Abstract
This study aims to understand the mechanisms of emergency response network evolution by quantitatively examining the link formation pattern among participants involved in a real emergency collaboration network. This is achieved by identifying the participants’ characteristics which can affect forming new links over time. The result indicates the existence of cumulative advantage process, where highly connected participants gain more new links over time. It also reveals the structural position of participants involved in a response network, i.e. brokering position, affects their number of future links. Understanding the link formation pattern is important for understanding the mechanisms of network evolution which help predict more precisely the behavior of actors and dynamics of network structure over time. This can assist researchers, decision makers and practitioners to manage and support the collaboration of actors in their systems in order to reach their organizational goals. The overall findings can contribute further to the development of network organizational theory in different contexts especially disaster and emergency response management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbasi A, and Kapucu N (2012) Structural dynamics of organizations during the evolution of interorganizational networks in disaster response. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 9(1). Article No 23
Abbasi A, Hossain L, Hamra J, Owen C (2010) Social networks perspective of firefighters’ adaptive behaviour and coordination among them. In: Paper presented at the IEEE/ACM international conference on & international conference on cyber, physical and social computing (CPSCom), China
Abbasi A, Hossain L, Leydesdorff L (2012) Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. J Inform 6(1):403–412
Abbasi A, Hossain L, Owen C (2013a) Investigating preferential attachment behavior over the evolution of disaster response networks, In: 46th Hawaii international conference on systems science (HICSS-46). Hawaii, HI, USA
Abbasi A, Owen C, Hossain L, Hamra J (2013b) Social connectedness and adaptive team coordination during fire events. Fire Saf J 59:30–36
Abbasi A, Wigand R, Hossain L (2014) Measuring social capital through network analysis and Its influence on individual performance. Library Information Sci Res 36(1)
Ahuja G, Polidoro F Jr, Mitchell W (2009) Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strateg Manag J 30(9):941–958
Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Clelland N, Livermore G, Button C (2009) Victorian bushfires royal commission final report: submission on the kilmore east fire. Parliament of Victoria, Government Printer for the State of Victoria
Comfort LK (1999) Shared risk: complex systems in seismic response. Pergamon Press, New York
Comfort LK, Kapucu N (2006) Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: the World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001. Nat Hazards 39(2):309–327
Comfort LK, Dunn M, Johnson D, Skertich R (2004a) Coordination in complex systems: increasing efficiency in disaster mitigation and response. Int J Emerg Manag 2(1):62–80
Comfort LK, Ko K, Zagorecki A (2004b) Coordination in rapidly evolving disaster response systems. Am Behav Sci 48(3):295
Comfort LK, Oh N, Ertan G (2009) The dynamics of disaster recovery: resilience and entropy in hurricane response systems 2005–2008. Public Organ Rev 9(4):309–323
DiPrete TA, Eirich GM (2006) Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: a review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annu Rev Sociol 32:271–297
Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Netw 1(3):215–239
Gulati R (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. Admin Sci Q 40: 619–652
Kapucu N (2005) Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: networks in emergency response management. Connections 26(2):33–48
Kapucu N (2006) Interagency communication networks during emergencies: boundary spanners in multi-agency coordination. Am Rev Public Adm 36(2):207
Kapucu N, Arslan T, Demiroz F (2010) Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Disaster Prev Manag 19(4):452–468
Murphy BL (2007) Locating social capital in resilient community-level emergency management. Nat Hazards 41(2):297–315
Price DS (1976) A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J Am Soc Inf Sci 27(5):292–306
Robinson SE, Eller WS, Gall M, Gerber BJ (2013) The core and periphery of emergency management networks. Public Manag Rev 15(3):344–362
Tompkins EL (2005) Planning for climate change in small islands: insights from national hurricane preparedness in the Cayman Islands. Glob Environ Chang 15(2):139–149
Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Acad Manag J 41(4):464–476
Wang J–J (2013) Post-disaster cross-nation mutual aid in natural hazards: case analysis from sociology of disaster and disaster politics perspectives. Nat Hazards 66(2):413–438
Waugh WL, Streib G (2006) Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Adm Rev Wash DC 66:131
Acknowledgments
The author gratefully appreciates the constructive comments of the anonymous reviewers. The author also thanks Liaquat Hossain and Christine Owen for their supports on the earlier version of this paper (Abbasi et al. 2013a) which has been presented in the 46th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Maui, HI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abbasi, A. Link formation pattern during emergency response network dynamics. Nat Hazards 71, 1957–1969 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0988-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0988-0