Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A feature-theoretic account of tense and aspect in Russian

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper offers an analysis of Tense and Aspect as temporal predicates with complex interpretable content represented as grammatical and abstract semantic features. Building on Klein (1995) and Demirdache and Uribe-Etxebarria (2000), it is proposed that although Tense and Aspect are distinct grammatical categories they both express a relation that can be characterized as (non)-coincidence. Tense expresses (non)-coincidence of the utterance time and the assertion time, while Aspect expresses (non)-coincidence of the assertion time and the situation time. Tense and Aspect are represented by a set of two features: grammatical features [±past] and [±perf], and the abstract feature [±coin]. Thus, they have different grammatical content but the same abstract semantic content. This fine-grained distinction enables us to capture the similarities and differences between the two categories. The interaction between the two types of features together with the syntactic operation of feature agreement accounts for the temporo-aspectual interpretation of verbal morphology, and it also derives the interaction between Tense and Aspect in languages such as Russian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binnick, R. (1991). Time and the verb. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borik, O. (2002). Aspect and reference time. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.

  • Borik, O., González, P., & Verkuyl, H. (2003). Comparing tense systems: The primacy of the Pres/Past opposition. Nordlyd, 31, 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkovsky, V. I., & Kuznecov, P. S. (2004). Istoricheskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka (Historical grammar of the Russian language). Moscow: URSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S., & Timberlake, A. (1985). Tense, aspect, and mood. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammarical categories and the lexicon (pp. 202–258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Ö. (1997). The relation between past time reference and counterfactuality: A new look. In A. Athanasiadou, & R. Dirven (Eds.), On conditionals again (pp. 97–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirdache, H., & Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2000). The primitives of temporal relations. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 157–186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enҫ, M. (1987). Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 633–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enҫ, M. (1996). Tense and modality. In S. Lapin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (pp. 345–358). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. D., & Seely, T. D. (2006). Derivations in minimalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassi Fehri, A. (2004). Temporal/aspectual interaction and variation across Arabic heights. In J. Guéron, & J. LeCarme (Eds.), The syntax of time (pp. 235–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filip, H. (2000). The quantization puzzle. In C. Tenny, & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Events as grammatical objects (pp. 39–96). Stanford, CA: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, J. (1970). A grammar of aspect: Usage and meaning in the Russian verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, S., & Greenberg, G. (1994). The functional structure of Slavic clauses. In J. Toman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (Ann Arbor 1992) (pp. 77–108). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A., & Pianesi, F. (1997). Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givón, T. (1994). Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in Language, 18, 265–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guéron, J. (2000). On the syntactic domains of temporal interpretation. In M. Goene, W. De Mulder, P. Dendale, & Y. D’Hulst (Eds.), Traiani Augusti vestigial pressa sequamur. Studia Linguistica in honorem Lilianae Tasmowski (pp. 411–428). Unipress: Padova, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guéron, J., & Hoekstra, T. (1995). The temporal interpretation of predication. In A. Cardinaletti, & M. T. Guasti (Eds.), Small clauses (Syntax and Semantics 28) (pp. 77–108). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, J. F. (1998). Coding the hypothetical: A comparative typology of Russian and Macedonian conditionals. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K. (1986). Notes on world view and semantic categories: Some Warlpiri examples. In P. Muysken, & H. van Riemskijk (Eds.), Features and projections (pp. 233–254). Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou, S. (2000). The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 231–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1957/1984). Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. In L. R. Waugh, & M. Halle (Eds.), Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981 (pp. 41–58). Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D. (1982). Past tense and the hypothetical: A cross-linguistic study. Studies in Language, 6, 375–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junghanns, U. (1997). On byt’ (and byti). In U. Junghanns, & G. Zybatow (Eds.), Formale Slavistik (Leipzig Schriften zur Kultur-, Literatur,- Sprach- und Ubersetzungswissenschaft, 7) (pp. 251–265). Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, W. (1995). A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language, 71, 669–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events in grammar (pp. 197–235). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.-W. (2005). Time in a language without tense: The case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics, 23, 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, J. D. (2005). Czech: An essential grammar. London: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogihara, T. (2005). Tense and aspect in truth-conditional semantics. Lingua, 117, 392–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paducheva, E. (1995). Taxonomic categories and semantics of aspectual opposition. In P. M. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, J. Higginbotham, & M. Squartini (Eds.), Temporal reference, aspect, and actionality, vol. 1: Semantic and syntactic perspectives (pp. 71–89). Torino, Italy: Rosenbergg and Sellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. (2004a). Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In J. Gueron, & J. LeCarme (Eds.), The syntax of time (pp. 495–538). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. (2004b). The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. Ms., MIT, UMass/Boston.

  • Poletto, C. (1995). Complementizer deletion and verb movement in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 5, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, S., & Press, I. (1999). Ukrainian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, E., & Wiltschko, M. (2005). Anchoring events to utterance time without tense. In J. Alderete, C.-H. Han, & A. Kochetov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 343–351). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, E., & Wiltschko, M. (2007). Alternatives to Tense in Halkomelem and Blackfoot. Paper presented at the 12th Workshop on the Structure of Native American Languages, March 30–April 1, 2007. University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.

  • Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Amsterdam: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, L. (2004). On the cartography on syntactic structures. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 2 (pp. 3–15). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoorlemmer, M. (1995). Participial passive and aspect in Russian. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.

  • Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Rappaport, G. (1991). The aspectual system of Russian. In C. Smith (Ed.), The parameter of aspect (pp. 227–261). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T. (1995). What is the meaning of the present and past tenses? In P. M. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, J. Higginbotham, & M. Squartini (Eds.), Temporal reference, aspect, and actionality, vol, 1: Semantics and syntactic perspectives (pp. 381–396). Torino, Italy: Rosenberg and Sellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, T. (1996). The phrase structure of tense. In J. Rooryck, & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 277–291). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Švedova, N. J. (1980). Russkaja grammatika (Russian grammar). Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, O. E. (2002). A grammar of contemporary Polish. Bloomington, Indiana: Slavica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, M. D. (2004). Time in child Inuktitut. A developmental study of an Eskimo-Aleut language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tynan, J., & Lavín, E. D. (1997). Mood, tense and the interpretation of conditionals. In A. Athanasiadou, & R. Dirven (Eds.), On conditionals again (pp. 115–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schooneveld, C. H. (1951). The aspect system of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian verbum finitum byti. Word, 7, 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. (2005). How (in-)sensitive is tense to aspectual information? In B. Hollebrandse, A. van Hout, & C. Vet (Eds.), Crosslinguistic views on tense, aspect and modality (pp. 145–169). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, V. V. (1947/1971). Russkij jazyk (The Russian language). Moscow: Vysšaja Škola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagona, K. (1990). Times and temporal argument structure. Ms., University of Washington: Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagona, K. (1995). Temporal argument structure: Configurational elements of construal. In P. M. Bertinetto, V. Vianchi, J. Higginbotham, & M. Squartini (Eds.), Temporal reference, aspect, and actionality, vol. 1: Semantic and syntactic perspectives (pp. 397–410). Torino, Italy: Rosenberg and Sellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagona, K. (2003). Tense and anaphora: Is there a tense-specific theory of coreference? In A. Barss (Ed.), Anaphora: A reference guide (pp. 140–171). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaliznjak, A., & Šmelev, A. (1997). Lekcii po russkoj aspektologii (Lectures on Russian aspectology). München: Verlag Otto Sagner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada

    Ilana Mezhevich

Authors
  1. Ilana Mezhevich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilana Mezhevich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mezhevich, I. A feature-theoretic account of tense and aspect in Russian. Nat Language Linguistic Theory 26, 359–401 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9038-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9038-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation