pp 1–27 | Cite as

From Green Revolution to Green Evolution: A Critique of the Political Myth of Averted Famine

  • Roger PielkeJr.Email author
  • Björn-Ola Linnér


This paper critiques the so-called “Green Revolution” as a political myth of averted famine. A “political myth,” among other functions, reflects a narrative structure that characterizes understandings of causality between policy action and outcome. As such, the details of a particular political myth elevate certain policy options (and families of policy options) over others. One important narrative strand of the political myths of the Green Revolution is a story of averted famine: in the 1950s and 1960s, scientists predicted a global crisis to emerge in the 1970s and beyond, created by a rapidly growing global population that would cause global famine as food supplies would not keep up with demand. The narrative posits that an intense period of technological innovation in agricultural productivity led to increasing crop yields which led to more food being produced, and the predicted crisis thus being averted. The fact that the world did not experience a global famine in the 1970s is cited as evidence in support of the narrative. Political myths need not necessarily be supported by evidence, but to the extent that they shape understandings of cause and effect in policymaking, political myths which are not grounded in evidence risk misleading policymakers and the public. We argue a political myth of the Green Revolution focused on averted famine is not well grounded in evidence and thus has potential to mislead to the extent it guides thinking and action related to technological innovation. We recommend an alternative narrative: The Green Evolution, in which sustainable improvements in agricultural productivity did not necessarily avert a global famine, but nonetheless profoundly shaped the modern world. More broadly, we argue that one of the key functions of the practice of technology assessment is to critique and to help create the political myths that preserve an evidence-grounded basis for connecting the cause and effect of policy action and practical outcomes.


Green revolution Political myth Technology assessment 



This paper had an usually long gestation period and we are thankful to many for patience in its completion. We are very grateful to Linköping University for supporting an extended faculty visit of RP and to CIRES at the University of Colorado for supporting an extended faculty visit of B-OL. No other funding supported this work. The paper has been improved by the comments of numerous colleagues over the past years. An earlier version of this analysis was presented as a keynote lecture at the 2015 PACITA conference in Berlin. The paper is also a deliverable within the Mistra Geopolitics Research Programme: Sustainable development in a changing geopolitical era (Mistra DIA 2016/11 #5). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


  1. Ahlberg, Kristin L. 2008. Transplanting the Great Society: Lyndon Johnson and Food for Peace. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bottici, Chiara, and Benoit Challand. 2006. Rethinking political myth: The clash of civilizations as a self-fulfilling prophecy. European Journal of Social Theory 9: 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunner, Ronald D. 1987. Key political symbols: the dissociation process. Policy Sciences 20: 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunner, Ronald D. 1994. Myth and American politics. Policy Sciences 27: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnier, Delysa. 1994. Constructing political reality: Language, symbols, and meaning in politics: A review essay. Political Research Quarterly 47: 239–253.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, Tim W. 2002. The policy process: A practical guide for natural resources professionals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Connelly, Matthew James. 2008. Fatal misconception: the struggle to control world population. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Conway, Gordon. 1997. The Double Green Revolution: Food for All in the Twenty-First Century. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Cullather, Nick. 2010. The Hungry World: America’s Cold War Battle against Poverty in Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Daly, Herman E. 1991. Steady State Economics. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dorward, Andrew, Shenggen Fan, Jonathan Kydd, Hans Lofgren, Jamie Morrison, Colin Poulton, et al. 2004. Institutions and policies for pro-poor agricultural growth. Development Policy Review 2: 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dreze, Jean, and Amartya Sen. 1989. Hunger and public action. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.Google Scholar
  13. Drèze, Jean, and Amartya Sen (eds.). 1990. The Political Economy of Hunger I–III. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ehrlich, Paul. 1968. The population bomb. New York: Nallentine.Google Scholar
  15. Elder, Charles D., and Roger W. Cobb. 1983. The political uses of symbols. New York: Longman Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Evenson, Robert E., and Douglas Gollin. 2003. Assessing the impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 300: 758–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Falcon, Walter P. 1970. The green revolution: Generations of problems. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 52: 698–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. FAO. 1946. World Food Survey. Washington DC: UN Food and Agricultural Organization.Google Scholar
  19. Fitzgerald, Deborah. 1986. Exporting American Agriculture: The Rockefeller Foundation in Mexico, 1943–53. Social Studies of Sciences 16: 457–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flood, Christopher. 2002. Political Myth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Friedrichs, Jörg. 2014. Who’s Afraid of Thomas Malthus? In Understanding Society and Natural Resources, eds. Michael Manfredo et al., 67–92. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Gaud, William. S. 1968. The Green Revolution: Accomplishments and Apprehensions. The Society for International Development, Washington, DC March 8, 1968. Accessed 1 Nov 2013.
  23. FAO and WFP (2018). Monitoring food security in countries with conflict situations. A joint FAO/WFP update for the United Nations Security Council. United Nations Agricultural Programme and the World Food Programme. Issue 3. Accessed 15 Dec 2018.
  24. Geertz, Clifford. 1993. Religion as a cultural system. The interpretation of culture: selected essays. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gollin, Douglas. 2006. Impacts of international research on intertemporal yield stability in wheat and maize: An economic assessment. Mexico, DF: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  26. Gunnell, John G. 1968. Social science and political reality: The problem of explanation. Social Research 35: 159–201.Google Scholar
  27. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harwood, Jonathan. 2009. Peasant Friendly Plant Breeding and the Early Years of the Green Revolution in Mexico. Agricultural History 83: 384–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huxley, J. 1964. Essays of a Humanist. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
  30. Kumar, Kanikicharla Krishna, Kolli Rupa Kumar, Raghavendra Ashrit, Nayana Deshpand, and James William Hansen. 2004. Climate impacts on Indian agriculture. International Journal of Climatology 24(11): 1375–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harré, Rom, Jens Brockmeier, and Peter Mühlhäusler. 1999. Greenspeak. A study of environmental discourse. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Hasell, Joe, and Max Roser. 2017. Famines. Published online at Retrieved from: Accessed 15 Jan 2018.
  33. Holdren, John. 1974. Testimony, “Domestic Supply Information Act” held by the Committee on Commerce and Committee on Government Operations (Serial No. 93-107).Google Scholar
  34. Hulme, Mike. 2009. Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lasswell, Harold, and A. Kaplan. 1950. Power and society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Lasswell, Harold D., Daniel Lerner, and Ithiel Sola de Pool. 1952. Comparative study of symbols: An introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leffler, Melvyn P. 1992. A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration and the Cold War. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Levenstein, Harvey. 2003. Paradox of plenty: A social history of eating in modern America, vol. 8. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Linnér, Björn-Ola. 2003. The return of Malthus: Environmentalism and post-war population-resource crises. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
  40. Maharatna, Arup. 1992. The demography of Indian famines: A historical perspective (Doctoral dissertation). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  41. McCoullough, David. 1992. Truman. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  42. McNeill, John R. 2000. Something new under the sun: An environmental history of the twentieth-century world. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  43. New York Times. 1948. Population Outgrows Food, Scientists Warn the World. 15 September, p. 1.Google Scholar
  44. Otero, Gerardo, and Gabriella Pechlaner. 2008. Latin American agriculture, food, and biotechnology: Temperate dietary pattern adoption and unsustainability. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  45. Parthasarathy, B., A.A. Munot, and D.R. Kothawale. 1988. Regression model for estimation of Indian foodgrain production from summer monsoon rainfall. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 42: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Patel, Raj. 2013. The long green revolution. The Journal of Peasant Studies 40: 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perkins, John H. 1997. Geopolitics and the green revolution: Wheat, genes, and the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pielke Jr., Roger. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pielke Jr., Roger A. 2012. Basic Research as a Political Symbol. Minerva 50(3): 339–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pinstrup-Andersen, Per, and Peter B. Hazell. 1985. The impact of the Green Revolution and prospects for the future. Food Reviews International 1: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poleman, T. 1975. World food: A perspective. Science 188: 561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States. 1964. Harry S. Truman: Containing the Public Messages, Speeches, and Statements of the President, 1949. Washington: United States Printing Office.Google Scholar
  53. Rosset, Peter, Joseph Collins, and Frances Lappé. 2000. Lessons from the Green Revolution. Third World Resurgence 15: 11–14.Google Scholar
  54. Sapir, E. 1934. Symbolism. In Encyclopaedia of the social sciences, 492–495. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Shenker, Israel. 1970. ‘Green Revolution’ has sharply increased grain yields but may cause problems. New York Times.Google Scholar
  56. Shiva, Vandana. 2016. The violence of the green revolution: Third world agriculture, ecology, and politics. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  57. Smith, Harrison. 1948. The saturday review of literature, August 21, p. 20.Google Scholar
  58. Stilgoe, Jack. 2018. Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars. Social Studies of Science 48: 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sullivan, Walter. 1966. Scientists warn on famine peril. New York Times, April 26, 1966, p. 13.Google Scholar
  60. Thakur, Baleshwar, V.N.P. Sinha, M. Prasad, M. Sharma, R. Pratap, R.B. Mandal, and R.B.P. Singh (eds.). 2005. Urban and Regional Development in India. New Delhi: Concept Publishing.Google Scholar
  61. USDA. 1961. The World Food Budget, 1962 and 1966. Washington DC: USDA Economic Research Service, Foreign Regional Analysis Division.Google Scholar
  62. Wagar, Warren W. 1982. Terminal Visions: The Literature of Last Things. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Woods, Randall Bennett, and Howard Jones. 1991. Dawning of the Cold War: The United States’ Quest for Order. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  64. Zachary, G. Pascal. 2018. Endless frontier: Vannevar Bush, engineer of the American century. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of Thematic Studies (TEMA), Environmental Change (TEMAM)Linköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations