Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of hydrocephalus using machine learning in medical science – a review

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is the study of computer algorithms that expand spontaneously by knowledge. ML algorithms construct an analytical model centred on sample data, recognized as ‘training data,’ in order to make projections or conclusions without being specifically programmed to do so. Hydrocephalus is the generally known disease found in children of the central nervous system and requires neurosurgical treatment and that has been studied and imaged for years however, there is still no prevalent solution and effective method for precise detection and computable evaluation of this. This work suggests a modern form of Machine Learning (ML) for the early detection of hydrocephalus. ML is the fast growing and challenging field now days. For medical diagnosis, ML methods are used. Four phases are involved in the identification of hydrocephalus using image processing methods, namely image pre-processing, image segmentation, detection and classification of features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Venkataramana NK (2011) Hydrocephalus Indian scenario–a review. J Pediatr Neurosci 6(l1):S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson D (2005) Hydrocephalus and shunts. In: Moore AJ, Newell DW (eds) Neurosurgery principles and practice. Springer, Specialist Surgery Series Neurosurgery, pp 425–442

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. http://www.stritch.luc.edu/lumen/MedEd/Radio/curriculum/Neurology/Hydrocephalus_2013.htm

  4. Weglinski T and Fabijańska A (2011) The concept of image processing algorithms for assessment and diagnosis of hydrocephalus in children.

  5. Shakunthala M, HelenPrabha K (2019) Preprocessing analysis of brain images with atherosclerosis, 2019 IEEE international conference on electrical, computer and communication technologies (ICECCT).

  6. Collins R, Lipton A, Kanade T (2000) Introduction to the special section on video surveillance. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(8):745–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stauffer C, Grimson WEL (Aug. 2000) Learning patterns of activity using real-time tracking. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(8):747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruzzone L, Prieto DF (Apr. 2002) An adaptive semiparametric and context-based approach to unsupervised change detection in multitemporal remote-sensing images, IEEE trans. Image Processing 11(4):452–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins JB, Woodcock CE (1996) An assessment of several linear change detection techniques for mapping forest mortality using multi temporal Landsat TM data, remote Sens. Environ. 56:66–77

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bosc M, Heitz F, Armspach JP, Namer I, Gounot D, Bach LR (2003) Automatic change detection in multimodal serial MRI: application to multiple sclerosis lesion evolution. Neuroimage 20:643–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dumskyj MJ, Aldington SJ, Dore CJ, Kohner EM (Jun. 1996) The accurate assessment of changes in retinal vessel diameter using multiple frame electrocardiograph synchronised fundus photography. Current Eye Res 15(6):652–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Landis E, Nagy E, Keane D, Nagy G (Jun. 1999) A technique to measure 3D work-offracture of concrete in compression. J Eng Mech 126(6):599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagy G, Zhang T, Franklin W, Landis E, Nagy E and Keane D (2001) Volume and surface area distributions of cracks in concrete, Proc Visual Form, 759–768.

  14. Lebart K, Trucco E and Lane DM (Sep. 2000) Real-time automatic sea-floor change detection from video, Proc MTS/IEEE OCEANS, 337–343.

  15. Whorff J, Griffing L (1992) A video recording and analysis system used to sample intertidal communities. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol 160:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fang C-Y, Chen S-W, Fuh C-S (May 2003) Automatic change detection of driving environments in a vision-based driver assistance system. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14(3):646–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kan WY, Krogmeier JV, Doerschuk PC (1996) Model-based vehicle tracking from image sequences with an application to road surveillance. Opt Eng 35(6):1723–1729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mishra M, Malay N, Nirmala S, Samerendra D (2011) Image processing techniques for Glaucoma detection. Communications in Computer and Information Science:365–373

  19. Kumar G, Bhatia PK (2014) A detailed review of feature extraction in image processing systems, 2014 fourth international conference on advanced computing & communication technologies.

  20. Movie Success Rate Prediction Using Robust Classifier, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 2019.

  21. Diving Deeper into Dimension Reduction with Independent Components Analysis (ICA), Paperspace. Accessed at: https://blog.paperspace.com/dimension-reduction-with-independent-components-analysis

  22. Ippolito PP (2019) Feature Extraction Techniques, https://towardsdatascience.com/feature-extraction-techniques-d619b56e31be.

  23. Flores S (2019) Variational Autoencoders are Beautiful”, http://www.compthree.com/blog/autoencoder.

  24. Schalkoff RJ (2007) Pattern recognition. Wiley Encyclopaedia of Computer Science and Engineering, Pattern Recognition.

  25. Schalkoff RJ (1992) Pattern recognition: statistical, syntactic and neural approaches. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kaur N, Kaur U (2013) Survey of pattern recognition methods. Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, International Journal of Advanced

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Kobashi S, Kondo K, Hata Y (2006) Computer-aided diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms in MRA images with case-based reasoning. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 89(1):340–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kobashi S, Takae T, Hata Y, Kitamura YT, Yanagida T, Ishikawa O, Ishikawa M (2001) Automated segmentation of the cerebrospinal fluid and the lateral ventricles from human brain MR images, proceedings joint 9th IFSA world congress and 20th NAFIPS international conference (cat. No. 01TH8569).

  29. Pustkova R et al. (2010) Measurement and calculation of cerebrospinal fluid in proportion to the skull. 9th RoEduNet IEEE international conference. IEEE.

  30. Sweetman B, Xenos M, Zitella L, Linninger AA (2011) Three-dimensional computational prediction of cerebrospinal fluid flow in the human brain. Comput Biol Med 41:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Linninger AA, Sweetman B, Penn R (2009) Normal and hydrocephalic brain dynamics: the role of reduced cerebrospinal fluid reabsorption in ventricular enlargement. Ann Biomed Eng 37:1434–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Linninger AA, Xenos M, Zhu DC, Somayaji MR, Kondapalli S, Penn RD (2007) Cerebrospinal fluid flow in the normal and hydrocephalic human brain, IEEE trans. Biomed Eng 54:291–302

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu DC, Xenos M, Linninger AA, Penn RD (2006) Dynamics of lateral ventricle and cerebrospinal fluid in normal and hydrocephalic brains. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:756–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hansen GA, Douglass RW, Zardecki A (2005) Mesh enhancement: selected elliptic methods. Imperial College Press, London, Foundations and Applications

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Segal MB (2001) Transport of nutrients across the choroid plexus. Microsc Res Tech 52:38–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Linguraru MG and Butman JA (2009) Segmentation propagation for the automated quantification of ventricle volume from serial MRI. Medical imaging 2009: computer-aided diagnosis. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 7260.

  37. Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12:629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Caselles VKR, Sapiro G (1997) Geodesic active contours. International Journal on Computer Vision 22(1):61–97

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Sethian JA (1996) [level set methods and fast marching methods], Cambridge University press.

  40. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DLG, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Non-rigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18(8):712–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Halberstadt W, Douglas TS (2005) Fuzzy clustering of CT images for the measurement of hydrocephalus associated with tuberculous meningitis, 2005 IEEE engineering in medicine and biology 27th annual conference.

  42. Gath I, Geva AB (1989) Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11:773–781

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Bezdek JC (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Plenum, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Ambarki K (2010) MR imaging of brain volumes: evaluation of a fully automatic software, American Journal of Neuroradiology, MR Imaging of Brain Volumes: Evaluation of a Fully Automatic Software.

  45. Klauschen F, Goldman A, Barra V, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Lundervold A (2009) Evaluation of automated brain MR image segmentation and volumetry methods. Hum Brain Mapp 30:1310–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cocosco C, Kollokian V, Kwan R-S, et al. (May 19–23, 1997) BrainWeb: online interface to a 3D MRI simulated brain database. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain. Copenhagen, Denmark.

  47. Viswanath K and Shweta (2017) Enhancement of brain tumor images, 2nd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT), Bangalore, 1894-1898.

  48. Tomar D, Agarwal S (2013) A survey on data mining approaches for healthcare. International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology 5(5):241–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. An L and Bhanu B (2012) Image super-resolution by extreme learning machine. In 2012 19th IEEE international conference on image processing, 2209-2212.

  50. Li B, Li Y, Rong X (2013) The extreme learning machine learning algorithm with tunable activation function. Neural Comput & Applic 22(3):531–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cao F, Liu B, Park DS (2013) Image classification based on effective extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 102:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bazi Y, Alajlan N, Melgani F, AlHichri H, Malek S, Yager RR (2013) Differential evolution extreme learning machine for the classification of hyperspectral images. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 11(6):1066–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Burrascano P (1991) Learning vector quantization for the probabilistic neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2(4):458–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Mao KZ, Tan K-C, Ser W (2000) Probabilistic neural-network structure determination for pattern classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 11(4):1009–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dev Baloni.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baloni, D., Verma, S.K. Detection of hydrocephalus using machine learning in medical science – a review. Multimed Tools Appl 81, 21199–21222 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12744-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12744-z

Keywords

Navigation