Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phytoglycogen-dsRNA nanoparticles demonstrate differential cytotoxicity and immunostimulatory potential in two ovarian cancer cell lines

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality in women, and novel treatments with improved efficacy are needed to fight ovarian cancer. Double-stranded (ds) RNA, including the synthetic polyinosinic cytidylic acid (poly (I:C), has shown promise as a cancer therapeutic. Phytoglycogen derived from sweet corn, nanodendrix (NDX) is a carrier for dsRNA. The responsiveness to NDX-delivered poly (I:C), NDX-poly (I:C), was tested in two ovarian cancer cell lines, SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3, previously identified as dsRNA-resistant and dsRNA-sensitive, respectively. NDX bound poly (I:C) at a w/w ratio of 2:1 NDX:poly (I:C) and poly (I:C)-NDX was tested for biological activity through uptake and two therapeutic modes of action, cytotoxicity, and immune stimulation. Immunocytochemistry demonstrated both cells bound to poly (I:C)-NDX. In OVCAR-3, poly (I:C)-NDX caused significant cell death, even at concentrations as low as 62.5 ng/mL; no cell death was observed with poly (I:C) alone at concentrations up to 5 μg/mL in SKOV-3 and 0.5 μg/mL in OVCAR-3. In both cell lines poly (I:C)-NDX stimulated the production of CXCL10 protein and transcripts, an innate immune chemokine, and at significantly higher levels than poly (I:C) alone. Interestingly, in response to poly (I:C)-NDX SKOV-3 produced a more robust immune response and higher levels of capase-3/-7 activation compared to OVCAR-3, despite showing no significant cell death. Poly (I:C)-NDX represents a robust and multifunctional therapy, potentiating poly (I:C) and sensitizing resistant cells. Additionally, the SKOV-3 and OVCAR-3 combination represents a powerful comparative model to help unravel dsRNA-mediated immune responses in ovarian cancer cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Coburn SB, Bray F, Sherman ME, Trabert B (2017) International patterns and trends in ovarian cancer incidence, overall and by histologic subtype. Int J Cancer 140(11):2451–2460. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandra A, Pius C, Nabeel M, Nair M, Vishwanatha JK, Ahmad S, Basha R (2019) Ovarian cancer: current status and strategies for improving therapeutic outcomes. Cancer Med 8(16):7018–7031. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bast RC, Hennessy B, Mills GB (2009) The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation. Nat Rev Cancer 9(6):415–428. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lengyel E (2010) Ovarian cancer development and metastasis. Am J Pathol 177(3):1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.100105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salaun B, Coste I, Rissoan MC, Lebecque SJ, Renno T (2006) TLR3 can directly trigger apoptosis in human cancer cells. J Immunol 176(8):4894–4901. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.176.8.4894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van DN, Roberts CF, Marion JD, Lépine S, Harikumar KB, Schreiter J, Dumur CI, Fang Z, Spiegel S, Bell JK (2012) Innate immune agonist, dsRNA, induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells and enhances the potency of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. FASEB J 26(8):3188–3198. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.11-202333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bianchi F, Pretto S, Tagliabue E, Balsari A, Sfondrini L (2017) Exploiting poly (I: C) to induce cancer cell apoptosis. Cancer Biol Ther 18(10):747–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2017.1373220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ammi R, De Waele J, Willemen Y, Van Brussel I, Schrijvers DM, Lion E, Smits EL (2015) Poly (I: C) as cancer vaccine adjuvant: knocking on the door of medical breakthroughs. Pharmacol Ther 146:120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.09.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Palchetti S, Starace D, De Cesaris P, Filippini A, Ziparo E, Riccioli A (2015) Transfected poly (I: C) activates different dsRNA receptors, leading to apoptosis or immunoadjuvant response in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. J Biol Chem 290(9):5470–5483. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.601625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen TA, Smith BR, Tate MD, Belz GT, Barrios MH, Elgass KD, Weisman AS, Baker PJ, Preston SP, Whitehead L, Garnham A (2017) SIDT2 transports extracellular dsRNA into the cytoplasm for innate immune recognition. Immunity. 47(3):498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.08.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DeWitte-Orr SJ, Collins SE, Bauer CM, Bowdish DM, Mossman KL (2010) An accessory to the ‘Trinity’: SR-As are essential pathogen sensors of extracellular dsRNA, mediating entry and leading to subsequent type I IFN responses. PLoS Pathog 6(3):e1000829. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hasselmann DO, Rappl G, Tilgen W, Reinhold U (2001) Extracellular tyrosinase mRNA within apoptotic bodies is protected from degradation in human serum. Clin Chem 47(8):1488–1489. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/47.8.1488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ultimo A, Giménez C, Bartovsky P, Aznar E, Sancenón F, Marcos MD, Amoros P, Bernardo AR, Martinez-Manez R, Jimenez-Lara AM, Murguia JR (2016) Targeting innate immunity with dsRNA-conjugated mesoporous silica nanoparticles promotes antitumor effects on breast cancer cells. Chemistry 22(5):1582–1586. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201504629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Elhaj Baddar Z, Gurusamy D, Laisney J, Tripathi P, Palli SR, Unrine JM (2020) Polymer-coated hydroxyapatite nanocarrier for double-stranded RNA delivery. J Agric Food Chem 68(25):6811–6818. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Qu J, Hou Z, Han Q, Zhang C, Tian Z, Zhang J (2013) Poly (I:C) exhibits an anti-cancer effect in human gastric adenocarcinoma cells which is dependent on RLRs. Int Immunopharmacol 17(3):814–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2013.08.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Massich MD, Giljohann DA, Schmucker AL, Patel PC, Mirkin CA (2010) Cellular response of polyvalent oligonucleotide− gold nanoparticle conjugates. ACS Nano 4(10):5641–5646. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn102228s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Komal A, Noreen M, El-Kott AF (2021) TLR3 agonists: RGC100, ARNAX, and poly-IC: A comparative review. Immunol Res 69(4):312–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-021-09203-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Le Naour J, Galluzzi L, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, Vacchelli E (2020) Trial watch: TLR3 agonists in cancer therapy. Oncoimmunol 9(1):1771143. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1771143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deci MB, Liu M, Dinh QT, Nguyen J (2018) Precision engineering of targeted nanocarriers. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 10(5):e1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nickels JD, Atkinson J, Papp-Szabo E, Stanley C, Diallo SO, Perticaroli S, Baylis B, Mahon P, Ehlers G, Katsaras J, Dutcher JR (2016) Structure and hydration of highly-branched, monodisperse phytoglycogen nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 17(3):735–743. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewinski N, Colvin V, Drezek R (2008) Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small 4(1):26–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200700595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Alkie TN, de Jong J, Jenik K, Klinger KM, DeWitte-Orr SJ (2019) Enhancing innate antiviral immune responses in rainbow trout by double-stranded RNA delivered with cationic phytoglycogen nanoparticles. Sci Rep 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49931-2

  23. Semple SL, Alkie TN, Jenik K, Warner BM, Tailor N, Kobasa D, DeWitte-Orr SJ (2022) More tools for our toolkit: the application of HEL-299 cells and dsRNA-nanoparticles to study human coronaviruses in vitro. Virus Res 321:198925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2022.198925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. NCBI. Poly I:C. National Library of Medicine. n.d. (accessed 2022-07-19)

  25. Besford QA, Cavalieri F, Caruso F (2019) Glycogen as a building block for advanced biological materials. Adv Mater 32(18). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.119041

  26. Lu C, Li Z, Chang L, Dong Z, Guo P, Shen G, Xia Q, Zhao P (2019) Efficient delivery of dsRNA and DNA in cultured silkworm cells for gene function analysis using PAMAM dendrimers system. Insects 11(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11010012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khodadust R, Mutlu P, Yalcın S, Unsoy G, Gunduz U (2013) Polyinosinic: polycytidylic acid loading onto different generations of PAMAM dendrimer-coated magnetic nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 15(8):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1860-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao J, Zhang Z, Xue Y, Wang G, Cheng Y, Pan Y, Zhao S, Hou Y (2018) Anti-tumor macrophages activated by ferumoxytol combined or surface-functionalized with the TLR3 agonist poly (I: C) promote melanoma regression. Theranostics 8(22):6307. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.29746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nguyen TA, Whitehead L, Pang KC (2018) Quantification of extracellular double-stranded RNA uptake and subcellular localization using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Bio Protoc 8(12). https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.2890

  30. Karin N, Razon H (2018) Chemokines beyond chemo-attraction: CXCL10 and its significant role in cancer and autoimmunity. Cytokine 109:24–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2018.02.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wendel M, Galani IE, Suri-Payer E, Cerwenka A (2008) Natural killer cell accumulation in tumors is dependent on IFN-gamma and CXCR3 ligands. Cancer Res 68(20):8437–8445. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu M, Guo S, Stiles JK (2011) The emerging role of CXCL10 in cancer. Oncol Lett 2(4):583–589. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sui Y, Potula R, Dhillon N, Pinson D, Li S, Nath A, Anderson C, Turchan J, Kolson D, Narayan O, Buch S (2004) Neuronal apoptosis is mediated by CXCL10 overexpression in simian human immunodeficiency virus encephalitis. Am J Pathol 164(5):1557–1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63714-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kübler K, Tho Pesch C, Gehrke N, Riemann S, Daßler J, Coch C, Landsberg J, Wimmenauer V, Pölcher M, Rudlowski C, Tüting T (2011) Immunogenic cell death of human ovarian cancer cells induced by cytosolic poly (I: C) leads to myeloid cell maturation and activates NK cells. E J Immuno l41(10):3028–3039. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201141555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Riss TL, O’Brien MA, Moravec RA, Kupcho K, Niles AL (2021) Apoptosis marker assays for HTS. In: Assay guidance manual. National Center for Biotechnology Information

  36. Kavanagh E, Rodhe J, Burguillos MA, Venero JL, Joseph B (2014) Regulation of caspase-3 processing by cIAP2 controls the switch between pro-inflammatory activation and cell death in microglia. Cell Death Dis 5(12):e1565-e. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2014.514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Deveraux QL, Roy N, Stennicke HR, Van Arsdale T, Zhou Q, Srinivasula SM, Alnemri ES, Salvesen GS, Reed JC (1998) IAPs block apoptotic events induced by caspase-8 and cytochrome c by direct inhibition of distinct caspases. EMBO J 17:2215–2223. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.8.2215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang HK, Joazeiro CA, Bonfoco E, Kamada S, Leverson JD, Hunter T (2000) The inhibitor of apoptosis, cIAP2, functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase and promotes in vitro monoubiquitination of caspases 3 and 7. J Biol Chem 275(35):26661–26664. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C000199200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun X, Liu H (2020) Nucleic acid nanostructure assisted immune modulation. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3(5):2765–2778. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b01195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Boyd MR, Paull KD (1995) Some practical considerations and applications of the National Cancer Institute in vitro anticancer drug discovery screen. Drug Dev Res 34:91–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.430340203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Poynter SJ, DeWitte-Orr SJ (2017) Visualizing virus-derived dsRNA using antibody-independent and-dependent methods. In: Innate Antiviral Immunity 103-118. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7237-1_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jondavid de Jong for his mentorship and guidance.

Funding

This research was supported by the Wilfrid Laurier University (SP and SDO) and an NSERSC CRD (SDO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Aaron Lewis completed experiments for Figs. 1, 3, and 4 and assisted in manuscript preparation. Andy Tran contributed to experiments for Fig. 2. Natalie Aldor contributed to experiments for Figs. 4 and 5 and assisted in manuscript preparation. Nicholas Jadaa contributed to experiments for Fig. 5. Tina Feng and Emily Moore synthesized the nanoparticle starting material. Stephanie DeWitte-Orr and Sarah Poynter developed the concept, designed experiments, and assisted in manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Poynter.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval was obtained from Wilfrid Laurier University for use of human cell lines (REB 6993)

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. EM and TF were paid employees of Mirexus Biotechnologies Inc. at the time of nanoparticle synthesis but were not involved in any tests using the nanoparticle in vitro. SP is a previous employee of Mirexus Biotechnologies Inc. but no longer has any financial connection to the company. SDO is an unpaid member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Mirexus Biotechnologies Inc. Authors AL, AT, NA, and NJ have no affiliation with Mirexus Biotechnologies Inc. As such all authors declare no competing financial or non-financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewis, A., Tran, A., Aldor, N.L. et al. Phytoglycogen-dsRNA nanoparticles demonstrate differential cytotoxicity and immunostimulatory potential in two ovarian cancer cell lines. J Nanopart Res 25, 104 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-023-05758-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-023-05758-7

Keywords

Navigation