Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Separate and combined applications of nontoxigenic Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus for biocontrol of aflatoxin in peanuts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 2-year study was carried out to determine the effect of applying nontoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus to soil separately and in combination on preharvest aflatoxin contamination of peanuts. A naturally occurring, nontoxigenic strain of A. flavus and a UV-induced mutant of A. parasiticus were applied to peanut soils during the middle of each of two growing seasons using a formulation of conidia-coated hulled barley. In addition to an untreated control, treatments included soil inoculated with nontoxigenic A. flavus only, soil inoculated with nontoxigenic A. parasiticus only, and soil inoculated with a mixture of the two nontoxigenic strains. Plants were exposed to late-season drought conditions that were optimal for aflatoxin contamination. Results from year one showed that significant displacement (70%) of toxigenic A. flavus occurred only in peanuts from plots treated with nontoxigenic A. flavus alone; however, displacement did not result in a statistically significant reduction in the mean aflatoxin concentration in peanuts. In year two, soils were re-inoculated as in year one and all treatments resulted in significant reductions in aflatoxin, averaging 91.6%. Regression analyses showed strong correlations between the presence of nontoxigenic strains in peanuts and aflatoxin reduction. It is concluded that treatment with the nontoxigenic A. flavus strain alone is more effective than the A. parasiticus strain alone and equally as effective as the mixture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CAST (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology). Mycotoxins: Risks in Plant, Animal and Human Systems. Task Force Report No. 139. CAST, Ames, Iowa, 2003

  2. Cole RJ, Sanders TH, Dorner JW, Blankenship PD. Environmental conditions required to induce preharvest aflatoxin contamination of groundnuts: summary of six years’ research. In: Hall SD, editor. Aflatoxin Contamination of Groundnut: Proceedings of the International workshop, 6–9 Oct 1987, ICRISAT Patancheru, India, 1989. p. 279–87

  3. Robens J, Cardwell KF. The costs of mycotoxin management in the United States. In: Abbas HK, editor. Aflatoxin and Food Safety. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2005. p. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorner JW. Biological control of aflatoxin crop contamination. In: Abbas HK, editor. Aflatoxin and Food Safety. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2005. p. 333–52

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dorner JW, Cole RJ, Blankenship PD. Use of a biocompetitive agent to control preharvest aflatoxin in drought stressed peanuts. J Food Prot 1992;55:888–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotty PJ. Influence of field application of an atoxigenic strain of Aspergillus flavus on the populations of A. flavus infecting cotton bolls and on the aflatoxin content of cottonseed. Phytopathology 1994;84:1270–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dorner JW, Cole RJ, Wicklow DT. Aflatoxin reduction in corn through field application of competitive fungi. J Food Prot 1999;62: 650–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horn BW, Dorner JW, Greene RL, Blankenship PD, Cole RJ. Effect of Aspergillus parasiticus soil inoculum on invasion of peanut seeds. Mycopathologia 1994;125:179–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dorner JW, Cole RJ, Blankenship PD. Effect of inoculum rate of biological control agents on preharvest aflatoxin contamination of peanuts. Biol Control 1998;12:171–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dorner JW, Cole RJ. Effect of application of nontoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus on subsequent aflatoxin contamination of peanuts in storage. J Stored Prod Res 2002;38:329–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorner JW, Cole RJ, Connick WJ, Daigle DJ, McGuire MR, Shasha BS. Evaluation of biological control formulations to reduce aflatoxin contamination in peanuts. Biol Control 2003;26:318–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorner JW. Combined effects of biological control formulations, cultivars, and fungicides on preharvest colonization and aflatoxin contamination of peanuts by Aspergillus species. Peanut Sci 2004;31:79–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cole RJ, Hill RA, Blankenship PD, Sanders TH. Color mutants of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus in a study of preharvest invasion of peanuts. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986;52:1128–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Blankenship PD, Cole RJ, Sanders TH, Hill RA. Effect of geocarposphere temperature on pre-harvest colonization of drought-stressed peanuts by Aspergillus flavus and subsequent aflatoxin contamination. Mycopathologia 1984;85:69–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blankenship PD, Sanders TH, Dorner JW, Cole RJ, Mitchell BW. Engineering aspects of aflatoxin research in groundnuts: evolution of an environmental control plot facility. In: Hall SD, editor. Aflatoxin Contamination of Groundnut: Proceedings of the International workshop, 6–9 Oct 1987, ICRISAT Patancheru, India, 1989. p. 269–78

  16. Cole RJ, Sanders TH, Hill RA, Blankenship PD. Mean geocarposphere temperatures that induce preharvest aflatoxin contamination of peanuts under drought stress. Mycopathologia 1985;91:41–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peanut Production Field Guide. Univ. of Georgia Coop. Ext. Serv., Bull. No. 1146, 1997

  18. Dorner JW. Simultaneous quantitation of Aspergillus flavus/A. parasiticus and aflatoxin in peanuts. J AOAC Int 2002;85:911–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Horn BW, Dorner JW. Soil populations of Aspergillus species from section Flavi along a transect through peanut-growing regions of the United States. Mycologia 1998;90:767–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Horn BW, Greene RL, Sobolev VS, Dorner JW, Powell JH, Layton RC. Association of morphology and mycotoxin production with vegetative compatibility groups in Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, and A. tamarii. Mycologia 1996;88:574–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tran-Dinh N, Pitt JI, Carter DA. Molecular genotype analysis of natural toxigenic and nontoxigenic isolates of Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus. Mycol Res 1999;103:1485–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Horn BW, Dorner JW. Regional differences in production of aflatoxin B1 and cyclopiazonic acid by soil isolates of Aspergillus flavus along a transect within the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999;65:1444–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank M. A. Schweikert, S. Hilton, III, V. A. Orner, and R. A. Tennille for expert technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA, ARS, National Peanut Research Laboratory, 1011 Forrester Dr., SE, PO Box 509, Dawson, GA, 39842, USA

    Joe W. Dorner & Bruce W. Horn

Authors
  1. Joe W. Dorner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruce W. Horn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe W. Dorner.

Additional information

The U.S. Government’s right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright is acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dorner, J.W., Horn, B.W. Separate and combined applications of nontoxigenic Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus for biocontrol of aflatoxin in peanuts. Mycopathologia 163, 215–223 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-007-9004-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-007-9004-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation