Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Naturalness in Concept Learning: A Computational Study

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the learnability of natural concepts in the context of the conceptual spaces framework. Previous work proposed that natural concepts are represented by the cells of optimally partitioned similarity spaces, where optimality was defined in terms of a number of constraints. Among these is the constraint that optimally partitioned similarity spaces result in easily learnable concepts. While there is evidence that systems of concepts generally regarded as natural satisfy a number of the proposed optimality constraints, the connection between naturalness and learnability has been less well studied. To fill this gap, we conduct a computational study employing two standard models of concept learning. Applying these models to the learning of color concepts, we examine whether natural color concepts are more readily learned than nonnatural ones. Our findings warrant a positive answer to this question for both models employed, thus lending empirical support to the notion that learnability is a distinctive characteristic of natural concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Or by sets of convex regions, if we are dealing with a multi-domain concept. We take this qualification to be read from here on.

  2. The RGB coordinates of the Munsell chips were downloaded from the website of the Munsell Color Science Laboratory of the Rochester Institute of Technology and converted to CIELUV coordinates using the Colors.jl package for the Julia language.

  3. For instance, Gärdenfors’ model has been used to derive prior probabilities for items falling under specific concepts (Decock et al., 2016) and to formalize vagueness (Douven et al., 2013; Douven, 2016; Douven et al., 2017) as well as analogical reasoning (Douven et al., 2022). It is not clear to us how any of that could be accomplished using the GCM.

  4. For similar results, see Kemp and Regier (2012); Xu and Regier (2014); Xu et al. (2016), Zaslavsky et al. (2022), and Mollica et al. (2021).

  5. In Nosofsky’s GCM, there are parameters to model response bias, memory strength, and salience of dimensions, which help to model recency and context effects. For our computational implementation, these do not matter. For instance, the order in which data are stored in computer memory makes no difference to how easily they can be retrieved.

  6. As an anonyous referee remarked, it would be interesting to conduct the simulations to be presented in the following also for the full set of 1625 Munsell chips, especially given that the chips for the WCS were all selected precisely because they all show highly saturated colors, thus raising the question whether we would obtain the same results if also chips showing less saturated colors were included. A practical problem here is that we currently lack data on how people would carve up the full set of Munsell chips into the eleven basic color categories. Jraissati and Douven (2018) did use the full set in their study, but presented their participants with a free-naming task, meaning that they could use any name they liked for any of the chips they were shown.

  7. Note that because a random number of chips was sampled randomly from each concept, there was no fixed sample size. It was empirically determined that the sample size was, on average, 165.02 (± 31.98).

  8. The nonnatural concepts have the color resulting from averaging the CIELUV coordinates of the chips that fall under the concept. Also, all color concepts that occurred in the study—both the natural ones and the nonnatural ones—were convex, by construction. That the charts shown in Fig. 6 might suggest otherwise is simply because these charts are not meant to represent a perceptual color space.

  9. I am grateful to Christopher von Bülow and to two anonymous referees for this journal for valuable comments on a previous version.

References

  • Alon, U. (2003). Biological networks: The tinkerer as an engineer. Science, 301, 1866–1867.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1991). Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 471–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendifallah, L., Abbou, J., Douven, I., & Burnett, H. (2023). Conceptual spaces for conceptual engineering? Feminism as a case study. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, in press.

  • Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms. CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S., & Shah, V. B. (2017). Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Review, 59, 65–98.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1980). A basic system of inductive logic, part II. In R. C. Jeffrey (Ed.), Studies in inductive logic and probability (pp. 7–155). University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, J. B., Ramanathan, A., & Chennubhotla, C. S. (2013). Categorical dimensions of human odor descriptor space revealed by non-negative matrix factorization. PLoS ONE, 8, e73289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073289

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (1999). Ten years of the rational analysis of cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 57–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M. (2012). Plato’s camera. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Claidière, N., Jraissati, Y., & Chevallier, C. (2008). A colour sorting task reveals the limits of the universalist/relativist dichotomy: Colour categories can be both language specific and perceptual. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. S., Kay, P., & Regier, T. (2005). The World Color Survey database: History and use. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 223–242). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deauvieau, J., Penissat, É., Brousse, C., & Jayet, C. (2014). Les catégorisations ordinaires de l’espace social français. Revue Française de Sociologie, 55, 411–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decock, L., & Douven, I. (2014). What is graded membership? Noûs, 48, 653–682.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Decock, L., Douven, I., & Sznajder, M. (2016). A geometric principle of indifference. Journal of Applied Logic, 19, 54–70.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Douven, I. (2016). Vagueness, graded membership, and conceptual spaces. Cognition, 151, 80–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douven, I. (2019). Putting prototypes in place. Cognition, 193, 104007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douven, I., Decock, L., Dietz, R., & Égré, P. (2013). Vagueness: A conceptual spaces approach. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 42, 137–160.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Douven, I., Elqayam, S., Gärdenfors, P., & Mirabile, P. (2022). Conceptual spaces and the strength of similarity-based arguments. Cognition, 218, 104951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douven, I., & Gärdenfors, P. (2020). What are natural concepts? A design perspective. Mind & Language, 35, 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douven, I., Wenmackers, S., Jraissati, Y., & Decock, L. (2017). Measuring graded membership: The case of color. Cognitive Science, 41, 686–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, M. D. (2013). Color appearance models. Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. C., & Goodman, N. D. (2012). Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science, 336, 998.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (2001). Concept learning: A geometrical model. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 101, 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P. (2014). The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P., Jost, J., & Warglien, M. (2018). From actions to effects: Three constraints on event mappings. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P., & Warglien, M. (2012). Using concept spaces to model actions and events. Journal of Semantics, 29, 487–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008). A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning. Cognitive Science, 32, 108–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T. L., Lieder, F., & Goodman, N. D. (2015). Rational use of cognitive resources: Levels of analysis between the computational and the algorithmic. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 217–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, C. L. (1988). Color for philosophers: Unweaving the rainbow. Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. M. (1969). A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 176–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, K., & D’Andrade, R. (1997). It’s not really red, green, yellow, blue: An inquiry into perceptual color space. In C. L. Hardin & L. Maffi (Eds.), Color categories in thought and language (pp. 295–319). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jraissati, Y., & Douven, I. (2018). Delving deeper into color space. i-Perception, 9, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518792062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2005). Finding groups in data. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, C., & Regier, T. (2012). Kinship categories across languages reflect general communicative principles. Science, 336, 1049–1054.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malacara, D. (2002). Color vision and colorimetry: Theory and applications. SPIE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Henry Holt and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollica, F., Bacon, G., Zaslavsky, N., Xu, Y., Regier, T., & Kemp, C. (2021). The forms and meanings of grammatical markers support efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, e2025993118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munsell, A. H. (1941). A color notation: An illustrated system defining all colors and their relations. The Hoffman Brothers Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87–108.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (2011). The generalized context model: An exemplar model of classification. In E. M. Pothos & A. J. Wills (Eds.), Formal approaches in categorization (pp. 18–39). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okabe, A., Boots, B., Sugihara, K., & Chiu, S. N. (2000). Spatial tessellations (2nd ed.). Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. (2017). The ethics of technology: A geometric analysis of five moral principles. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petitot, J. (1989). Morphodynamics and the categorical perception of phonological units. Theoretical Linguistics, 15, 25–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfitzer, D., Leibbrandt, R., & Powers, D. (2009). Characterization and evaluation of similarity measures of pairs of clusterings. Knowledge and Information Systems, 19, 361–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., Goldsmith, R., & Welton, K. E., Jr. (1967). Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 28–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1970). Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regier, T., Kay, P., & Khetarpal, N. (2007). Color naming reflects optimal partitions of color space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 1436–1441.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regier, T., Kay, P., & Khetarpal, N. (2009). Color naming and the shape of color space. Language, 85, 884–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Miller, R. S. (1976). Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 54–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, T., Lewis, M. B., & Hills, P. J. (2016). Face-space: A unifying concept in face recognition research. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1996–2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheyen, S., & Égré, P. (2018). Typicality and graded membership in dimensional adjectives. Cognitive Science, 42, 2250–2286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verheyen, S., & Peterson, M. (2021). Can we use conceptual spaces to model moral principles? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 12, 373–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y. & Regier, T. (2014). Numeral systems across languages support efficient communication: From approximate numerosity to recursion. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1802–1807). Austin TX: Cognitive Science Society.

  • Xu, Y., Regier, T., & Malt, B. C. (2016). Historical semantic chaining and efficient communication: The case of container names. Cognitive Science, 40, 2081–2094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, N., Garvin, K., Kemp, C., Tishby, N., & Regier, T. (2022). The evolution of color naming reflects pressure for efficiency: Evidence from the recent past. Journal of Language Evolution, 7, 184–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Douven.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The Supplementary Materials, including the Julia file that was used for the simulations reported, are available in a GitHub repository which can be accessed via this link https://github.com/IgorDouven/Concept_Learning.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Douven, I. The Role of Naturalness in Concept Learning: A Computational Study. Minds & Machines 33, 695–714 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-023-09652-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-023-09652-y

Keywords

Navigation