Abstract
Nonlocal hereditariness in Bernoulli–Euler beam is investigated in this paper. An approach to solve that problem is proposed and some analytical solutions are provided. To this aim, time-dependent hereditary behavior is modeled by means of non-integer order operators of the fractional linear viscoelasticity. While, space-dependent nonlocal phenomena are simulated through the integral stress-driven formulation. These two approaches are combined providing a new model able to simulate nonlocal viscoelastic bending problem. Several application samples of the proposed formulation and a thorough parametric study are presented showing the influences of hereditariness and nonlocal effects on the mechanical bending response. Proposed formulation can be useful for design and optimization of structures used in advanced applications when local elastic theory cannot be adopted.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Small-scale devices [1,2,3,4], biological and bioinspired materials [5,6,7], advanced porous nanostructures [8, 9], self-healing matter [10], hierarchical and periodic structures [11, 12], new-generation of complex composites [13,14,15] require sophisticated methodologies and advanced models to predict their mechanical behavior. Usually, classical models of local continuum elasticity are not accurate enough to simulate the mechanical behavior of these nonconventional structural elements. Therefore, researching of new mechanical formulations able to predict complex behaviors represent an open problem of the structural mechanics. In this context, this manuscript deals with the simulation of two phenomena which occur in some mechanical behaviors providing a new approach to solve the bending problem of hereditary nonlocal beam.
Hereditariness is the property of such materials that posses mechanical memory of past effects. Usually, in these materials stress decay under constant strain as well as strain increments under constant stress showing a time-dependent material behavior. This phenomenon cannot be modeled by the classical theory of elasticity and regards several nonconventional materials. An approach to model this mechanical phenomena is based on the linear theory of viscoelasticity [16, 17]. Specifically, in the integral formulation of hereditariness the stress–strain relation is given as an integral Volterra-Boltzamann relation where the kernel is a time-dependent function which takes into account the memory of the material. Among the various model of linear viscoelasticity, hereditary model based on the fractional calculus is able to represent the real time-dependent behavior of a wide variety of materials, like polymers [18], biological tissues [19], clays [20], non-newtonian fluids [5], rubbers [21], bones [22], and so on [23, 24]. Moreover, these models are also recently used to model nonlinear time-dependent behavior [25,26,27]. For these capabilities viscoelastic models based upon fractional calculus will be used in this paper to obtain a versatile time-dependent stress–strain relation useful to model several advanced bending problems where hereditary effects cannot be neglected.
The other considered phenomenon in this paper is related to the nonlocal effects. Nonlocality regards various mechanical issues where the mechanical interactions cannot be considered as local. In fact, in nonlocal problem the stress (or the strain) at a point of the continuum is function of the stress (or strain) field of the entire domain [28, 29]. Size-effects at small scale [30], strain and stress localizations [31, 32], anomalous waves dispersions in complex materials with marked microstructures [33, 34], structures forced by long-range force field [35,36,37] are some examples where nonlocal phenomena cannot be neglected. Among the various nonlocal models, Eringen’s formulation is probably the most famous one [38, 39]. In such a model stress–strain relation is described by a convolution integral where the long-range interactions are weighted by the averaging kernel characterized by an internal-length parameter. Thus, the nonlocal stress is obtained by a Fredholm integral equation of the first kind between the averaging kernel and the local strain [40]. That approach was useful to describe screw dislocations and wave propagation in nonlocal unbounded domains. However, some mathematical issues and physical paradoxes occur when the model is applied in a bounded domain [41, 42]. Nevertheless, there are other various nonlocal approaches to overcome these difficulties, e.g., two-phase models [43, 44], strain-difference approaches [45, 46], strain and stress gradient theory [47,48,49,50,51,52,53], displacement-based nonlocal model [54,55,56,57], stress-driven integral formulation [58, 59]. Among these well-posed nonlocal formulations the stress-driven approach is used in this paper to perform the study of the nonlocal interactions in bending problem. Recent papers have proved that the stress-driven formulation is able to simulate nonlocal behavior providing exact solutions for several structural problems of applicative interests [60,61,62,63,64].
In summary, in this paper fractional hereditariness and integral stress-driven formulation of nonlocality are combined providing analytical solution of bending nonlocal viscoelastic problem. Closed-form solutions will allow us to obtain some interesting parametric results in order to show the influence of nonlocal and viscoelastic parameters in the mechanical response. This study can be useful to show the difference between the considered complex case and the classical local elastic bending response. The outcomes can be useful for design and optimization of structures at small-scale, bioinspired structural elements, porous viscoelastic devices, and so on. Therefore, the proposed formulation can be useful to capture different phenomena related to nonlocality and hereditariness, such as,
-
size effects in small-scale structures where molecular interactions and long-range force cannot be neglected,
-
time-dependent behavior of non-elastic materials like polymeric and nonconventional structural continua,
-
nonlocalities in non-continuous materials with microstructures like artificial and biological tissues,
-
mechanical behavior of multiphase materials in advanced smart composites.
The manuscript is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces integral formulation of viscoelasticity with special regard to the uniaxial stress–strain relation useful in bending problems. Section 3 is devoted to the fractional stress–strain relations. Specifically, three time-dependent models are described in detail showing the influence of the fractional order in the mechanical response of the viscoelastic material. Fractional stress–strain relation and stress-driven integral approach are used in conjunction in Sect. 4 providing a new formulation of bending behavior of a nonlocal hereditary beam. Such a section contains analytical solution of this time-dependent problem where hereditariness and nonlocality can be modeled varying two specific mechanical parameters. Numerical simulations and detailed parametric studies are reported in Sect. 5. Finally, Sect. 6 summarizes and highlights the main concluding remarks.
2 Viscoelastic stress–strain relation
This section introduces integral formulation of linear viscoelasticity used to model hereditariness in real materials. Uniaxial constitutive law for viscoelastic isotropic homogeneous material are introduced below and will be used to formulate the nonlocal beam problem. That constitutive relation is suitably derived from the tridimensional stress–strain relation.
2.1 Integral formulation of viscoelasticity
Let us assume that strain and stress are space- and time-dependent functions related by a convolution integral where the kernel takes into account memory effects of an homogeneous viscoelastic material [16, 17]. Specifically, this constitutive relation is given as
where \(i,j \in \{1,2,3\}\), \(\varepsilon _{kl}\) represents the viscoelastic strain tensor, \(\sigma _{ij}\) is the stress tensor and \({\mathcal {G}}_{ijklm}\) is the forth-order relaxation tensor which contains the time-dependent mechanical parameters of the viscoelastic material. The symmetry of the strain and stress tensors implies that
If the material is isotropic the relaxation tensor can be represented by two independent function as follows
where \({\mathcal {G}}_1(t)\) and \({\mathcal {G}}_2(t)\) are independent relaxation functions and \(\delta _{ij}\) is the Kronecker symbol. The first relaxation function \({\mathcal {G}}_1(t)\) is defined to states of dilatation whereas \({\mathcal {G}}_2(t)\) is defined relative to states of shear. Specifically, by introducing the deviatoric components of the stress \(s_{ij}\) and the strain \(e_{ij}\), Eq. (1) reduces to
being
2.2 Uniaxial stress–strain relation for bending problem
Now, let us consider the state of the stress and the strain in a 3D continuum beam element referred to a coordinate cartesian axis (x, y, z), where z coincides with the centroidal axis of the beam while x and y are the principal intertia axes of the cross-section. Under the kinematic assumptions of the Bernoulli–Euler beam model the sole axial deformation \(\varepsilon _z(t)\) is sufficient to describe the entire displacement field and the problem is ruled only by the axial stress \(\sigma _z(t)\). Thus, from Eq. (4) the isotropic viscoelastic stress-strain relation of that structural element becomes
where \(\nu \) is the Poisson’s ratio. Moreover, we assume that Poisson’s ratio is a constant during the time [17, 65], this assumption implies that
Thus, taking into account this relation between the two relaxation functions we can assume that
and Eq. (6) yields
where \({\mathcal {E}}(t)\) is the axial relaxation modulus. The inverse relation of Eq. (9) is
where the integral kernel \({\mathcal {J}}(t)\) represents the creep compliance. The two integral kernels in Eqs. (9) and (10) represent the relaxation and the creep functions and take into account the memory of the material. In linear viscoelasticity they are related in the Laplace domain by the following relation
where \({\hat{\cdot }}\) denotes the Laplace transform. Such integral transform is defined as
being s a complex number.
3 Uniaxial fractional-order viscoelasticity
Among the various time-dependent kernel function used in the viscoelastic stress–strain relation in Eqs. (9) and (10) the power-law type is considered to simulate hereditariness in the bending problem studied in this manuscript. This choice is motivated by experimental evidences reported in various works [18, 19, 21, 23]. These cited papers have proved that power-law functions are able to fit experimental data of relaxation tests modeling long-time memory effects in several hereditary materials. Moreover, with a proper selection of the power-law as kernel function in Eqs. (9) and (10) fractional operators can be appeared in the stress–strain relation [24, 66, 67]. This kind of formulation is called fractional-order viscoelasticity and allows us to model time-dependent mechanical behavior with a selection of a few number of parameters.
In this section three different kind of power-law law functions as time-dependent kernel are considered. These kernels provide the stress–strain relation of three fractional order models. That is, the spring-pot, the fractional Kelvin–Voigt and the fractional Maxwell model [68, 69].
3.1 One-term fractional model
Among the fractional order models, the simplest one is known as spring-pot (SP) model [70,71,72]. It is ruled by a one-term fractional differential equation characterized by a fractional order \(\beta :0\leqslant \beta \leqslant 1\) and a viscoelastic parameter \(\mathrm {E}_\beta \,\left[ \mathrm {Pa\, s}^\beta \right] \). Specifically, choosing as relaxation modulus a power-law decaying function of the type
placing it into the Eq. (9) and assuming that \(\varepsilon _z(0)=0\), the following relation holds true
where \(\Gamma (\cdot )\) is the Euler’s gamma function, \(\left( {}\mathrm {D}^\beta _{0^+}\cdot \right) (t)\) represents the time-derivative of order \(\beta \) with lower bound \(t=0\). Eq. (14) represents the strain-driven constitutive law of the SP and involves fractional differential operator that generalizes the classical integer order derivative. Specifically, for \(t>0\) it is defined as
Moreover, fractional stress-driven viscoelastic relation of the SP can be obtained by performing integration of Eq. () or considering integral formulation and selecting a proper creep function. Specifically, taking into account the relaxation function in Eq. (13) and the relation in Laplace domain in Eq. (11) the creep function is
by placing Eq. (16) into Eq. (10) we obtain
where \(\left( \mathrm {I}^\beta _{0^+}\cdot \right) (t)\) is the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral with order \(\beta \) and lower bound \(t=0\) defined as
Stress–strain relation of SP is ruled by the relation in Eqs. (14) and (17). The fractional-order constitutive laws are the generalization of the classical elastic and viscous model. Specifically, for the bounded limit of the order \(\beta \) the fractional-order relations describe Young elastic law and Newton–Petroff viscous law. That is,
where \(\mathrm {E}\) is the Young modulus \([\mathrm {Pa}]\), and \(\mu \) is the viscosity \([\mathrm {Pa}\, \mathrm {s}]\).
3.2 Two-terms fractional models
SP model is able to simulate the stress–strain relation of several materials by means of two mechanical parameters. However, some viscoelastic materials exhibit mechanical behaviors that need more than two parameters, e.g., rubbery-transition phenomena is well described by fractional Kelvin–Voigt model [73], some damper materials used to mitigate vibrations for seismic protection applications require the use of fractional Maxwell model [74]. Both these other fractional-order models are characterized by three mechanical parameters, their stress–strain relations are reported below. SP model and the other two fractional models are considered in this paper to derive the nonlocal behavior of viscoelastic Bernoulli–Euler beam.
Fractional Kelvin–Voigt (FK) model is characterized by the following relaxation function \({\mathcal {E}}_{\mathrm {fk}}(t)\) and creep compliance \({\mathcal {J}}_{\mathrm {fk}}(t)\)
where \(\mathrm {E}\) is a purely elastic modulus which represent the limit for \(t\rightarrow \infty \) of the relaxation function and \({\mathbb {E}}_\beta \left( \cdot \right) \) is one-parameter Mittag-Leffler function defined as
By using Eqs. (20) into the integral formulation in Eqs. (9) and (10) the following fractional-order stres-strain relations hold true
these costitutive laws represent the stress–strain relation of an elastic spring connected in parallel with a SP.
The fractional Maxwell (FM) model is characterized by the following relaxation function \({\mathcal {E}}_{\mathrm {fm}}(t)\) and creep compliance \({\mathcal {J}}_{\mathrm {fm}}(t)\)
by using these function as kernels in the integral formulation Eqs. (9) and (10) we obtain
in this case the constitutive laws represent a viscoelastic model composed by an elastic spring connected in series with a SP.
In the next section these fractional viscoelastic models are used to describe the time-dependent bending behavior of a nonlocal Bernoulli–Euler beam. Nonlocal effects will be modeled by stress-driven approach. Following this approach the nonlocal viscoelastic strain field will be derived from the local one defined in Eq. (10) where creep function is the integral kernel of the costitutive law. The considered creep functions used in the next section are reported in Fig. 1. It shows the creep function of the SP, the FK and the FM, respectively evaluated from Eqs. (16), (20b) and (23b), for different values of the fractional order \(\beta \). It can be observed that SP creep function yields the elastic constant compliance for \(\beta =0\) and linear viscous one for \(\beta =1\). Moreover, classical Kelvin–Voigt model is a particular case of FK with \(\beta =1\) and classical Maxwell model can be obtained from FM by placing \(\beta =1\).
4 Viscoelastic nonlocal Bernoulli–Euler beam
Let us consider the viscoelastic beam element length L and cross section A. The volume of the beam is described with respect to a cartesian coordinate system \((x,\,y,\,z)\) oriented in such a way that z coincides with the centroidal longitudinal axis and the other two are the principal intertia axes of the cross-section, the domain of this structural element is \({\mathcal {B}}:0\leqslant z \leqslant L\).
The beam is loaded by time-dependent transversal load \(q_y(z,t)\) as it is shown in Fig. 2. The beam is characterized by viscoelastic behavior and nonlocal phenomena. To simulate the viscoelastic time dependent effects the fractional models introduced in the previous section are considered. While the nonlocal behavior is modeled by means of the stress-driven integral formulation [58]. This approach allows us to obtain the analytical solution of several problems avoiding the physical paradoxes of classical strain-driven Eringen’s formulation that appear in various nonlocal problems of bounded domains [75]. Specifically, for the considered bending problem, after the definition of the local viscoelastic curvature-moment relation \(\chi _z^{\mathrm {ve}}(z,t)\text {-}M_x(z,t)\) the nonlocal curvature \(\chi _z(z,t)\) is obtained as convolution integral relation between a kernel function \(\phi _\lambda (z)\) and the local moment.
4.1 Local viscoelastic bending problem
Considering kinematic Bernoulli–Euler hypothesis, being the element loaded only in y-direction all the strain field in the deformed configuration is described from the knowledge of the displacement v(z, t) of the longitudinal axis and rotation \(\varphi _x(z,t)\) of the cross-section. In this case, bending curvature is
which is related with axial strain \(\varepsilon _z(z,t)\) by the following relation
Stress \(\sigma _z(t)\) and bending moment \(M_x\) are related by the following relations
where \({\mathcal {I}}_x\) is the moment of inertia of the cross section respect to x-axis. That is,
Considering the beam domain \({\mathcal {B}}:0\leqslant z \leqslant L\), and by taking into account Eqs. (26) and (27), viscoelastic relation in Eq. (10) becomes
where the considered kernels \({\mathcal {J}}_j(t)\) for \(j=\left\{ \mathrm {sp,\,fk,\,fm}\right\} \) are defined in Eqs. (16), (20b) and (23b).
4.2 Nonlocal stress-driven formulation
Nonlocal phenomena modeled by stress-driven approach is characterized of a constitutive law in which the nonlocal viscoelastic curvature \(\chi _x(z,t)\) is a function of the entire local viscoelastic curvature \(\chi _x^{\mathrm {ve}}(z,t)\) in Eq. (29). This relation is expressed by a convolution integral where the kernel is an attenuation space-function \(\phi _\lambda (z)\) which weighs the effects of the local curvature in each point of the domain \({\mathcal {B}}\). That is,
the kernel is characterized by the nonlocal parameter \(\lambda \). The local viscoelastic curvature is defined in Eq. (29), therefore, Eq. (30) becomes
this equation represents the stress-driven nonlocal viscoelastic relation in terms of bending nonlocal curvature and moment. The convolution kernel must be selected among the symmetric positive functions with limit impulsivity propriety. It can be selected among exponential, Gaussian, power-law function, and so on. We consider as convolution kernel the following bi-exponential function
where \(l_\lambda =\lambda L\) measure the long-range nonlocal interaction. With this selection of the kernel, the integral relation in Eq. (29) is equivalent to the following integro-differential relation
under the following constitutive boundary condition
Taking into account Eq. (25) and the following equilibrium equation
Eq. (33) yields
and the constitutive boundary conditions in Eq. (34) become
Bending moment \(M_x(z,t)\) and the shear force \(T_y(z,t)\) become
where the considered kernels \({\mathcal {E}}_j(t)\) for \(j=\left\{ \mathrm {sp,\,fk,\,fm}\right\} \) are defined in Eqs. (13), (20a) and (23a).
5 Sample applications and parametric study
Stress-driven nonlocal approach allows us to obtain some analytical solutions useful to investigate the influence of the nonlocal parameter and viscoelastic phenomena in the structural response. This section shows the analytical solutions and the parametric analysis of two sample cases. Specifically, the first sample application is a simply supported beam where the influence of the viscoelastic and nonlocal parameters is investigated. The second one is a cantilever micro beam used to model some small-scale devices.
In both case the system is quiescent at \(t=0\), therefore, the Eq. (36) yields
5.1 Simply supported beam forced by uniform distributed load
By assuming that beam is forced by an uniform distributed load along z and constant in time, thus \(q_y(z,t)=a\,U(t)\), where a is a constant value and U(t) is the unit step function defined as
the derivative of the unit step function is the Dirac delta function \(\delta (t)=\dot{U}(t)\), therefore Eq. (39) yields
for the sampling property of the delta function Eq. (41) becomes
and its solution is
the six coefficients \(c_k\) must be evaluated by imposing the costitutive boundary conditions in Eq. (37) and the following static and kinematic ones
The figures shown below are obtained considering the normalized displacement \({\tilde{v}}(\zeta ,t)\) defined as
where \(\zeta =z/L\) is the normalized abscissa. For the FK and the FM model it is assumed that \(\mathrm {E}_\beta /\mathrm {E}=1\). The influence of nonlocal parameter \(\lambda \) and the effects of fractional order \(\beta \) for the three viscoelastic models SP, FK and FM on the structural response are discussed below.
5.1.1 Influence of nonlocal parameter
By assuming that \(\beta =1/2\) the nonlocal effects are highlighted in Fig. 3. It shows time-evolution of the normalized displacement along the normalized abscissa \(\zeta \) considering three different viscoelastic models.
The chosen viscoelastic model influences the time-evolution of the response, while the nonlocal parameter \(\lambda \) modifies the response along the space coordinate \(\zeta \). Specifically, in any time the response is stiffer when \(\lambda \) increases. The main difference between the nonlocal viscoelastic responses in Fig. 3 consists in a variation of the shape during the time. Thus, the nonlocal effects can be observed independently of the chosen viscoelastic model considering a generic time and different values of \(\lambda \). Therefore, without loss of generality, we consider below the effect of the nonlocal parameter in terms of normalized nonlocal rotation \({\tilde{\varphi }}_x(\zeta ,t)\) and normalized nonlocal curvature \({\tilde{\chi }}_x(\zeta ,t)\) in a generic \(t=1~\mathrm {s}\) when the chosen viscoelastic model is the spring-pot with \(\beta =1/2\).
For different values of \(\lambda \) the normalized nonlocal viscoelastic rotation of the cross-section \(\tilde{\varphi }_x(\zeta ,1)\) is shown in Fig. 4. Whereas, Fig. 5 shows the influence of the nonlocal parameter on the normalized viscoelastic curvature \({\tilde{\chi }}_x(\zeta ,1)\).
In accordance with Fig. 3 also these other two pictures show that when the nonlocal parameters grows up the beam become stiffer.
5.1.2 Viscoelastic effects
To study the viscoelastic phenomena in nonlocal viscoelastic beam we consider the influence of the fractional order \(\beta \) in the structural response in terms of normalized displacement, rotation and curvature. For this study, we fix the nonlocal parameter \(\lambda =0.10\).
Figure 6 shows the displacements at a fixed time \(t=2\) s for the considered viscoelastic model and different values of the fractional order \(\beta =\{1/4,\,1/2,\,3/4\}\).
Time evolution of the maximum normalized displacement \(\tilde{v}(1/2,t)\) is depicted in Fig. 7. It shows the difference in terms of the maximum displacement for different viscoelastic model and different viscoelastic parameter \(\beta \).
These pictures show that the time response is ruled by the chosen creep function \({\mathcal {J}}_j(t)\). The fractional order \(\beta \) influences the viscoelastic response, specifically, when it increases the viscous response grows up and the viscoelastic response, after a certain time, becomes less stiff. At the initial times the response is ruled by the viscous phase, therefore, an increment of \(\beta \) causes an apparent stiffening in the response.
5.2 Cantilever micro-beam inflected by end-point load
We consider now another application where the viscoelastic nonlocal beam is forced by an end-point time-dependent force. This load condition is typical of several small-scale applications, e.g., nano-actuator modeled by a nano-cantilever beam forced by an end-point load [50]. In this application we consider a microelectromechanical system (MEMS). Usually, MEMS are made of a piezoresistive nanocomposite where the matrix is an epoxy resin filled by nanofibers [76]. In this case a proper mechanical model is a viscoelastic cantilever nonlocal micro-beam. Where the viscoelastic properties are due to the polymeric matrix and the nonlocal phenomena are related to the size effects at the micro-scale. The viscoelastic stress–strain relation of the epoxy resin is modeled as the fractional-order law in Eq. (17) where the mechanical parameters are \(\beta =0.04\) and \(C_\beta =2660\,\mathrm {MPa\, s}^\beta \) [18]. The size-effect influences the mechanical response and to take into account this effect we consider the stress-driven approach described before and report the response in terms of displacement, rotation and curvature for different value of the nonlocal parameter \(\lambda \).
For this sample application the Eq. (36) yields
the constitutive boundary conditions are the same in Eq. (37) and the kinematic and the static ones are
where \(F_y(t)\) is a time-dependent vertical force applied at \(z=L\).
For this numerical application we consider a cantilever micro-beam of length \(L=300\,\upmu \mathrm {m}\) and rectangular cross section \(A=30\times 25\,\upmu \mathrm {m}^2\) forced at the end-point by the following force
where \(a=1\,\mathrm {mN}\).
The response in terms of transversal displacement v(z, t) of the cantilever micro-beam made of epoxy resin for different values of the nonlocal parameter \(\lambda \) is shown in Fig. 8. Specifically, that picture contains the time-evolution of the transversal displacement of the longitudinal axis for \(\lambda =\{0.1,\,0.2,\,0.3,\,0.4\}\).
The time evolution of the maximum displacement v(L, t) is reported in Fig. 9a, while the displacement for a fixed time \(t=1\,\hbox {s}\) is shown in Fig. 9b.
Whereas rotation and bending curvature of the cross section at \(t=1~\mathrm {s}\) are reported in Fig. 10.
All these figures show that the nonlocal parameter influences the viscoelastic response. Specifically, when \(\lambda \) increases the magnitude of displacement and rotation decrease. The nonlocal curvature shows a particular behavior where the maximum value decreases when \(\lambda \) increases and the distribution along the space domain changes in function of the nonlocal parameter. This behavior is a consequence of the increment of the long-range interactions when \(\lambda \) grows up.
6 Concluding remarks
Analytical solutions of bending problems of hereditary nonlocal Bernoulli–Euler beam have been presented in this paper. Two main nonconventional mechanical phenomena have been considered in this paper, that is, hereditariness and nonlocality. They have been simulated by means of fractional operators and stress-driven nonlocal formulation.
Time-dependent hereditary behavior, that is typical of viscoelastic materials, has been modeled considering three long-memory models. Specifically, spring-pot, fractional Kelvin–Voigt and fractional Maxwell models have been considered. All these models have a constitutive law based on the differential and integral operators with non-integer orders. They are versatile models that by means of a proper selection of a few number of parameters provide good results in the simulation of the real hereditary mechanical behavior.
Nonlocal phenomena have been simulated by means of the integral stress-driven formulation. This consists in a well-posed integral nonlocal formulation avoiding the paradoxical problems of Eringen’s strain-driven counterpart and providing some useful analytical solutions. Combining fractional hereditary constitutive law and stress-driven nonlocal model a new formulation of nonlocal hereditary relation has been derived. This formulation has been applied to solve bending problems of nonlocal hereditary Bernoulli–Euler beams. Specifically, some closed-form solutions have been obtained and a detailed parametric study has been presented.
Thanks to the proposed closed-form solutions, nonlocal effects and hereditary behaviour in the bending problem have been highlighted. This study has shown the influence of both nonlocal and hereditary parameters in the time-dependent bending response. Proposed formulation and presented outcomes can be useful for design and optimization of structures at small-scale, for the mechanical simulation of bioinspired structural elements, for describing the strain localization in porous viscoelastic devices, and for all those mechanical applications where the local elastic theory cannot be adopted.
References
Mojahedi M (2017) Size dependent dynamic behaviour of electrostatically actuated microbridges. Int J Eng Sci 111:74–85
De Bellis ML, Bacigalupo A, Zavarise G (2019) Characterization of hybrid piezoelectric nanogenerators through asymptotic homogenization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 355:1148–1186
Kiani K, Zur KK (2021) Vibrations of double-nanorod-systems with defects using nonlocal-integral-surface energy-based formulations. Compos Struct 256:113028
Malikan M, Uglov NS, Eremeyev VA (2020) On instabilities and post-buckling of piezomagnetic and flexomagnetic nanostructures. Int J Eng Sci 157:103395
Alotta G, Di Paola M, Pinnola FP, Zingales M (2020) A fractional nonlocal approach to nonlinear blood flow in small-lumen arterial vessels. Meccanica 55(4):891–906
Scott CG et al (2015) Control of hierarchical polymer mechanics with bioinspired metal-coordination dynamics. Nat Mater 14:1210–1216
Giuliani N, Heltai L, DeSimone A (2018) Predicting and optimizing microswimmer performance from the hydrodynamics of its components: the relevance of interactions. Soft Rob 5(4):410–424
Jankowski P, Żur KK, Kim J, Reddy JN (2020) On the bifurcation buckling and vibration of porous nanobeams. Compos Struct 250:112632
Malikan M, Eremeyev VA (1935) Żur KK (2020) Effect of axial porosities on flexomagnetic response of in-plane compressed piezomagnetic nanobeams. Symmetry 12(12):1935
Lei Z et al (2017) A bioinspired mineral hydrogel as a self-healable, mechanically adaptable ionic skin for highly sensitive pressure sensing. Adv Mater 29(22):1700321
Vollrath F, Knight DP (2001) Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 410(6828):541–548
Ling Q et al (2012) Biomimetic superelastic graphene-based cellular monoliths. Nat Commun 3:1241
Pourasghar A, Chen Z (2019) Effect of hyperbolic heat conduction on the linear and nonlinear vibration of CNT reinforced size-dependent functionally graded microbeams. Int J Eng Sci 137:57–72
Xia X, Weng GJ, Hou D, Wen W (2019) Tailoring the frequency-dependent electrical conductivity and dielectric permittivity of CNT-polymer nanocomposites with nanosized particles. Int J Eng Sci 142:1–19
Sedighi HM, Malikan M, Valipour A, Żur KK (2020) Nonlocal vibration of carbon/boron-nitride nano-hetero-structure in thermal and magnetic fields by means of nonlinear finite element method. J Comput Des Eng 7(5):591–602
Flugge W (1967) Viscoelasticity. Blaisdell Publishing Company, Waltham
Christensen RM (1982) Theory of viscoelasticity, an introduction. Academic Press, New York
Di Paola M, Fiore V, Pinnola FP, Valenza A (2014) On the influence of the initial ramp for a correct definition of the parameters of the fractional viscoelastic material. Mech Mater 69:63–70
Demirci N, Tonuk E (2014) Non-integer viscoelastic constitutive law to model soft biological tissues to in-vivo indentation. Acta Bioeng Biomech 16(4):13–21
Liu Z-Y, Yang Q (2017) One-dimensional rheological consolidation analysis of saturated clay using fractional order Kelvin’s model. Yantu Lixue/Rock Soil Mech 38(12):3680–3687 and 3697
Di Paola M, Pirrotta A, Valenza A (2011) Visco-elastic behaviour through fractional calculus: an easier method for best fitting experimental results. Mech Mater 43(12):799–806
Deseri L, Di Paola M, Zingales M, Pollaci P (2013) Power-law hereditariness of hierarchical fractal bones. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 29(12):1338–1360
Nutting PG (1921) A new general law of deformation. J Frankl Inst 191:679–685
Bagley RL, Torvik PJ (1984) On the appearance of the fractional derivative in the behavior of real materials. J Appl Mech 51:294–298
Di Mino G, Airey G, Di Paola M, Pinnola FP, D’Angelo G, Lo Presti D (2016) Linear and nonlinear fractional hereditary constitutive laws of asphalt mixtures. J Civ Eng Manag 22(7):882–889
Yifei S, Yang X (2017) Fractional order plasticity model for granular soils subjected to monotonic triaxial compression. Int J Solids Struct 118–119:224–234
Pinnola FP, Zavarise G, Del Prete A, Franchi R (2018) On the appearance of fractional operators in non-linear stress–strain relation of metals. Int J Non-Linear Mech 105:1–8
Rogula D (1965) Influence of spatial acoustic dispersion on dynamical properties of dislocations. Bull Acad Pol Sci Ser Sci Tech 13:337–343
Rogula D (1982) Introduction to nonlocal theory of material media. In: Rogula D (ed) Nonlocal theory of material media. CISM courses and lectures, vol 268. Springer, Wien, pp 125–222
Rahmani O, Pedram O (2014) Analysis and modeling the size effect on vibration of functionally graded nanobeams based on nonlocal Timoshenko beam theory. Int J Eng Sci 77:55–70
Bažant ZP (1986) Mechanics of distributed cracking. Appl Mech Rev 39(5):675–705
Bažant ZP, Jirásek M (2002) Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage: survey of progress. J Eng Mech 128(11):1119–1149
Wang L, Hu H (2005) Flexural wave propagation in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 71(19):195412
Di Paola M et al (1993) The mechanically based non-local elasticity: an overview of main results and future challenges. Philos Trans R Soc A 371:20120433
Carpinteri A et al (2009) Fractional calculus in solid mechanics: local versus non-local approach. Phys Scr T 136:014003
Alotta G, Failla G, Zingales M (2014) Finite element method for a nonlocal Timoshenko beam model. Finite Elem Anal Des 89:77–92
Alotta G, Failla G, Pinnola FP (2017) Stochastic analysis of a nonlocal fractional viscoelastic bar forced by Gaussian white noise. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertainty Part B 3(3):030904
Eringen AC (1972) Linear theory of nonlocal elasticity and dispersion of plane waves. Int J Eng Sci 10:425–435
Eringen AC (1983) On differential equations of nonlocal elasticity and solutions of screw dislocation and surface waves. J Appl Phys 54:4703
Tricomi FG (1957) Integral equations. Interscience, New York, 1957. Reprinted by Dover Books on Mathematics, 1985
Challamel N, Wang CM (2008) The small length scale effect for a non-local cantilever beam: a paradox solved. Nanotechnology 19:345703
Fernández-Sáez J, Zaera R, Loya JA, Reddy JN (2016) Bending of Euler–Bernoulli beams using Eringen’s integral formulation: a paradox resolved. Int J Eng Sci 99:107–116
Borino G, Failla B, Parrinello F (2003) A symmetric nonlocal damage theory. Int J Solids Struct 40:3621–3645
Khodabakhshi P, Reddy JN (2015) A unified integro-differential nonlocal model. Int J Eng Sci 95:60–75
Polizzotto C, Fuschi P, Pisano AA (2004) A strain-difference-based nonlocal elasticity model. Int J Solids Struct 41:2383–2401
Fuschi P, Pisano AA, Polizzotto C (2019) Size effects of small-scale beams in bending addressed with a strain-difference based nonlocal elasticity theory. Int J Mech Sci 151:661–671
Lam DCC, Yang F, Chong ACM, Wang J, Tong P (2003) Experiments and theory in strain gradient elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 51(8):1477–1508
Challamel N, Reddy JN, Wang CM (2016) Eringen’s stress gradient model for bending of nonlocal beams. J Eng Mech 142(12):04016095
Lim CW, Zhang G, Reddy JN (2015) A higher-order nonlocal elasticity and strain gradient theory and its applications in wave propagation. J Mech Phys Solids 78:298–313
Barretta R, Marotti de Sciarra F (2018) Constitutive boundary conditions for nonlocal strain gradient elastic nano-beams. Int J Eng Sci 130:187–198
Apuzzo A, Barretta R, Faghidian SA, Luciano R, Marotti de Sciarra F (2008) Free vibrations of elastic beams by modified nonlocal strain gradient theory. Int J Eng Sci 133:99–108
Bacciocchi M, Fantuzzi N, Ferreira AJM (2020) Conforming and nonconforming laminated finite element Kirchhoff nanoplates in bending using strain gradient theory. Comput Struct 239:106322
Bacciocchi M, Fantuzzi N, Ferreira AJM (2020) Static finite element analysis of thin laminated strain gradient nano-plates in hygro-thermal environment. Continuum Mech Thermodyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-020-00940-x
Di Paola M, Zingales M (2008) Long-range cohesive interactions of non-local continuum faced by fractional calculus. Int J Solids Struct 45:5642–5659
Di Paola M, Pirrotta A, Zingales M (2010) Mechanically-based approach to non-local elasticity: variational principles. Int J Solids Struct 47(5):539–548
Di Paola M, Failla G, Zingales M (2013) Non-local stiffness and damping models for shear-deformable beams. Eur J Mech A/Solids 40:69–83
Failla G, Sofi A, Zingales M (2015) A new displacement-based framework for non-local Timoshenko beams. Meccanica 50(8):2103–2122
Romano G, Barretta R (2017) Nonlocal elasticity in nanobeams: the stress-driven integral model. Int J Eng Sci 115:14–27
Barretta R, Marotti de Sciarra F, Vaccaro MS (2019) On nonlocal mechanics of curved elastic beams. Int J Eng Sci 144:103–140
Romano G, Barretta R (2017) Stress-driven versus strain-driven nonlocal integral model for elastic nano-beams. Compos B Eng 114:184–188
Apuzzo A, Barretta R, Luciano R, Marotti de Sciarra F, Penna R (2017) Free vibrations of Bernoulli–Euler nano-beams by the stress-driven nonlocal integral model. Compos B Eng 123:105–111
Barretta R, Čanadija M, Feo L, Luciano R, Marotti de Sciarra F, Penna R (2018) Exact solutions of inflected functionally graded nano-beams in integral elasticity. Compos B 142:273–286
Barretta R, Fabbrocino F, Luciano R, Marotti de Sciarra F (2018) Closed-form solutions in stress-driven two-phase integral elasticity for bending of functionally graded nano-beams. Physica E 97:13–30
Ouakad HM, Valipour A, Zur KK, Sedighi HM, Reddy JN (2020) On the nonlinear vibration and static deflection problems of actuated hybrid nanotubes based on the stress-driven nonlocal integral elasticity. Mech Mater 148:103532
Sokolnikof IS (1956) Mathematical theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York
Podlubny I (1999) Fractional differential equation. Academic Press, San Diego
Hilfer R (2000) Application of fractional calculus in physics. World Scientific, Singapore
Mainardi F (2010) Fractional calculus and waves in linear viscoelasticity. Imperial College, London
Alotta G, Barrera O, Cocks ACF, Di Paola M (2016) On the behavior of a three-dimensional fractional viscoelastic constitutive model. Meccanica 52:2127–2142
Gemant A (1936) A method of analyzing experimental results obtained from elasto-viscous bodies. Physics 7:311–317
Scott Blair GW, Caffyn JE (1949) An application of the theory of quasi-properties to the treatment of anomalous strain–stress relations. Philos Mag 40(300):80–94
Slonimsky GL (1961) On the law of deformation of highly elastic polymeric bodies. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 140(2):343–346 (in Russian)
Bagley RL (1979) Applications of generalized derivatives to viscoelasticity. Technical notes of Air Force Institute of Technology
Makris N (1997) Three-dimensional constitutive viscoelastic laws with fractional order time derivatives. J Rheol 41:1007–1020
Romano G, Barretta R, Diaco M, Marotti de Sciarra F (2017) Constitutive boundary conditions and paradoxes in nonlocal elastic nano-beams. Int J Mech Sci 121:151–156
Thuau D, Ayela C, Lemaire E, Heinrich S, Poulinb P, Dufoura I (2015) Advanced thermo-mechanical characterization of organic materials by piezoresistive organic resonators. Mater Horiz 2(1):106–112
Acknowledgements
Financial supports from the MIUR in the framework of the Projects PRIN 2017 (code 2017J4EAYB) Multiscale Innovative Materials and Structures (MIMS), University of Naples Federico II Research Unit and from the research program ReLUIS 2021 are gratefully acknowledged.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Barretta, R., Marotti de Sciarra, F., Pinnola, F.P. et al. On the nonlocal bending problem with fractional hereditariness. Meccanica 57, 807–820 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01366-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01366-8