Abstract
We use the term “Zoomification” to refer to the primary mode of research collaboration used by academic researchers during much of the COVID-19 pandemic. While neither video-enabled technology or remote collaboration is new, the technology developments and needs that occurred during the pandemic proved exceptional, indeed a step-change in approaches to research collaboration. This study, based on in-depth interviews with 65 tenured and tenure track professors in dozens of United States universities in a wide variety of STEM disciplines, focuses on collegial effects of Zoomification on research collaboration, including research with graduate students. We find diverse impacts according to career status, with younger faculty and doctoral students faring least well with an absence of face-to-face communication. As expected, impacts vary according to the nature of work, including the need to work in the field, reliance on laboratory equipment, laboratory animals, samples and high cost, centralized equipment. The effects of remote collaboration are to some extent predictable but there are results that point toward realignment in some of the ways research collaboration is established and maintained. We conclude with speculations about the long-range implications of Zoomification of research collaboration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Throughout this paper we refer to Zoom much more often than competitor brands because Zoom is omnipresent in universities and dominates academic teaching, administration, and research. This not by any means an endorsement, as the most prominent technologies have known strengths and weaknesses and it is not at all clear which, if any, will in the long run prove to be the dominant design (Chourasia 2021).
We will say, however, that we look forward to watching the attempts of scientific corporations to commercialize the process of developing and formalizing ideas in the context of actual humans discussing scientific problems with one another. Perhaps there will be a bot that can do that in the future. In the meantime, we are focusing on scientific collaboration in the old school sense: synchronous, contemporaneous discussion.
The ASU IRB required that recordings be deleted as soon as transcription was completed. Unfortunately, we did not record the exact length of each interview prior to its deletion. The interviews ranged from 30 to 75 minutes, however, and resulted in over 700 pages of single-spaced transcription.
References
Baxter, Jamie, and John Eyles. 1997. Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 22(4): 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1997.00505.x.
Bennett, Andrew A., Emily D. Campion, Kathleen R. Keeler, and Sheila K. Keener. 2021. Videoconference fatigue? Exploring changes in fatigue after videoconference meetings during COVID-19. Journal of Applied Psychology 106(3): 330. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000906.
Blast Media. 2013. Over 700 universities and colleges now use Zoom. https://blog.zoom.us/over-700-universities-and-colleges-now-use-zoom-video-conferencing. Accessed 18 January 2022.
Bozeman, Barry, James S. Dietz, and Monica Gaughan. 2001. Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management 22(7–8): 716–740. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2001.002988.
Bozeman, Barry, Daniel Fay, and Catherine P. Slade. 2013. Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer 38(1): 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8.
Bozeman, Barry, and Jan Youtie. 2017. The Strength in numbers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Burgoyne, Nancy, and Aaron Samuel Cohn. 2020. Lessons from the transition to relational teletherapy during COVID-19. Family Process 59(3): 974–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12589.
Cadili, Lina, Kristin DeGirolamo, Crystal Suet-Ying Ma, Leo Chen, Elaine McKevitt, Jin-Si Pao, Carol Dingee, Amy Bazzarelli, and Rebecca Warburton. 2021. The breast cancer patient experience of telemedicine during COVID-19. Annals of Surgical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11103-w.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 2001. The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, 2000th ed. California: Menlo Park.
Carter, R. 2017. About Polycom—The voice, video and collaboration company. UC Today. https://www.uctoday.com/endpoints/about-polycom/. Accessed 12 December 2021.
Chourasia, S. 2021. Zoom vs. Microsoft Teams vs. Google Meet: A Step-by-Step Comparison. TRO: A Knowledge Base for IT Pros. https://techresearchonline.com/blog/zoom-vs-microsoft-teams-vs-google-meet-a-step-by-step-comparison/#. Accessed 25 October 2021.
Colbert, Russ. 2005. New technologies for the education market smash barriers in distance learning. Distance Learning 2(4): 7.
Cummings, Jonathon N., and Sara Kiesler. 2007. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi- university collaborations. Research Policy 36(10): 1620–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.001.
da Silva-Neto, Victo Jose, and Tulio Chiarini. 2023. The platformization of science: Towards a scientific digital platform taxonomy. Minerva 61: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09477-6.
De’, Rahul, Neena Pandey, and Abhipsa Pal. 2020. Impact of digital surge during Covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice. International Journal of Information Management 55: 102171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102171.
Dwivedi, Yogesh K., D. Laurie Hughes, Crispin Coombs, Ionna Constantiou, et al. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management 55: 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211.
Egido, Carmen. 1988, January. Video conferencing as a technology to support group work: a review of its failures. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, 13–24. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/62266.62268
Fortune Business Insights. 2021. Market Research Report: Video Conferencing. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/video-conferencing-market-100293. Accessed 18 January 2022.
Fosslien, Liz, and Mollie West Duffy. 2020. How to combat zoom fatigue. Harvard Business Review 29: 1–6.
Gnanapragasam, Sam Nishanth, Keith Hariman, and Antonio Ventriglio. 2021. To zoom or not to zoom–that is the question. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 67(8): 974–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076-40211004991.
Green, M. 2007. Science and Engineering Degrees: 1966–2004 (NSF 07–307). Arlington: National Science Foundation.
Grossman, Michele, and Natalie Davis. 2021. A bridge too far? An academic-national security practitioner dialogue on research collaboration across the divide. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism 16(1): 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2021.1883723.
Guest, Greg, Emily Namey, and Mario Chen. 2020. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076.
Hagaman, Ashley K., and Amber Wutich. 2017. How many interviews are enough to identify metathemes in multisited and cross-cultural research? Another perspective on Guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) landmark study. Field Methods 29(1): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16640447.
Herath, Tejaswini, and Hemantha S. B. Herath. 2020. Coping with the new normal imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons for technology management and governance. Information Systems Management 37(4): 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1818902.
Hertel, Guido, Susanne Geister, and Udo Konradt. 2005. Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review 15(1): 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002.
Historydraft. 2021. The story of Zoom video communications. https://historydraft.com/story/zoom-video-communications/article/698. Accessed 18 January 2022.
Holden, Michael C., and John F. Wedman. 1993. Future issues of computer-mediated communication: The results of a Delphi study. Educational Technology Research and Development 41(4): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297509.
Iqbal, Abeda Muhammad, Adnan Shahid Khan, Johari Abdullah, Narayanan Kulathuramaiyer, and Aslan Amat Senin. 2021. Blended system thinking approach to strengthen the education and training in university-industry research collaboration. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1905790.
Johnston, Lisa G., and Keith Sabin. 2010. Sampling hard-to-reach populations with respondent driven sampling. Methodological Innovations Online 5(2): 38–48. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2010.0017.
Katz, J. Sylvan., and Ben R. Martin. 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1.
Kouzes, R.T., J.D. Myers, and W.A. Wulf. 1996. Collaboratories: Doing science on the Internet. Computer 29(8): 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.532044.
Lederman, Norman G., and Judith S. Lederman. 2014. Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In Handbook of Research on Science Education, vol. II, eds. Norman G. Lederman and Sandra K. Abell, 614–634. London: Routledge.
Lin, Tao, Suzannah J. Stone, Timothy G. Heckman, and Timothy Anderson. 2021. Zoom-in to zone-out: Therapists report less therapeutic skill in telepsychology versus face-to-face therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychotherapy 58(4): 449. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000398.
Luborsky, Mark R., and Robert L. Rubinstein. 1995. Sampling in qualitative research: Rationale, issues, and methods. Research on Aging 17(1): 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027595171005.
McReynolds, Melanie R., Christina M. Termini, Antentor O. Hinton Jr, Brittany L. Taylor, et al. 2020. The art of virtual mentoring in the twenty-first century for STEM majors and beyond. Nature Biotechnology 38(12): 1477–1482. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-00758-7.
Melin, G., and O. Persson. 1996. Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics 36(3): 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02129600.
Mervosh, Sarah and Venessa Swales. March 10, 2020. Colleges and Universities Cancel Classes and Move Online Amid Coronavirus Fears. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on April 7, 2021.
Mirowski, Philip. 2018. The future (s) of open science. Social Studies of Science 48(2): 171–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718772086.
Moirano, Regina, Marisa Analia Sánchez, and Libor Štěpánek. 2020. Creative interdisciplinary collaboration: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity 35: 100626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100626.
Montonen, Tero, Paivi Eriksson, and Janna Woiceshyn. 2021. It’s not a lonely journey: Research collaboration strategies for knowledge production with allies. Academy of Management Learning & Education 20(2): 233–248. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0318.
Nadler, Robby. 2020. Understanding “Zoom fatigue”: Theorizing spatial dynamics as third skins in computer-mediated communication. Computers and Composition 58: 102613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102613.
O’Conaill, Brid, Steve Whittaker, and Sylvia Wilbur. 1993. Conversations over video conferences: An evaluation of the spoken aspects of video-mediated communication. Human-Computer Interaction 8(4): 389–428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0804_4.
Olson, Gary M., and Judith S. Olson. 2000. Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction 15(2–3): 139–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4.
Peper, Erik, Vietta Wilson, Marc Martin, Erik Rosegard, and Richard Harvey. 2021. Avoid Zoom fatigue, be present and learn. NeuroRegulation 8(1): 47. https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.8.1.47.
Pidel, Catlin, and Philipp Ackermann. 2020. Collaboration in virtual and augmented reality: a systematic overview. In Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics, eds. Lucio Tommaso De Paolis and Patrick Bourdot, 141–156. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58465-8_10.
Plantin, Jean-Christophe, Carl Lagoze, Paul N. Edwards, and Christian Sandvig. 2018. Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society 20(1): 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553.
Reuters Staff. 2020. Zoom pulls in more than 200 million daily video users during worldwide lockdowns. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-zoom/zoom-pulls-in-more-than-200-million-daily-video-users-during-worldwide-lockdowns-idUSKBN21K1C7. Accessed 10 April 2023.
Richter, Felix. 2022. Zoom consolidates pandemic gains. Statista. https://www.statista.com/chart/21906/zoom-revenue/. Accessed 10 April 2023.
Riedl, Rene. 2022. On the stress potential of videoconferencing: definition and root causes of Zoom fatigue. Electronic Markets 32: 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00501-3.
Sadler, Troy D., Stephen Burgin, Lyle McKinney, and Luis Ponjuan. 2010. Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 47(3): 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20326.
Schnaars, Steve, and Cliff Wymbs. 2004. On the persistence of lackluster demand—the history of the video telephone. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 71(3): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(02)00410-9.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Creative destruction. Capitalism, socialism and democracy 825: 82–85.
Serhan, Derar. 2020. Transitioning from face-to-face to remote learning: Students’ attitudes and perceptions of using Zoom during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science 4(4): 335–342.
Soeldner Jens-Henrik. 2021. Systematic Literature Review: Research Collaboration and Social Software. Understanding Social Research Networking Sites. Markets and Organisations. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31575-7_2
Sorkin, Andrew Ross, Jason Karaian, Sarah Kessler, Stephen Gandel, Michael J. de la Merced, Lauren Hirsch, and Ephrat Livni. 2021. Peleton’s bumpy ride. New York Times, Dec. 14, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/14/business/dealbook/peloton-pandemic-stocks.html. Accessed 10 April 2022.
Steinfield, Charles, Chyng-Yang Jang, and Ben Pfaff. 1999, November. Supporting virtual team collaboration: the TeamSCOPE system. In Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work, 81–90. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/320297.320306.
Tee, Kimberly, Saul Greenberg, and Carl Gutwin. 2009. Artifact awareness through screen sharing for distributed groups. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67(9): 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.04.001.
Townsend, Anthony M., Samuel M. DeMarie, and Anthony R. Hendrickson. 1998. Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Perspectives 12(3): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1998.1109047.
Tsai, Chin-Chang, Elizabeth A. Corley, and Barry Bozeman. 2016. Collaboration experiences across scientific disciplines and cohorts. Scientometrics 108: 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1997-z.
Weiss, C. 1990. Desk top video conferencing-an important feature of future visual communications. In IEEE International Conference on Communications, Including Supercomm Technical Sessions, 134–139. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.1990.117060.
Whittaker, Steve. 1995. Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: theory and design implications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 42(5): 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1995.1022.
Wiederhold, Brenda K. 2020. Connecting through technology during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Avoiding “Zoom Fatigue.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 23(7): 437–438. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.29188.bkw.
Wild, Abigail, Breanne Kunstler, Denise Goodwin, Saturnino Onyala, et al. 2021. Communicating COVID-19 health information to culturally and linguistically diverse communities: insights from a participatory research collaboration. Public Health Research & Practice 31(1): e3112105. https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3112105.
Wulf, William A. 1993. The collaboratory opportunity. Science 261(5123): 854–856. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8346438.
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by the National Science Foundation, Rapid Program, Award: 2030013, RAPID: Winners and Losers when Science Moves Home: Differential Effects of COVID-19 based on Discipline, Caregiving, and Career Stage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Interview Protocol
Doing Science in the Time of Covid-19
Thank you for agreeing to speak with me about our NSF-sponsored project. As you recall the purpose of the project is to understand ways in which the pandemic is affecting the research programs of academic researchers.
I emailed the informed consent to you with the zoom invitation. Please remember that you can stop the interview at any time or skip questions for any reason. Your interview transcript will be edited to remove proper nouns or other identifying information, or you may redact them yourself as you respond to questions. Do you have any questions about the informed consent?
Do I have your permission to record this interview? Zoom records the video and audio together, but we will save only the audio until we have transcribed it. If you prefer not to be videotaped, please turn off your computer’s video camera. [If no, then interviewer needs to be prepared to take notes during interview.]
Cognitive Frame
We are using the “research-teaching-service workload” plus “work-life” constructs to organize the interviews.
Research Program
Infrastructure
What physical, infrastructure, or location resources do you typically need to conduct your research program?
-
For example, labs, field work, computing
Covid-19
Since Covid-19 started, what disruptions, if any, have occurred to your research program, and how have you dealt with them?
-
For example, due to changes in access to research sites/infrastructure, visas (own or students) pressures on the home, “zooming,” scientific meetings
To what extent—if any—have Covid-19 related disruptions changed your collaborations with scientific colleagues, or with other sites?
University research and advancement policies
What is your understanding of your university’s Covid-19 policies related specifically to research and advancement?
-
How do you anticipate that university policies related to research and advancement will affect you this coming year?
As you anticipate this academic year, what additional adjustments—if any--do you anticipate making to your research program in response to Covid-19?
Scholarly Productivity
Since the beginning of Covid-19, would you say that you are more productive in your research, less productive, or about the same?
-
[If not “about the same”] What factors explain the changes in your productivity level?
-
[If about the same] Have you experienced tradeoffs, where some aspects work better and others less?]
Anything else about research and scholarship?
Before we move on to teaching and mentoring, is there anything else you would like to add about your research program, or impacts of the pandemic on it?
Teaching and Mentoring
What and how are you teaching this semester?
-
How many undergrads are you teaching/mentoring this semester?
-
How many graduate students do you advise?
-
How many postdocs are you supervising?
Covid-19
Since Covid-19 started, what disruptions, if any, have occurred for your students, and how have you dealt with them?
-
undergrads?
-
graduate students
-
postdocs
University research and teaching policies
What is your understanding of your university’s Covid-19 policies related to students?
How do you anticipate that university policies will affect students this coming year?
-
Probes:
-
How are they being taught?
-
-
Degree Progress
Anything else about teaching and mentoring?
Before we move on to service, is there anything else you would like to add about your role as an educator, or impacts of the pandemic on it?
Service and Leadership
Since Covid-19 started, have you noticed differences in how service work is being organized and conducted at your university, or in your profession?
-
In what ways?
-
Has this affected you, and if so, how?
General Work Satisfaction
Before Covid-19, would say you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied or very unsatisfied with your job?
How about now?
Life at Home
Working at home
Given our interest in the pandemic, there are a lot of people spending more time at home, ……
-
What percentage of your work time is currently taking place at home?
-
Is this different from what was typical for you before Covid-19? Probe: how?
University policy
How is your university supporting your work-life balance needs during the pandemic?
Your situation
It would be helpful, given our focus on a pandemic that keeps many people at home more than usual, if you could tell us a little about your household situation.
How are you and your family are adjusting to Covid-19?
[If spouse or partner]
Does your partner work for pay?
-
If so, what kind of work do they do?
-
About what percentage of your partner’s work time is currently taking place at home?
Has your partner’s work productivity been affected by Covid-19? If so, in what ways?
Would you say that the allocation between yourself and your partner of domestic responsibilities is about the same as before COVID-19 or has it changed?
For about what percentage of domestic work are you responsible, and what percentage does your partner do?
[If kids at home]
Do you have children at home? What are their ages?
How are they going to school?
What kinds of help do they need from you to deal with Covid-19 disruptions?
[Other caregiving responsibilities]
Do you have other caregiving responsibilities?
e.g., Spouse, parents, siblings, extended family
In Closing
Is there anything that surprised you, or that you have learned from this experience thus far?
What should I have asked you that I did not?
Is there anything you would like to add?
Thank you for your time.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bozeman, B., Gaughan, M. The ‘Zoomification’ of Collaboration: How Timely Technology has Affected Academic Research. Minerva 61, 467–493 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09500-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09500-4