Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 263–295). JAI Press.
Alexius, S., & Grossi, G. (2018). Decoupling in the age of market-embedded morality: Responsible gambling in a hybrid organization. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(2), 285–313.
Anderson, A. R., Dodd, S. D., & Jack, S. (2010). Network practices and entrepreneurial growth. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(2), 121–133.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.
Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 51–55.
Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685.
Billis, D. (2010). Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Billis, D., & Rochester, C. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook on hybrid organisations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (2001). The emergence of social enterprise. Routledge.
Bouchard, M.J., & Rousselière, D. (2016). Do hybrid organizational forms of the social economy have a greater chance of surviving? An examination of the case of Montreal. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1894–1922.
Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2010). Strategic management and public service performance: The way ahead. Public Administration Review, 70, 185–192.
Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155–170). Guilford Press.
Cornelissen, J. P., Akemu, O., Jonkman, J. G., & Werner, M. D. (2021). Building character: The formation of a hybrid organizational identity in a social enterprise. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1294–1330.
Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76, 54–69.
Dees, J. G. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 321–334.
Dees, J. G., & Anderson, B. B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: Building on two schools of practice and thought. Research on Social Enterpreneurship, 1(3), 39–66.
Defourny, J. (2001). From third sector to social enterprise. In C. Borzaga & J. Defourny (Eds.), The emergence of social enterprise 2 (pp. 1–28). Routledge.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2012). Conceptions of social enterprise in Europe: A comparative perspective with the United States. In J. Defourny, & M., Nyssens, Social enterprises (pp. 71–90). London (UK), Palgrave Macmillan.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2013). Social co-operatives: When social enterprises meet the co-operative tradition. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 2(2), 11–33.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an international typology of social enterprise models. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2469–2497.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2021). Social enterprise, welfare regimes and policy implications. In J. Defourny, & M., Nyssens, Social enterprise in Western Europe: Theory, Models and Practice (pp.351–356). London (UK), Routledge.
Defourny, J., Nyssens, M., & Brolis, O. (2021). Testing social enterprise models across the world: Evidence from the “International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) project.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(2), 420–440.
Denis, J. L., Ferlie, E., & Van Gestel, N. (2015). Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 273–289.
Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436.
Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100.
Eikenberry, A. M., & Drapal Kluver, J. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
Finch, J. (2002). The role of grounded theory in developing economic theory. Journal of Economic Methodology, 9(2), 213–234.
Göbel, M., Vogel, R., & Weber, C. (2013). Management research on reciprocity: A review of the literature. Business Research, 6(1), 34–53.
Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. (2012). Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 126–134.
Haigh, N., Kennedy, E. D., & Walker, J. (2015a). Hybrid organizations as shape-shifters. California Management Review, 57(3), 59–82.
Haigh, N., Walker, J., Bacq, S., & Kickul, J. (2015b). Hybrid organizations: Origins, strategies, impacts, and implications. California Management Review, 57(3), 5–12.
Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298.
Jäger, U.P., & Schröer, A. (2014). Integrated organizational identity: A definition of hybrid organizations and a research agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(5), 1281–1306.
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.
Joldersma, C., & Winter, V. (2002). Strategic management in hybrid organizations. Public Management Review, 4(1), 83–99.
Karré, P. M. (2018). Navigating between opportunities and risks: The effects of hybridity for social enterprises engaged in social innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, 7(1), 37–60.
Kenis, P., & Provan, K. G. (2009). Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration, 87(3), 440–456.
Koppenjan, J., Karré, P. M., & d Termeer, K. (Eds.). (2019). Smart hybridity: Potentials and challenges of new governance arrangements. Eleven International Publishing.
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.
Kreutzer, K., & Jäger, U. (2011). Volunteering versus managerialism: Conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 634–661.
Lee, M., Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2018). From protest to product: Strategic frame brokerage in a commercial social movement organization. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2130–2158.
Leviten-Reid, C. (2012). Organizational form, parental involvement, and quality of care in child day care centers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(1), 36–57.
Manetti, G., Bellucci, M., & Bagnoli, L. (2017). The management of the plague in Florence at the beginning of the Renaissance: The role of the partnership between the Republic and the Confraternita of Misericordia. Accounting History, 22(4), 510–529.
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A Source of explanation, prediction and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–41.
Mair, J., Mayer, J., & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36(6), 713–739.
Mongelli, L., Rullani, F., & Versari, P. (2017). Hybridisation of diverging institutional logics through common-note practices–an analogy with music and the case of social enterprises. Industry and Innovation, 24(5), 492–514.
Morales, A., Calvo, S., Martínez, J. M. G., & Martín, J. M. M. (2021). Hybrid forms of business: Understanding the development of indigenous social entrepreneurship practices. Journal of Business Research, 124, 212–222.
Mort, G., Weerawardena, J., & Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualization. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 76–88.
Müller, A. L., & Pfleger, R. (2014). Business transformation towards sustainability. Business Research, 7(2), 313–350.
Nyssens, M. (2006). Social enterprise—At the crossroads of market. Public Policies and Civil Society.
Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.
Pless, N. M. (2012). Social entrepreneurship in theory and practice-an introduction. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 1–4.
Poledrini, S., & Borzaga, C. (2021). Social enterprise in Italy. A plurality of business and organisational models. In J. Defourny, & M., Nyssens, social enterprise in Western Europe: Theory, models and practice (pp.131–147). Routledge.
Rajala, T., Laihonen, H., & Vakkuri, J. (2020). Exploring challenges of boundary-crossing performance dialogues in hybrids. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(3), 799–820.
Ramus, T., Vaccaro, A., & Brusoni, S. (2017). Institutional complexity in turbulent times: Formalization, collaboration, and the emergence of blended logics. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1253–1284.
Ridder, H. G. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research, 10(2), 281–305.
Rosenzweig, P. M., & Singh, J. V. (1991). Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 340–361.
Sacchetti, S., & Borzaga, C. (2020). The foundations of the “public organisation”: Governance failure and the problem of external effects. Journal of Management and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09525-x
Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-non-profit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1–2), 29–49.
Saldaña, J. (2012). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage.
Salvini, A. (2011). Introduzione. Trionfo, declino e nuove prospettive di sviluppo del volontariato in Italia. Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, 96, 9–31.
Salvini, A. (2012). Volontariato come interazione. Come cambia la solidarietà organizzata in Italia. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
Santos, F., Pache, A. C., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making hybrids work. California Management Review, 57(3), 36–58.
Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.
Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478.
Teasdale, S. (2012). What’s in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 99–119.
Testi, E., Bellucci, M., Franchi, S., & Biggeri, M. (2017). Italian social enterprises at the crossroads: Their role in the evolution of the welfare state. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(6), 2403–2422
Tracey, P., & Jarvis, O. (2006). An enterprising failure. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 4(1), 66–70.
Vakkuri, J., & Johanson, J. E. (Eds.). (2020). Hybrid governance, organisations and society: Value creation perspectives. Routledge.
Van Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 1–17.
Vestergaard, A., Langevang, T., Morsing, M., & Murphy, L. (2021). Partnerships for development. Assessing the impact potential of cross-sector partnerships. World Development, 143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105447.
Vickers, I., Lyon, F., Sepulveda, L., & McMullin, C. (2017). Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing. Research Policy, 46(10), 1755–1768.
Weerawardena, J., McDonald, R. E., & Mort, G. S. (2010). Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 346–356.
Wolf, M., & Mair, J. (2019). Purpose, commitment and coordination around small wins: A proactive approach to governance in integrated hybrid organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(3), 535–548.
Yin, R. (1993). Applications of case study research. Sage Publishing.
Zollo, L., Faldetta, G., Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2017). Reciprocity and gift-giving logic in NPOs. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(7), 513–526.
Zollo, L., Faldetta, G., Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2021). “Eyes for eyes, teeth for teeth”: Positive and negative reciprocity in NPOs. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2020-1671
Zollo, L., Laudano, M. C., Boccardi, A., & Ciappei, C. (2019). From governance to organizational effectiveness: The role of organizational identity and volunteers’ commitment. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(1), 111–137.