Skip to main content
Log in

The relative importance of needs among traumatized and non-traumatized samples

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Typically, people rate enhancement needs as more important than security needs to their well-being. Two studies tested whether event valence and prior trauma moderate relative need importance. Traumatized (hurricane survivors) and non-traumatized (control) participants recalled the most “distressing” (security-relevant) or “satisfying” (enhancement-relevant) event they had recently experienced and rated the importance of 10 needs in defining the event. In both studies, event valence moderated relative need importance on explicit (salience) and implicit (affect) measures as enhancement needs were more important for enhancement-relevant (satisfying) events whereas security needs were more important for security-relevant (distressing) events. However, results also suggest that differences in traumatic experience across samples moderated the effect of event valence on relative need importance. Unlike non-traumatized (control) participants, traumatized (hurricane survivors) participants did not reassign greater importance to enhancement over security needs when event valence shifted to enhancement-relevant (satisfying) memories. We close by discussing implications for human motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although one could argue that popularity is a basic interpersonal enhancement need, evidence suggests that popularity is not a basic need in itself but, instead, an extrinsic goal that serves more basic needs directly linked to well-being (Kasser and Ryan 1996).

  2. We also re-ran the analyses using the reduced model of negative affect that restricted the predictor terms only to the subset of centered need scores (self-esteem, security, autonomy, competence, and relatedness) directly relevant to our hypotheses regarding changes in relative importance of enhancement vs. security needs across distressing as well as satisfying event memories. For distressing events, the results of the reduced model were consistent with the full model as security deprivation scores accounted for a significant portion of unique variance in negative affect, β = .31 SE = .15, t (1, 55) = 2.11, p < .05, whereas competence, autonomy, relatedness, and self-esteem did not, all βs < .25, all ts (1, 55) < 1.90, all ps > .06. For satisfying events, moreover, the results of the reduced model converged with the full model as self-esteem accounted for a unique portion of the variance in positive affect, β = .69 SE = .18, t (1, 55) = 3.97, p < .05, whereas security, competence, autonomy, and relatedness did not, all βs < .22, all ts (1, 55) < 1.70, all ps > .10.

  3. Unfortunately, we had to exclude the PANAS as well as several other measures from the Study 2 questionnaire as the Red Cross had to impose length constraints on the interview experience to fully protect the already compromised mental state of hurricane survivors. We certainly understood the Red Cross’s position and, ultimately, felt that the convergence of the implicit affect measure with the explicit salience measure in Study 1 and in Sheldon’s prior work did not make the replication of this finding in Study 2 an absolute necessity.

  4. Results showed adequate interrater reliability (Cohen’s κ > .65) between two raters in coding the frequency of specific references made to 1 of the 5 critical needs (security, competence, relatedness, autonomy, and self-esteem) relevant to our predictions.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir, N., McNally, R., & Wiegartz, A. (1996). Implicit memory bias for threat in posttraumatic stress disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 20(6), 625–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment (Attachment and loss, Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Separation: Anxiety and anger (Attachment and loss, Vol. 2). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, C. R., Christodoulides, J., & Hutchinson, G. (1996a). Intrusive thoughts and intrusive memories in a non-clinical sample. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, C., Dagliesh, T., & Joseph, S. (1996b). A dual representation theory of post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological Review, 103, 670–686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, P. J., Wichman, A. L., & Arkin, R. M. (2006). Security in the aftermath of 9–11. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 289–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self- determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J., Shaver, P. R., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2005). Attachment, Self-esteem, worldviews, and terror management: Evidence for a tripartite security system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 999–1013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. (1996). Aspirations and well-being in a prison setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1367–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. (2002). Sketches for a self-determination theory of values. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 123–140). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Well-being correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. (2008). Psychological threat and extrinsic goal striving. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., Cross, S. E., & Wurf, E. (1990). The role of the self-system in competence. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligan Jr. (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 205–226). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Luedke, D. L., Beysner, J. K., Peterson, R. A., Bohm, K., & Lips, O. J. (1987). Sensitivity to stress-relevant stimuli in post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 1, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., Aspi, S. P., Reimann, B. C., & Zeitlin, S. B. (1990). Selective processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99(4), 398–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychology needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., & Reis, H. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day, and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 325–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher, S. M., Dalgleish, T., & Yule, W. (1994). Information processing in post-traumatic stress disorder. Behavior Research & Therapy, 32, 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasey, M. W., Daleiden, E. L., Williams, L. L., & Brown, L. M. (1995). Biased attention in childhood anxiety disorders: A preliminary study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 267–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasey, M. W., El-Hag, N., & Daleiden, E. L. (1996). Anxiety and the processing of emotionally threatening stimuli: Distinctive patterns of selective attention among high- and low-test-anxious children. Child Development, 67, 1173–1185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, M. A., & Bridwell, L. G. (1976). Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 212–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D., Shore, W. J., & Grahe, J. E. (1998). The silent treatment: Perceptions of its behaviors and associated feelings. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1(2), 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health. We would like to thank Joann Benigno as well as Johnmarshall Reeve, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick J. Carroll.

Additional information

This publication was partially supported by Grant No. T32-MH19728 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Instructions for recall exercise

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, P.J., Arkin, R.M., Seidel, S.D. et al. The relative importance of needs among traumatized and non-traumatized samples. Motiv Emot 33, 373–386 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9139-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9139-z

Keywords

Navigation