Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 802–814 | Cite as

Bending perception to desire: Effects of task demands, motivation, and cognitive resources

  • Jocelyn J. Bélanger
  • Arie W. Kruglanski
  • Xiaoyan Chen
  • Edward Orehek
Original Paper

Abstract

Determinants of motivated judgments were examined in this research. Three experiments investigated how dominant motivation, biasing difficulty and mental resources combine to produce motivationally congruent judgments. Studies 1 and 2 showed that where a biasing motivation is dominant the presence of resources can augment a motivational bias in judgment. Study 3 replicated that result and showed that resources contribute to the formation of biased judgments only where biasing is difficult to accomplish, but not where it is relatively easy to accomplish. In addition, Study 3 showed that where the accuracy motivation is dominant and biasing is the easy default, unbiased judgments will occur only in the presence (vs. absence) of resources. In contrast, where unbiased judgments are easy to come by, such judgments occur irrespective of resources.

Keywords

Cognitive energetics theory Goals Cognitive resources Decision making 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by a grant from the Social Sciences Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) to the first author and an NSF Grant 0314291/0313483 to the second author.

References

  1. Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumhart, R. (1968). An honest profit. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1, 319–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of general Psychology, 3, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Schurtz, D. R., & Gailliot, M. T. (2010). Acting on limited resources: The interactive effects of self-regulatory depletion and individual differences, Chapter 11. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Personality and Self-Regulation.Google Scholar
  8. Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovitch, A. M., & Lockhart, L. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 53.Google Scholar
  9. Dunning, D. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford (1920) concept of defense mechanisms University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. (1920). A general introduction to psychoanalysis. New York, NY, US: Horace Liveright.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freund, T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Shpitzajzen, A. (1985). The freezing and unfreezing of impressional primacy effects of the need for structure and the fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 479–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsee, C. K. (1996). Elastic justification: How unjustifiable factors influence judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(1), 122–129.Google Scholar
  16. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and attribution process. In E. E. Jones, et al. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151–174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  18. Klauer, K. C., Schmitz, F., Teige-Mocigemba, S., & Voss, A. (2010). Understanding the role of executive control in the Implicit Association Test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 595–619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knowles, M. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2008). Benefits of membership: The activation and amplification of group identities in response to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1200–1213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krizan, Z., & Windschitl, P. D. (2007). The influence of outcome desirability on optimism. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 95–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., Chen, X., Köpetz, C., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2012). The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis. Psychological Review, 119, 1–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kruglanski, A. W., Köpetz, C., Bélanger, J. J., Chun, W. Y., Orehek, E., & Fishbach, A. (2013). Features of multifinality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 22–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kruglanski, A., & Pierro, A. (2008). On circadian mismatches and transference effect in social perception. Psychological Science, 19(3), 296–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kunda, Z., & Sanitioso, R. (1989). Motivated changes in the self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(3), 272–285.Google Scholar
  28. Kunda, Z., & Sinclair, L. (1999). Motivated reasoning with stereotypes: Activation, application, and inhibition. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2005). Exclusion and nonconscious behavioral mimicry. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 279–295). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  30. Larwood, L. (1978). Swine flu: A field study of self-serving biases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moreno, K. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1999). Resisting stereotype change: The role of motivation and attentional capacity in defending social beliefs. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morris, W. N., & Reilly, N. P. (1987). Toward the self-regulation of mood: Theory and research. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 215–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muraven, M., & Slessareva, E. (2003). Mechanisms of self-control failure: Motivation and limited resources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 894–906.Google Scholar
  34. Pareto, V. (1916). The mind and society (1st Italian edition) (Translated. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1935).Google Scholar
  35. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 1123–1205). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The social monitoring system: Enhanced sensitivity to social cues and information as an adaptive response to social exclusion and belonging need. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213–226). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  37. Richards, J. M., & Gross, J. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, C. S., Reilly, C., & Midkiff, K. (1989). Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 728–738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 47, 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tangney, J. P., Niedenthal, P. M., Covert, M. V., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Are shame and guilt related to distinct self-discrepancies? A test of Higgins’s (1987) hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tesser, A. (1976). Attitude polarization as a function of thought and reality constraints. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wegner, D., Erber, R., & Zanakos, S. (1993). Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1093–1104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wright, R. A. (1998). Ability perception and cardiovascular response to behavioral challenge. In Personal control in action (pp. 197–232). US: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Wright, R. A. (2008). Refining the prediction of effort: Brehm’s distinction between potential motivation and motivation intensity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 682–701.Google Scholar
  50. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Coull, A., & Rocher, S. J. (1999). Fencing off the deviant: The role of cognitive resources in the maintenance of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jocelyn J. Bélanger
    • 1
  • Arie W. Kruglanski
    • 2
  • Xiaoyan Chen
    • 2
  • Edward Orehek
    • 3
  1. 1.Département de PsychologieUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations