Skip to main content
Log in

Expression studies of stress responsive genes in cotton Gossypium hirsutum L.

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cotton is the world’s richest source of natural fiber. Meanwhile cotton plant is top ranked stress sensitive plant thereby affecting its yield and fiber quality. But, in climate change scenario, fiber yield and quality are being affected due to environmental stresses, especially heat, drought and salinity. Present study is aimed to identify cotton genotype harboring prominently expressed stress responsive genes.

Methods

Four cotton genotypes (IUB-13, IUB-222, IUB-09 and MM-58) were evaluated under drought and salinity stress for yield traits and expression of different stress responsive genes (GhWRKY3, GhDREB2 and GhRDR6).

Results

Pronounced expression of GhWRKY3, GhDREB2and GhRDR6 was observed in cotton variety IUB-13 in stress condition (drought and salinity) as compared to control followed by IUB-222 which revealed that these genotypes might possess substantial potential to cope with environmental hazards encountered in growing season

Conclusion

Utilization of cotton genotypes i.e., IUB-13 and IUB-222 in cotton breeding program can be very much fruitful for developing cotton genotypes adoptable to climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OECD/FAO (2019) OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2019-2028, OECD Publishing, Paris/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome https://doi.org/10.1787/agr_outlook-2019-en

  2. Iqbal M, Ul-Allah S, Naeem M, Ijaz M, Sattar A, Sher A (2017) Response of cotton genotypes to water and heat stress: from field to genes. Euphytica 213(6):1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Canavar O, Mark DR (2021) Differences of flavonoid structural genes preferentially expressed in brown and green natural colored cotton. Turk J Agric For 45:266–272. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-2006-98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saleem MA, Malik W, Qayyum A, Ul-Allah S, Ahmad MQ, Afzal H, Amjid MW, Ateeq MF, Zia ZU (2021) Impact of heat stress responsive factors on growth and physiology of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Mol Biol Rep 48(2):1069–1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu H, He X, Tu L, Zhu L, Zhu S, Ge Z, Zhang X (2016) GhJAZ2 negatively regulates cotton fiber initiation by interacting with the R2R3-MYB transcription factor Gh MYB 25-like. Plant J 88(6):921–935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo R, Yu F, Gao Z, An H, Cao X, Guo X (2011) GhWRKY3, a novel cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) WRKY gene, is involved in diverse stress responses. Mol Biol Rep 38(1):49–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jin LG, Li H, Liu JY (2010) Molecular characterization of three ethylene responsive element binding factor genes from cotton. J Integr Plant Biol 52(5):485–495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang M, Cheng ST, Wang HY, Wu JH, Luo YM, Wang Q, Wang FX, Xia GX (2017) iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis of defence responses triggered by the necrotrophic pathogen Rhizoctonia solani in cotton. J Proteomics 152:226–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang M, Li S, Yang H, Gao Z, Wu C, Guo X (2012) Characterization and functional analysis of GhRDR6, a novel RDR6 gene from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Biosci Rep 32(2):139–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinnear PR, Colin DG (2011) IBM SPSS statistics 18 made simple. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hussain M, Farooq S, Hasan W, Ul-Allah S, Tanveer M, Farooq M, Nawaz A (2018) Drought stress in sunflower: physiological effects and its management through breeding and agronomic alternatives. Agric Water Manage 201:152–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiranmai K, Lokanadha RG, Pandurangaiah M, Nareshkumar A, Amaranatha RV, Lokesh U, Venkatesh B, Anthony JAM, Sudhakar C (2018) A novel WRKY transcription factor, MuWRKY3 (Macrotyloma uniflorum Lam. Verdc.) enhances drought stress tolerance in transgenic groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) plants. Front Plant Sci 9:346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Han X, Zhang L, Zhao L, Xue P, Qi T, Zhang C, Yuan H, Zhou L, Wang D, Qiu J, Shen QH (2020) SnRK1 phosphorylates and destabilizes WRKY3 to enhance barley immunity to powdery mildew. Plant Commun 1(4):100083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aamir M, Kashyap SP, Singh VK, Dubey MK, Ansari WA, Upadhyay RS, Singh S (2019) Trichoderma erinaceum bio-priming modulates the WRKYs defense programming in tomato against the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) challenged condition. Front Plant Sci 10:911–911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00911

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aamir M, Singh VK, Meena M, Upadhyay RS, Gupta VK, Singh S (2017) Structural and functional insights into WRKY3 and WRKY4 transcription factors to unravel the WRKY–DNA (W-Box) complex interaction in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). A computational approach. Front Plant Sci 8:819–819. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00819

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jia H, Wang X, Wei T, Zhou R, Muhammad H, Hua L, Ren X, Guo J, Ding Y (2019) Accumulation and fixation of Cd by tomato cell wall pectin under Cd stress. Environ Exp Bot 167:103829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hardie DG (1999) Plant protein serine/threonine kinases: classification and functions. Annu Rev Plant Biol 50(1):97–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin ZJD, Liebrand TW, Yadeta KA, Coaker G (2015) PBL13 is a serine/threonine protein kinase that negatively regulates Arabidopsis immune responses. Plant Physiol 169(4):2950–2962

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Akbudak MA, Filiz E, Kontbay K (2018) DREB2 (dehydration-responsive element-binding protein 2) type transcription factor in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor): genome-wide identification, characterization and expression profiles under cadmium and salt stresses. 3 Biotech 8(10):426–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1454-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen HC, Cao PB, San Clemente H, Ployet R, Mounet F, Ladouce N, Harvengt L, Marque C, Teulieres C (2017) Special trends in CBF and DREB2 groups in Eucalyptus gunnii vs. Eucalyptus grandis suggest that CBF are master players in the trade-off between growth and stress resistance. Physiol Plant 159(4):445–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Agarwal PK, Gupta K, Lopato S, Agarwal P (2017) Dehydration responsive element binding transcription factors and their applications for the engineering of stress tolerance. J Exp Bot 68(9):2135–2148. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Abid MA, Liang C, Malik W, Meng Z, Tao Z, Meng Z, Ashraf J, Guo S, Zhang R (2018) Cascades of ionic and molecular networks involved in expression of genes underpin salinity tolerance in cotton. J Plant Growth Regul 37(2):668–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-017-9744-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shaheen T, Mahmood-ur-Rahman MFA, Zaib P, Mehboob-ur-Rahman I (2018) Identification, characterization, homology modeling and protein-protein interactions of cotton (Gossypium arboreum L.) DREB gene. Int J Agric Biol 20(5):1055–1061

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hussain B (2015) Modernization in plant breeding approaches for improving biotic stress resistance in crop plants. Turk J Agric For 39(4):515–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang M, Wang Q, Zhang B (2013) Evaluation and selection of reliable reference genes for gene expression under abiotic stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Gene 530(1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.07.084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yikilmazsoy G, Necip T (2021) Characterization of Fusarium sambucinum isolates associated with potato dry rot and evaluation of cultivar susceptibility and fungicides. Turk J Agric For 45:222–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J, Sun N, Deng T, Zhang L, Zuo K (2014) Genome-wide cloning, identification, classification and functional analysis of cotton heat shock transcription factors in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). BMC Genomics 15(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nejat N, Mantri N (2017) Plant immune system: crosstalk between responses to biotic and abiotic stresses the missing link in understanding plant defense. Curr Issues Mol Biol 23(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research work is partially funded by the NRPU Research Project funded by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan Project No. 6931/Punjab/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MN: Experiment Planning, methodology, data collection and writing; MI and SUA: Data Curation, analysis, review and editing; HJC, WN, JA and FSB: Review and editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Muhammad Naeem or Faheem Shahzad Baloch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naeem, M., Iqbal, M., Ul-Allah, S. et al. Expression studies of stress responsive genes in cotton Gossypium hirsutum L.. Mol Biol Rep 48, 7077–7085 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06696-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06696-0

Keywords

Navigation