Abstract
The nature of preverbal nominals and their relation to the verb have been the focus of much debate in languages with a productive complex predication process. For Persian, certain analyses have argued that the bare nominals in complex predicate constructions are distinct from bare objects, while others have treated the two types of bare nominals uniformly. This paper argues that the two categories of preverbal nouns cannot receive the same analysis since they display distinct syntactic and semantic behavior: the preverbal nominals, unlike the bare object nouns, cannot be questioned, are modified differently, have different interpretations, give rise to distinct case-assignment contexts, and can co-occur with a non-specific object. The distinct properties of the two nominal categories are captured by positing distinct structural positions for these nouns. Non-specific bare nouns are internal arguments of the thematic verb, while the nominal element of the complex predicate construction is part of the verbal domain with which it combines through a process of conflation, as defined in Hale and Keyser (2002), to form a single predicate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barjasteh, Darab. 1983. Morphology, syntax, and semantics of Persian compound verbs: A lexical approach. PhD diss, University of Illinois.
Bashiri, Iraj. 1981. Persian syntax. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company.
Binnick, Robert I. 1971. Bring and come. Linguistic Inquiry 2 (2): 260–265.
Borer, Hagit. 1994. The projection of arguments. In Occasional papers in linguistics 17, eds. Elena Benedicto and Jeffrey Runner, 19–48. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
Browning, Marguerite, and Ezat Karimi. 1994. Scrambling to object position in Persian. In Studies in scrambling, eds. Norbert Corver and Henk van Riemsdijk, 61–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Culicover, Peter W. 2009. Natural language syntax. London: Oxford University Press.
Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad. 1997. Compound verbs in Persian. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 27 (2): 25–59.
Dayal, Vaneeta. 2003. A semantics for pseudo incorporation. Rutgers University, Manuscript.
Folli, Raffaella, Heidi Harley, and Simin Karimi. 2005. Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates. Lingua 115 (10): 1365–1401.
Ganjavi, Shadi. 2007. Direct objects in Persian. PhD diss, University of Southern California.
Ghomeshi, Jila. 1997. Topics in Persian vps. Lingua 102: 133–167.
Ghomeshi, Jila, and Diane Massam. 1994. Lexical/syntactic relations without projections. Linguistic Analysis 23 (3–4): 175–217.
Goldberg, Adele. 2004. Words by default: The Persian complex predicate construction. In Linguistic mismatches, eds. Elaine Frances and Laura Michaelis. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Haji-Abdolhosseini, Mohammad. 2002. Event types in the generative lexicon: Implications for Persian compound verbs. In Proceedings of nls 2000, Vol. 19. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.
Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1990. On some syntactic rules in the lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Lexicon Project.
Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, eds. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 53–110. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel Jay Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, eds. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 53–110. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi. 1995a. If you have, you can give. In Proceedings of wccfl 15, eds. Brian Agbayani and Sze-Wing Tang. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Harley, Heidi. 1995b. Subjects, events and licensing. PhD diss, MIT.
Harley, Heidi. 1996. Sase bizarre: The Japanese causative and structural case. In Proceedings of the 1995 Canadian linguistics society meeting, ed. P. Koskinen. Toronto: University of Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.
Holmberg, Anders. 1986. Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and english. PhD diss, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2004. The syntax of sentential stress. PhD diss, University of Toronto.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2009. The syntax of sentential stress. London: Oxford University Press.
Karimi, Simin. 1989. Aspects of Persian syntax, specificity, and the theory of grammar. PhD diss, University of Washington.
Karimi, Simin. 1996. Case and specificity: Persian râ revisited. Linguistic Analysis 26: 174–194.
Karimi, Simin. 1997. Persian complex verbs: Idiomatic or compositional. Lexicology 3 (2): 273–318.
Karimi, Simin. 2003. Word order and scrambling. Explaining linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Karimi-Doostan, Gholamhossein. 2008. Separability of Persian complex predicates. Manuscript, University of Kurdistan.
Karimi-Doostan, Mohamad-Reza. 1997. Light verb constructions in Persian. PhD diss, University of Essex.
Khanlari, Parviz. 1986. Tarix-e zæban-e Farsi (a history of the Persian language)—3 volume set. Tehran: Nashr-e Now Publishing Company.
Labelle, Marie. 2000. The Semantic Representation of Denominal Verbs. In Lexical specification and insertion, eds. Martin Everaert, Peter Coopmans, and Jane Grimshaw, 241–268. Amherst: John Benjamins.
Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.
Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.
McCawley, James D. 1968. The role of semantics in grammar. In Universals of linguistic theory, eds. E. Bach and R. Harms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Megerdoomian, Karine. 2001. Event structure and complex predicates in Persian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 46 (1/2): 97–125.
Megerdoomian, Karine. 2002a. Aspect in complex predicates. Talk presented at the Workshop on complex predicates, particles and subevents. Univ. of Konstanz.
Megerdoomian, Karine. 2002b. Beyond words and phrases: A unified theory of predicate composition. PhD diss, University of Southern California.
Megerdoomian, Karine. 2008. Preverbal nominals and telicity in Persian complex predicates. Talk presented at the International conference on complex predicates in Iranian languages. Univ. of Sorbonne.
Megerdoomian, Karine. 2009. Beyond words and phrases: A unified theory of predicate composition. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag.
Mohammad, Jan, and Simin Karimi. 1992. Light verbs are taken over: Complex verbs in Persian. In Proceedings of wecol 5, 195–212.
Moyne, John A. 1970. The structure of verbal constructions in Persian. PhD diss, Harvard University.
Onishi, Masayuki. 2000. Transitivity and valency-changing derivations in motuna. In Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, eds. R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, 115–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pantcheva, Marina. 2009. First phase syntax of Persian complex predicates: Argument structure and telicity. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 2 (1): 53–72.
Samvelian, Pollet. 2001. Le statut syntaxique des objets nus en persan. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris XCVI: 349–388.
Tenny, Carol. 1992. The aspectual interface hypothesis. In Lexical matters, eds. Ivan Sag and Anna Szabolcsi. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. PhD diss, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Travis, Lisa. 1992. Inner tense with nps: The position of number. In 1992 annual conference of the Canadian linguistics association, 329–345. Toronto: University of Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.
Vahedi-Langrudi, Mohammad-Mehdi. 1996. The syntax, semantics and argument structure of complex predicates in modern Farsi. PhD diss, University of Ottawa.
Verkuyl, Henk K. 1993. A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Webelhuth, Gert. 1992. Principles and parameters of syntactic saturation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Megerdoomian, K. The status of the nominal in Persian complex predicates. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 30, 179–216 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9146-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9146-0