Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of inter-organizational coordination in response to extreme events. Extreme events require coordinated action among multiple actors across many jurisdictions under conditions of urgent stress, heavy demand and tight time constraints. The problem is socio-technical in that the capacity for inter-organizational coordination depends upon the technical structure and performance of the information systems that support decision making among the participating organizations. Interactions among human managers, computers and organizations under suddenly altered conditions of operation are complex and not well understood. Yet, coordinating response operations to extreme events is an extraordinarily complex task for public and nonprofit managers. This paper will analyze the interactions among public, private and nonprofit organizations that evolved in response to the 11 September 2001 attacks, examining the relationships among organizations in terms of timely access to information and types of supporting infrastructure.
The performance of the inter-organizational system is examined in the context of the events of 11 September 2001 from the theoretical perspective of complex adaptive systems. A model of auto-adaptation is proposed for implementation to improve inter- organizational performance in extreme events. This model is based on the concept of individual, organizational and collective learning in environments exposed to recurring risk, guided by a shared goal. Such a model requires public investment in the development of an information infrastructure that can support the intense demand for communication, information search, exchange and feedback that characterizes an auto-adaptive system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris C (1993), Knowledge for action: a guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Axelrod R, Cohen MD (1999) Harnessing complexity: organizational implications of a scientific frontier. The Free Press, New York
P Bak K Chen (1991) ArticleTitleSelf-organized criticality Scientific Am 264 46–53 Occurrence Handle10.1038/scientificamerican0191-46
Berger RA (1983) Building community partnerships: vision, cooperation, leadership. National Civic Rev, May, 249–255
Carley KM, Harrald JR (1997) Organizational learning under fire: theory and practice, Am Behav Scientist 40(3) (January):310–332
Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin Sci Quart 35:128–152
Comfort L (2002a) Governance under fire: organizational fragility in complex systems, Governance and Public Security. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, pp 113–127
Comfort L (2002b) Rethinking security: organizational fragility in extreme events, Public Admin Rev 62, Special Issue (September):98–107
Comfort L (1999) Shared risk: complex systems in seismic response. Pergamon Press, New York
Comfort L (1994) Self organization in complex systems. J Public Admin Res Theory 4.3 (July):393–410
Dawes SS, Birkland T, Tayi GK, Scheinder CA (2004) Information technology and coordination: lessons from the world trade center response. Center for Technology and Government, SUNY at Albany, Albany, NY
Feldman M, March JG (1981) Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Admin Sci Quart 26:171–86
FEMA: (2001a) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Situation Reports, 11 September–4 October, 2001
FEMA: (2001b) United States Government Interagency Domestic Terrorism Concept of Operations Plan, February 22, Washington, DC. URL: http://www.fema.gov/rrr/conplan/foreword.shtm
FEMA (2000) Federal response plan. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
Flin R (2001) Decision making in crises: the Piper Alpha disaster, In: Rosenthal U, Boin A, Comfort LK (eds.) Managing crises: threats, dilemmas, opportunities. Charles C. Thomas Publishers, Springfield, IL, pp 103–118
Flin R (1996) Sitting in the hot seat: leaders and teams for critical incident management. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
Gawronski VT, Olson RS (2000) ‘Normal’ versus ‘Special’ time corruption: an exploration of Mexican attitudes, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 14.1 (December):344–361
Gell-Mann M, (1994) Complex Adaptive Systems. In: Cowan, GA, Pines D and Meltzer D (eds.), Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality. Reading, MA, Addision-Wesley Publishing Co. Proceedings Volume XIX, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity, pp. 17–46
Goodman P, Sproull L et al. (1990) Technology and organizations. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
Gray B (1989) Collaborating. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
Hayes-Roth F, Waterman DA, Lenat DB (1983) Building expert systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA
Holland J (1995) Hidden order: how adaptation builds complexity. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA
Kartez JD, Kelly WJ (1988) Research Based Disaster Planning: Conditions for Implementation. In: LK Comfort (eds) Managing disaster: strategies and policy perspectives. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp 126–146
Kauffman SA (1993) The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New York
Kettl D (2003) System under stress: homeland security and American politics. CQ Press, Washington, DC
Klein GA (1993) A recognition primed decision making (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In: Klein G, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok C (eds), Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, pp 138–147
McKinsey & Company Report (2002) Increasing FDNY’s preparedness: fire department of the city of New York. URL: http://www.nyc.gov/html/fdny/html/mck_report/index.html
Mileti D (ed) (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC
New York Times, 12 September–4 October, 2001
Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Plume, New York
Ostrom E (1998) A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Am Political Sci Rev 92(1):1–22
Peitgen H-O, Jürgens H, Saupe D (1992) Chaos and fractals: new frontiers of science. Springer-Verlag, New York
Platt RB et al. (1999) Disasters and democracy. Island Press, Washington, DC
Powell WW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network form of organization. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 12, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 295–336
Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos. Bantam Press, New York
Relyea HC (2004) Homeland security: department organization and management- implementatipn phase, CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress
Ruelle D (1991) Chance and chaos. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA
Sylves RT, Waugh WL Jr (eds) (1996) Disaster management in the U.S. and Canada: the politics, policymaking, administration, and analysis of emergency management, 2nd edn. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Ill
Weick KE (2001) Making sense of the organization. Blackwell Business, Malden, MA
Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Admin Sci Quart 22(3):606–639
Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2001) Managing the unexpected: assuring high performance in an age of complexity. Jossey Bass, San Francisco
Weick KE, Roberts K (1993) Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin Sci Quart 9(38):357–381
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Comfort, L.K., Kapucu, N. Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001. Nat Hazards 39, 309–327 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0030-x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-0030-x