Abstract
Medical images provide information that can be used to detect and diagnose a variety of diseases and abnormalities. Because cardiovascular disorders are the primary cause of death and cancer is the second, good early identification can aid in the reduction of cancer mortality rates. There are different medical imaging modalities that the radiologists use in order to study the organ or tissue structure. The significance of each imaging modality is changing depending on the medical field. The goal of this research is to give a review that shows new machine learning applications for medical image processing and gives a review of the field’s progress. The classification of medical photographs of various sections of the human body is the focus of this review. Additional information on methodology developed using various machine learning algorithms to aid in the classification of tumors, non-tumors, and other dense masses is available. It begins with an introduction of several medical imaging modalities, followed by a discussion of various machine learning algorithms to segmentation and feature extraction.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Machine learning
- Feature extraction
- Segmentation
- Cancer classification
- Image processing
- Histopathological images
- HI
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Mammogram images
- Supervised ML
- Unsupervised ML
1 Introduction
Medical imaging makes use of emerging technology to improve people’s health and quality of life. Computer-assisted diagnostic (CAD) systems in medicine are a good example. Scientists are increasingly using X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI), computed tomography (CT), Mammography, and histopathology images (HIs).
Despite major breakthroughs in diagnosis and medical treatment, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of death worldwide. According to a World Health Organization report, there were 17.9 million deaths attributed to CVDs in 2016. Cancer is another disease with a high mortality rate, with 9 million deaths. Both developed and developing countries are affected by cancer. Because of the increase in risk factors and late detection of diseases, death rates in low and middle-income nations are high. The early and precise detection of tumors and CVDs is the key point of treatment and diagnostic decision making [1, 2].
Prior diagnostic data should be reviewed then valuable information from previous data is obtained. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in medical imaging have advanced exponentially in recent years as a result of technological advancements and increased computer capacity. In the image-based diagnosis procedure, machine learning (ML) is applied. It depends on previous clinical models through explicit programming identification of complex imaging data patterns. As ML technique ingest training data, it is then possible to produce more precise models depending on those training patterns. Existing review declares the incremental value of image-based diagnosis using ML methods [3, 4].
1.1 Medical Imaging
Rapid tumor detection and diagnosis using image processing and machine learning techniques can now be an important tool in increasing cancer diagnostic accuracy. Medical imaging is used for clinical diagnosis, therapy, and identifying problems in various body parts.
The goal of a medical imaging the purpose of this research is to establish the location and scale of the project, and features of the tissue or organ in question. This classification is thought to be a good technique to get useful information out of a vast volume of data. As a result, some scientists have focused their efforts in creating and interpreting medical images in order to diagnose the vast majority of diseases. As a result, medical images aid in illness identification, the detection of pathogenic abnormalities and the treatment of patients in a clinical setting.
The techniques and methods used to acquire images of various parts of the human body for diagnostic purposes are referred to as medical imaging. Different radiological imaging techniques are included in medical imaging such as:
X-Ray.
The brighter areas on the X-ray are solid tissues, while the darker areas include air or normal tissues. On an X-ray film of the chest, for example, Many organs that separate the chest cavity from the abdominal cavity, such as the heart, ribs, thoracic spine, and diaphragm, are readily visible. This can be used in lung infection detection [5].
CT/CMRI.
Significant aspects of the bodily organ, such as shape and size, must be understood in order to categorize the various disorders. Image processing tools such as CT or CMRI are used to develop the diagnosis of cardiac disease. This can be used in CVDs diagnosis [6,7,8].
Mammography.
Mammography is regarded as the simplest approach for early breast cancer diagnosis, using only a small amount of radiation. It aids radio-graphic Breast cancer examination to detect any growth or lump in the early stages, even before it becomes obvious to the doctor or the woman herself, and that these rays are not dangerous if used at yearly intervals, as recommended by the National Guidelines for early breast cancer diagnosis. The only method that has been proved to be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality by detecting the disease early on is mammography. Mammography is the most successful approach for early detection of breast cancer, despite the fact that it cannot prevent cancer [2, 9].
Histopathological Images (HI).
Despite fast developments in medical field research, the gold standard for tumor identification remains histology. HI is a type of medical imaging in which tissues from microscopy biopsies are shown. The pathologists can use these images to study tissues characteristics in a cell basis. Because HIs contain complicated geometric shapes and textures, they can be utilized to identify, monitor, and treat cancer in various organs such as the breast, lung, liver, lymph nodes, and so on… [10, 11].
1.2 Motivation
The purpose of this study is to show radiologists how to use machine learning techniques to enhance the rate of rapid and accurate cancer detection and CVD diagnosis and categorization. This research seeks to provide a review of novel applications of machine learning for the analysis of medical pictures, as well as an overview of progress in this field. This paper focuses on segmentation and feature extraction in multi-modal medical images of various areas of the human body that have lately been employed.
1.3 Paper Structure
The following is a breakdown of the paper’s structure. Section 2 presents a taxonomy for categorizing medical image analysis machine learning algorithms. Section 3 displays several supervised segmentation methodologies as well as supervised ML that was used for the segmentation methods. Section 4 introduces unsupervised machine learning (ML), which is used for segmentation, and then displays various unsupervised segmentation algorithms that aim to find essential structures in medical images, which may aid diagnosis. The feature extraction methods used to describe HIs for further categorization using ML are presented in Sect. 5. Finally, in Sect. 6, the conclusions are stated.
2 Machine Learning
Machine learning (ML) is a type of data analysis that automates the generation of analytical system models. It’s a subset of AI that governs how a machine learns from data, recognizes patterns, and makes decisions with little or no human assistance. ML is used to provide a pathological diagnosis of malignancy in a variety of tissues and organs (breast, prostate, skin, brain, bones, liver, and others). Machine learning methods have been widely used in segmentation, feature extraction, and classification [12].
Unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods are the two types of machine learning methods. Unsupervised learning organizes and interprets data based solely on input data, whereas supervised learning (classification and regression) creates prediction models based on both input and output data (clustering).
ML Medical analysis methods can be classified as illustrated in Fig. 1. Typically, pathology specialists are interested in tissue regions that are related to the condition being identified. The goal of medical segmentation is to Label pixels with the structure that they could represent.
Nucleus structure identification, for example, can be used to extract morphological information like the number of nuclei per region, their size, and format, which can be particularly useful in evaluating a tumor’s diagnosis. Several segmentation methods are based on supervised or unsupervised machine learning techniques.
3 Supervised ML for Segmentation
Support vector machine (SVM), genetic algorithm (GA), decision trees (DT), regression trees (RT), and k-nearest neighbors algorithm are some of the supervised machine learning algorithms used for segmentation (k-NN).
SVMs are a type of learning machine that can recognize patterns and predict time series, among other things. The support vectors of selected samples map samples into feature space, and the greatest margin hyperplane separates feature vectors [12, 13].
GA is a search-based optimization technique depends on the idea of genetics and natural selection. Optimal or near-optimal solutions to complicated problems are found while the typical solution will consume a very long time to find out. GA searches a space of potential solutions to find one which solves the problem [14].
One of the predictive modelling methods is DT. DT moves from observations, which are represented the tree’s branches lead to inferences about the target value, which the tree’s leaves reflect. Classification trees are DT when the target variable is a discrete set of values. Class labels are the leaves in these tree structures, and feature combinations that lead to those class labels are the branches. When the target variable is a set of continuous values, such as real numbers, RT is DT [15].
A non-parametric classification method is the K-NN classification method. Data categorization and regression are both done with it. The k closest training samples from the data set are used as the input in all cases. Depending on the mode (classification or regression), the output changes. The outcome of k-NN classification is a class membership. The most common class of its neighbours is used to name an object based on a majority vote of its neighbours. The algorithm determines the value of a property for an object in k-NN regression. This property’s value is the average of its k closest neighbours’ values [12, 16].
The supervised segmentation algorithms are shown in Table 1 along with the ML methods they employ.
4 Unsupervised Ml Segmentation
Unsupervised machine learning (ML) segmentation should discover patterns from untagged data and can be divided into several types, such as k-means, general vector machine (GVM), mean shift, and thresholding. The k-means technique is an unsupervised machine learning clustering approach that has been used to segment pixel regions. The K-means technique, which is an unsupervised clustering method, is used to separate the item from the background. It divides the input data into K-clusters, or groupings, based on the K-centroids. When unlabeled data, i.e. data with no established categories or groupings, the method is employed. The purpose is to locate specific groups based on some form of data similarity, with K being the number of groups [12].
The GVM is used to replace the SVM, which are support vectors of selected samples separated by the greatest margin hyper-plane. The support vectors are substituted by general project vectors chosen from the normal vector space, and the general vectors are found using the Monte Carlo (MC) process. GVM improves the capacity to extract features [26].
When a set of data points is given, the mean shift approach labels each data point towards the nearest cluster centroid iteratively, with the direction to the closest cluster centroid defined by where the majority of the neighbor points are. Each iteration brings each data point gets closer to the cluster centre, which contains the most data points. Each point is assigned to a cluster when the algorithm finishes [27, 28].
Decision scores, which are the output of the decision function that is used to produce the prediction, are employed in the thresholding approach. The best score from the output of the decision function can be chosen as the value of the decision threshold All decision score values less than this decision threshold value are considered negative, and all decision score values more than this decision threshold value are considered positive [29].
Table 2 depicts the unsupervised segmentation methodologies as well as the machine learning methods employed.
5 Feature Extraction ML
Before doing classification, some methods rely on feature extraction from raw data. Feature extraction methods aim to reduce the granularity of the input and highlight relevant information related to the problem, such as the presence or absence of a specific element, the amount of that element, texture, shape, histogram, and so on, while providing a form that is unaffected by changes like translation, scaling, and rotation.
Prior to categorization, these issues necessitate the translation of picture pixels into meaningful features. Feature extraction methods take photographs and extract a reasonable number of characteristics from them that summarize the information they contain. Several different types of characteristics, such as shape, size, texture, fractal, and even a combination of these, have been used.
-
1-
Feature Extraction Approaches
-
2-
Deep Learning Feature Extraction.
In conclusion, due to the nature of medical images, particularly HIs, which contain complex geometric structures and textures, multiple types of characteristics need be merged in many cases for further description. As shown in Table 3, different approaches extract several types of characteristics metamorphic characteristics are useful for identifying geometric structures, but they are more difficult to obtain due to the extensive pre-processing required. Texture, on the other hand, is one of the most significant features for identifying items or regions of interest in a photograph.
Finally, the most recent techniques rely on deep feature extraction. They’re similar to a set of filters that extract geometric and textural features. As a result, deep features and deep approaches for medical image analysis appear to be quite promising.
6 Conclusion
There are different imaging modalities that the radiologists use in order to study the organ or tissue structure. The significance of each imaging modality is changing depending on the medical field. This review provides a brief description of the medical images significance using multi-modalities of different parts in human body; X-ray, CT, MRI, CMRI, Mammography and HI.
This review divides ML applications into supervised segmentation, unsupervised segmentation and feature extraction approaches and describes the various methods in ML was used to offer a summary of development in this area.
There are several supervised ML methods is used for segmentation such as SVM, GA, DT, RT and k-NN. On the other hand, unsupervised ML segmentation methods can be divided into methods such as K-means, GVM, mean shift and thresholding.
Textural characteristics, on the other hand, are crucial in segmentation and are more difficult to collect due to the extensive pre-processing required. Morphometric characteristics are crucial for identifying geometric structures, but they are more difficult to collect due to the need for extensive pre-processing. Finally, the most current feature extraction techniques use deep features to describe organ or tissue details. They’re like a series of filters for detecting geometric structures and textures. This research also demonstrates that some deep feature extraction algorithms for medical picture analysis appear to be extremely promising.
References
World Health Statistics 2020: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. World Health Organization, Geneva (2020)
American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2019–2020. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta (2019)
Saxena, S., Gyanchandani, M.: Machine learning methods for computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis using histopathology: a narrative review. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Sci. 51, 182–193 (2020)
Yassin, N.I., Omran, S., El Houby, E.M., Allam, H.: Machine learning techniques for breast cancer computer aided diagnosis using different image modalities: a systematic review. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 156, 25–45 (2018)
X-rays: Radiography. U.S. National Library of Medicine (12 April 2021). https://medlineplus.gov/xrays.html. Accessed May 2021
Judice, A., Geetha, K.: A novel assessment of various bio-imaging methods for lung tumor detection and treatment by using 4-D and 2-D CT images. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. (IJBS) 9(2), 54–60 (2013)
Pennell, D.S.U., et al.: Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): consensus panel report. Eur. Heart J. 25(21), 1940–1965 (2004)
Patient safety: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America (June 2013). http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/safety/index.cfm?pg=sfty_m. Accessed May 2021
Dheeba, J., Singh, N.A., Selvi, S.T.: Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: a swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach. J. Biomed. Inform. 49, 45–52 (2014)
Sudharshan, P., Petitjean, C., Spanhol, F.: Multiple instance learning for histopathological breast cancer image classification. Expert Syst. Appl. 117, 103–111 (2019)
Aresta, G., Araújo, T., Kwok, S., Chennamsetty, S., et al.: Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images. Med. Image Anal. 56, 122–139 (2019)
Mahesh, B.: Machine learning algorithms: a review. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 9(1), 381–386 (2020)
Kotsiantis, S.B.: Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques. Informatica 31, 249–268 (2007)
Shapiro, J.: Genetic algorithms in machine learning. In: Paliouras, G., Karkaletsis, V., Spyropoulos, C.D. (eds.) Machine Learning and Its Applications. ACAI 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol. 2049. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44673-7_7
Amin, R.K., Sibaroni, Y.: Implementation of decision tree using C4.5 algorithm in decision making of loan application by debtor (Case study: Bank pasar of Yogyakarta Special Region). In: 2015 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), Yogyakarta (2015)
Salman, S., et al.: A machine learning approach to identify prostate cancer areas in complex histological images. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 283, 295–306 (2014)
Chen, J., et al.: New breast cancer prognostic factors identified by computer-aided image analysis of HE stained histopathology images. Scientific Reports 2015 (2015)
Geessink, O., Baidoshvili, A., Freling, G., Klaase, J., Slump, C., Van Der Heijden, F.: Toward automatic segmentation and quantification of tumor and stroma in whole-slide images of H&E stained rectal carcinomas. In: Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE (2015)
Zarella, M., Breen, D., Reza, M., Milutinovic, A., Garcia, F.: Lymph node metastasis status in breast carcinoma can be predicted via image analysis of tumor histology. Anal. Quant. Cytopathol. Histopathol. 37, 273–285 (2015)
Santamaria-Pang, A., Rittscher, J., Gerdes, M., Padfield, D.: Cell segmentation and classification by hierarchical supervised shape ranking. In: IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp. 1296–1299 (2015)
Wang, P., Hu, X., Li, Y., Liu, Q., Zhu, X.: Automatic cell nuclei segmentation and classification of breast cancer histopathology images. Signal Process. 122, 1–13 (2016)
Arteta, C., Lempitsky, V., Noble, J., Zisserman, A.: Detecting overlapping instances in microscopy images using extremal region trees. Med. Image Anal. 27, 3–16 (2016)
Arteta, C., Lempitsky, V., Noble, J., Zisserman, A.: Learning to detect cells using non-overlapping extremal regions. Med. Image Comput. Comput.-Assist. Interv. 7510, 348–356 (2012)
Brieu, N., Schmidt, G.: Learning size adaptive local maxima selection for robust nuclei detection in histopathology images. In: IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (2017)
Song, J., Xiao, L., Molaei, M., Lian, Z.: Multi-layer boosting sparse convolutional model for generalized nuclear segmentation from histopathology images. Knowl.-Based Syst. 176, 40–53 (2019)
Zhao, H.: General vector machine. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1602.03950 (2016)
Yang, L., Qi, X., Xing, F., Kurc, T., Saltz, J., Foran, D.: Parallel content-based sub-image retrieval using hierarchical searching. Bioinformatics 30(7), 996–1002 (2014)
Demirovic, D.: An implementation of the mean shift algorithm. Image Process. On Line 9, 251–268 (2019)
Sirinukunwattana, K., Khan, A., Rajpoot, N.: Cell words: modelling the visual appearance of cells in histopathology images. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 42, 16–24 (2015)
Mazo, C., Trujillo, M., Alegre, E., Salazar, L.: Automatic recognition of fundamental tissues on histology images of the human cardiovascular system. Micron 89, 1–8 (2016)
Mazo, C., Alegre, E., Trujillo, M.: Classification of cardiovascular tissues using LBP based descriptors and a cascade SVM. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 147, 1–10 (2017)
Shi, P., Zhong, J., Huang, R., Lin, J.: Automated quantitative image analysis of hematoxylin-eosin staining slides in lymphoma based on hierarchical k-means clustering. In: 8th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (2016)
Brieu, N., Pauly, O., Zimmermann, J., Binnig, G., Schmidt, G.: Slide-specific models for segmentation of differently stained digital histopathology whole slide images. In: Medical Imaging 2016: Image Processing, Proceedings of SPIE (2016)
Shi, P., Chen, J., Lin, J., Zhang, L.: High-throughput fat quantifications of hematoxylin-eosin stained liver histopathological images based on pixel-wise clustering. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 60, 1–12 (2017)
Olgun, G., Sokmensuer, C., Gunduz-Demir, C.: Local object patterns for the representation and classification of colon tissue images. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 18, 1390–1396 (2014)
Kandemir, M., Feuchtinger, A., Walch, A., Hamprecht, F.: Digital pathology: multiple instance learning can detect Barrett’s cancer. In: IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp. 1348–1351 (2014)
Gertych, A., et al.: Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 46(2), 197–208 (2015)
Coatelen, J., et al.: A feature selection based framework for histology image classification using global and local heterogeneity quantification. In: 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (2014)
Coatelen, J., et al.: A subset-search and ranking based feature-selection for histology image classification using global and local quantification. In: International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA) (2015)
Noroozi, N., Zakerolhosseini, A.: Computer assisted diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma using Z-transform features. J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent. 40, 128–148 (2016)
Chan, A., Tuszynski, J.: Automatic prediction of tumour malignancy in breast cancer with fractal dimension. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160558 (2016)
Spanhol, F., Oliveira, L., Cavalin, P., Petitjean, C., Heutte, L.: Deep features for breast cancer histopathological image classification. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2017)
Vo, D., Nguyen, N., Lee, S.: Classification of breast cancer histology images using incremental boosting convolution networks. Inf. Sci. 482, 123–138 (2019)
Akkus, Z., Galimzianova, A., Hoogi, A., Rubin, D.L., Erickson, B.J.: Deep learning for brain MRI segmentation: state of the art and future directions. J. Digit. Imaging 30, 449–459 (2017)
Maier, A., Syben, C., Lasser, T., Riess, C.: A gentle introduction to deep learning in medical image processing. Z. Med. Phys. 29(2), 86–101 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Elmahalawy, A., Abdel-Aziz, G. (2022). Machine Learning in Medical Image Processing. In: Qian, Z., Jabbar, M., Li, X. (eds) Proceeding of 2021 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Applications. WCNA 2021. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2456-9_93
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2456-9_93
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-2455-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-2456-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)