Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Different Combinations of Explosively Welded Plates with the Same Areal Density on Their Antipenetration Performance

  • Published:
Mechanics of Composite Materials Aims and scope

In order to analyze the influence of different thickness distributions on the antipenetration performance of layered plates with a good surface-to-surface combination, five types of two-layer steel/aluminum and three-layer steel/aluminum/steel plates with the same areal density were manufactured by the method of explosive welding. Ballistic experiments and numerical simulation were performed to study the antipenetration performance of the plates impacted by a spherical steel projectile of diameter 8 mm. A 14.5-mm riffled gun was used to launch the projectile, and the numerical simulation were carried out by using the LS-DYNA 3D explicit finite-element code. Effects of the number of layers, their thickness distribution, and total thickness on the antipenetration performance of the layered plates were investigated. Results showed that the antipenetration performance of the multilayer plates was better than that of a monolithic plate with the same areal density — the ballistic limit speed of the two-layer and three-layer plates, on the average, increased by 9.6 and 19.9% compared with that of the monolithic one. In addition, the antipenetration performance of the three-layer plates was better than that of the two-layer ones if the thickness of the steel and aluminum plates was same. The influence of layer thickness distribution on the antipenetration performance was more pronounced for the two-layer plates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Dey, T. Børvik, X Teng, et al., “On the ballistic resistance of double-layered steel plates: An experimental and numerical investigation,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 44, 6701-6723 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. I. Pavelko and M. Smolyaninov, “Analysis of the effect of impact damage on the strength characteristics of a composite,” Mech. Compos. Mater.. 47, No. 3, 323-334 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. K. Solberg, J. R. Leinum, J, D. Embury, et al., “Localised shear banding in Weldox steel plates impacted by projectiles,” Mech. Mater., 39, 865-880 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Elek, S. Jaramaz, and D. Mickovic, “Modeling of perforation of plates and multi-layered metallic targets,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 42, 1209-1224 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Findik and N. Tarim, “Ballistic impact efficiency of polymer composites,” Compos. Struct., 61, 187-192 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Zhou, J. X. Wang, et al. Damage mechanism and anti-penetration performance of multi-layered explosively welded plates impacted by spherical projectile,” Theor. Appl. Fract. Mec., 60, 23-30 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. N. Aptukov, V. L. Belousov, and M. A. Kanibolotskii, “Optimization of the structures of a layered slab with the penetration of a rigid striker,” Mech. Compos. Mater., 2, 252-257 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. F. A. Mohaned, C. Soutis, and A. Hodzic, “Blast resistance and damage modeling of fibre metal laminates to blast loads,” Appl. Compos. Mater., 19, 619-636 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. W. Zhou and W. J. Stronge, “Ballistic limit for oblique impact of thin sandwich panels and spaced plates,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 35, 1339-1354 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. A. Iqbal, G. Gupta, and N. K. Gupta, “3D numerical simulations of ductile targets subjected to oblique impact by sharp nose projectiles,” Int. J. Solids Struct.. 47, 224-237 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. X. Teng, T. Wierzbicki, and M. Huang, “Ballistic resistance of double-layered armor plates,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 35, 870-884 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. A. Flores-Johnson, M. Saleh, and L. Edwards, “Ballistic performance of multi-layered metallic plates impacted by a 7.62-mm APM2 projectile,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 38, 1022-1032 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Børvik, L. Olovsson, S. Dey, et al., “Normal and oblique impact of small arms bullets on AA6082-T4 aluminium protective plates,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 38, 577-589 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Sadighi, T. Parnanen, R. C. Alderliesten, et al., “Experimental and numerical investigation of metal type and thickness effects on the impact resistance of fiber metal laminates,” Appl. Compos. Mater.,19, 545-559 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. A. Almohandes, M. S. Abdel-Kader, and A. M. Eleiche, “Experimental investigation of the ballistic resistance of steel-fiberglass reinforced polyester laminated plates,” Composites: Part B., 27, 447-458 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. A. Zukas and D. R. Scheffler, “Impact effects in multilayered plates,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 38, 3321-3328 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. S. J. Corran, P. J. Shadbolt, and C. Ruiz, “Impact loading of plates—an experimental investigation,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 1, 3-22 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Findik, “Recent developments in explosive welding,” Mater. Des., 32, 1081-1093 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Durgutlu, B. Gulenc, and F. Findik, “Examination of copper/stainless steel joints formed by explosive welding,” Mater. Des., 26, 497-507 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Acarer, B. Gulenc, and F. Findik, “Investigation of explosive welding parameters and their effects on microhardness and shear strength,” Mater. Des., 24. No. 8, 659-664 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. N. K. Gupta, M. A. Iqbal, and G. S. Sekhon, “Effect of projectile nose shape, impact velocity and target thickness on the deformation behavior of layered plates,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 35, 37-60 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J.O. Hallquist, LS-DYNA Keyword user’s manual, version 971, California: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Børvik, O. S. Hopperstad, and K. O. Pedersen, “Quasi-brittle fracture during structure impact of AA7075-T651 aluminium plates,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 37, 537-551 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Hason, B. Murat, and E. Azim, “Design automation of a laminated armor for best impact performance using approximate optimization method,” Int. J. Impact Eng., 29, 397-406 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11272158), the Foundation of Science and Technology of Transient Physics Laboratory (Grant No. 9140C300402120C30113), the Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds(Grant No. 1101003B), and the Ministries and Commissions echnology Infrastructure Project (Grant No. C1820130005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Wang.

Additional information

Russian translation published in Mekhanika Kompozitnykh Materialov, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 869-882 , September-October, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Zhou, N. & Peng, C. Influence of Different Combinations of Explosively Welded Plates with the Same Areal Density on Their Antipenetration Performance. Mech Compos Mater 50, 623–632 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-014-9450-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11029-014-9450-y

Keywords

Navigation