Abstract
This paper explores a period of advocacy on behalf of Spanish language education in the United States from 1914 to 1945. It interrogates claims made by policy actors about the centrality of Spanish language education to US geopolitical and economic interests in Latin America. I make two arguments: first, that realization of US economic and geopolitical interests across the hemisphere did not require significant capacity in the Spanish language among the US population; second, that linking Spanish language education to such interests contributed, paradoxically, to the closing of ideological and implementational space (Hornberger in Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and glocalization. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK, pp. 223–237, 2006) for second language education overall, Spanish included. To support these claims, I begin by situating this specific case of Spanish language education advocacy within the context of contemporary language education policy research. Second, as background, I describe this advocacy as it occurred between 1914 and 1945, including key policy actors and venues for their advocacy. At the heart of this paper is an analysis of three specific rationales that policy actors employed in their advocacy. Here, I assess those rationales against the historical development of US economic and geopolitical interests in Latin America. Finally, I rely on both empirical and interpretative analysis to assess these three rationales on their own terms, that is, the extent to which they led to expanded Spanish language education between the two world wars.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Primary Sources
Bulletin of high points in the teaching of modern languages in the high schools of New York City: (V.[1]-2). (1917). New York: Board of Education. Retrieved on October 25, 2010 from www.hathitrust.org.
Butler, N. M. (1942). The war and modern language study. The Modern Language Journal, 26, 299–302.
Butler, N. M., Cutter, V. M., & Shepherd, W. R. (1934). The importance of the study of Spanish. Hispania, 14, 370–372.
Butler, S. (1935a). America’s armed forces—2. “In time of peace”: The army. Common Sense, 4(11), 8–12.
Butler, S. (1935b). America’s armed forces—3. “Happy days are here again”: The navy. Common Sense, 4(12), 10–14.
Crawford, J. P. W. (1922). Facilities for the advanced study of Spanish. Hispania, 5, 346–353.
Doyle, H. G. (1929). Things are not what they seem. Hispania, 12, 49–58.
Fitz-Gerald, J. D. (1918). Importance of Spanish to the American citizen. Chicago: Benj. H. Sanborn & Co. Retrieved on October 25, 2010 from http://books.google.com.
Fitz-Gerald, J. D. (1921). The bilingual-biracial problem of our border states. Hispania, 4, 175–186.
Hein, H. E. (1936). Spanish and the millennium. Hispania, 19, 9–12.
Luquiens, F. B. (1915). The national need for Spanish. Yale Review, 4, 699–711.
McAdoo, W. G. (1916). Some international aspects of public education: An address delivered at the annual convention of the National Education Association held in Madison Square Garden, New York City, on July 6, 1916. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Taylor, R. L., & Wilkins, L. A. (1920). The value and future of Spanish. Hispania, 3, 316–317.
Wilkins, L. A. (1917). On the threshold. Hispania, 1(Organizational Number), 1–10.
Wilkins, L. A. (1918a). Spanish as a substitute for German for training and culture. Hispania, 1, 205–221.
Wilkins, L. A. (1918b). Spanish in the high schools: A handbook of methods. Chicago: Benj. H. Sanborn & Co.
Wilkins, L. A. (1919a). The President’s address. Hispania, 2, 36–40.
Wilkins, L. A. (1919b). The war and world languages. Educational Review, 58, 289–302.
Wilkins, L. A. (1922). Concerning the study of Spanish in the US. Educational Review, 64, 409–414.
Wilkins, L. A. (1923). Educating the educators. Hispania, 6, 23–30.
Wilkins, L. A. (1936). Horizons. Hispania, 19, 33–36.
Secondary Sources
Bale, J. Tongue-tied: Imperialism and second language education in the United States. Critical Education, 2(8), 1–25 (in press).
Bale, J. (2010). International comparative perspectives on heritage language education policy research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 42–65.
Bernhardt, E. B. (1998). Sociohistorical perspectives on language teaching in the modern United States. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspective in research and scholarship (pp. 37–57). New York: The Modern Language Association.
Brecht, R. D. (2007). National language educational policy in the nation’s interests: Why? How? Who is responsible? The Modern Language Journal, 91, 264–265.
Brecht, R. D. & Ingold, C. W. (2002). Tapping a national resource: Heritage languages in the United States. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved March 1, 2006 from http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/0202brecht.html.
Brecht, R. D., & Rivers, W. P. (2000). Language and national security for the 21st century: The role of Title VI and Fulbright-Hays in supporting national language capacity. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Bucheli, M. (2008). Multinational corporations, totalitarian regimes and economic nationalism: United Fruit Company in Central America, 1899–1975. Business History, 50, 433–454.
Callinicos, A. (2009). Imperialism and global political economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Heath, S. B. (1981). English in our language heritage. In C. A. Ferguson & S. B. Heath (Eds.), Language in the U.S.A (pp. 6–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herman, D. M. (2002). “Our patriotic duty”: Insights from professional history, 1980–1920. In T. Osborn (Ed.), The future of foreign language education in the United States (pp. 1–29). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Hornberger, N. H. (2006). Nichols to NCLB: Local and global perspectives on U.S. language education policy. In O. Garcia, T. Skutnabb-Kangas, & M. E. Torres-Guzmán (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and glocalization (pp. 223–237). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Kloss, H. (1998). The American bilingual tradition. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems. (Original work published 1977).
Lens, S. (2003). The forging of the American empire: From the revolution to Vietnam: A history of U.S. imperialism. London: Pluto Books and Haymarket Books. (Originally published by Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York, 1971).
McGroarty, M. (2006). Neoliberal collusion or strategic simultaneity? On multiple rationales for language-in-education policies. Language Policy, 5, 3–13.
O’Connell, M. E., & Norwood, J. L. (Eds.). (2007). International education and foreign languages: Keys to securing America’s future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Petrovic, J. E. (2005). The conservative restoration and neoliberal defenses of bilingual education. Language Policy, 4, 395–416.
Petrovic, J. E. (2010). Language minority education in the United States: Power and policy. In J. E. Petrovic (Ed.), International perspectives on bilingual education: Policy, practice and controversy (pp. 3–19). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the ‘language-as-resource’ discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the U.S.A. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9, 348–368.
Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8, 15–34.
Ruiz, R. (2010). Reorienting language-as-resource. In J. E. Petrovic (Ed.), International perspectives on bilingual education: Policy, practice and controversy (pp. 155–172). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Schmidt, H. (1987). Maverick Marine: General Smedley D. Butler and the contradictions of American Military history. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
Watzke, J. L. (2003). Lasting change in foreign language education: A historical case for change in national policy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Wiley, T. G. (1998). The imposition of World War I-era English-only policies and the fate of German in North America. In T. Ricento & B. Burnaby (Eds.), Language policies in the United States and Canada: Myths and realities (pp. 211–241). Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bale, J. The campaign for Spanish language education in the “Colossus of the North,” 1914–1945. Lang Policy 10, 137–157 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9200-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9200-0