemical Industry, which covers fossil energy-related emission, indirect emission generated by electricity and heat, carbonate-related process emission and the reuse of CO2. In particular, fossil energy used as feedstock is included. By applying the Emission Accounting Model in the Chemical Industry in China, the calculated CO2 emissions would be 19–30% less than the result from the traditional method. In addition, it is found that the indirect CO2 emissions generated by electricity and heat account for 67% of the total amount, the fossil energy-related emissions account for approximately 37%, the process-related emissions accounted for 2%, and reuse of CO2 accounts for − 6% in 2016. The production of ammonia, ethylene and calcium carbide generated approximately half of the total CO2 emissions in 2016. In addition, in view of emission sources and carbon source flow, two other bottom-up accounting methods are proposed that can take effect when the chemical plant-level data are available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The chemical industry in this study refers to the division 26 called Manufacturing of Chemical Materials and Chemicals which is defined by the national standard (SAC 2017). It covers thousands of chemical products and can be divided into eight parts: (1) Manufacturing of Basic Chemical Raw Materials, (2) Manufacturing of Fertilizer, (3) Manufacturing of Pesticide, (4) Manufacturing of Coatings, Inks, Pigments and Similar Products, (5) Manufacturing of Synthetic Materials, (6) Manufacturing of Special Chemical Products, (7) Manufacturing of Explosives, Pyrotechnics and Fireworks Products and (8) Manufacturing of Daily Chemical Products.

  2. http://www.wind.com.cn/.

  3. In this study, coal includes raw coal, cleaned coal and other washed coal.

  4. In this study, petroleum and its products refer to crude oil, gasoline, kerosene, diesel oil, fuel oil, naphtha, petroleum coke, LPG, refinery gas and other petroleum products.

  5. Coking products represent coke and other coking products. Gas includes coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, converter gas and other gas.

  6. This ratio is calculated on the basis of BP (2017), in which China produced about 9163 Mt CO2.

  7. Here, the ethylene production also includes the production of its by-products, such as propylene and butadiene in this process. However, it should be noted that only part of propylene and butadiene is produced in accompaniment with ethylene, not the whole.

  8. Here, the emissions of calcium carbide are total emissions. They were calculated by the authors. The production of calcium carbide and its emission factor come from NBSC (2017c) and (Liu et al. 2011) respectively.

References

  • An R, Yu B, Li R, Wei Y-M (2018) Potential of energy savings and CO2 emission reduction in China’s iron and steel industry. Appl Energy 226:862–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP (British Petroleum) (2017) BP statistical review of world energy June 2017. BP, London

  • Broeren MLM, Saygin D, Patel MK (2014) Forecasting global developments in the basic chemical industry for environmental policy analysis. Energy Policy 64:273–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cefic (European Chemical Industry Council) (2017) Facts & figures of the European chemical industry. Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Tang B-J, Liao H, Wei Y-M (2016) A multi-period power generation planning model incorporating the non-carbon external costs: a case study of China. Appl Energy 183:1333–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Kang J-N, Liao H, Tang B-J, Wei Y-M (2017) Costs and potentials of energy conservation in China’s coal-fired power industry: a bottom-up approach considering price uncertainties. Energy Policy 104:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J-M, Yu B, Wei Y-M (2018) Energy technology roadmap for ethylene industry in China. Appl Energy 224:160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin PW, Hammond GP, Norman JB (2017) Industrial energy use and carbon emissions reduction in the chemicals sector: a UK perspective. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (International Energy Agency) (2017) Key world energy statistics. France

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (2007-04-01). https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html. Accessed 10 Mar 2018

  • Li R, Tang B-J (2016) Initial carbon quota allocation methods of power sectors: a China case study. Nat Hazards 84:1075–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Bing Z, Zhou W, Hu S, Chen D, Griffy-Brown C (2011) CO2 emissions in calcium carbide industry: an analysis of China’s mitigation potential. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5:1240–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, De Preux LB, Wagner UJ (2014) The impact of a carbon tax on manufacturing: evidence from microdata. J Public Econ 117:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China) (2014) China energy statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China) (2015) China energy statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China) (2016) China energy statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China) (2017a) China energy statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China) (2017b) The production of ammonia. http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0E0H&sj=2016. Accessed 10 Apr 2018

  • NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China) (2017c) The production of calcium carbide. http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01&zb=A0E0H&sj=2016. Accessed 11 Apr 2018

  • NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission) (2011) Guidelines for the compilation of provincial greenhouse gas emission inventories (trial). http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/. Accessed 25 Mar 2018

  • NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission) (2013) Accounting method and report guide for greenhouse gas emission in China’s chemical production enterprises (trial) (2013-11-04). http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-11/04/content_2520743.htm. Accessed 15 Apr 2018

  • Raupach MR et al (2014) Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions. Nat Clim Change 4:873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAC (Standardization Administration of China) (2015) Requirements of greenhouse gas emissions accounting and reporting—part 10: chemical production enterprise vol 13.020.10. Standards Press of China, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • SAC (Standardization Administration of China) (2017) Industrial classification for national economic activities vol 35.040. Standards Press of China, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Saygin D, Patel MK, Tam C, Gielen DJ (2009) Chemical and petrochemical sector: potential of best practice technology and other measures for improving energy efficiency. IEA information paper

  • Selvakkumaran S, Limmeechokchai B (2015) Low carbon society scenario analysis of transport sector of an emerging economy—the AIM/Enduse modelling approach. Energy Policy 81:199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang B, Li R, Yu B, An R, Wei Y-M (2018) How to peak carbon emissions in China’s power sector: a regional perspective. Energy Policy 120:365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y-M et al (2018) An integrated assessment of INDCs under shared socioeconomic pathways: an implementation of C(3)IAM. Nat Hazards 92:585–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3297-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrell E, Price L, Martin N (2001) Energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction opportunities in the US iron and steel sector. Energy 26:513–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-5442(01)00017-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C-Y, Han R, Yu B, Wei Y-M (2018) Accounting process-related CO2 emissions from global cement production under shared socioeconomic pathways. J Clean Prod 184:451–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Wang M (2016) Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: a review. Ecol Econ 125:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Zhu B, Li Q, Ma T, Hu S, Griffy-Brown C (2010) CO2 emissions and mitigation potential in China’s ammonia industry. Energy Policy 38:3701–3709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu B, Zhou W, Hu S, Li Q, Griffy-Brown C, Jin Y (2010) CO2 emissions and r eduction potential in China’s chemical industry. Energy 35:4663–4670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support received from the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFA0602603), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71822401, 71603020, 71521002 and 71642004) and the Joint Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education. We are also thankful for the support and help provided by CEEP-BIT colleagues.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biying Yu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, JM., Yu, B. & Wei, YM. CO2 emissions accounting for the chemical industry: an empirical analysis for China. Nat Hazards 99, 1327–1343 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03589-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03589-1

Keywords

Navigation