Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simulation of strong ground motion due to great earthquake in the central seismic gap region of Uttarakhand Himalaya

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uttarakhand Himalaya in India lies in the central seismic gap region identified by Khattri and Tyagi (Tectonophysics 96:281–297, 1983). Most of the area in Uttarakhand state has been placed under zone V (the highest seismic zone) and zone IV (second highest seismic zone) of the seismic hazard map published by Bureau of Indian standard, Govt. of India (BIS in Indian standards code of practice for earthquake resistant Design of Structures, Indian Standards Institution, New Delhi, 2002). Some of the thrust/faults in the region manifest evidence of neotectonics and recurrent seismicity (Valdiya and Pant in Indian Nat Sci Acad 112–117, 1986; Valdiya in Geodynamics of NW Himalaya Gondwana Research Group Memoir 1999; Thakur in Curr Sci 86(II):1544–1560, 2004; Paul et al. in Seismotectonic implications of data recorded by DTSN in the Kumaon region of Himalaya 2004). On the basis of strain accumulation, Bilham et al. (Science 293:1442–1444, 2001) suggested a future magnitude of M ≥ 8 in this region. Therefore, a great earthquake along main central thrust in the central seismic gap region has been modeled using semi-empirical technique of Joshi and Mohan (J Seismol 12:35–51, 2008). For modeling great earthquake, the shear wave quality factor \( Q_{\beta } \left( f \right) = 30f^{1.45} \) (Joshi et al. in J Earthq Technol 47(1):508, 2010) has been used for Pithoragarh region of Kumaon Himalaya. The strong-motion parameters [peak ground acceleration (PGA), spectral acceleration, and normalized spectral acceleration] are computed at five stations (Sobla, Didihat, Munsiari, Dharchula, and Pithoragarh) in Uttarakhand Himalaya. The maximum PGA of the order of “2g” is computed due to scenario great earthquake in the region at Sobla station. Such type of study is quite helpful for seismic-resistant designs of the buildings in earthquake-prone areas and is essentially required in Uttarakhand Himalaya.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Litehiser JJ (1989) Attenuation of vertical peak acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:549–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Arya AS (1995) Long term measures for earthquake protection in Uttaranchal area of Uttar Pradesh, India. Mem Geol Soc India 30:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Araya R, Kiureghian AD (1988) Seismic hazard analysis, improved models, uncertainties and sensitivities; report no. EERC-90/11, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, p 155

  • Bardet JP (2004) Preliminary observations of the Niigata-ken Chuetsu, Japan, earthquake of October 23, 2004. A preliminary report for the EERI-GEER earthquake engineering reconnaissance team

  • Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1997) Modelling finite fault radiation from ωn spectrum. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:67–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Gaur VK, Molnar P (2001) Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293:1442–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIS (2002) Indian standards code of practice for earthquake resistant design of structures. Indian Standards Institution, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motion based on seismological models of radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1865–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson CM (1987) Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard rock sites in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:440–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB (1991) Estimation of ground motion at deep soil sites in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:2167–2185

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 76:5002

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune JN (1993) The seismic hazard at Tehri dam. Tectonophysics 218:281–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancani, A. (1904) Sur l’emploi d’une double 0echelle sismique des intensit0es, empirique et absolue. Gerlands Beitr z Geophys 2: 281–283, not seen. Cited in Gutenberg and Richter (1942)

  • GSI (2000) Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs, Geological Survey of India

  • Hadley DM, Helmberger DV (1980) Simulation of strong ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:617–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, McGuire RK (1981) Character of high frequency ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2071–2095

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell SH (1978) Earthquake aftershocks as green functions. Geophys Res Lett 5:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell SH (1982) Simulation of ground accelerations for May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:2381–2387

    Google Scholar 

  • Horike M, Zhao B, Kawase H (2001) Comparison of site response characteristics inferred from microtremors and earthquake shear waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91:1526–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Housner GW (1947) Characteristics of strong-motion earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 37(1):19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Housner GW, Jennings PC (1964) Generation of artificial earthquakes. J Eng Mech Div 90:113–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings L (1985) Modeling earthquakes with empirical green’s functions (abs). Earthq Notes 56:14

    Google Scholar 

  • Irukara K (1983) Semi empirical estimation of strong ground motion during large earthquakes. Bull Disaster Prevent Res Inst 33:63–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Irikura K (1986) Prediction of strong acceleration motion using empirical green’s function, In: Proceedings of 7th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, pp 151–156

  • Irikura K, Kamae K (1994) Estimation of strong ground motion in broad-frequency band based on a seismic source scaling model and an empirical green’s function technique. Ann Geophys 37:1721–1743

    Google Scholar 

  • Irikura K, Muramatu I (1982) Synthesis of strong ground motions from large earthquakes using observed seismograms of small events. In: Proceedings of 3rd Internet Microzonation Conference 1, Seattle, pp 447–458

  • Irikura K, Kagawa T, Sekiguchi H (1997) Revision of the empirical green’s function method. Programme and abstracts of the seismological society of Japan, vol 2, p B25 (in Japanese)

  • Joshi A (2004) A simplified technique for simulating wide band strong ground motion for two recent Himalaya earthquakes. Pure Appl Geophys 161:1777–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Midorikawa S (2005) Attenuation characteristics of ground motion intensity from earthquakes with intermediate depth. J Seismol 9:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Mohan K (2008) Simulation of accelerograms from simplified deterministic approach for Niigata earthquake of 23rd October 2004. J Seismol 12:35–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Patel RC (1997) Modelling of active lineaments for predicting a possible earthquake scenario around Dehradun, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Tectonophysics 283:289–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Mohan Kapil, Patel RC (2007) A deterministic approach for preparation of seismic hazard maps in North East India. Nat Hazards 43:129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Singh S, Kavita G (2001) The simulation of ground motions using envelope summations. Pure Appl Geophys 158:877–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A, Kumar P, Mohanty M, Bansal AR, Dimri VP, Chadha RK (2010) Use of strong motion data for frequency dependent shear wave attenuation studies in the Pithoragarh region of Kumaon Himalaya, ISET. J Earthq Technol 47(1):508

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamae K, Irikura K (1998) Source model of the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake and simulation of near source ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:400–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameda H, Sugito M (1978) Prediction of strong earthquake motions by evolutionary process model, In: Proceedings of 6th Japan earthquake engineering Symposium, pp 41–48

  • Kanamori H (1979) A semi empirical approach to prediction of long period ground motions from great earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69:1645–1670

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:1073–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN, Tyagi AK (1983) Seismicity patterns in the Himalayan plate boundary and identification of areas of high seismic potential. Tectonophysics 96:281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai SP (1982) Statistical characterization of strong ground motions using power spectral density function. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:259–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee WHK, Stewart SW (1981) Principles and applications of microearthquake networks. Academic Press, New York, p 293

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK, Becker AM, Donovan NC (1984) Spectral estimates of seismic shear waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:2167–2185

    Google Scholar 

  • Midorikawa S (1993) Semi empirical estimation of peak ground acceleration from large earthquakes. Tectonophysics 218:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikumo T, Irikura K, Imagawa K (1981) Near field strong motion synthesis from foreshock and aftershock records and rupture process of the main shock fault (abs.). IASPEI 21st General Assembly, London, Canada

  • Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:995–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muguia L, Brune JM (1984) Simulations of strong ground motions for earthquakes in the Mexicali-Imperial valley. Proceedings of workshop on strong ground motion simulation and earthquake engineering applications Pub. 85-02 Earthq Eng Res Inst, Los Altos, California, 21-1-21-19

  • Nakamura Y (1988) Inference of seismic response of surficial layer based on microtremor measurement, Quaterly report on railroad research 4, Railway Technical Railway Institute, 18–27 (in Japanese)

  • Parvez IA, Vaccari F, Panza GF (2003) A deterministic seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas. Geophys J Int 155:489–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul A, Gupta SC, Pant CC (2003) Coda Q estimates for Kumaon Himalaya. J Earth Planet Sci 112:569–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul A, Wason HR, Sharma ML, Pant CC, Nirwan A, Tripathi HB (2004) Seismotectonic implications of data recorded by DTSN in the Kumaon region of Himalaya, Geol Surv India, Spl. Publ., no 85:89–93

  • Saikia CK (1993) Ground motion studies in great Los Angles due to Mw = 7.0 earthquake on the Elysian thrust fault. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83:780–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Saikia CK, Herrmann RB (1985) Application of waveform modelling to determine focal mechanisms of four 1982 Miramichi aftershocks. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:1021–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato R (1989) Handbook of fault parameters of Japanese earthquakes Kajima, Tokyo, pp 390 (in Japanese)

  • Shinozuka M, Sato Y (1967) Simulation of nonstationary random process. J Eng Mech 93(EM1):11–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo K, Samano T (1993) Use of microtremor for prediction of seismic motion, Report of General Research (A) under contract with the ministry of education. pp 198–200 (in Japanese)

  • Somerville P, Irikura K, Graves R, Sawada S, Wald D, Abrahamson N, Iwasaki Y, Kagawa T, Smith N, Kowada A (1999) Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the prediction of strong ground motion. Seismol Res Lett 70:59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur VC (2004) Active tectonics of Himalayan frontal thrust and seismic hazard to Ganga plains. Curr Sci 86(II):1544–1560

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya KS (1999) Fast uplift and geomorphic development of the western Himalaya in quaternary period. In: Jain AK, Manickavasagam (eds) Geodynamics of NW Himalaya Gondwana Research Group Memoir, pp 179–187

  • Valdiya KS, Pant CC (1986) Neotectonic movements: Geological evidence, Indian Nat Sci Acad New Delhi, pp 112–117

  • Yu G (1994) Some aspects of earthquake seismology: slip portioning along major convergent plate boundaries: composite source model for estimation of strong motion and non linear soil response modeling. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nevada

  • Yu G, Khattri KN, Anderson JG, Brune JN, Zeng Y (1995) Strong ground motion from the Uttarkashi earthquake, Himalaya, India, earthquake: comparison of observations with synthetics using the composite source model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Anderson JG, Su F (1994) A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions. Geophys Res Lett 21:725–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Dr. B.K. Rastogi, Director General, Institute of Seismological Research, Raisan, Gandhinagar for his permission to publish this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Seismological Research, Raisan, Gandhinagar, 382009, Gujarat, India

    Kapil Mohan

  2. Department of Earth Science, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

    A. Joshi

Authors
  1. Kapil Mohan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kapil Mohan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohan, K., Joshi, A. Simulation of strong ground motion due to great earthquake in the central seismic gap region of Uttarakhand Himalaya. Nat Hazards 69, 1733–1749 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0773-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0773-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation