Skip to main content
Log in

On the use of a pendulum as mass damper to control the rocking motion of a rigid block with fixed characteristics

  • Nonlinear Dynamics, Identification and Monitoring of Structures
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many works have been focused on the use of the base isolation to improve the dynamic response of the rigid blocks, avoiding the overturning of these systems. In this paper the effects of a mass damper on the rocking motion of a non-symmetric rigid block, subject to one-sine pulse type excitation, is investigated. The damper is modelled as a pendulum, hinged at the top of the block, with the mass lumped at the end. The equations of rocking motion, the uplift and the impact conditions are derived and the results are obtained by numerical integration of these equations. An extensive parametric analysis is performed, by taking as variable parameters the eccentricity of the centre of mass, the frequency and the amplitude of the excitation and the characteristics of the mass damper. Here the geometrical parameters characterizing the block are taken as fixed quantities, since the main objective of the study is understand if it is possible to find the optimal properties of the pendulum, capable to make more difficult the overturning of the body. The results show that the presence of the mass damper, if correctly designed, leads to a general improvement of the response of the system, since the overturning of the block occurs for values, of the amplitude of the base excitation, higher than those observed where no mass damper is used. Curves providing the optimum value of the characteristics of the mass damper versus the parameters characterizing the excitation, are finally obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shenton HW, Jones NP (1991) Base excitation of rigid bodies. I: formulation. J Eng Mech 117(10):2286–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andreaus U (1990) Sliding-uplifting response of rigid blocks to base excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 19(8):1181–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anooshehpoor A, Heaton TH, Shi B, Brune JN (1999) Estimates of the ground accelerations at Point Reyes Station during the (1906) San Francisco earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:845–853

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang J, Makris N (2001) Rocking response of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses. J Eng Mech 127(5):473–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Spanos P, Koh A (1984) Rocking of rigid blocks due to harmonic shaking. J Eng Mech 110:1627–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Andreaus U, Casini P (1998) Rocking-sliding of a rigid block: friction influence on free motion. Eng Trans 46(2):143–164

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Andreaus U, Casini P (1999a) On the rocking-uplifting motion of a rigid block in free and forced motion: influence of sliding and bouncing. Acta Mech 138:1–23

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Agbabian MS, Masri FS, Nigbor RL, Ginel WS (1998) Seismic damage mitigation concepts for art objects in museum. In: Proceeding of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo–Kyoto, Japan, vol 7, pp 235–240

  9. Pompei A, Scalia A, Sumbatyan M (1998) Dynamics of rigid block due to horizontal ground motion. J Eng Mech 124(7):713–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Taniguchi T (2002) Non-linear response analyses of rectangular rigid bodies subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:1481–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spanos P, Koh A (1986) Analysis of block random rocking. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 5:178–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Caliò I, Marletta M (2003) Passive control of the seismic response of art objects. Eng Struct 25:1009–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boroscheck RL, Romo D (2004) Overturning criteria for non-anchored non-symmetric rigid bodies. In: Proceeding of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada

  14. Contento A, Di Egidio A (2009) Investigations into benefits of base isolation for non-symmetric rigid blocks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:849–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shenton HW III (1996) Criteria for initiation of slide, rock, and slide-rock rigid-body modes. J Eng Mech 122(7):690–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tung CC (2007) Initiation of motion of a free-standing body to base excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:1431–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Purvance MD, Anooshehpoor A, Brune JN (2008) Freestanding block overturning fragilities: numerical simulation and experimental validation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:791–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andreaus U, Casini P (1999b) Dynamics of three rigid block assemblies with unilateral deformable contacts. part 1: contact modelling. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(12):1621–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Andreaus U, Casini P (1999c) Dynamics of three rigid block assemblies with unilateral deformable contacts. part 2: sample application. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(12):1637–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vassiliou MF, Makris N (2011) Analysis of the rocking response of rigid blocks standing free on a seismically isolated base. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(2):177–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Spanos P, Roussis Y, Politis NP (2000) Dynamic analysis of stacked rigid blocks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21:559–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Andreaus U, Casini P (2003) Dynamic response of mdof mechanical systems with contact and friction. Recent research development. In: Luongo A (ed) Dynamics structural. Research Signpost, Kerala, pp 299–329

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spanos P, Koh A, Roesset J (1986) Harmonic rocking of rigid block on flexible foundation. J Eng Mech 112:1165–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Di Egidio A, Contento A (2009) Base isolation of sliding-rocking non-symmetyric rigid blocks subjected to impulsive and seismic excitations. Eng Struct 31:2723–2734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Di Egidio A, Contento A (2010) Seismic response of a non-symmetric rigid block on a constrained oscillating base. Eng Struct 32:3028–3039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Contento A, Di Egidio A (2014) On the use of base isolation for the protection of rigid bodies placed on a multi-storey frame under seismic excitation. Eng Struct 62–63:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koh AS, Mustafa G (1990) Free rocking of cylindrical structures. J Eng Mech 116:34–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Batista M (2006) Steady motion of a rigid disc of finite thickness on a horizontal plane. J Nonlinear Mech 41:850–859

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Stefanou I, Vardoulakis I, Mavraganis A (2011) Dynamic motion of a conical frustum over a rough horizontal plane. Int J Nonlinear Mech 46:114–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Taniguchi T (2004) Rocking behavior of unanchored flat-bottom cylindrical shell tanks under action of horizontal base excitation. Eng Struct 26:415–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zulli D, Contento A, Di Egidio A (2012) Three-dimensional model of rigid block with a rectangular base subject to pulse-type excitation. Int J Nonlinear Mech 47:679–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Egidio A, Zulli D, Contento A (2014) Comparison between the seismic response of 2d and 3d models of rigid blocks. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 13:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Di Egidio A, Alaggio R, Contento A, Tursini M, Della Loggia E (2015) Experimental characterization of the overturning of three-dimensional square based rigid block. Int J Nonlinear Mech 69:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Corbi O (2006) Laboratory investigation on sloshing water dampers coupled to rigid blocks with unilateral constraints. Int J Mech Solids 1(1):29–40

    Google Scholar 

  35. Collini L, Garziera R, Riabova K, Munitsyna M, Tasora A (2016) Oscillations control of rocking-block-type buildings by the addition of a tuned pendulum. Shock Vib. doi:10.1155/2016/8570538

  36. Kounadis AN (2010) On the overturning instability of a rectangular rigid block under ground excitation. Open Mech J 4:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix: Rocking around the right corner

Appendix: Rocking around the right corner

This section shows the expressions of all the quantities required to define the equations of motion for rocking around the right corner B.

1.1 Equations of motion

The position of the center of mass M of the rigid body with respect to an inertial reference frame with origin initially coincident with the point B are:

$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ {\begin{array}{l} x_{MB} =x_g+R_{BG}\, \cos \left( \pi -\alpha _{BG}+\vartheta \right) \\ y_{MB} =R_{BG}\, \sin \left( \pi -\alpha _{BG}+\vartheta \right) \end{array}} \right. \end{aligned}$$
(13)

while the position of the center of the mass pendulum m read:

$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ {\begin{array}{l} x_{mB} =x_{g}+R_{BC}\, \cos \left( \pi -\alpha _{BC}+\vartheta \right) +l\,\sin \left( \psi \right) \\ y_{mB}= R_{BC}\, \sin \left( \pi -\alpha _{BC}+\vartheta \right) -l\,\cos \left( \psi \right) \\ \end{array}} \right. \end{aligned}$$
(14)

The expression of the kinetic energy of the system reads:

$$\begin{aligned} {\begin{array}{l} T=\frac{1}{2} J_{G} {{\dot{\vartheta }}} + \frac{1}{2}M\left( {{\dot{x}}}^2_{MB} + {{\dot{y}}}^2_{MB}\right) + \frac{1}{2}m\left( {{\dot{x}}}^2_{mB}+ {{\dot{y}}}^2_{mB}\right) \end{array}} \end{aligned}$$
(15)

while the expression of the potential energy of the system reads:

$$\begin{aligned} {U = Mg\left( y_{MB}-{{\hat{y}}}_{MB}\right) + mg\left( y_{mB} - {{\hat{y}}}_{mB}\right) } \end{aligned}$$
(16)

The equations of motion are obtained by following the Lagrangian approach:

$$\begin{aligned} \left\{ {\begin{array}{l} -g m R_{BC} \cos (\alpha _{BC}-\vartheta )-g M R_{BG} \cos (\alpha _{BG}-\vartheta )+J_{G} {{\ddot{\vartheta }}}+\\ -l m R_{BC} {{\ddot{\psi }}} \sin (\alpha _{BC}-\vartheta +\psi )-l m R_{BC} {{\dot{\psi }}}^2 \cos (\alpha _{BC}-\vartheta +\psi )+\\ -{{\ddot{x}}}_{g} (m R_{BC} \sin (\alpha _{BC}-\vartheta )+M R_{BG} \sin (\alpha _{BG}-\vartheta ))+\\ +m R_{BC}^2 {{\ddot{\vartheta }}}+M R_{BG}^2 {{\ddot{\vartheta }}}=0\\ l\,m \left( g \sin (\psi )+l {{\ddot{\psi }}}-R_{BC} {{\ddot{\vartheta }}} \sin (\alpha _{BC}-\vartheta +\psi )\right) +\\ +\,l\,m \left( R_{BC} {{\dot{\vartheta }}}^2 \cos (\alpha _{BC}-\vartheta +\psi )+{{\ddot{x}}}_{g} \cos (\psi )\right) =0 \end{array}}\right. \end{aligned}$$
(17)

1.2 Uplift conditions

With reference to Fig. 3, the uplift condition around the right corner B reads:

$$\begin{aligned} {\begin{array}{l} {{\ddot{x}}}_{g}\ge -\frac{2 }{H}\left[ g\,b_{2}+\mu \left( {{\ddot{y}}}_{m}\,\frac{B}{2}+{{\ddot{x}}}_{m}\,H\right) \right] \end{array}} \end{aligned}$$
(18)

1.3 Impact conditions

With reference to an impact that happens when the body is rocking around the left corner A and successively re-uplifts around the right corner B, the conservation of the angular momentum evaluated with respect to the right corner B, reads:

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{array}{l} \left( {{J_B} + BM{R_{BG}}cos(\pi - {\alpha _{BG}})} \right) {{{\dot{\vartheta }} }^ + } \\ + m\left( { - \frac{{{B^2}{{{\dot{\vartheta }} }^ + }}}{4} + \frac{1}{2}Bl{{{\dot{\vartheta }} }^ + }\sin (\psi ) + {H^2}{{{\dot{\vartheta }} }^ + } - H l {{{\dot{\vartheta }} }^ + }\cos (\psi )} \right) \\ = {J_B}{{{\dot{\vartheta }} }^ - } + m\left( {\frac{{{B^2}{{{\dot{\vartheta }} }^ - }}}{4} - \frac{1}{2}B l {{{\dot{\vartheta }} }^ - }\sin (\psi ) + {H^2}{{{\dot{\vartheta }} }^ - } - H l {{{\dot{\vartheta }} }^ - }\cos (\psi )} \right) \end{array} \end{aligned}$$
(19)

where \(J_{B}=J_{G}+R_{BG}^2 M\) is the polar momentum evaluated with respect to the right corner B.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Leo, A.M., Simoneschi, G., Fabrizio, C. et al. On the use of a pendulum as mass damper to control the rocking motion of a rigid block with fixed characteristics. Meccanica 51, 2727–2740 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0448-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-016-0448-5

Keywords

Navigation