Skip to main content
Log in

A thermodynamical formulation for the constitutive modeling of a shape memory alloy with two martensite phases

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a thermodynamical formulation for the one-dimensional constitutive model for shape memory alloys (SMAs) proposed by the authors in Marfia and Rizzoni (Eur J Mech A Solids 40:166–185, 2013) and able to describe the pseudo-elastic and shape memory effects and the martensite detwinning. The model takes into account the asymmetric behavior in tension and compression and the different elastic properties of the three phases considered for the SMA material: austenite, tensile and compressive martensite. A new formulation based on two specific energy potentials, the Helmholtz and the Gibbs free energies, is proposed. For the two potentials an expression is given, depending on the martensite volume fractions taken as internal variables, and incorporating a mixing energy of the three phases as proposed in Frémond (C R Acad Sci Paris 304:239–244, 1987). An original analysis of the non dissipative and dissipative processes is carried out in the general framework of tension-compression asymmetry and different elastic properties of the three phases; in particular, in the dissipative case the non-negativity of the dissipation is used to restrict evolutive processes. The numerical procedure developed in Marfia and Rizzoni (Eur J Mech A Solids 40:166–185, 2013) is applied to time integrate the evolutive equations of the internal variables. Applications are carried out in order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model and to compare the numerical results of the model with the experimental results, available in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun L, Huang W, Ding Z, Zhao Y, Wang C, Purnawali H, Tang C (2012) Stimulus-responsive shape memory materials: a review. Mater Des 33:577–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marfia S, Rizzoni R (2013) One-dimensional constitutive SMA model with two martensite variants: analytical and numerical solutions. Eur J Mech A Solids 40:166–185

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Birman V (1997) Review of mechanics of shape memory alloy structures. Appl Mech Rev 50(11):629–645

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roubíček T (2004) Nonlinear homogenization and its applications to composites, polycrystals and smart materials. In: Models for microstructure evolution in shape memory alloys. Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 269–304

  5. Seelecke S, Müller I (2004) Shape memory alloy actuators in smart structures: modeling and simulation. Appl Mech Rev 57(1–6):23–46

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Patoor E, Lagoudas DC, Entchev PB, Brinson LC, Gao X (2006) Shape memory alloys, part I: general properties and modeling of single crystals. Mech Mater 38(5–6):391–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lagoudas DC, Entchev PB, Popov P, Patoor E, Brinson LC, Gao X (2006) Shape memory alloys, part II: modeling of polycrystals. Mech Mater 38(5–6):430–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lagoudas DC (2008) Shape memory alloys: modeling and engineering applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khandelwal A, Buravalla V (2009) Models for shape memory alloy behavior: an overview of modeling approaches. Int J Struct Changes Solids 1(1):111–148

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paiva A, Savi MA (2009) An overwiew of costitutive models for shape memory alloy. Math Probl Eng 1(1):111–148

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lexcellent C (2013) Shape-memory alloys handbook. Wiley-ISTE, Oakland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Bodaghi M, Damanpack A, Aghdam M, Shakeri M (2013) A phenomenological SMA model for combined axial-torsional proportional/non-proportional loading conditions. Mater Sci Eng A 587:12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J, Steinmann P, Dai HH (2013) Analytical study on the stress-induced phase or variant transformation in slender shape memory alloy samples. Meccanica 48(4):943–970

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Marfia S, Vigliotti A (2014) 1D constitutive models and applications. In: Lecce, Concilio (eds) Shape memory alloy engineering for Aerospace, Structural and Biomedical Applications, 1st edn. Elsevier

  15. Artioli E, Sacco E (2014) 3D constitutive models and applications. In: Lecce, Concilio (eds) Shape memory alloy engineering for Aerospace, Structural and Biomedical Applications, 1st edn. Elsevier

  16. Tanaka K, Kobayashi S, Sato Y (1986) Thermomechanics of transformation pseudoelasticity and shape memory effect in alloys. Int J Plast 2:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liang C, Rogers A (1990) One-dimensional thermomechanical constitutive relations for shape memory materials. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 1:207–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brinson L (1993) One dimensional constitutive behaviour of shape memory alloys: thermo-mechanical derivation with non-constant functions and redefined martensite internal variable. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 4:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Auricchio F, Sacco E (1997) A one-dimensional model for superelastic shape-memory alloys with different elastic properties between austenite and martensite. Int J Non-Linear Mech 32(6):1101–1114

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Rajagopal KR, Srinivasa AR (1999) On the thermomechanics of shape memory wires. Math Phys 50:459–496

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Savi MA, Paiva A, Baeta-Neves A, Pacheco P (2002) Phenomenological modeling and numerical simulation of shape memory alloys: a thermo-plastic-phase transformation coupled model. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 13:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Paiva A, Savi MA, Braga AMB, Pacheco PMCL (2005) A constitutive model for shape memory alloys considering tensile compressive asymmetry and plasticity. Int J Solids Struct 42(11–12):3439–3457

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Evangelista V, Marfia S, Sacco E (2009) Phenomenological 3D and 1D consistent models for shape-memory alloy materials. Comput Mech 44:405–421

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Auricchio F, Sacco E (1999) A temperature-dependent beam for shape-memory alloys: constitutive modelling, finite-element implementation, and numerical simulations. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 174:171–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Frémond M (1987) Méchanique des milieux continus: matériaux mémoire ds forme. C R Acad Sci Paris 304:239–244

    Google Scholar 

  26. Govindjee S, Kasper EP (1999) Computational aspects of one-dimensional shape memory alloy modeling with phase diagrams. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 171:309–326

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Nallathambi A, Doraiswamy S, Chandrasekar A, Srinivasan S (2009) A 3-species model for shape memory alloys. Int J Struct Changes Solids Mech Appl 1(1):149–170

    Google Scholar 

  28. Daghia F, Fabrizio M, Grandi D (2010) A non isothermal Ginzburg-Landau model for phase transitions in shape memory alloys. Meccanica 45(6):797–807

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Fabrizio M, Pecoraro M (2013) Phase transitions and thermodynamics for the shape memory alloy AuZn. Meccanica 48(7):1695–1700

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Grandi D, Stefanelli U (2014) A phenomenological model for microstructure-dependent inelasticity in shape-memory alloys. Meccanica 9:2265–2283

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Lexcellent C, Tobushi H (1995) Internal loops in pseudoelastic behaviour of Ti-Ni shape memory alloys: experiment and modelling. Meccanica 30(5):459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Marfia S, Sacco E, Reddy J (2003) Superelastic and shape memory effects in laminated shape memory alloy beams. AIAA J 41:100–109

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. De la Flor S, Urbina C, Ferrando F (2006) Constitutive model of shape memory alloys: theoretical formulation and experimental validation. Mater Sci Eng A 427(12):112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Popov P, Lagoudas DC (2007) A 3-D constitutive model for shape memory alloys incorporating pseudoelasticity and detwinning of self-accommodated martensite. Int J Plast 23(10–11):1679–1720

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Jaber MB, Smaoui H, Terriault P (2008) Finite element analysis of a shape memory alloy three-dimensional beam based on a finite strain description. Smart Mater Struct 17(045):005

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rizzoni R, Merlin M, Casari D (2013) Shape recovery behaviour of NiTi strips in bending: experiments and modelling. Contin Mech Thermodyn 25(2–4):207–227

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Achenbach M (1989) A model for an alloy with shape memory. Int J Plast 5:371–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chenchiah IV, Sivakumar SM (1999) A two variant thermomechanical model for shape memory alloys. Mech Res Commun 26(3):301–307

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Suquet P (1982) Plasticité et homogénéisation. Sciences Mathématiques (Mécanique théorique), Paris VI, Thèse d’Etat.

  40. Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1994) Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rockafellar RT (1970) Convex analysis. Princeton Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Chiozzi A, Merlin M, Rizzoni R, Tralli A (2012) Experimental comparison for two one-dimensional constitutive models for shape memory alloy wires used in anti-seismic applications. In: ECCOMAS 2012–European congress on computational methods in applied sciences and engineering, e-Book Full Papers, pp 4672–4682.

  43. Chiozzi A, Merlin M, Rizzoni R, Tralli A Comparative assessment of two constitutive models for superelastic shape-memory wires against experimental measurements. Mech Adv Mater Struct (in press).

  44. Merlin M, Soffritti C, Fortin A (2011) Study of the heat treatment of NiTi shape memory alloy strips for the realisation of adaptive deformable structures. Metallurgia Italiana 103(11–12):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nastasi, A (2012) Caratterizzazione sperimentale di lamine niti a memoria di forma: metodi di misura e di deformazione. Master’s thesis, University of Ferrara.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Prof. Sacco for the useful discussion on SMA modeling and Dr. Merlin for having provided his experimental data.

The financial support of PRIN 2010-11, project “Advanced mechanical modeling of new materials and technologies for the solution of 2020 European challenges” CUP n. F11J12000210001 is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raffaella Rizzoni.

Appendix: stability analysis in the non dissipative case.

Appendix: stability analysis in the non dissipative case.

In this Appendix, the stability analysis in the non dissipative case is performed by adopting the following procedure: the signs of \(Y^+,\) \(Y^-\) and \(\Delta Y:= Y^+ - Y^-\) are studied as functions of the stress and the temperature, and the stability of the various phases is established according to Table 1. The computation shows that three cases need to be distinguished, and each case is detailed in each one of the following Subsections.

1.1 Appendix 1: Case \(T < T_{0}\) and \( \alpha ^+, \alpha ^- > 0\)

In this case, three further subcases arise depending on the sign of \(\Delta \alpha ,\) defined by relation (27). If \(\Delta \alpha \,>\, 0,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • if \(\sigma = 0\) or \(\sigma = - \Delta \epsilon / \Delta \alpha ,\) then it follows that \(Y^+ = Y^- >0.\) Thus, condition (24) implies that \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. the material is composed only of the phases \(S^+\) and \(S^-,\) and the austenite phase is absent.

  • if \(\sigma < - \Delta \epsilon / \Delta \alpha \) or \(\sigma >0,\) then it follows that \(Y^+ > Y^-\) and \(Y^+ > 0.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • if \( - \Delta \epsilon / \Delta \alpha < \sigma < 0,\) then it follows that \(Y^- > Y^+ \) and \(Y^- > 0.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

If \(\Delta \alpha\, < \,0,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • if \(\sigma = 0\) or \(\sigma = - \Delta \epsilon / \Delta \alpha ,\) then it still follows that \(Y^+ = Y^- >0,\) and thus \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1\) (mixture of \(S^+\) and \(S^-\)).

  • if \( 0 < \sigma < - \Delta \epsilon / \Delta \alpha ,\) then it follows that \(Y^+ > Y^-\) and \(Y^+ > 0.\) Thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0\) (phase \(S^+\)).

  • if \( \sigma < 0\) or \(\sigma > - \Delta \epsilon / \Delta \alpha , \) then it follows that \(Y^- > Y^+ \) and \(Y^- > 0.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1\) (phase \(S^-\)).

If \(\Delta \alpha = 0,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • if \(\sigma = 0,\) then it follows that \(Y^+ = Y^- >0,\) and thus \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1\) (mixture of \(S^+\) and \(S^-\)).

  • if \( \sigma >0,\) then it follows that \(Y^+ > Y^-\) and \(Y^+ > 0.\) Thus \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0\) (phase \(S^+\)).

  • if \( \sigma < 0,\) then it follows that \(Y^- > Y^+ \) and \(Y^- > 0.\) Thus, \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1\) (phase \(S^-\)).

These results are illustrated in Fig. 8 and they give the portions for \(T < T_0\) of the phase diagrams shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Regions of the stress-temperature plane where \(Y^{+}, Y^{-}\) are positive or negative, for \(T < T_0\) and accordingly to the sign of \(\Delta \alpha \) .Dashed lines correspond to points where \(Y^+\) or \(Y^-\) vanish, bold continuous lines to points where \(Y^+ = Y^-.\)

1.2 Appendix 2: Case \(T \ge T_{0}\) and \( \alpha ^+, \alpha ^- > 0\)

In this case, the quantities \(\sigma _{R}^{+}(T), \sigma _{L}^{+}(T), \sigma _{R}^{-}(T)\) and \(\sigma _{L}^{-}(T)\) defined by relations (3134) play an important role in view of the factorization (30).

The graphs of \(\sigma _{R}^{\pm }(T), \sigma _{L}^{\pm }(T)\) as functions of the temperature are depicted with dash lines in the Figs. 9, 10 and 11, which also show the regions of the \((\sigma , T)\) plane where \(Y^+\) and \( Y^-\) take positive or negative values in the three cases \(\Delta \alpha >0,\) \(\Delta \alpha <0,\) and \(\Delta \alpha =0.\) In the same Figures, dashed lines are taken to indicate the loci where \(Y^+\) and \( Y^-\) vanish. The sets of points satisfying the conditions \(Y^+ > Y^-, Y^+ < Y^-\) and \(Y^+ = Y^-\) are also indicated.

In the study of the signs of \(Y^+, Y^-\) and \(\Delta Y\) the following nine cases occur, depending on the sign of \(\Delta \alpha \) and \(\epsilon _L^++ \epsilon _L^-.\)

If \(\Delta \alpha > 0\) and \(\epsilon _L^+> -\epsilon _L^-,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • If \(\sigma > \sigma _{R}^{+}(T)\) or \(\sigma < \min _{T > T_0} \{ \sigma _{C}^{-}(T), \sigma _{L}^{+}(T) \},\) then \(Y^+ >0\) and \(Y^+ > Y^-.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • If \(T_0 < T < T_L\) and \(\sigma _C^-(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{L}^{-}(T),\) then \(Y^- >0\) and \(Y^- > Y^+;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\max _{T > T_0} \{ \sigma _L^-(T), \sigma _L^+(T) \} < \sigma < \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^- , Y^+\) \( < 0;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0 = \xi _S^-,\) i.e. only phase \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _C^-(T) \) and \(T_0 <T < T_L,\) then \(Y^+ = Y^- >0;\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _{R}^{+}(T) \) or \(T > T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _{L}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ =0\) and \(Y^- < 0;\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^-= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T_0 < T < T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T),\) then \(Y^- =0\) and \(Y^+ < 0;\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^+= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^-\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T = T_0\) and \(\sigma = 0\) or if \(T = T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T_L) = \sigma _L^+(T_L) = \sigma _C^-(T_L), \) then \(Y^+ = 0 = Y^-;\) thus (24) implies that the point representative of the system lies inside the triangle \({\mathcal {T}},\) i.e. the three phases \(S^+,\) \(S^-\) and \(A\) coexist.

If \(\Delta \alpha > 0\) and \(\epsilon _L^+< -\epsilon _L^-,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • If \(\sigma < \sigma _{C}^{-}(T)\) or \(\sigma > \max _{T > T_0} \{ \sigma _{C}^{+}(T), \sigma _{R}^{+}(T) \},\) then \(Y^+ >0\) and \(Y^+ > Y^-;\) thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma _{C}^{-}(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{L}^{-}(T)\) or \(T > T_R\) and \(\sigma _R^-(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{C}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^- >0\) and \(Y^- > Y^+;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \( \sigma _{L}^{-}(T) < \sigma < \max _{T > T_0} \{ \sigma _R^-(T), \sigma _R^+(T) \} ,\) then \(Y^- , Y^+ \) \( < 0;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0 = \xi _S^-,\) i.e. only phase \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _{C}^{-}(T)\) or if \(T> T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _C^+(T),\) then \(Y^+ = Y^- >0;\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(T_0 < T < T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ =0\) and \(Y^- < 0;\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^-= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T)\) or if \(T > T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _R^-(T),\) then \(Y^- =0\) and \(Y^+ < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^+= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^-\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T = T_0\) and \(\sigma = 0\) or if \(T = T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _R^+(T_R) = \sigma _R^-(T_R) = \sigma _C^+(T_R), \) then \(Y^+ = 0 = Y^-;\) thus (24) implies that the point representative of the system lies inside the triangle \({\mathcal {T}},\) i.e. the three phases \(S^+,\) \(S^-\) and \(A\) coexist.

If \(\Delta \alpha > 0\) and \(\epsilon _L^+= -\epsilon _L^-,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • If \(\sigma > \sigma _{R}^{+}(T)\) or if \(\sigma < \sigma _{C}^{-}(T),\) then \(Y^+ >0\) and \(Y^+ > Y^-;\) thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma _{C}^{-}(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{L}^{-}(T),\) then \(Y^- >0\) and \(Y^- > Y^+;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma _{L}^{-}(T) < \sigma < \sigma _R^+(T),\) then \(Y^- , Y^+ < 0;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0 = \xi _S^-,\) i.e. only phase \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _{C}^{-}(T),\) then \(Y^+ = Y^- >0;\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ =0\) and \(Y^- < 0;\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^-= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T),\) then \(Y^- =0\) and \(Y^+ < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^+= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^-\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T = T_0\) and \(\sigma = 0,\) then \(Y^+ = 0 = Y^-;\) thus (24) implies that the point representative of the system lies inside the triangle \({\mathcal {T}},\) i.e. the three phases \(S^+,\) \(S^-\) and \(A\) coexist.

If \(\Delta \alpha\, <\, 0\) and \(\epsilon _L^+> -\epsilon _L^-,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • If \( \sigma _{R}^{+}(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{C}^{-}(T), \) or if \(T>T_L\) and \( \sigma _{C}^{+}(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{L}^{-}(T), \) then \(Y^+ >0\) and \(Y^+ > Y^-.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma < \max _{T > T_0} \{ \sigma _{L}^{-}(T), \sigma _C^+(T) \},\) then \(Y^- >0\) and \(Y^- > Y^+;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(T_0 < T < T_L\) and \( \sigma _{L}^{-}(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{R}^{+}(T), \) or if \(T>T_L\) and \( \sigma _{L}^{+}(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{R}^{+}(T), \) then \(Y^- , Y^+ < 0;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0 = \xi _S^-,\) i.e. only phase \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _{C}^{-}(T) \) or \(T > T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _{C}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ = Y^- >0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _{R}^{+}(T), \) of if \(T > T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _{L}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ =0\) and \(Y^- < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^-= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T_0 < T < T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T),\) then \(Y^- =0\) and \(Y^+ < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^+= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^-\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T = T_0\) and \(\sigma = 0,\) or if \(T = T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T_L) = \sigma _L^+(T_L) = \sigma _C^+(T_L), \) then \(Y^+ = 0 = Y^-\) and therefore (24) implies that the point representative of the system lies inside the triangle \({\mathcal {T}},\) i.e. the three phases \(S^+,\) \(S^-\) and \(A\) coexist.

If \(\Delta \alpha < 0\) and \(\epsilon _L^+< -\epsilon _L^-,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • If \(T_0 < T < T_R\) and \(\sigma _R^+(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{C}^{-}(T),\) then \(Y^+ >0\) and \(Y^+ > Y^-.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma < \sigma _{L}^{-}(T)\) or \(\sigma > \max _{T > T_0} \{ \sigma _{C}^{-}(T), \sigma _{R}^{-}(T) \},\) then \(Y^- >0\) and \(Y^- > Y^+;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma _{L}^{-}(T) < \sigma < \min _{T > T_0} \{ \sigma _R^-(T), \sigma _R^+(T) \} ,\) then \(Y^- , Y^+\) \( < 0;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0 = \xi _S^-,\) i.e. only phase \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T_0 \le T \le T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _C^-(T), \) then \(Y^+ = Y^- >0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(T_0 \le T \le T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ =0\) and \(Y^- < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^-= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T),\) or if \(T> T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _R^-(T),\) then \(Y^- =0\) and \(Y^+ < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^+= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^-\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T = T_0\) and \(\sigma = 0,\) or if \(T = T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _R^-(T_R) = \sigma _R^+(T_R) = \sigma _C^-(T_R), \) then \(Y^+ = 0 = Y^-\) and therefore (24) implies that the point representative of the system lies inside the triangle \({\mathcal {T}},\) i.e. the three phases \(S^+,\) \(S^-\) and \(A\) coexist.

If \(\Delta \alpha < 0\) and \(\epsilon _L^+= -\epsilon _L^-,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • If \(\sigma _{R}^{+}(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{C}^{-}(T),\) then \(Y^+ >0\) and \(Y^+ > Y^-.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma > \sigma _C^-(T)\) or if \(\sigma < \sigma _{L}^{-}(T),\) then \(Y^- >0\) and \(Y^- > Y^+;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \( \sigma _L^-(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^- , Y^+ < 0;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0 = \xi _S^-,\) i.e. only phase \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _C^-(T), \) then \(Y^+ = Y^- >0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ =0\) and \(Y^- < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^-= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T),\) then \(Y^- =0\) and \(Y^+ < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^+= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^-\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T = T_0\) and \(\sigma = 0,\) then \(Y^+ = 0 = Y^-\) and therefore (24) implies that the point representative of the system lies inside the triangle \({\mathcal {T}},\) i.e. the three phases \(S^+,\) \(S^-\) and \(A\) coexist.

If \(\Delta \alpha = 0\) and \(\epsilon _L^+> -\epsilon _L^-,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • If \(\sigma > \sigma _{R}^{+}(T)\) or if \(T > T_L\) and \(\sigma _C(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{L}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ >0\) and \(Y^+ > Y^-.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • If \( \sigma < \min _{T>T_0} \{ \sigma _C(T) , \sigma _{L}^{-}(T)\},\) then \(Y^- >0\) and \(Y^- > Y^+;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\max _{T > T_0} \{ \sigma _L^-(T), \sigma _L^+(T) \} < \sigma < \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^- , Y^+ \) \( < 0;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0 = \xi _S^-,\) i.e. only phase \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T > T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _C(T), \) then \(Y^+ = Y^- >0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _{R}^{+}(T) \) or if \(T > T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _{L}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ =0\) and \(Y^- < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^-= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T_0 < T < T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T),\) then \(Y^- =0\) and \(Y^+ < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^+= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^-\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T = T_0\) and \(\sigma = 0,\) or if \(T = T_L\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T_L) = \sigma _L^+(T_L)=\sigma _C (T_L), \) then \(Y^+ = 0 = Y^-\) and therefore (24) implies that the point representative of the system lies inside the triangle \({\mathcal {T}},\) i.e. the three phases \(S^+,\) \(S^-\) and \(A\) coexist.

If \(\Delta \alpha = 0\) and \(\epsilon _L^+< -\epsilon _L^-,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • If \(\sigma > \max _{T>T_0} \{ \sigma _{R}^{+}(T). \sigma _C(T) \},\) then \(Y^+ >0\) and \(Y^+ > Y^-.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • If \(T > T_R\) and \(\sigma _R^-(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{C}(T),\) or if \(\sigma < \sigma _L^-(T),\) then \(Y^- >0\) and \(Y^- > Y^+;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma _{L}^{-}(T) < \sigma < \min _{T > T_0} \{ \sigma _R^-(T), \sigma _R^+(T) \} ,\) then \(Y^- , Y^+ \) \( < 0;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0 = \xi _S^-,\) i.e. only phase \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T > T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _C(T), \) then \(Y^+ = Y^- >0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^++ \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(T_0 < T < T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ =0\) and \(Y^- < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^-= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T > T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _R^-(T),\) or if \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T),\) then \(Y^- =0\) and \(Y^+ < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^+= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^-\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T = T_0\) and \(\sigma = 0,\) or if \(T = T_R\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _R^-(T_R) = \sigma _R^+(T_R) = \sigma _C(T_R), \) then \(Y^+ = 0 = Y^-\) and therefore (24) implies that the point representative of the system lies inside the triangle \({\mathcal {T}},\) i.e. the three phases \(S^+,\) \(S^-\) and \(A\) coexist.

If \(\Delta \alpha = 0\) and \(\epsilon _L^+= -\epsilon _L^-,\) then the following results are obtained.

  • If \(\sigma > \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ >0\) and \(Y^+ > Y^-.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • If \( \sigma < \sigma _{L}^{-}(T),\) then \(Y^- >0\) and \(Y^- > Y^+;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma _{L}^{-}(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^- , Y^+ < 0;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0 = \xi _S^-,\) i.e. only phase \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ =0\) and \(Y^- < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^-= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T),\) then \(Y^- =0\) and \(Y^+ < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^+= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^-\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T = T_0\) and \(\sigma = 0,\) then \(Y^+ = 0 = Y^-\) and therefore (24) implies that the point representative of the system lies inside the triangle \({\mathcal {T}},\) i.e. the three phases \(S^+,\) \(S^-\) and \(A\) coexist.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Regions of the stress-temperature plane where \(Y^{+}, Y^{-}\) take positive or negative values for \(T \ge T_0, \; \Delta \alpha >0\) and accordingly to the sign of \(\Delta \epsilon .\) The dashed lines correspond to points where \(Y^+\) or \(Y^-\) vanish, bold continuous curves are loci where \(Y^+ = Y^-.\)

Fig. 10
figure 10

Regions of the stress-temperature plane where \(Y^{+}, Y^{-}\) take positive or negative values for \(T \ge T_0, \; \Delta \alpha <0\) and accordingly to the sign of \(\Delta \epsilon .\) The dashed lines correspond to points where \(Y^+\) or \(Y^-\) vanish, bold continuous curves are loci where \(Y^+ = Y^-.\)

Fig. 11
figure 11

Regions of the stress-temperature plane where \(Y^{+}, Y^{-}\) take positive or negative values for \(T \ge T_0, \; \Delta \alpha =0\) and accordingly to the sign of \(\Delta \epsilon .\) The dashed lines correspond to points where \(Y^+\) or \(Y^-\) vanish, while at the points on the bold continuous curve the condition \(Y^+ = Y^-\) is satisfied

1.3 Appendix 3: Case \( \alpha ^+, \alpha ^- = 0\)

In this case \(Y^+\) and \( Y^-\) take the special forms (52), (53). Figure 12a shows the regions of the \((\sigma , T)\) plane where \(Y^+\) and \( Y^-\) take now positive or negative values. The sets of points where \(Y^+\) and \( Y^-\) vanish are also shown, together with those satisfying the conditions \(Y^+ > Y^-, Y^+ < Y^-\) and \(Y^+ = Y^-.\) In particular, the following results are obtained.

  • If \(T< T_0\) and \(\sigma >0,\) or if \(T> T_0\) and \(\sigma > \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ >0\) and \(Y^+ > Y^-.\) Thus, (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 1, \xi _S^-= 0,\) i.e. only phase \(S^+\) is present.

  • If \(T< T_0\) and \(\sigma <0,\) or if \(T> T_0\) and \( \sigma < \sigma _{L}^{-}(T),\) then \(Y^- >0\) and \(Y^- > Y^+;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0, \xi _S^-= 1,\) i.e. only phase \(S^-\) is present.

  • If \(\sigma _{L}^{-}(T) < \sigma < \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^- , Y^+ < 0;\) thus (24) implies that \(\xi _S^+= 0 = \xi _S^-,\) i.e. only phase \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T> T_0\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _{R}^{+}(T),\) then \(Y^+ =0\) and \(Y^- < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^-= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^+\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T> T_0\) and \(\sigma = \sigma _L^-(T),\) then \(Y^- =0\) and \(Y^+ < 0,\) thus (24) implies \(\xi _S^+= 0 ,\) i.e. a mixture of the phases \(S^-\) and \(A\) is present.

  • If \(T = T_0\) and \(\sigma = 0,\) then \(Y^+ = 0 = Y^-\) and therefore (24) implies that the point representative of the system lies inside the triangle \({\mathcal {T}},\) i.e. the three phases \(S^+,\) \(S^-\) and \(A\) coexist.

The corresponding non dissipative phase diagram is represented in Fig. 12b.

Fig. 12
figure 12

a Regions of the stress-temperature plane for \(T \ge T_0\) where \(Y^{+}, Y^{-}\) take positive or negative values in the special case of equal elastic moduli of the three phases (\( \alpha ^+, \alpha ^- = 0\)) and b corresponding non dissipative phase diagram

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rizzoni, R., Marfia, S. A thermodynamical formulation for the constitutive modeling of a shape memory alloy with two martensite phases. Meccanica 50, 1121–1145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-014-0078-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-014-0078-8

Keywords

Navigation