Skip to main content
Log in

A BKR Operation for Events Occurring for Disjoint Reasons with High Probability

  • Published:
Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given events A and B on a product space \(S={\prod }_{i = 1}^{n} S_{i}\), the set \(A \Box B\) consists of all vectors x = (x1,…,xn) ∈ S for which there exist disjoint coordinate subsets K and L of {1,…,n} such that given the coordinates xi,iK one has that xA regardless of the values of x on the remaining coordinates, and likewise that xB given the coordinates xj,jL. For a finite product of discrete spaces endowed with a product measure, the BKR inequality

$$ P(A \Box B) \le P(A)P(B) $$
(1)

was conjectured by van den Berg and Kesten (J Appl Probab 22:556–569, 1985) and proved by Reimer (Combin Probab Comput 9:27–32, 2000). In Goldstein and Rinott (J Theor Probab 20:275–293, 2007) inequality Eq. 1 was extended to general product probability spaces, replacing \(A \Box B\) by the set consisting of those outcomes x for which one can only assure with probability one that xA and xB based only on the revealed coordinates in K and L as above. A strengthening of the original BKR inequality Eq. 1 results, due to the fact that . In particular, it may be the case that \(A \Box B\) is empty, while is not. We propose the further extension depending on probability thresholds s and t, where is the special case where both s and t take the value one. The outcomes are those for which disjoint sets of coordinates K and L exist such that given the values of x on the revealed set of coordinates K, the probability that A occurs is at least s, and given the coordinates of x in L, the probability of B is at least t. We provide simple examples that illustrate the utility of these extensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arratia R, Garibaldi S, Hales AW (2015) The van den Berg—Kesten—Reimer operator and inequality for infinite spaces. Bernoulli, to appear. arXiv:1508.05337 [math.PR]

  • Arratia R, Garibaldi S, Mower L, Stark PB (2015) Some people have all the luck. Math Mag 88:196–211. arXiv:1503.02902 [math.PR]

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L (1968) Probability. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn DL (1980) Measure theory. Birkhäuser, Boston

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Folland G (2013) Real analysis: modern techniques and their applications. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein L, Rinott Y (2007) Functional BKR inequalities, and their duals, with applications. J Theor Probab 20:275–293

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein L, Rinott Y (2015) Functional van den Berg–Kesten–Reimer inequalities and their Duals, with Applications. arXiv:1508.07267 [math.PR]

  • Gupta JC, Rao BV (1999) van den Berg-Kesten inequality for the Poisson Boolean Model for continuum Percolation. Sankhya A 61:337–346

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Last G, Penrose MD, Zuyev S (2017) On the capacity functional of the infinite cluster of a Boolean model. Ann Appl Probab 27:1678–1701. arXiv:1601.04945 [math.PR]

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Meester R, Roy R (2008) Continuum percolation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose M (2003) Random geometric graphs (No. 5). Oxford University Press, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer D (2000) Proof of the Van den Berg-Kesten conjecture. Combin Probab Comput 9:27–32

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg J, Kesten H (1985) Inequalities with applications to percolation and reliability. J Appl Probab 22:556–569

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg J, Fiebig U (1987) On a combinatorial conjecture concerning disjoint occurrences of events. Ann Probab 15:354–374

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are deeply indebted to an anonymous referee for a very careful reading of two versions of this paper. The penetrating comments provided enlightened us on various measurability issues and other important, subtle points. We thank Mathew Penrose for a useful discussion and for providing some relevant references.

The work of the first author was partially supported by NSA grant H98230-15-1-0250. The second author would like to thank the Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge, for support and hospitality during the program Data Linkage and Anonymisation where part of the work on this paper was undertaken, supported by EPSRC grant no EP/K032208/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry Goldstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldstein, L., Rinott, Y. A BKR Operation for Events Occurring for Disjoint Reasons with High Probability. Methodol Comput Appl Probab 20, 957–973 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-018-9623-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-018-9623-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation