Abstract
A language policy document on English teaching asserted that in India, “the colonial origins [of English are] now forgotten or irrelevant” (NCERT 2006: 1). Using data obtained in the course of a longitudinal ethnographic investigation into the language and literacy practices of young multilingual boys living at an anathashram (orphanage) in suburban New Delhi, India, I contest NCERT’s (2006) ideological framing. This study, employing the theoretical perspective of language ideology, demonstrates how the colonial encounter, in fact, continues to frame, inform, and regulate notions about the English language in India. Furthermore, this study sheds light on how the reductive ideological arc of language educational policy documents—such as the one articulated in NCERT (2006)—can enforce and enact a homogenizing gaze that glosses over ideological pluralities. The larger ambition of this exploration is to inquire how and why such ideological normativization is enforced in language educational policy discourse, as well as to consider its implications for educational equity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It is important to point out here that as a federal body, the NCERT has been vulnerable to pressures from different political regimes in power over the years (see Banerjee 2004; Dev 2005; Guichard 2012; Banerjee 2007). The NCERT document being discussed here was prepared under a different administration than the current one; it is unclear at this stage how the Framework is being taken up under the present leadership. Regardless, it is a useful window into policy-based ideologies at the national level.
In order to contextualize the larger literacy backdrop against which this study takes place, it is important here to offer some sense of those figures. Per the Census of India (2011), the national literacy rate is 74.4 %, showing significant disparity along state, setting (rural/urban) and gender lines, among others.
Previously referred to as “untouchable.”
Hindu prayer rituals.
The 2011 Census found there to be 82.14 % male literacy rate but only 65.46 % female literacy rate in India. (See also footnote #1.)
Indian cigarettes.
Milky, sugary black tea.
Twenty sixth of January, the day India’s constitution came into effect.
Fifteenth of August, marking India’s independence from British rule.
Mahatma Gandhi.
References
Aggarwal, Y. (2000). Public and private partnership in primary education in India: A study of unrecognized schools in Haryana. New Delhi, National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration. Retrieved from http://www.dise.in/Downloads/Reports%26Studies/Public%20Private%20Partnership%20in%20India.pdf
Agnihotri, R. K. (2010). Multilinguality and the teaching of English in India. The EFL Journal, 1(1), 1–13.
Allen, A., & Gupta, S. (2015). The profession of English studies 2: Employment, management, and the multilingual context. In S. Gupta, R. Allen, S. Chattarji, & S. Chaudhuri (Eds.), Reconsidering english studies in Indian higher education (pp. 59–76). London: Routledge.
Annamalai, E. (2005). Nation-building in a globalised world: Language choice and education in India. In A. M. Y. Lin & P. W. Martin (Eds.), Decolonisation, globalisation: Language-in-education policy and practice (pp. 20–37). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Limited.
Azam, M., Chin, A., & Prakash, N. (2013). The returns to English-language skills in India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61(2), 335–367.
Banerjee, S. (2004). Need of the hour: Beyond ‘detoxification’ (pp. 2342–2344). Mumbai: Economic and Political Weekly.
Banerjee, B. K. (2007). West Bengal history textbooks and the Indian textbook controversy. Internationale Schulbuchforschung, 29, 355–374.
Bhattacharya, U. (2013). Mediating inequalities: Exploring english-medium instruction in a suburban Indian village school. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 164–184.
Blackledge, A. (2008). Language ecology and language ideology. In C. Martin & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 27–40). New York: Springer.
Census of India. (1961). Vol I. Part II – C (ii) language tables. Government of India.
Census of India. (2011). Retrieved 15 Oct 2015. http://censusindia.gov.in/.
Chauhan, K. K. (2012). English language learner in primary schools of Gujarat: A sociolinguistic perspective. ELT Voices-India, 2(5), 157–166.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De, A., Majumdar, M., Samson, M., & Noronha, C. (2002). Private schools and universal elementary education. In R. Govinda (Ed.), India education report: A profile of basic education (pp. 131–150). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Dev, A. (2005). Reversing the main thrust of the national policy on education (pp. 13–22). New Delhi: Social Scientist.
Diener, E., & Crandall, R. (1978). Ethics in social and behavioral research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eagleton, T. (2007). Ideology: An introduction (New ed.). London: Verso.
Faust, D., & Nagar, R. (2001). Politics of development in postcolonial India: English-medium education and social fracturing. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(30), 2878–2883.
Gal, S. (1998). Multiplicity and contention among language ideologies: A commentary. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (p. 323). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gargesh, R. (2015). 6 miles to go. In B. Spolsky & K. Sung (Eds.), Secondary school english education in Asia: From policy to Practice (pp. 103–122). London: Routledge.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Culture: Critical Concepts in Sociology, 6(36), 1465–1514.
Ghosh, A., & Madhumathi, P. (2012). Validity of NCERT curriculum for English. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research and Innovations, 2(5), 110–113.
Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Gudavarthy, A. (2012). Can we de-stigmatize reservations in India? Economic and Political Weekly, 47(6), 55–62.
Guichard, S. (2012). The construction of history and nationalism in India. London: Routledge.
Gupta, A. F. (1997). Colonization, migration, and functions of English. In E. Schneider (Ed.), Englishes around the world (Vol. 1, pp. 47–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heath, S. B. (1989). Language ideology. In E. Barnouw (Ed.), International encyclopedia of communications (pp. 393–435). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hill, J. H. (1998). Today there is no respect: Nostalgia, respect, and oppositional discourse in Mexican (Nahuatl) language ideology. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies, practice and theory (pp. 68–86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hohenthal, A. (2003). English in India. Loyalty and attitudes. Language in India, 3(5), Chapter 5. http://www.languageinindia.com/may2003/annika.html.
Hornberger, N., & Vaish, V. (2009). Multilingual language policy and school linguistic practice: Globalization and English language teaching in India. Singapore and South Africa. Compare, 39(3), 305–320.
Irvine, J. T. (1989). When talk isn’t cheap: Language and political economy. American Ethnologist, 6(2), 248–267.
Irvine, J. T. (2012). Language ideology. Oxford bibliographies. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0012.
Irvine, J. T., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, polities, and identities (pp. 35–83). Santa Fe: SAR.
Jhingran, D. (2009). Hundreds of home languages in the country and many in most classrooms—coping with diversity in primary education in India. In A. K. Mohanty, M. Panda, R. Phillipson, & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local (pp. 250–267). New Delhi: Orient Black Swan.
Kam, M., Kumar, A., Jain, S., Mathur, A., & Canny, J. (2009). Improving literacy in rural India: Cellphone games in an after-school program. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACM Conference on ICTD. http://ictd2009.org/presentations/pdfs/day2/10_Kam-ICTD2009-SemesterPilot.pdf
Kelman, H. C. (1982). Ethical issues in different social science methods. In T. L. Beauchamp, R. R. Faden, R. J. Wallace Jr, & L. Waters (Eds.), Ethical issues in social science research (pp. 40–98). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
Khubchandani, L. M. (1978). Multilingual education in India. In B. Spolsky & R. Cooper (Eds.), Case studies in bilingual education (Vol. 2, pp. 88–125). Newbury House: Rowley, MA.
Khubchandani, L. M. (2003). Defining mother tongue education in plurilingual context. Language Policy, 2(3), 239–254.
Kroskrity, P. V. (2000). Regimenting languages: Language ideological perspectives. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities (pp. 1–34). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Kroskrity, P. (2004). Language ideology. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 496–517). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2011). Political strategies and language policies: the European Union Lisbon strategy and its implications for the EU’s language and multilingualism policy. Language Policy, 10(2), 115–136.
Kumar, K. (1991). Political agenda of education: A study of colonialist and nationalist ideas. New Delhi: Sage.
LaDousa, C. (2005). Disparate markets: language, nation, and education in North India. American Ethnologist, 32(3), 460–478.
Langer, A., & Brown, G. (2008). Cultural status inequalities: an important dimension of group mobilization. In F. Stewart (Ed.), Horizontal inequalities and conflict: Understanding group violence in multiethnic societies (pp. 41–53). Palgrave: London, UK. [Working paper].
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mertz, E. (1998). Linguistic ideology and praxis in US law school classrooms. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 151–172). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mishra, P. K. (2000). English language, postcolonial subjectivity, and globalization in India. A Review of International English Journal, 31(2), 383–410.
Mishra, P. K. (2014). Objectives of teaching and learning English in India. Global Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(9), 191–194.
Mitchell, L. (2009). Language, emotion, and politics in South India: The making of a mother tongue. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Mohanty, A. K. (2006). Multilingualism of the unequals and predicaments of education in India: Mother tongue or other tongue? In O. Garcia, T. Skutnabb-Kangas, & M. Torres-Guzman (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools (pp. 262–279). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Mohanty, A. K. (2010). Language policy and practice in education: Negotiating the double divide in multilingual societies. In K. Heugh & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual education works: From the Periphery to the Centre. Orient Black Swan: Hyderabad.
Mohanty, A. K., Panda, M., & Pal, R. (2010). Language policy in education and classroom practices in India. In K. Menken & O. Garcia (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers (pp. 211–231). New York, NY: Routledge.
Moore, L. (2008). Language socialization and second/foreign language and multilingual education in nonwestern settings. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 175–185). New York: Springer.
Nambissan, G. B. (2003). Educational deprivation and primary school provision: a study of providers in the city of Calcutta, IDS Working Paper 187. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
National Knowledge Commission. (2000). Report to the nation 2006–2009. New Delhi: National Knowledge Commission, Government of India.
NCERT (2006). National focus group on the teaching of English: Position paper on the teaching of English (Position Paper No. 1.4), pp. 1–26. http://www.ncert.nic.in/sites/publication/schoolcurriculum/Position_Papers/english.pdf.
Panda, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2015). Multilingual education in South Asia. In W. E. Wright, S. Boun & O. García (Eds.), The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education. Chichester, UK: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118533406.ch34.
Pandey, N., & Anshu, A. P. (2014). The language of knowledge? A case study of English-medium teaching in Delhi University. The Delhi University Journal Of The Humanities & The Social Science, 1, 77–86.
Parameswaran, R. (1997). Colonial interventions and the postcolonial Situation in India: The English language, mass media and the articulation of class. International Communication Gazette, 59(1), 21–41.
Pattanayak, D. P. (1998). The language heritage of India. In D. Balasubramanian & N. A. Rao (Eds.), The Indian human heritage (pp. 95–99). Hyderabad: Universities Press (India) Ltd.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283.
Phillipson, R. (2008). Lingua franca or lingua frankensteinia? English in European integration and globalisation. World Englishes, 27(2), 250–267.
PROBE (1999) Public report on basic education in India. The Probe team in association with Centre for Development Economics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Proctor, L. M. (2015). English and globalization in India: The fractal nature of discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 24(3), 294–314.
Raina, B. (1991). A note on language, and the politics of English in India. In S. Joshi (Ed.), Rethinking English: Essays in literature, language, and history (pp. 264–297). New Delhi: Trianka Publishers.
Ramanathan, V. (1999). English is here to stay: A critical look at institutional and educational practices in India. TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 211–231.
Ramanathan, V. (2005). The English-vernacular divide: Postcolonial language politics and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Rao, A. G. (2013). The English-only myth: Multilingual education in India. Language Problems & Language Planning, 37(3), 271–279.
Roy, S. (2014). Pedagogic predicament: The problems of teaching English within a postcolonial space. Interventions, 1(11), 1–11.
Rumsey, A. (1990). Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist, 92(2), 346–361.
Schieffelin, B. B., & Doucet, R. C. (1994). The “real” Haitian Creole: Ideology, metalinguistics, and orthographic choice. American Ethnologist, 21(1), 176–200.
Sekar, J. J. (2013). What fails English as the dream language of rural India? Sino-US English Teaching, 10(5), 352–357.
Shah, M. (2010). Bilingual educational programmes in Indian schools: Addressing the English language needs of the country. In: D. Wyse, R. Andrews & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook Series (p. 461). New York, NY: Routledge.
Sharma, A., & Kaur, H. (2014). Impact of changing factors in English learning on students and teenagers by several new schemes introduced by CBSE. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 4(5), 25–27.
Sheorey, R. (2006). Learning and teaching English in India. New Delhi: Sage.
Shohamy, E. G. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Shohamy, B. S. E., & Spolsky, B. (2000). Language practice, language ideology, and language policy. Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honour of A. Ronald Walton. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: J. Benjamins, 1-41.
Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In P. R. Clyne, W. F. Hanks, & C. L. Hofbauer (Eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels (pp. 193–224). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Singh, N. K., Zhang, S., & Besmel, P. (2012). Globalization and language policies of multilingual societies: Some case studies of South East Asia. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 12(2), 349–380.
Sonalde, D. & Vanneman, R. (2005) National Council of Applied Economic Research. India Human Development Survey, Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/22626
Thiyagarajan, K. (2008). Higher education and practice of English in India. Language in India 8(8). Retrieved from: http://www.languageinindia.com/aug2008/thiyagaenglishpractice.html
Vaish, V. (2005). A peripherist view of English as a language of decolonization in post-colonial India. Language Policy, 4(2), 187.
Veettil, R. P. (2013). Attitudes to varieties of English: The postcolonial scenario. ELT Voices – India. International Journal, 3(6), 14–34.
Vulli, D. (2014). English and medium of instruction: Dalit discourse in Indian education. Research Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2), 1–6.
Woolard, K. A. (1992). Language ideology: Issues and approaches. Pragmatics, 2(3), 235–249.
Woolard, K. A. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. A. Woolard, & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideology: Practice and theory (pp. 3–47). New York: Oxford University Press.
Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhattacharya, U. Colonization and English ideologies in India: a language policy perspective. Lang Policy 16, 1–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9399-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9399-2