Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Electrochemical water splitting using nano-zeolite Y supported tungsten oxide electrocatalysts

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nanoparticle Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zeolites are often used as supports for metals and metal oxides because of their well-defined microporous structure and high surface area. In this study, nano-zeolite Y (50–150 nm range) and micro-zeolite Y (500–800 nm range) were loaded with WO3, by impregnating the zeolite support with ammonium metatungstate and thermally decomposing the salt thereafter. Two different loadings of WO3 were studied, 3 wt.% and 5 wt.% with respect to the overall catalyst. The prepared catalysts were characterized for their morphology, structure, and surface areas through scanning electron microscope (SEM), XRD, and BET. They were further compared for their electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in 0.5 M H2SO4. On comparing the bare micro-zeolite particles with the nano-form, the nano-zeolite Y showed higher currents with comparable overpotentials and lower Tafel slope of 62.36 mV/dec. WO3 loading brought about a change in the electrocatalytic properties of the catalyst. The overpotentials and Tafel slopes were observed to decrease with zeolite-3 wt.% WO3. The smallest overpotential of 60 mV and Tafel slope of 31.9 mV/dec was registered for nano-zeolite with 3 wt.% WO3, while the micro-zeolite gave an overpotential of 370 mV and a Tafel slope of 98.1 mV/dec. It was concluded that even with the same metal oxide loading, nano-zeolite showed superior performance, which is attributed to its size and hence easier escape of hydrogen bubbles from the catalyst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anis, S. F., & Hashaikeh, R. (2016). Electrospun zeolite-Y fibers: fabrication and morphology analysis. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 233(Supplement C), 78-86

  • Anis SF, Khalil A, Singaravel G, Hashaikeh R (2016) A review on the fabrication of zeolite and mesoporous inorganic nanofibers formation for catalytic applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 236:176–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anis SF, Lalia BS, Mostafa AO, Hashaikeh R (2017a) Electrospun nickel–tungsten oxide composite fibers as active electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Sci 52(12):7269–7281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0964-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anis SF, Lalia BS, Palmisano G, Hashaikeh R (2018) Photoelectrochemical activity of electrospun WO3/NiWO4 nanofibers under visible light irradiation. J Mater Sci 53(3):2208–2220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anis SF, Singaravel G, Hashaikeh R (2017b) Electropsun Ni-W/zeolite composite fibers for n-heptane hydrocracking and hydroisomerization. Mater Chem Phys 200:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chekin F, Bagherib S, Hamidb SBA (2013) Synthesis of tungsten oxide nanorods by the controlling precipitation reaction: application for hydrogen evolution reaction on a WO3 nanorods/carbon nanotubes composite film modified electrode. J Chin Chem Soc 60:447–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Reinhard M (2006) Sorption of trichloroethylene in hydrophobic micropores of dealuminated Y zeolites and natural minerals. Environ Sci Technol 40(24):7694–7701. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060886s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chica A (2013) Zeolites: promised materials for the sustainable production of hydrogen. ISRN Chem Eng 2013(19):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/907425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruciani G (2006) Zeolites upon heating: factors governing their thermal stability and structural changes. J Phys Chem Solids 67(9–10):1973–1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.05.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey N, Labhsetwar NK, Devotta S, Rayalu SS (2007) Hydrogen evolution by water splitting using novel composite zeolite-based photocatalyst. Catal Today 129(3):428–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox MA, Pettit TL (1989) Photoactivity of zeolite-supported cadmium sulfide: hydrogen evolution in the presence of sacrificial donors. Langmuir 5(4):1056–1061. https://doi.org/10.1021/la00088a032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García EJ, Pérez-Pellitero J, Pirngruber GD, Jallut C, Palomino M, Rey F, Valencia S (2014) Tuning the adsorption properties of zeolites as adsorbents for CO2 separation: best compromise between the working capacity and selectivity. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(23):9860–9874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong M, Zhou W, Tsai M-C, Zhou J, Guan M, Lin M-C et al (2014) Nanoscale nickel oxide/nickel heterostructures for active hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis. Nat Commun 5:4695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen NK, Rufford TE, Watson G, Zhang DK, Chan KI, May EF (2011) Screening zeolites for gas separation applications involving methane, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide. J Chem Eng Data 57(1):106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadyk, T., Bruce, D., & Eikerling, M. (2016). How to enhance gas removal from porous electrodes?, 6, 38780. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38780

  • Lalia BS, Ahmed FE, Shah T, Hilal N, Hashaikeh R (2015a) Electrically conductive membranes based on carbon nanostructures for self-cleaning of biofouling. Desalination 360:8–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalia BS, Khalil A, Shah T, Hashaikeh R (2015b) Flexible carbon nanostructures with electrospun nickel oxide as a lithium-ion battery anode. Ionics 21(10):2755–2762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-015-1482-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalia BS, Shah T, Hashaikeh R (2015c) Microbundles of carbon nanostructures as binder free highly conductive matrix for LiFePO4 battery cathode. J Power Sources 278:314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M (2007) Peak oil, the rise of China and India, and the global energy crisis. J Contemp Asia 37(4):449–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YH, Liu PF, Pan LF, Wang HF, Yang ZZ, Zheng LR et al (2015) Local atomic structure modulations activate metal oxide as electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution in acidic water. Nat Commun 6(6):8064. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Liu M, Pan Y, Zhang J (2017) Porous Co–Mo phosphide nanotubes: an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. J Mater Sci 52(17):10406–10417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Jiang G, Liu Y, Di J, Wang Y, Zhao Z et al (2014) Hierarchical macro-meso-microporous ZSM-5 zeolite hollow fibers with highly efficient catalytic cracking capability. Sci Rep 4

  • Luo Z, Miao R, Huan TD, Mosa IM, Poyraz AS, Zhong W et al (2016) Mesoporous MoO3–x material as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reactions. Adv Energy Mater 6(16)

  • Meng Z-D, Zhu L, Choi J-G, Park C-Y, Oh W-C (2011) Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic behavior of WO3-fullerene/TiO2 catalysts under visible light. Nanoscale Res Lett 6(1):459. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276x-6-459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentus S, Mojovic Z, Cvjeticanin N, Tesic Z (2003) Hydrogen evolution on zeolite supported platinum clusters. Fuel Cells 3(1–2):15–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.200320240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentus S, Mojovic Z, Cvjeticanin N, Tesic Z (2004) Electrochemical water splitting on zeolite supported platinum clusters. J New Mater Electrochem Syst 7(3):213–220. https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=212-s212.210-13444267823&origin=inward&txGid=13444267823aad13444267374f13444267871ddc13444240354a13444267847fdbf13444267821e13444267214d13444267828

    Google Scholar 

  • Momirlan M, Birjega R (1997) Structure of zeolites used in hydrogen evolution from water. Int J Hydrog Energy 22(12):1133–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajeswari J, Kishore P, Viswanathan B, Varadarajan T (2007) Facile hydrogen evolution reaction on WO3 nanorods. Nanoscale Res Lett 2(10):496–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-007-9088-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shevade S, Ford RG (2004) Use of synthetic zeolites for arsenate removal from pollutant water. Water Res 38(14):3197–3204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.K. Shah, Basantkumar, H. Liu, C. A. Fleischer, J.J. Sedlak, J.M. Patel, W.P. Burgess, J.M. (2013)

  • Wang N, Sun Q, Bai R, Li X, Guo G, Yu J (2016) In situ confinement of ultrasmall Pd clusters within nanosized silicalite-1 zeolite for highly efficient catalysis of hydrogen generation. J Am Chem Soc 138(24):7484–7487. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b03518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan X, Tian L, Chen X (2015) Crystalline/amorphous Ni/NiO core/shell nanosheets as highly active electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Power Sources 300:336–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue P, Khan F (1991) Methods for increasing photo-assisted production of hydrogen over titanium exchanged zeolites. Int J Hydrog Energy 16(9):609–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Zhu H, Zou M, Liu X, Yang H, Zhang M et al (2017) Design and fabrication of size-controlled Pt–Au bimetallic alloy nanostructure in carbon nanofibers: a bifunctional material for biosensors and the hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Sci 52(13):8207–8218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Zeng K (2012) Evaluating the behavior of electrolytic gas bubbles and their effect on the cell voltage in alkaline water electrolysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(42):13825–13832. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie301029e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Mathe M (2011) Hydrogen evolution reaction on single crystal WO 3/C nanoparticles supported on carbon in acid and alkaline solution. Int J Hydrog Energy 36(3):1960–1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuman B (2017) Thesis: the use of carbon nanostructures as a binding material for zeolite particles and the evaluation of their catalytic performance. (MSc), Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou S, Liu J, Kobayashi H, Chen C, Qiao P, Li R et al (2017) Boosting hydrogen evolution activities by strong interfacial electronic interaction in ZnO@ Bi (NO3) 3 core–shell structures. J Phys Chem C 121(8):4343–4351

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the ADNOC Refining Research Centre (ARRC), Abu Dhabi, for partially funding this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemical Engineering Department, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Masdar Institute, Masdar City, Abu Dhabi, 54224, United Arab Emirates

    Shaheen Fatima Anis & Raed Hashaikeh

Authors
  1. Shaheen Fatima Anis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raed Hashaikeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raed Hashaikeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

(MP4 3378 kb).

(MP4 1346 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anis, S.F., Hashaikeh, R. Electrochemical water splitting using nano-zeolite Y supported tungsten oxide electrocatalysts. J Nanopart Res 20, 47 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4153-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4153-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation