Skip to main content
Log in

Development of eastern cottonwood cuttings as modified by cutting length and surface area available for rooting

  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh.) is commonly propagated using un-rooted cuttings. While cutting length and diameter, genetics and environmental conditions are often cited as major factors contributing to the successful establishment of cottonwood plantations, it is difficult to determine which specific cutting characteristic or mechanism leads to improved root establishment or plant development. For example, increasing stem size can affect rooting and subsequent plant growth by altering the cutting energy reserves as well as the surface area from which latent roots develop. In this study, the contribution of cutting length and belowground surface area to rooting and early growth was examined for eastern cottonwood. To discern cutting length effects, the belowground portion of four different cutting lengths was restricted so each cutting had the same belowground surface area available for rooting. To discern surface area effects, 40-cm-long cuttings were restricted to produce four different levels of surface area from which roots could develop. Leaf area, stem height, aboveground and belowground biomass, and root numbers were measured after 13 weeks of growth. The only statistically significant relationships related to biomass were due to the initial differences in cutting length. Cuttings with greater surface areas formed more lateral roots, while longer cuttings did not. By contrast, increased cutting lengths resulted in greater numbers of basal roots, but not for cuttings with greater belowground surface areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Block RMA, Van Rees KCJ, Knight JD (2006) A review of fine root dynamics in Populus plantations. Agrofor Syst 67(1):73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadfoot WM, Bonner FT (1966) Soil compaction slows early growth of planted cottonwood. Tree Planters’ Notes 79:1–2

  • Carpenter LT, Pezeshki SR, Shields FD (2008) Responses of nonstructural carbohydrates to shoot removal and soil moisture treatments in Salix nigra. Trees 22:737–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler JW, Thielges BA (1973) Chilling and photoperiod affect dormancy of cottonwood cuttings. In: 12th southern forest tree improvement conference, Baton Rouge, LA, pp 200–205, 12–13 June 1973

  • De Klerk GJ, Van Der Krieken W, De Jong JC (1999) Review the formation of adventitious roots: new concepts, new possibilities. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 35:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesRochers A, Lieffers VJ (2001) Root biomass of regenerating aspen (Populus tremuloides) stands of different densities in Alberta. Can J For Res 31:1012–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesRochers A, Thomas BR (2003) A comparison of pre-planting treatments on hardwood cuttings of four hybrid poplar clones. New Forest 26:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DesRochers A, Landhäusser SM, Lieffers VJ (2002) Coarse and fine root respiration in aspen (Populus tremuloides). Tree Physiol 22:725–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DesRochers A, Thomas BR, Butson R (2004) Reclamation of roads and landings with balsam poplar cuttings. For Ecol Manage 199:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickmann D, Phipps H, Netzer D (1980) Cutting diameter influences early survival and growth of several Populus clones. St Paul (MN): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, Research Note NC-261, p 4

  • Fege AS, Brown GN (1984) Carbohydrate distribution in dormant Populus shoots and hardwood cuttings. For Sci 30(4):999–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez M, Tejero JR, Perez I, Soria F, Ruiz F, Lopez G (2007) Effect of copper coating nursery containers on plant growth and root morphology of Eucalyptus globulus L. cuttings and seedlings. Silva Lusit 15(2):215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen EA, Tolsted DN (1981) Effect of cutting diameter and stem or branch position on establishment of a difficult-to-root Populus alba hybrid. Can J For Res 11:723–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies FT, Geneve RL (2002) Plant propagation principles and practices, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp 367–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman PE, Ekuan G, Fogle DB (1994) First-order root development from cuttings of Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoides hybrids. Tree Physiol 14:911–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jasik J, De Klerk GJ (1997) Anatomical and ultrastructural examination of adventitious root formation in stem slices of apple. Biol Plant 39(1):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarek DJ, Rousseau RJ, Wright JA, Wachelka BC (2014) The influence of alternative plant propagation and stand establishment techniques on survival and growth of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) clones. New For 45:487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaps M, Lamberson WR (2009) Biostatistics for animal science, 2nd edn. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA

  • Kennedy HE (1977) Planting depth and source affect survival of planted green ash cuttings. New Orleans (LA): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. Forest Service Research Note SO-224, p 3

  • Landhausser SM (2003) Effect of soil temperature on rooting and early establishment of balsam poplar cuttings. Tree Planters’ Notes 50 (1): 34–37

  • Luxova M, Lux A (1981) The course of root differentiation from root primordial in poplar stems. Biol Plant 23(6):401–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy WP (2011) Initial cottonwood cutting development modified by cutting length and belowground surface area available for rooting. MS Thesis, University of Arkansas-Monticello

  • McKnight JS (1970) Planting cottonwood cuttings for timber production in the South. New Orleans (LA): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. Forest Service Research Paper SO 60, p 17

  • Mohn CA, Randall WK, McKnight JS (1970) Fourteen cottonwood clones selected for Midsouth timber production. Southern forest experiment station, Stoneville, MS, p 18. USDA Forest Service Research Paper SO-62

  • Nelson LE, Switzer GL, Lockaby BG (1987) Nutrition of Populus deltoides plantations during maximum production. For Ecol Manage 20(1–2):25–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanisamy K, Kumar P (1997) Effect of position, size of cutting and environmental factors on adventitious rooting in neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss). For Ecol Manage 98:277–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pallardy SG, Gibbins DE, Rhoads JL (2003) Biomass production by two-year-old poplar clones on floodplain sites in the Lower Midwest, USA. Agrofor Syst 59:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pijut PM, Woeste KE, Michler CH (2011) Promotion of adventitious root formation of difficult-to-root hardwood tree species. In: Niemi K, Scagel C (eds), Adventitious root formation of forest trees and horticultural plants- from genes to applications. Horticultural Reviews 38: 213–251

  • Puri S, Thompson FB (2003) Effect of soil and plant water relations on rooting of Populus x euramericana stem cuttings. New For 25:109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall WK, Krinard RM (1977) First-year growth and survival of long cottonwood cuttings. New Orleans (LA): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. Forest Service Research Note SO-222, p 3

  • Richardson SG, Barker JR, Crofts KA, van Epps GA (1979) Factors affecting rooting of stem cuttings of salt desert shrubs. J Range Manage 32:280–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemenschneider DE, Bauer EO (1997) Quantitative genetic analysis of adventitious root forming ability in Populus trichocarpa (Torr & Gray). In: Altman A, Waisel Y (eds) Biology of root formation and development. Plenum Press, New York, pp 193–201

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Riemenschneider DE, Stanton BJ, Vallee G, Perinet P (2001) Poplar breeding strategies. In: Dickmann DI, Isebrands JG, Eckenwalder JE, Richardson J (eds) Poplar culture in North America. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, pp 43–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison TL, Rousseau RJ, Zhang J (2006) Biomass productivity improvement for eastern cottonwood. Biomass Bioenergy 30:735–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder WR, Walker DS (1991) Effect of cutting position on rooting and shoot growth of two poplar clones. New For 4:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith NG, Wareing PF (1974) The distribution of latent root primordia in stems of Populus × robusta, and factors affecting the emergence of preformed roots from cuttings. Forestry 45(2):197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuhlinger HC, Toliver JR (1985) Variation in rooting among selected clones of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr. ex Marsh) in southern Louisiana. Tree Planter’s Notes 36(2):13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley DJ (2006) Pre-soaking dormant willow and cottonwood cuttings. Aberdeen (ID): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Plant Materials Center. 6429, p 11

  • Tilley DJ, Hoag JC (2008) Riparian/wetland project information series No. 24: effects of pre-plant soaking treatments on hardwood cuttings of peachleaf willow. Aberdeen (ID): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Plant Materials Center 7668, p 7

  • U.S. Department of Energy (2011) U.S. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry. R.D. Perlack and B.J. Stokes (Leads), ORNL/TM-2011/224. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. p 227

  • Wiese AH, Zalesny JA, Donner DM, Zalesny RS Jr (2006) Bud removal affects shoot, root, and callus development of hardwood Populus cuttings. Silvae Genet 55:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalesny RS Jr, Zalesny JA (2009) Selecting Populus with different adventitious root types for environmental benefits, fiber, and energy. In: Niemi K, Scagel C, Adventitious root formation of forest trees and horticultural plants- from genes to applications, Research Signpost, Kerala, pp 359–384

  • Zalesny RS, Wiese AH (2006) Date of shoot collection, genotype, and original shoot position affect early rooting of dormant hardwood cuttings of Populus. Silvae Genet 55:169–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalesny RS, Hall RB, Bauer EO, Riemenschneider DE (2003) Shoot position affects initiation and growth of dormant unrooted cuttings of Populus. Silvae Genet 52:273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalesny RS Jr, Bauer EO, Riemenschneider DE (2004) Use of belowground growing degree days to predict rooting of dormant hardwood cuttings of Populus. Silvae Genet 53:154–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalesny RS Jr, Riemenschneider DE, Hall RB (2005) Early rooting of dormant hardwood cuttings of Populus: analysis of quantitative genetics and genotype × environmental interactions. Can J For Res 35(4):918–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the US Department of Energy MidSouth/Southeast Bioenergy Consortium for the funding for this project. We thank Jonathan Hartley and Ben Christiansen for their assistance throughout this project. This research was conducted while the corresponding author was at the University of Arkansas-Monticello.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamie L. Schuler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schuler, J.L., McCarthy, W. Development of eastern cottonwood cuttings as modified by cutting length and surface area available for rooting. New Forests 46, 547–559 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9482-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9482-8

Keywords

Navigation