Skip to main content
Log in

A Tale of Two Cultures: Charity, Problem Solving, and the Future of Social Entrepreneurship

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two cultures are at play in the field of social entrepreneurship: an age-old culture of charity, and a more contemporary culture of entrepreneurial problem solving. These cultures permeate activities from resource providers to front line operations. Both have roots in our psychological responses to the needs of others and are reinforced by social norms. They can work hand-in-hand or they can be at odds. Some of the icons of the social entrepreneurship movement have spoken harshly about charity, yet most of them rely to some degree, at least early in their development process, on resources that are given out of a charitable impulse. The success of social entrepreneurship requires an integration of values from each of these cultures, in which the satisfactions of giving are correlated with social benefits of rigorous problem solving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, J., Smith, A., & Adler, C. (2010). The dragonfly effect: Quick, effective, and powerful ways to use social media to drive social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Biswas-Diener, R., Kemeza, et al. (2010). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, September.

  • Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A. V. (2007). Making aid work. Cambridge, MA: Boston Review Book, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beito, D. (2000). From mutual aid to the welfare state: Fraternal societies and social services, 1890–1967. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkshire, J. C. (2012). To lure baby-boomer donors, charities must prove their results. Chronicle of Philanthropy. February 23, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G. (1994). Inside the boardroom: Governance by directors and trustees (especially Chap. 6, pp. 131–144). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Brooks, A. (2008). Gross national happiness: Why happiness matters for American—and how we can get more of it. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, B. (2007). Giving: How each of us can change the world. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, C. (2006). Strings attached: Along with their big bucks, rich donors want to give charities their two cents. Wall Street Journal, July 3, B1.

  • Corbett, S., & Fikkert, B. (2009). When helping hurts: How to alleviate poverty without hurting the poor…and yourself. Chicago: Moody Publishers.

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996a). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996b). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. (2009). The age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. (2009). Social ventures as learning laboratories (Special edition for the World Economic Forum at Davos, January, pp. 11–15). Boston, MA: Innovations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1908). Ethics. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (as reprinted in full as volume 5 in a series, 1978). Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

  • Ellerman, D. (2005). Helping people help themselves: From the World Bank to an alternative philosophy of development assistance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. (2001). Can international relief do more good than harm? New York Times Magazine, February 11.

  • Fisher, J. D., Nadler, A., & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbaugh, W., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316, 1622–1625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harford, T. (2011). Adapt: Why success always starts with failure. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. D. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelfarb, G. (1991). Poverty and compassion: The moral imagination of the late Victorians. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, C. (1995). The missionary position: Mother Teresa in theory and practice. New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. G., & Duggan, W. (2009). The aid trap: Hard truths about ending poverty. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. S. (2005). An end to poverty?: A historical debate. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlan, D., & Appel, J. (2011). More than good intentions: How a new economics is helping to solve global poverty. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keizer, G. (2004). Help: The original human dilemma. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. (2005). Rediscovering vulgar charity: a historical analysis of America’s tangled nonprofit law. Fordham Law Review, 73(6), 2937–2946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maathai, W. (2009). The challenge for Africa. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1893). Preliminary statement and evidence before the Royal Commission on the Aged Poor. In J. M. Keynes (Ed.), Official papers by Alfred Marshal (1926). London: Macmillan.

  • Martin, R., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for a definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(Spring), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1950). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies [Quotes come from Halls’ translation from the French (1990)]. New York: Routledge.

  • McKnight, J. (1995). The careless society: community and its counterfeits. New York: Basis Books.

  • Morino, M. (2011). Leap of reason: Managing to outcomes in an era of scarcity. Washington, DC: Venture Philanthropy Partners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, D. (2009). Dead aid: Why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, M. (2012). Wired for culture: Origins of the human social mind. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope Benedict IV. (2009). Encyclical letter. Caritas in veritate. Issued July 29.

  • Ridley, M. (1996). The origins of virtue: Human instincts and the evolution of cooperation. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, R. (2000). Low risk, high return: Starting and growing your business with minimal risk. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, C Jr. (1994). Wealthy and wise: How you and America can get the most out of your giving. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. (1999). Giving back. December: Fast Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawhill, J., & Williamson, D. (2001). Mission impossible? Measuring success in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 11(3), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. (1994). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias: A tour of the irrationally positive brain. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shershow, S. C. (2005). The work & the gift. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2010). The life you save. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, D., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments (Quotes from reprint of the “New Edition” published by Henry Bell in London in 1853). Indianapolis: LibertyClassics, 1969, and 1976.

  • Thoreau, H. D. (1852). Walden [Quote from version edited by Thomas, O. (1996)]. New York: Norton.

  • Tierney, T. J., & Fleishman, J. L. (2011). Give smart: Philanthropy that gets results. New York: Public Affairs.

  • Trout, J. D. (2009). The empathy gap: Building bridges to the good life and the good society. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, J. (2009). Scroogenomics: Why you shouldn’t buy presents for the holidays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (1999). Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world poverty. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2010). Building social business: The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author thanks the Skoll Foundation for its generous support of this work as part of a larger project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Gregory Dees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dees, J.G. A Tale of Two Cultures: Charity, Problem Solving, and the Future of Social Entrepreneurship. J Bus Ethics 111, 321–334 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1412-5

Keywords

Navigation