Abstract
Context
Urbanization and local urban climate have multiple impacts on vegetation phenology in urban and suburban areas. Understanding these effects and their interactions with the surface urban heating effect remains limited.
Objective
We employed a time series of Earth observation data to analyze land surface phenology (LSP) dynamics and related environmental drivers in the highly urbanized Pearl River Delta (PRD) region.
Methods
First, local climate zone (LCZ) maps were generated from Earth observation datasets of 2000 and 2019. Second, LSP (i.e., start, end, and length of season) were extracted from vegetation indices for 2000–2019. Thirdly, land surface temperature (LST) was used as an explanatory variable based on the LCZ of cities. Finally, interannual trends of LSP and their association with LST were analyzed, depending on the distance gradient of vegetation to compact high-rise buildings.
Results
Urban surface characteristics showed that LSP in regions dominated by compact and high-rise urban areas presented significant spatiotemporal variation at the start and end of season than those dominated by open, mid-rise, and low-rise areas. The impacts of spring and autumn LST in the daytime on LSP were slightly more substantial than those in the nighttime. The association of decreasing spring LST in the daytime with a delayed start of season is especially pronounced in urban domains.
Conclusions
The results indicate that vegetated areas adjacent to urban domains presented greater spatiotemporal dynamics than suburban and rural regions. Our study emphasizes the dependence of spatiotemporal changes in vegetation phenology on the effects of urban surface warming.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Land surface phenology (LSP) is a significant indicator for studying the recurring season of vegetated areas based on remote sensing (White et al. 2009; de Beurs and Henebry 2010; Richardson et al. 2013; Xie et al. 2021). The dynamics of LSP in vegetated areas in urban and rural ecosystems play a crucial role in affecting the human living environment, such as public health and ecological processes (Buyantuyev and Wu 2012; Donnelly et al. 2018). However, the changing urban built environment can affect the LSP and lead to its spatiotemporal alteration, such as advanced spring and delayed autumn vegetation phenology in many temperate cities (Walker et al. 2015; Krehbiel et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2016; Gervais et al. 2017; Li et al. 2017a; Meng et al. 2020). These impacts are significantly amplified in urban ecosystems because of anthropogenic activities, particularly in urbanization and infrastructure development (Luder et al. 2018; Jeong et al. 2019).
LSP studies have revealed differences between urban and rural regions (e.g., city and countryside) by contrasting different land use and land cover types (Dallimer et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2016; Krehbiel et al. 2017; Li et al. 2017b; Qiu et al. 2017; Yao et al. 2017). However, the comparisons of microclimates or micro-scale characteristics within a city (Parece and Campbell 2018) and between cities (Zipper et al. 2016; Xie et al. 2022) has received little attention. Notably, the response mechanism of vegetation phenology to temperatures in the built environment under various local climates in mega-urban areas has not been investigated (Melaas et al. 2016; Zipper et al. 2016; Krehbiel et al. 2017; Li et al. 2017c; Villalobos-Jiménez and Hassall 2017; Kabano et al. 2021).
Generally, the start of season and end of seasons (SOS and EOS, respectively) influence ecosystem processes in cities (Richardson et al. 2010; Zipper et al. 2016; Jeong et al. 2019). The SOS is documented as a critical determinant of the beginning of growth (Richardson et al. 2010; Trujillo et al. 2012; Barrio et al. 2013). Changes in both SOS and EOS determines the length of season (i.e., the growing period) (Walther et al. 2002; Richardson et al. 2013; Gill et al. 2015). Reports have indicated that the higher land surface temperatures (LSTs) lead to earlier SOS, thus, an extended season in urban regions than in rural or naturally vegetated areas (Jochner et al. 2011, 2012, 2013). Urban surface warming effects can influence the EOS. For example, temperate cities may experience interannual differences in the EOS, resulting in an extended length of the growing season, whereas tropical cities may encounter a shortened growing season (Zhou et al. 2016; Krehbiel et al. 2017; Kabano et al. 2020, 2021).
Urban regions with high coverage of impervious surfaces increase the sensible heat flux resulting in the urban heat island (UHI) that affects the local climate, contrasting the effect of natural ground cover (Avissar 1996). Unlike the UHI, which focuses on the urban–rural air temperature gradient, the surface UHI (SUHI) typically represents the most significant surface temperature differences along the urbanization gradient during daytime and the slightest discrepancies at night (Roth et al. 1989). The SUHI in urban regions is higher than that in the surrounding zones (Walker et al. 2015). The urban canopy layer air temperature and SUHIs are influenced by the morphology of streets and buildings, construction materials, the permeability of surfaces, and the anthropogenic heat of cities (Stewart and Oke 2012; Stewart et al. 2014; Leconte et al. 2015; Krehbiel et al. 2017; Villalobos-Jiménez and Hassall 2017; Lindh et al. 2018; Daramola and Balogun 2019; Backe et al. 2021). The local climate zone (LCZ) describes the morphology, structure, and cover of urban land surface with the comparability and consistency of cities’ land use and land cover classification (Stewart and Oke 2012). Local climate zones (LCZs) can be categorized into different classification levels (Stewart et al. 2014) (see the summary of values describing their surface properties in Table S1). SUHIs and their climatic effects differed among LCZ types (Goggins et al. 2012; Leconte et al. 2015; Ng and Ren 2018; Mushore et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2019a).
Over the past two decades, the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region has experienced rapid urban sprawl (Xu and Gong 2018), and its expansion is expected to intensify (Liang et al. 2018a, 2018b; Chen et al. 2020). On the one hand, accompanied by a high urbanization rate and high urban density, the region has observed an increasing trend of SUHI intensity (Wang et al. 2019a, 2019b) and greenness (Hu and Xia 2019), although the two are usually negatively correlated (Jochner et al. 2011, 2013). On the other hand, considering the expected urban growth in future land use (Liang et al. 2018a, 2018b), an investigation of SUHIs and urban ecosystems would benefit future urban heating mitigation and greenspace planning and optimization (Dallimer et al. 2016; Su et al. 2020) in the PRD region. In the subtropical region, the interannual variability of vegetation phenology was higher than that in temperate regions (Wang et al. 2015). It is sensitive to the local urban climate (Kabano et al. 2020), which can affect biodiversity change (Du et al. 2019) and water use efficiency (Guo et al. 2020).
However, there remains insufficient knowledge on the spatiotemporal dynamics of LSP associated with urbanization, its high-density urban setting, and complicated urban activities in the PRD region, which is critical for the understanding and strategic planning of the human living environment. Effects of combined fine urbanization characteristics and the corresponding SUHI (Wang et al. 2019a, 2019b) on urban LSP require further analysis related to the LCZ scheme. Studying LCZ combined with LSP is crucial for applications in studies of urban ecosystems and their response to SUHIs (Parece and Campbell 2018; Kabano et al. 2021). Moreover, understanding the feedback mechanisms that microclimate and micro-characteristics of urban areas generate in the environment and climate is critical (Latorre 1999; Solonen and Hildén 2014; Townroe and Callaghan 2014; Lindh et al. 2018; Katz et al. 2019; Su et al. 2020).
In this work, the study objectives are to (i) investigate the spatial relationship of LCZs with LSP and LST across the PRD, (ii) test the interannual changes of LSP and study its association with the urban–rural changes of LCZs combined with their LST for the period 2000–2019, and (iii) analyze the influence of urbanization intensification on LSP across LCZ gradients in the PRD region.
Methods
Study area
The PRD region is one of the global most urbanized, emerging mega-urban areas. With a total area of 55,374.79 km2 surrounding the estuary of the Pearl River (Fig. 1), the PRD region is on the southeast coast of China (111.35–115.40° E, 21.56–24.40° N) with both tropical and subtropical climate characteristics. Its physical condition is characterized by extensive plains and numerous hills ranging from 0 to 1585 m above sea level (m asl; Fig. 1). The PRD region comprises 11 cities and has experienced exponential economic and industrial development since the effective implementation of China’s Reform and Opening-Up policies in 1978 (Wong et al. 2003; Shen et al. 2006), accompanied by a substantial population increase and environmental changes (Gong et al. 2019; Yim et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019). Additionally, the study region has experienced high urban density and high rates of urban expansion (Lin et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2019a; Wong et al. 2019) and the degradation of vegetated areas that have converted to built areas since the 1970s (Wang et al. 2019a, 2019b).
Overview of study steps
Figure 2 provides a flowchart of the steps involved in this analysis. Each step is outlined in more detail below, starting with LCZ determination, LSP identification, LST calculation, and then finally regression analysis (Fig. 2). In this study, we employed time series LSP metrics (i.e., start, end, and length of season) and LST metrics (i.e., daytime and nighttime LST in both spring and autumn). We analyzed the interannual covariation of LSP metrics with LST metrics depending on LCZ types of vegetated areas from 2000 to 2019. As explanatory variables, we used the LCZs (Table S1) of the PRD region.
Local climate zones and urban–rural gradients
Open-access remote-sensing resources provide free data for classifying LCZ maps over decades. Multispectral and radar imaging sensors have systematically tracked and characterized urbanization and spatiotemporal variations in millions of locations across Earth for over a decade (Xu et al. 2017; Bechtel et al. 2019; Demuzere et al. 2019). We employed the LCZ classification in 2000 and 2019 to avoid the uncertainty in tracking continuous time series dynamics of vegetation phenology resulting from land cover conversion between LCZ built types (i.e., LCZ 1–10) and land cover types (i.e., LCZ A–H) over the investigated period of 2000–2019.
To map the LCZs of 2000 and 2019 in the PRD region (first column in Fig. 2), we presented an adjusted workflow using a cloud-based Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform: (1) various pre-processed Earth observation data in the GEE archive were selected and post-processed using GEE’s client library; (2) LCZ sampling data (Fig. S1) were collected and edited in Google Earth Pro and exported to the GEE platform using the.kml format; and (3) the random forest (RF) classifier was applied to produce the LCZ classification on the GEE platform, and an accuracy assessment was conducted, as described by (Hay Chung et al. 2021).
For the 2000 LCZ classification, USGS Landsat 5 TM orthorectified images at a 30 m spatial resolution for 01/01/2000–31/12/2000, NASA SRTM Digital Elevation 30 m (Farr et al., 2007) of 2000, and DMSP OLS: Global Radiance-Calibrated Nighttime Lights Version 4 and Nighttime Lights Time Series Version 4, Defense Meteorological Program Operational Linescan System at 30 arc seconds (approximately 1 km spatial resolution) of 2000 were collected. For the 2019 LCZ classification, the Sentinel-1 SAR GRD: C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar Ground Range Detected, log scaling bands at a 10 m spatial resolution and cloud-free Sentinel-2 MSI: MultiSpectral Instrument, Level-1C bands at 10 and 60 m spatial resolution, VIIRS Stray Light Corrected Nighttime Day/Night Band Composites Version 1 at 15 arc seconds (approximately 500 m spatial resolution) for 01/01/2019–12/31/2019, and GMTED2010: Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 at 7.5 arc seconds (approximately 250 m spatial resolution) were employed.
A total of 1972 (2000) and 2144 (2019) digitized samples (Fig. S1) were collected across the urbanized areas and their surrounding areas in the PRD region based on Google Earth Pro by using the World Urban Database and Access Portal Tools (WUDAPT) workflow (Bechtel et al. 2015) that typify the LCZ types (Fig. S1). They were digitized, saved in the KML format, and imported into the GEE platform using a Google Fusion table. The training and testing samples were selected randomly, and 70% of samples (1405 samples [2000] and 1459 samples [2019]) were used for classifier training. The remaining 30% of samples (567 samples [2000] and 685 samples [2019]) were used for the accuracy assessment. To create the LCZ maps of 2000 and 2019 for the study regions, an RF classifier (Breiman 2001) was employed because of its ability to balance the computational performance and achieve accuracy (Bechtel et al. 2015). The number of trees was set to 80, according to the error tests of the RF classifier in this study.
Temperature and its elevated local warming effect differ among LCZ types with urban–rural gradients (Goggins et al. 2012; Leconte et al. 2015; Ng and Ren 2018; Mushore et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2019a). Compact high-rise denotes a dense mix of tall buildings with the highest impervious but the lowest pervious surface fraction and the highest anthropogenic heat output among LCZ built types (1–10) (Stewart and Oke 2012). Moreover, most compact high-rise buildings are located in the centre of urban areas in the PRD region from 1999 to 2019 (Xie et al. 2022). Thus, we computed the distance gradients by selecting a distinct 250 m zone iteratively displaced every 250 m between the spatial borders of compact high rises (i.e., LCZ 1) of the LCZ classification map of 2019 and the administrative boundary of the PRD region. In this study, an urban–rural gradient represented the distance to the closest urban center (i.e., LCZ 1).
Land surface phenology
The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) can capture seasonal changes in vegetation properties and productivity, but EVI is more suitable for high biomass conditions (Pettorelli et al. 2005; Sesnie et al. 2012; Melaas et al. 2013). These indices enable local to broad-scale monitoring of vegetation phenological events (Tucker 1979; Pettorelli et al. 2005; Fisher et al. 2006; Cleland et al. 2007; Liang and Schwartz 2009; White et al. 2009; Zhao et al. 2022). Moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) data provide advantages in monitoring LSP derived from the vegetation index (VI) in long-term observations and broad coverage (Walker et al. 2012). In this study, 457 NASA MOD13Q1 (collection 6250 m resolution) products between 2000 and 2019 were employed to extract the NDVI and EVI (represented as VIs) (2nd column in Fig. 2), VI quality indicators, and day of year VI pixel layers by using the practice of (Xie et al. 2017). A pixel with annual mean VIs lower than 0.2 from the LSP estimation was excluded and thus not considered in this study, since the annual mean VI values within built areas of 2000 and 2019 are lower than 0.2 according to the LCZ 1–10 sample test.
Many approaches can determine the start of season (SOS) and end of season (EOS) from Earth observation data (de Beurs and Henebry 2010). However, the standard midpoint pixel threshold (White et al. 2009) applies well to time series phenology variations and at large scales such as in tropical/subtropical regions (Garonna et al. 2016, 2018). VIs were used to derive yearly LSP metrics for the SOS, EOS, and length of season (LOS) at the pixel level. First, the time series of the VIs were smoothed using harmonic analysis describe the seasonal change by sinusoidal functions effectively (Roerink et al. 2000). Second, SOS was estimated using the day of a year when VIs first arrived at the midpoint of their annual amplitude using the Midpointpixel approach (White et al. 2009). EOS was then computed using the day on which VIs declined below this mid-threshold, and LOS was estimated as the number of days of the year between the SOS and EOS. Day of Year (DOY) was expressed for the SOS and EOS, and number of days for LOS. Finally, pixels with the SOS before DOY 16 and EOS after DOY 352 were filtered out according to the collection date range of the VI layers. In this study, SOSNDVI, EOSNDVI, and LOSNDVI represent the LSP metrics derived from the NDVI, and SOSEVI, EOSEVI, and LOSEVI represent the LSP metrics derived from the EVI. Vegetated pixels that experienced land cover changes based on LCZ maps between 2000 and 2019 were masked off. Furthermore, an independent Global land-cover product (GLC_FCS30) of 2000 and 2020 (Zhang et al. 2021) was utilized to ensure the exclusion of agricultural vegetation information. VIs and LSP computation were conducted using R programming (version 3.4.1). Mapping visualizations of LCZs were conducted using ArcGIS (v10.8, ESRI, USA).
Land surface temperature metrics and the digital elevation model
We also analyzed the temperature controls on phenology in the PRD region (3rd column in Fig. 2). Remotely sensed LST is reported to correlate well with a SUHI, depending on urban–rural gradients (Roth et al. 1989; Walker et al. 2015). In this study, LST data over the period 2000–2019 were obtained from 3660 NASA MOD11A1 products with a spatial/temporal resolution of ~ 1 km/1 day. We converted MOD11A1 LST from Kelvin degrees to degrees Celsius (°C). The seasonal average values were calculated from the daily values for each temperature factor (day LST and night LST). A pixel with good quality, a cloud-free record, or a small error was employed in the seasonal average LST metric computation according to MOD11A1 layers of daytime and nighttime LST quality indicators. According to the varying range of DOY for SOS (SOSNDVI and SOSEVI) and EOS (EOSNDVI and EOSEVI) over the study period (Fig. S6), the selected spring season was defined as March, April, and May (92 days of the year), and autumn was defined as September, October, and November (91 days of the year) (Zhou et al. 2016; Xie et al. 2020). The employed LST metrics in this study were the spring day average LST (STday), spring night average LST (STnight), autumn day average LST (ATday), and autumn night average LST (ATnight) in vegetated areas (LCZ A–D).
Digital elevation information of the PRD region at an ~ 30 m scale was collected from the United States Geological Survey (https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/SRTM1Arc) and employed to generate a digital elevation model (DEM). DEM was applied to mask the pixels at a higher elevation because more than 99.0% of built areas were located at elevations lower than 200 m asl by 2019 (Xie et al. 2022). The time series of LST metrics and DEM were converted into the Universal Transverse Mercator projection in Zone 49 North (UTM 49N) and World Geodetic System 84 (WGS-84) and resampled as 250 m scale images by using the nearest neighbor approach in an ENVI/IDL environment (v5.3, EXELIS Inc., McLean, VA, USA) for subsequent statistical analysis matching coordinates and 250 m resolution of LSP metrics. Mapping visualizations were performed in ArcGIS (v10.8, ESRI, USA).
Statistical analysis
To identify relative changes in both SOS and EOS to the interannual dynamics of LOS over the study period in the PRD region, we computed the interannual differences (Δ) of SOS and EOS at the pixel level, which are the difference (expressed in days) between the current (observed) year and the preceding year, as Xie et al. (2017) described. To measure the relative determination of interannual variation in SOS and EOS to the interannual dynamics of LOS by employing interannual differences of SOS (ΔSOS) and EOS (ΔEOS), we adopted the C index approach used by Garonna et al. (2014) as follows:
We evaluated each pixel’s mean C values (computed from the symmetry of 19 ΔSOS and 19 ΔEOS). The C index varies between − 1 and 1. A positive value of C indicates that LOS variation is more influenced by a shift of SOS than EOS between the current (observed) year and the preceding year. By contrast, a negative C index means that the EOS shift is more important than the SOS shift in the interannual variation in LOS. We expressed CNDVI to identify the C index derived from SOSNDVI, EOSNDVI, and LOSNDVI, and CEVI computed from SOSEVI, EOSEVI, and LOSEVI.
Linear regression was used to test the urban–rural change trends (with statistical significance defined as p < 0.001) in LST variables at the 250 m gradient level. Linear regression was also employed to examine interannual trends (with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05) in LSP metrics and LST variables at the pixel level over the 20 investigated years. Partial Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (r) were used to test interannual associations (with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05) of LSP metrics with LST variables at the pixel level of the study period.
We combined 250 m scale maps of the statistical outcomes with the 250 m scale distance gradients and LCZ maps. They were then analyzed across distance gradients in the PRD region (lower panel in Fig. 2). Each distance gradient was characterized by the average values of consisting 250-m gradient zones of the statistical regression/correlation outcomes on statistical significance (defined as p < 0.05). Distance gradients with (i) a few vegetated pixels less than 5% proportion of total areas and (ii) a percentage of statistically significant regression/correlation lower than 5% were filtered out in the urban–rural gradient analysis. All statistical analyses were computed using R programming (version 3.4.1).
Results
Local climate zones, land surface phenology, and land surface temperatures and their urban–rural gradients
Based on the LCZ classification, the LCZ maps of 2000 and 2019 were generated (Fig. 3). The accuracy assessment was conducted using an independent set of validation samples for all 17 LCZ classes from 2000 to 2019 (Tables S2, S3). The overall accuracies were 96.3% and 94.7%, built class accuracies were 71.7% and 72.5%, and κ coefficients were 0.810 and 0.883 for 2000 and 2019, respectively. The areas of all LCZ built types (1–10) of 2000 and 2019 accounted for 10.5% and 13.4%, respectively, of the total areas (Fig. 3). Based on the LCZ 1 compact high-rise of 2019, the distance gradients were generated to identify the urban–rural local climate zone gradients (Fig. S2). According to the detection of LCZ changes between 2000 and 2019, 62.7% of the vegetated pixels experienced no changes and were employed in the following analysis.
More than 99.0% of LCZ built areas were located at gradients between 0 and 10,000 m (Fig. 4). More than 95.0% of LCZ built areas were distributed in the distance gradients between 0 and 5000 m of 2000 and 2019 (Fig. 4; Fig. S3). Compact high-rise (LCZ 1) is the most central among all other LCZ built types (i.e., 2–10). The areas of LCZ 2–10 varied with their distance gradient to LCZ 1 of 2019, especially notable is the decrease in distance gradients between 0 and 5000 m. However, LCZ built types were limited but regularly scattered at a distance farther than 5000 m in 2000 and 2019. Specifically, LCZ 1, 2, 4, and 5 (characterized as compact, high-rise, or mid-rise types) were located at distance gradients between 0 and 2000 m. LCZ 3, 6, 7, and 8 (characterized as open or low-rise types) were mainly distributed at distance gradients between 0 and 2000 m and secondarily between 2000 and 5000 m. More than 95.0% of LCZ built areas were distributed in the distance gradients between 0 and 5000 m of the period 2000–2019 (Fig. 4; Fig. S3). The LCZ 2–10 of each city showed a similar variation with its distance gradient to LCZ 1 in the PRD region of 2019 (Fig. S4). The investigated vegetation areas (LCZ A–D) between 2000 and 2019 are distributed around each city’s LCZ built types (Fig. 3) and varied regularly with their distance gradient to LCZ 1 of 2019 (Fig. S5). In most surveyed cities, the area of all LCZ built types decreased with distance gradients between 0 and 2000 m (Fig. S4). Compact and high-rise LCZ built types (2–4) were primarily located at distance gradients close to LCZ 1. In the following statistical analysis of distance gradients, we set 2000 and 5000 m as gradient thresholds to match the variation of LCZ types with distance gradients.
Over the study period of 2000–2019, the land surface phenology (LSP) metrics, i.e. SOSNDVI and EOSNDVI derived from NDVI and SOSEVI and EOSEVI derived from EVI, varied with vegetated spatial patterns across the PRD region (Fig. S6). More specifically, the mean value of start of season (SOS) (SOSNDVI and SOSEVI) ranged between 50 and 159 day of the year (DOY), the mean value of end of season (EOS) (EOSNDVI and EOSEVI) changed from 202 to 335 DOY.
The variations of LOS (LOSNDVI and LOSEVI) are determined by the changes of SOS (SOSNDVI and SOSEVI) and EOS (EOSNDVI and EOSEVI). C index analysis results (Fig. 5) show that CNDVI varied between − 0.13 and − 0.10, and CEVI varied between − 0.20 and − 0.16 with the distance gradients. The negative values of CNDVI and CEVI showed that the interannual variations of LOS (LOSNDVI and LOSEVI) are more determined by the interannual shifts of EOS (EOSNDVI and EOSEVI) rather than SOS (SOSNDVI and SOSEVI) over the study period. CNDVI and CEVI presented the most substantial values at distance gradients of 0–2000 m, and the values were secondary at 2000–5000 m. Spatial patterns of CNDVI and CEVI are shown in Fig. S7.
Figure 6 shows that the day and night LST in spring and autumn decreased with an increase in distance to the urban built centre (LCZ 1) and their urban–rural decrease trends (with statistical significance defined as p < 0.001) with an increase in gradients in the PRD region. Taking Fig. 6a as an example, an increase of X meters (from X1 to X2) in distance is associated with a temperature decrease of 0.177(ln(X2) − ln(X1)) °C in STday. STday decreased from 13.5 to 12.8 °C, and STnight decreased from 13.9 to 12.7 °C (Fig. 6a, b). However, STnight was slightly higher than STday at the distance gradients between 0 and 3750 m but lower at distance gradients farther than 3,750 m (Fig. 6a, b; Fig. S8a, b). By contrast, at distance gradients to the urban built center (i.e., LCZ 1), the day LST in autumn (ATday) slightly decreased from 23.5 to 21.5 °C, and the night LST in autumn (ATnight) slightly decreased from 18.0 to 16.0 °C (Fig. 6c, d). Notably, ATday and ATnight in the vegetated regions decreased more steeply close to the built areas between 0 and 2000 m than in the farther regions (Fig. 6c, d; Fig. S8c, d). These urban–rural decrease trends were statistically significant in areas at distance gradients between 0 and 10,000 m. Overall, the daytime and nighttime LST in spring (STday and STnight) and autumn (ATday and ATnight) in built areas and their adjoining areas were higher than in other regions.
Interannual trends in land surface phenology and land surface temperature
Linear least-squares regression results (with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05) showed that LSP metrics experienced statistically significant trends in the PRD area from 2000 to 2019. Figure 7 shows that the average interannual trends (i.e., average linear least-squares regression slopes) of the LSP metrics varied with their distance to LCZ 1. These interannual trends were more pronounced in built areas at distance gradients between 0 and 5000 m than in other vegetated areas farther than 5000 m. Specifically, SOSNDVI and SOSEVI illustrated statistically significant postponing trends with less than 10% of the total pixels over the study period (Fig. 7a). The proportion of statistically significant pixels (% of total pixels) was more than 5% but less than 10% at the distance gradients between 0 and 5000 m and less than 5% at distance gradients farther than 5000 m. EOS (EOSNDVI and EOSEVI) also showed a significantly delayed trend with less than 15% of the total pixels over the investigated 20 years (Fig. 7b). The delayed trends of EOSNDVI occurred more significantly (with more than 7% of the total pixels) at distance gradients between 0 and 5000 than at farther distance gradients. More statistically significant pixels were observed closer to the central built areas, except for EOSEVI and LOSEVI at gradients between 0 and 2000 m. Compared with EOSNDVI, EOSEVI presented a similar case but with the less interannual delay and the corresponding proportion of statistically significant pixels at distance gradients of 0–5000 m (Fig. 7b). LOS (LOSNDVI and LOSEVI) also significantly tended to extend, with less than 25% of the total pixels from 2000 to 2019. The extension of LOSNDVI and LOSEVI increased between 0 and 2000 m (Fig. 7c). Areas with significant trends (with more statistically significant pixels) of LOSNDVI and LOSEVI were more pronounced at distance gradients between 0 and 5000 than at distance gradients greater than 5000 m.
Distance gradient mean values of an interannual trend (day year−1) of LSP metrics (a SOSNDVI and SOSEVI, b EOSNDVI and EOSEVI, and c LOSNDVI and LOSEVI) and the corresponding proportion of statistically significant areas (a % of SOSNDVI and % of SOSEVI, b % of EOSNDVI and % of EOSEVI, and c % of LOSNDVI and % of LOSEVI) of vegetated area for the PRD region. Dashed grey lines represent the distance of 2000 and 5000 m
Over the study period of 2000–2019, the spring LST (i.e., STday and STnight) tended to decrease. The interannual decreasing trend of STday was more substantial than that of STnight (Fig. 8). Notably, the interannual decreasing trends of STnight mainly occurred in the built areas of the distance gradients between 0 and 5000 m. The interannual decreasing trends of STday are especially pronounced in built areas and their adjoining regions. However, ATday and ATnight showed statistically significant trends, with fewer than 3% of the total area in the PRD region over the 20 investigated years.
Distance gradient mean values of an interannual trend (°C year−1) of spring day and night LST metrics (STday and STnight) and the corresponding proportion of statistically significant areas (% of STday and % of STnight) of vegetated area for the PRD region. Dashed grey lines represent the distance of 2000 and 5000 m
Association of land surface phenology with land surface temperature
Over the study period of 2000–2019, the average partial Spearman’s correlation coefficients (r) (with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05) of SOS (SOSNDVI and SOSEVI) with spring LST (STday and STnight) and of EOS (EOSNDVI and EOSEVI) with autumn LST (ATday and ATnight) varied with distance gradients (Fig. 9). In spring, correlations between SOS (SOSNDVI and SOSEVI) and STday and the corresponding proportion of statistically significant areas (% of total pixels) were more substantial and more significant than those observed between SOS metrics and STnight across the distance gradients. In autumn, only the proportion of statistically significant areas (% of total pixels) of correlations between EOS (EOSNDVI and EOSEVI) and ATday were more substantial than those observed between EOS metrics and ATnight across the distance gradients.
Variation in average partial Spearman’s correlation coefficients between spring day and night LST metrics (STday and STnight) and (a SOSNDVI and b SOSEVI) and between autumn day and night LST metrics (ATday and ATnight) and EOS (c EOSNDVI and d EOSEVI) and the corresponding proportion of statistically significant areas (% of total pixels) of each distance gradient for the PRD region. Dashed grey lines represent the distance of 2000 and 5000 m, and the dashed purple line denotes an average correlation coefficient of 0
The correlation of STday with SOSNDVI (with average moderate r approximately − 0.50) was stronger than that of STnight with SOSNDVI across the distance gradients (Fig. 9a). The corresponding proportion of statistically significant areas was the largest at closer distance gradients of 0–2000 m and was secondary at 2000–5000 m. The average correlations of SOSEVI with STday (mean r ranging between − 0.60 and − 0.22) were slightly reduced across distance gradients between 0 and 10,000 m (Fig. 9b). Correlations of SOSEVI with STnight (mean r ranging between − 0.14 and − 0.05) were insignificant across distance gradients. The corresponding proportion of statistically significant areas for the correlations of SOSEVI with STday decreased with distance gradients while for the correlations of SOSEVI with STnight increased with distance gradients but then decreased; expectedly, these correlations were the strongest at distance gradients between 0 and 2000 m and secondary between 2000 and 5000 m.
Correlations between EOSNDVI and ATday differed from positive to negative with distance gradients between 0 and 5000 m. Across distance gradients farther than 5000 m, correlations between EOSNDVI and ATday were negative, with a mean r of approximately − 0.60 (Fig. 9c). Absolute correlations of EOSNDVI with ATnight slightly reduced with distance gradients between 0 and 5000 m but tended to 0 and became insignificant at distance gradients farther than 5000 m. The corresponding proportion of statistically significant areas for the correlations of EOSNDVI with ATday and ATnight showed the highest values at distance gradients of 0–2000 m and presented secondary values of 2000–5000 m.
Negative correlations of EOSEVI with ATday and ATnight were stronger and more significant at a closer distance gradient of 0–5000 m than at farther distance gradients (Fig. 9d). Specifically, the correlation of EOSEVI with ATday has negative values with a mean r of approximately − 0.40 across distance gradients, and the correlation of EOSEVI with ATnight has negative values with a mean r of approximately − 0.35 on distance gradients. The corresponding proportion of statistically significant areas for the correlation between EOSNDVI and ATday and the correlation between EOSNDVI and ATnight presented the most considerable ratio at distance gradients of 0–2000 m and showed a secondary matter of 2000–5000 m.
Discussion
Local climate zones, land surface phenology, and land surface temperatures and their urban–rural gradients
Our results show that the zones closer to the centers of urban areas (LCZ 1: compact high-rise) have higher proportion of LCZ built types. Moreover, our results show that LCZ built types have changed from open, low-rise, and mid-rise LCZs to compact and high-rise across the urban–rural gradients from 2000 to 2019 (Fig. 4). This phenomenon was pronounced in zones close to the Pearl River estuary (Fig. 3) and the centers of the urban regions (Fig. 4), which confirms the urbanization in the PRD region happening as the growth of compact and high-rise buildings, particularly in proximity to the estuary and downtown areas (Liang et al. 2018a, 2018b; Wang et al. 2019a; Chen et al. 2020).
Vegetation phenology can be affected by temperature in both spring and autumn (Menzel et al. 2006; Körner and Basler 2010). However, phenological events are reported to be more variable in autumn than in spring (Walther et al. 2002; Richardson et al. 2013; Garonna et al. 2014; Donnelly et al. 2018). In this study, we observed that the EOS played a more important role than the SOS in determining LOS, based on the C index analysis (Fig. 5). This phenomenon was slightly pronounced (i.e., a greater absolute value of C index) in urban domains (distance gradients of 0–2000 m). This finding further suggests that variation in autumn vegetation phenology can play a significantly pronounced role in the vegetation of urban domains.
Our results show that the areas and proportions of urban–rural LCZs, as well as the spring and autumn LST metrics of vegetated areas, varied considerably and exhibited a statistically significant relationship with distance gradients from urban centers, namely, compact high-rise (LCZ 1; Figs. 4, 6). The LST transition depends on the LCZs and reveals that the SUHI showed a significant urban–rural decline across the PRD region. Specifically, we found that the interannual trends of spring and autumn LST metrics of vegetated areas were more significant in urban–rural gradients dominated by compact and high-rise urban areas compared to those dominated by open, mid-rise, or low-rise regions. Furthermore, these metrics decreased as the distance to compact high-rise (LCZ 1) areas increased. These results indicate that LCZs are linked to the distance gradients of the LST (Figs. 4, 6). This finding is in line with reports that the UHI and SUHI effects are more pronounced in the centre than in other areas of cities and metropolitan belts (Han and Xu 2013; Geletič et al. 2016; Krehbiel et al. 2016; Zipper et al. 2016; Ferreira and Duarte 2018; Parece and Campbell 2018; Richard et al. 2018; Brousse et al. 2019; Katz et al. 2019; Mushore et al. 2019).
Interannual trends in land surface phenology and land surface temperature
Although a small portion of pixels showed statistically significant trends, our findings illustrate the interannual trends of SOS (3.6% of SOSNDVI pixels and 4.1% of SOSEVI pixels) and EOS (5.9% of EOSNDVI pixels and 6.8% of EOSEVI pixels) were delayed. In contrast, the trends of LOS (10.9% of LOSNDVI pixels and 12.4% of LOSEVI pixels) extended over the period of investigation. These trends were more pronounced in vegetated areas located in urban–rural gradients dominated by LCZ 1–6 (i.e., urban domains of distance gradients between 0 and 2000 m) than in other vegetated areas (Figs. 4, 7). These findings confirm the dependency of spatiotemporal vegetation phenology on urbanization identification and expansion in metropolitan areas, which is consistent with reported findings (Gazal et al. 2008; Jochner et al. 2012; Han and Xu 2013; Walker et al. 2015; Dallimer et al. 2016; Liang et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2016; Zipper et al. 2016; Gervais et al. 2017; Li et al. 2017b; Qiu et al. 2017, 2020; Yao et al. 2017; Parece and Campbell 2018; Singh et al. 2018).
Although an advanced spring start of vegetation growth over the past decades has been reported worldwide in urban domains in the field (e.g., Li et al. 2017c, 2019; Yao et al. 2017; Qiu et al. 2020), our analysis presents a notable finding that the delayed SOS is especially pronounced in regions close to urban centers (of distance gradients between 0 and 2000 m), although without considerably significant statistical results based on linear regression found in the PRD region over the investigated period (Fig. 7). This finding agrees with a report on delayed SOS trends between 2007 and 2013 in Guangzhou (Zhou et al. 2016). We found a delayed trend in EOS, and the delay was more pronounced in urban domains (of distance gradients between 0 and 2000 m) than in suburban (distance gradients between 2000 and 5000 m) and rural regions (distance gradients farther than 5000), which agrees with the widely reported delay of vegetation senescence (Li et al. 2017c). Furthermore, these findings show that the EOS played a role in extending the LOS in the PRD region because both SOS and EOS were delayed over the investigated years.
Our findings indicate that both spring day and night LST (STday and STnight) experienced decreasing trends and variation over the period 2000–2019 (Fig. 8). We did not find significant trends in the autumn day and night LST (ATday and ATnight) based on the time series LST variables and the statistical method employed in this study. Nevertheless, the differences in research periods must be considered when comparing these inconsistencies between reported findings because the direction and strength of a trend are highly dependent on the temporal scale of the investigation periods (Bertin 2008; Marty et al. 2017; Lindh et al. 2018).
Although the ranges of the proportion of pixels (% of total) with a significant interannual trend of LSP metrics (between 5 and 25%) and spring LST variables (between 5 and 40%) were not significant (Figs. 7, 8), our study shows that locations closer to the central urban regions (compact high-rise) showed a greater trend of vegetation phenology and spring LSTs than those that were further away.
Association of land surface phenology and land surface temperature
LST analysis based on urban–rural gradients revealed a significant influence of SUHIs on spatiotemporal LSP in vegetated areas of the PRD region (Fig. 9). That SOSNDVI and SOSEVI were negatively correlated with spring LST metrics, although a slight positive correlation coefficient was observed between SOSNDVI and STnight across distance gradients (Fig. 9a, b), which clearly indicates that spring day and night LSTs influenced the start of vegetation growth in the PRD region and thus affected the variation in vegetation, particularly in urban domains (of distance gradients between 0 and 2000 m). Studies have reported that elevated urban air or LSTs result in significant differences in vegetation phenology (Zhang et al. 2004; Gazal et al. 2008; Dallimer et al. 2016; Zipper et al. 2016; Krehbiel et al. 2017; Katz et al. 2019). Moreover, lower air temperatures can result in later-onset growth of plants (Jochner et al. 2011; Parece and Campbell 2018). In this study, based on the LCZ scheme, our findings show that urban LSTs have a gradient-dependent influence on spring vegetation phenology.
Most centrally, under the scenarios of a global warming climate (IPCC 2019), anthropogenic activities can significantly amplify the impacts of the changing urban built environment on LSP and lead to its spatiotemporal alteration (Luder et al. 2018; Jeong et al. 2019). Specifically, over the investigated period 2000–2019, we found several novel results: decreased spring LST metrics, delayed SOSNDVI and SOSEVI, and the corresponding negative correlation of spring LST metrics with SOSNDVI and SOSEVI across urban–rural gradients in the PRD region. These findings indicate that the PRD region experienced a decreasing trend in spring daytime LST across the entire urban–rural gradients (Fig. 8) and that a delayed SOS was relatively pronounced in the urban domains (Fig. 7a). This cooling trend might be due to the afforestation and vegetation coverage improvements in the PRD region over the past decades (Hu and Xia 2019) because the greening strategy effectively mitigates UHI effects (Venter et al. 2021). Correspondingly, a cooling temperature-influenced delay of spring phenology should be observed over the same period. Based on the space-borne observation findings, a similar case was reported in Fairbanks, USA (Gazal et al. 2008). In addition, the dynamics of a later bud break, longer leaf discolouration, and shorter growing seasons were reported to be affected by UHIs in Salzburg, Austria (Stanley et al. 2019).
We found that EOSNDVI and EOSEVI were negatively correlated with ATnight across distance gradients (Fig. 9c, d), indicating that autumn night LSTs influence the senescence of vegetation. However, ATday presented a positive correlation with EOSNDVI but was negatively correlated with EOSEVI at distances of less than 1500 m. This inconsistency may arise due to the varying sensitivities of the time series of NDVI and EVI to temperature differences.
Statistical analysis of the correlation of SOSNDVI and SOSEVI with spring LST metrics and the correlation of EOSNDVI and EOSEVI with autumn LST metrics (Fig. 9) show that the number of statistically significant pixels (% of total) decreased with distance to compact high-rise (i.e., LCZ 1, the central urban patterns), which confirms that the changing spring and autumn LST and SUHI affect vegetation phenology and thus the ecosystem. These effects are more pronounced in urban domains than in suburban and rural regions. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that LSP could also be employed as an indicator or proxy of SUHI intensity and its effect on the urban ecosystem based on the LCZ gradients.
Urban–rural gradients and variations in vegetation phenology might be related not only to SUHI gradients and LCZ types but also to elevational gradients, which have been widely reported in naturally vegetated areas (Xie et al. 2017, 2020). Nevertheless, our findings indicate a more pronounced sensitivity of urban ecological processes to the SUHI and LST effects associated with distance to centres of built areas than that of suburban and rural areas in the RPD region. In addition, spatial differences in the effects of SUHIs on the LSP of vegetated areas are especially pronounced in urban domains with higher built proportions in the PRD region.
Because of the relatively higher sensitivity of urban vegetation than suburban and rural areas in the PRD region (Fig. 9), our results suggest that the direction and strength of the response of urban vegetation to SUHIs depend on the distance of vegetated areas to the urban centres and compact and high-rise buildings (of distance gradients between 0 and 2000 m) over the study period.
Limitations and further research
The urban composition characteristics and medium spatial resolution of remote-sensing-derived vegetation indices in the PRD region make LSP metrics estimates complex (Li et al. 2017a, 2019). Over the observed period, missing data might have created bias in the curve-fitting estimation and the midpoint threshold determination, increasing uncertainties in the computation of vegetation phenology metrics (Fisher et al. 2006; Hmimina et al. 2013). A significant concern in heterogeneous urban areas is that the use of coarse satellite images may introduce bias when estimating vegetation phenology due to the greater diversity of phenology dates within a pixel (Tian et al. 2020). Consequently, finer resolution data holds the potential for greater biophysical accuracy compared to its coarse counterparts (Gao et al. 2021). Previous findings indicate that finer resolution datasets enable effective assessment of vegetation phenology at the landscape/ecosystem level (Gu et al. 2023) and even at the tree crown/canopy level (Zhao et al. 2022; Cao et al. 2023). While finer resolution datasets may contribute to more credible conclusions in heterogeneous urban regions, it is essential to acknowledge the potential for differences. Future studies should undertake comprehensive comparisons among these datasets in real-world conditions to provide a more nuanced understanding. Validation of remote-sensing modeled phenology at a fine resolution based on ground observations of phenology is also necessary in heterogeneous urban areas.
Heterogeneity of vegetation within LCZs could result in inaccuracies in LSP comparison at the vegetation type classes. Further LSP analysis should consider the lower hierarchical level of LCZs (Stewart and Oke 2012) to clarify the effect differences of LST between vegetation types. However, the LCZ classification results are also affected by various resolutions of the Earth observation dataset, such as MODIS, Sentinel-1 and 2, and DEM data. Limited by the spatial resolution of LCZ maps and LSP metrics, we cannot exclude all agricultural land covers from our investigation. Therefore, agricultural practices and management in the croplands surrounding urbanized areas, which affect the estimation of LSP metrics and their relationships with LCZs and the corresponding SUHI, were not considered in this study. This topic was beyond the scope of this research, for example, seeding and sowing in spring and harvesting in autumn. Nevertheless, LSTs are not entirely associated with air temperature (Roth et al. 1989; Arnfield 2003). Disentangling the climate and SUHI effects of agricultural activities on greening solely using Earth observation data would be difficult. In addition, SUHI assessments relying on satellite data were reported to have an upward bias over both day- and nighttime (Venter et al. 2021), which might limit the estimation confidence in analysis of the urban–rural SUHI gradient based on the LCZ scheme. To this end, further analyses involving additional auxiliary information are required. We focused our analysis of the LSP of vegetated areas on pixels that experienced no urbanization. Although we recognize vegetation transformations due to urban development and LCZ changes are going to affect LSP dynamics (Wang et al. 2019a, 2019b) such processes were beyond the scope of this study and require further research.
Remote sensing-based analysis of LSP of tropical/subtropical urban regions should focus on the relative influence of identified driving factors LSP dynamics across vegetated areas. Combining air temperature and LST in such analyses should facilitate, the detection of long-term trends in the start and end of greening and the role of precipitation, solar and artificial light, as well as urban water availability in explaining complex patterns of phenology. It should improve our understanding of the effect of urban expansion and changing climate on the vegetation in the PRD region.
Conclusion
Based on multi-source Earth observation data, classified LCZ maps and time series vegetation indices, we derived LSP metrics (SOS, EOS, and LOS) along the distance gradient to urban centres (i.e., LCZ 1 compact high-rise) in the PRD region. We found that more than 95.0% of built areas were distributed within a distance of 5000 m to urban centers, and the distances of compact and high-rise LCZ types to LCZ 1 were closer than those of open, mid-rise, and lower-rise LCZ types. The interannual trends of SOS and EOS were delayed, and the interannual trend of LOS extended over the investigated period and. The trends were pronounced in vegetated areas next to built-dominated regions (of distance gradients between 0 and 5000 m) than in other vegetated areas. Additionally, the interannual dynamics of LOS depended more on the EOS than the SOS. The influence of compact and high-rise areas on LSP in urban domains was more substantial than that of open, mid-rise, and lower-rise areas. Correspondingly, the association of LSP with LST was higher in the areas adjoining compact high-rise than in the open, mid-rise, and lower-rise areas; the effects of day LST on the LSP were slightly more substantial than those of the night LST.
This study provides a novel view in combining LSP and LCZ and reveals the spatiotemporal dependence of the vegetation on the LCZ and the LST. Taking forward the conservation of urban ecosystems in the PRD region (i.e., the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area), the LSP of vegetated areas along with LCZ-based urban–rural gradients might be critical for understanding vegetation phenology changes and for the planning and management of urban ecosystem services. Notably, a good understanding of urban vegetation and well-verified LSP and LST metrics is essential for vegetation protection and the resilience of ecosystems along with urban development. Our applications show the potential for using LCZ as a critical indicator in urban vegetation and its gradient identification.
Data availability
Supplementary material for this article can be found online at the Landscape Ecology website. Other additional datasets computed during this study are available on reasonable request.
Code availability
R codes employed to analyze data in this study are available on reasonable request.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- PRD:
-
Pearl River Delta
- LCZ:
-
Local climate zone
- LCZs:
-
Local climate zones
- GEE:
-
Google Earth Engine
- RF:
-
Random forest
- NDVI:
-
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
- EVI:
-
Enhanced Vegetation Index
- LSP:
-
Land surface phenology
- SOS:
-
Start of season
- SOSNDVI :
-
SOS derived from NDVI
- SOSEVI :
-
SOS derived from EVI
- EOS:
-
End of season
- EOSNDVI :
-
EOS derived from NDVI
- EOSEVI :
-
EOS derived from EVI
- LOS:
-
Length of season
- LOSNDVI :
-
LOS derived from NDVI
- LOSEVI :
-
LOS derived from EVI
- C index:
-
The relative determination of interannual differences in SOS and EOS
- C NDVI :
-
C Index measured from SOSNDVI and EOSNDVI
- C EVI :
-
C Index measured from SOSEVI and EOSEVI
- LST:
-
Land surface temperature
- STday :
-
Spring day LST
- STnight :
-
Spring night LST
- ATday :
-
Autumn day LST
- ATnight :
-
Autumn night LST
- UHI:
-
Urban heat island
- SUHI:
-
Surface UHI
- DEM:
-
Digital elevation model
References
Arnfield AJ (2003) Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. Int J Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.859
Avissar R (1996) Potential effects of vegetation on the urban thermal environment. Atmos Environ 30(3):437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00013-5
Backe K, Rousselet J, Bernard A, Frank S, Roques A (2021) Human health risks of invasive caterpillars increase with urban warming. Landsc Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01214-w
Barrio IC, Bueno CG, Nagy L, Palacio S, Grau O, Munilla I, García MB, Garcia-Cervigón A, Gartzia M, Gazol AG, Lara-Romero C, Anadon-Rosell A, Ninot J, Chocarro C, Alados, Fillat C, Zamora R (2013) Alpine ecology in the Iberian Peninsula: what do we know, and what do we need to learn? Mt Res Dev. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd-journal-d-13-00052.1
Bechtel B, Alexander PJ, Böhner J, Ching J, Conrad O, Feddema J, Mills G, See L, Stewart I (2015) Mapping local climate zones for a worldwide database of the form and function of cities. ISPRS Int J Geoinf 4:199–219. https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/4/1/199
Bechtel B, Alexander PJ, Beck C et al (2019) Generating WUDAPT Level 0 data—current status of production and evaluation. Urban Clim. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.10.001
Bertin RI (2008) Plant phenology and distribution in relation to recent climate change. J Torrey Bot Soc. https://doi.org/10.3159/07-rp-035r.1
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Brousse O, Georganos S, Demuzere M, Vanhuysse S, Wouters H, Wolff E, Linard C, Lipzig N, Dujardin S (2019) Using Local Climate Zones in Sub-Saharan Africa to tackle urban health issues. Urban Clim 27:227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.12.004
Buyantuyev A, Wu J (2012) Urbanization diversifies land surface phenology in arid environments: interactions among vegetation, climatic variation, and land use pattern in the Phoenix Metropolitan Region, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 105:149–159
Cao J, Xu X, Zhuo L, Liu K (2023) Investigating mangrove canopy phenology in coastal areas of China using time series Sentinel-1/2 images. Ecol Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110815
Chen G, Li X, Liu X, Chen Y, Liang X, Leng J, Xu X, Liao W, Qiu Y, Wu Q, Huang K (2020) Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14386-x
Cleland EE, Chuine I, Menzel A, Mooney HA, Schwartz MD (2007) Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol Evol 22:357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.04.003
Dallimer M, Tang Z, Gaston KJ, Davies ZG (2016) The extent of shifts in vegetation phenology between rural and urban areas within a human-dominated region. Ecol Evol 6:1942–1953
Daramola MT, Balogun IA (2019) Local climate zone classification of surface energy flux distribution within an urban area of a hot-humid tropical city. Urban Clim 29:100504
de Beurs KM, Henebry GM (2010) A land surface phenology assessment of the northern polar regions using MODIS reflectance time series. Can J Remote Sens 36:S87–S110
Demuzere M, Bechtel B, Middel A, Mills G (2019) Mapping Europe into local climate zones. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214474
Donnelly A, Liu L, Zhang X, Wingler A (2018) Autumn leaf phenology: discrepancies between in situ observations and satellite data at urban and rural sites. Int J Remote Sens 39:8129–8150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1482021
Du Y, Yang B, Chen SC, Ma K (2019) Diverging shifts in spring phenology in response to biodiversity loss in a subtropical forest. J Veg Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12806
Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R, Hensley S, Kobrick M, Paller M, Rodriguez E, Roth L, Seal D, Shaffer S, Shimada J, Umland J, Werner M, Oskin M, Burbank D, Alsdorf DE (2007) The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev Geophys 45(2):RG2004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183
Ferreira LS, Duarte DHS (2018) Land surface temperature, vegetation cover and urban morphology over different local climate zones in São Paulo Metropolitan Region. In: 10th International conference on urban climate/14th symposium on the urban environment, 2018
Fisher JI, Mustard JF, Vadeboncoeur MA (2006) Green leaf phenology at Landsat resolution: scaling from the field to the satellite. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.022
Gao X, Gray JM, Reich BJ (2021) Long-term, medium spatial resolution annual land surface phenology with a Bayesian hierarchical model. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112484
Garonna I, de Jong R, de Wit AJW et al (2014) Strong contribution of autumn phenology to changes in satellite-derived growing season length estimates across Europe (1982–2011). Glob Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12625
Garonna I, de Jong R, Schaepman ME (2016) Variability and evolution of global land surface phenology over the past three decades (1982–2012). Glob Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13168
Garonna I, De Jong R, Stöckli R et al (2018) Shifting relative importance of climatic constraints on land surface phenology. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa17b
Gazal R, White MA, Gillies R, Rodemaker E, Sparrow E, Gordon L (2008) GLOBE students, teachers, and scientists demonstrate variable differences between urban and rural leaf phenology. Glob Change Biol 14:1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01602.x
Geletič J, Lehnert M, Dobrovolný P (2016) Land surface temperature differences within local climate zones, based on two central European cities. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8100788
Gervais N, Buyantuev A, Gao F (2017) Modeling the effects of the urban built-up environment on plant phenology using fused satellite data. Remote Sens (basel) 9:99. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9010099
Gill AL, Gallinat AS, Sanders-DeMott R, Rigden AJ, Gianotti DJS, Mantooth JA, Templer PH (2015) Changes in autumn senescence in Northern Hemisphere deciduous trees: a meta-analysis of autumn phenology studies. Ann Bot. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv055
Goggins WB, Chan EYY, Ng E, Ren C, Chen L (2012) Effect modification of the association between short-term meteorological factors and mortality by urban heat islands in Hong Kong. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038551
Gong P, Li X, Zhang W (2019) 40-Year (1978–2017) human settlement changes in China reflected by impervious surfaces from satellite remote sensing. Sci Bull (beijing). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.04.024
Gu Y, Zhao Y, Guo Z, Meng L, Zhang K, Wang J, Lee CKF, Xie J, Wang Y, Yan Z, Zhang H, Wu J (2023) The underappreciated importance of solar radiation in constraining spring phenology of temperate ecosystems in the Northern and Eastern United States. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113617
Guo F, Jin J, Yong B, Wang Y, Jiang H (2020) Responses of water use efficiency to phenology in typical subtropical forest ecosystems—a case study in Zhejiang Province. Sci China Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-018-9360-0
Han G, Xu J (2013) Land surface phenology and land surface temperature changes along an urban–rural gradient in Yangtze River Delta, China. Environ Manag 52:234–249. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-013-0097-6
Hay Chung LC, Xie J, Ren C (2021) Improved machine-learning mapping of local climate zones in metropolitan areas using composite earth observation data in Google Earth Engine. Build Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107879
Hmimina G, Dufrêne E, Pontailler JY, Delpierre N, Aubinet M, Caquet B, Grandcourt A, Burban B, Flechard C, Granier A, Gross P, Heinesch B, Longdoz B, Moureaux C, Ourcival JM, Rambal S, André LA, Soudani K (2013) Evaluation of the potential of MODIS satellite data to predict vegetation phenology in different biomes: an investigation using ground-based NDVI measurements. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.01.010
Hu M, Xia B (2019) A significant increase in the normalized difference vegetation index during the rapid economic development in the Pearl River Delta of China. Land Degrad Dev 30:359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3221
IPCC (2019) Global warming of 1.5 °C. IPCC. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996621.ch50
Jeong SJ, Park H, Ho CH, Kim J (2019) Impact of urbanization on spring and autumn phenology of deciduous trees in the Seoul Capital Area, South Korea. Int J Biometeorol 63:627–637. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30267322/
Jochner SC, Beck I, Behrendt H, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Menzel A (2011) Effects of extreme spring temperatures on urban phenology and pollen production: a case study in Munich and Ingolstadt. Clim Res 49:101–112. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01022
Jochner SC, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Menzel A (2012) The influence of altitude and urbanisation on trends and mean dates in phenology (1980–2009). Int J Biometeorol 56:387–394. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21604152/
Jochner S, Alves-Eigenheer M, Menzel A, Morellato LPC (2013) Using phenology to assess urban heat islands in tropical and temperate regions. Int J Climatol 33:3141–3151
Kabano P, Harris A, Lindley S (2020) Sensitivity of canopy phenology to local urban environmental characteristics in a tropical city. Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-020-00571-y
Kabano P, Lindley S, Harris A (2021) Evidence of urban heat island impacts on the vegetation growing season length in a tropical city. Landsc Urban Plan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103989
Katz DSW, Dzul A, Kendel A, Batterman SA (2019) Effect of intra-urban temperature variation on tree flowering phenology, airborne pollen, and measurement error in epidemiological studies of allergenic pollen. Sci Total Environ 653:1213–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.020
Körner C, Basler D (2010) Plant science. Phenology under global warming. Science 327:1461–1462. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1186473
Krehbiel CP, Jackson T, Henebry GM (2016) Web-enabled Landsat data time series for monitoring urban heat island impacts on land surface phenology. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 9:2043–2050. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7335573
Krehbiel C, Zhang X, Henebry GM (2017) Impacts of thermal time on land surface phenology in urban areas. Remote Sens (basel) 9:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050499
Latorre F (1999) Differences between airborne pollen and flowering phenology of urban trees with reference to production, dispersal and interannual climate variability. Aerobiologia (bologna) 15:131–141. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1007523316024
Leconte F, Bouyer J, Claverie R, Pétrissans M (2015) Using Local Climate Zone scheme for UHI assessment: evaluation of the method using mobile measurements. Build Environ 83:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.005
Li F, Song G, Liujun Z, Zhou Y, Lu D (2017a) Urban vegetation phenology analysis using high spatio-temporal NDVI time series. Urban for Urban Green 25:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.001
Li X, Zhou Y, Asrar GR, Mao J, Li X, Li W (2017b) Response of vegetation phenology to urbanization in the conterminous United States. Glob Change Biol 23:2818–2830. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13562
Li X, Zhou Y, Asrar GR, Meng L (2017c) Characterizing spatiotemporal dynamics in phenology of urban ecosystems based on Landsat data. Sci Total Environ 605–606:721–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.245
Li X, Zhou Y, Meng L, Asrar GR, Lu C, Wu Q (2019) A dataset of 30 m annual vegetation phenology indicators (1985–2015) in urban areas of the conterminous United States. Earth Syst Sci Data 11:881–894. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-881-2019
Liang L, Schwartz MD (2009) Landscape phenology: an integrative approach to seasonal vegetation dynamics. Landsc Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9328-x
Liang S, Shi P, Li H (2016) Urban spring phenology in the middle temperate zone of China: dynamics and influence factors. Int J Biometeorol 60:531–544. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00484-015-1049-z
Liang X, Liu X, Li D, Zhao H, Chen G (2018a) Urban growth simulation by incorporating planning policies into a CA-based future land-use simulation model. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1502441
Liang X, Liu X, Li X, Chen Y, Tian H, Yao Y (2018b) Delineating multi-scenario urban growth boundaries with a CA-based FLUS model and morphological method. Landsc Urban Plan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.016
Lin W, Zhang L, Du D, Yang L, Lin H, Zhang Y, Li J (2009) Quantification of land use/land cover changes in Pearl River Delta and its impact on regional climate in summer using numerical modeling. Reg Environ Change 9:75–82. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10113-008-0057-5
Lindh BC, McGahan KA, Bluhm WL (2018) Changes in urban plant phenology in the Pacific Northwest from 1959 to 2016: anthropogenic warming and natural oscillation. Int J Biometeorol 62:1675–1684. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00484-018-1567-6
Liu W, Zhan J, Zhao F, Yan H, Zhang F, Wei X (2019) Impacts of urbanization-induced land-use changes on ecosystem services: a case study of the Pearl River Delta Metropolitan Region, China. Ecol Indic 98:228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.054
Luder K, Knop E, Menz MHM (2018) Contrasting responses in community structure and phenology of migratory and non-migratory pollinators to urbanization. Divers Distrib 24:919–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12735
Marty C, Tilg AM, Jonas T (2017) Recent evidence of large-scale receding snow water equivalents in the European alps. J Hydrometeorol. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0188.1
Melaas EK, Friedl MA, Zhu Z (2013) Detecting interannual variation in deciduous broadleaf forest phenology using Landsat™/ETM+ data. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.01.011
Melaas EK, Wang JA, Miller DL, Friedl MA (2016) Interactions between urban vegetation and surface urban heat islands: a case study in the Boston Metropolitan Region. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054020
Meng L, Mao J, Zhou Y, Jia G (2020) Urban warming advances spring phenology but reduces the response of phenology to temperature in the conterminous United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911117117
Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kübler K, Bissolli P, Braslavská O, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Åslög Dahl A, Defila A, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Måge F, Mestre A, Nordli Ø, Peñuelas J, Pirinen P, Remišová V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski FE, Zach S, Zust A (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x
Mushore TD, Dube T, Manjowe M, Gumindoga W, Chemura A, Rousta I, Odindi J, Mutanga O (2019) Remotely sensed retrieval of Local Climate Zones and their linkages to land surface temperature in Harare Metropolitan City, Zimbabwe. Urban Clim. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.12.006
Ng E, Ren C (2018) China’s adaptation to climate and urban climatic changes: a critical review. Urban Clim. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2017.07.006
Parece T, Campbell J (2018) Intra-urban microclimate effects on phenology. Urban Sci 2:26. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2010026
Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard JM, Tucker CJ, Stenseth NC (2005) Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011
Qiu T, Song C, Li J (2017) Impacts of urbanization on vegetation phenology over the past three decades in Shanghai, China. Remote Sens (basel) 9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090970
Qiu T, Song C, Zhang Y et al (2020) Urbanization and climate change jointly shift land surface phenology in the northern mid-latitude large cities. Remote Sens Environ 236:111477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111477
Richard Y, Emery J, Dudek J, Pergaud J, Chateau-Smith C, Zito S, Rega M, Vairet T, Castel T, Thévenin T, Pohl B (2018) How relevant are local climate zones and urban climate zones for urban climate research? Dijon (France) as a case study. Urban Clim 26:258–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.10.002
Richardson AD, Black TA, Ciais P, Delbart N, Friedl MA, Gobron N, Hollinger DY, Kutsch WL, Longdoz B, Luyssaert S, Migliavacca M, Montagnani L, Munger JW, Moors E, Piao S, Rebmann C, Reichstein M, Saigusa N, Tomelleri E, Vargas R, Varlagin A (2010) Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity. Philos Trans R Soc B. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0102
Richardson AD, Keenan TF, Migliavacca M, Ryu Y, Sonnentag O, Toomey M (2013) Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric for Meteorol 169:156–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.012
Roerink GJ, Menenti M, Verhoef W (2000) Reconstructing cloudfree NDVI composites using Fourier analysis of time series. Int J Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311600209814
Roth M, Oke TR, Emery WJ (1989) Satellite-derived urban heat islands from three coastal cities and the utilization of such data in urban climatology. Int J Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168908904002
Sesnie SE, Dickson BG, Rosenstock SS, Rundall JM (2012) A comparison of Landsat™ and MODIS vegetation indices for estimating forage phenology in desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) habitat in the Sonoran Desert, USA. Int J Remote Sens 33:276–286. http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tres20
Shen J, Feng Z, Wong KY (2006) Dual-track urbanization in a transitional economy: the case of Pearl River Delta in South China. Habitat Int 30:690–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.04.003
Singh KK, Chen YH, Smart L, Gray J, Meentemeyer RK (2018) Intra-annual phenology for detecting understory plant invasion in urban forests. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 142:151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.05.023
Solonen T, Hildén M (2014) Breeding phenology in Great and Blue Tits (Parus spp.): are urban populations more resistant to climate change than rural ones? Ornis Fenn 91:209–219. https://doi.org/10.51812/of.133858
Stanley CH, Helletsgruber C, Hof A (2019) Mutual influences of urban microclimate and urban trees: an investigation of phenology and cooling capacity. Forests 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10070533
Stewart ID, Oke TR (2012) Local climate zones for urban temperature studies. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
Stewart ID, Oke TR, Krayenhoff ES (2014) Evaluation of the “local climate zone” scheme using temperature observations and model simulations. Int J Climatol 34:1062–1080. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3746
Su Y, Liu L, Liao J, Wu J, Ciais P, Liao J, He X, Liu X, Chen X, Yuan W, Zhou G, Lafortezza R (2020) Phenology acts as a primary control of urban vegetation cooling and warming: a synthetic analysis of global site observations. Agric for Meteorol 280:107765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107765
Tian J, Zhu X, Wu J, Shen M, Chen J (2020) Coarse-resolution satellite images overestimate urbanization effects on vegetation spring phenology. Remote Sens (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/RS12010117
Townroe S, Callaghan A (2014) British container breeding mosquitoes: the impact of urbanisation and climate change on community composition and phenology. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095325
Trujillo E, Molotch NP, Goulden ML, Kelly AE, Bales RC (2012) Elevation-dependent influence of snow accumulation on forest greening. Nat Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1571
Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0
Venter ZS, Chakraborty T, Lee X (2021) Crowdsourced air temperatures contrast satellite measures of the urban heat island and its mechanisms. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb9569
Villalobos-Jiménez G, Hassall C (2017) Effects of the urban heat island on the phenology of Odonata in London, UK. Int J Biometeorol 61:1337–1346. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28190181/
Walker JJ, de Beurs KM, Henebry GM (2015) Land surface phenology along urban to rural gradients in the U.S Great Plains. Remote Sens Environ 165:42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.019
Walker JJ, de Beur KM, Wynne RH, Gao F (2012) Evaluation of landsat and MODIS data fusion products for analysis of dryland forest phenology. Remote Sens Environ 117:381–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.014
Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin JM, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein R (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395. https://www.nature.com/articles/416389a
Wang H, Dai J, Zheng J, Ge Q (2015) Temperature sensitivity of plant phenology in temperate and subtropical regions of China from 1850 to 2009. Int J Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4026
Wang R, Cai M, Ren C, Bechtel B, Xu Y, Ng E (2019a) Detecting multi-temporal land cover change and land surface temperature in Pearl River Delta by adopting local climate zone. Urban Clim. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100455
Wang Y, Chan A, Lau GNC, Li Q, Yang Y, Yim SHL (2019b) Effects of urbanization and global climate change on regional climate in the Pearl River Delta and thermal comfort implications. Int J Climatol 39:2984–2997. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5996
White MA, de Beurs KM, Didan K, Inouye DW, Richardson AD, Jensen OP, O'keefe J, Zhang G, Nemani RR, Leeuwen WJD, Brown JF, Wit A, Schaepman M, Lin X, Dettinger M, Bailey AS, Kimball J, Schwartz MD, Baldocchi DD, Lee JT, Lauenroth WK (2009) Intercomparison, interpretation, and assessment of spring phenology in North America estimated from remote sensing for 1982–2006. Glob Change Biol 15:2335–2359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01910.x9
Wong KY, Shen J, Feng Z, Gu C (2003) An analysis of dual-track urbanisation in the Pearl River Delta since 1980. Tijdschrift Econ Soc Geogr 94:205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00249
Wong MMF, Fung JCH, Yeung PPS (2019) High-resolution calculation of the urban vegetation fraction in the Pearl River Delta from the Sentinel-2 NDVI for urban climate model parameterization. Geosci Lett. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-019-0132-4
Xie J, Kneubühler M, Garonna I, Notarnicola C, Gregorio LD, Jong RD, Chimani B, Schaepman ME (2017) Altitude-dependent influence of snow cover on alpine land surface phenology. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003728
Xie J, Jonas T, Rixen C, Jong RD, Garonna I, Notarnicola C, Asam S, Schaepman ME, Kneubühler M (2020) Land surface phenology and greenness in Alpine grasslands driven by seasonal snow and meteorological factors. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138380
Xie J, Hüsler F, de Jong R, Chimani B, Asam S, Sun Y, Schaepman ME, Kneubühler M (2021) Spring temperature and snow cover climatology drive the advanced springtime phenology (1991–2014) in the European Alps. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jg006150
Xie J, Ren C, Li X, Chung LCH (2022) Investigate the urban growth and urban–rural gradients based on local climate zones (1999–2019) in the Greater Bay Area, China. Remote Sens Appl 25:100669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100669
Xu N, Gong P (2018) Significant coastline changes in China during 1991–2015 tracked by Landsat data. Sci Bull (beijing). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2018.05.032
Xu Y, Ren C, Cai M, Edward NYY, Wu T (2017) Classification of local climate zones using ASTER and Landsat data for high-density cities. 10(7). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7891588
Yao R, Wang L, Huang X, Guo X, Niu Z, Liu H (2017) Investigation of urbanization effects on land surface phenology in Northeast China during 2001–2015. Remote Sens (basel) 9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9010066
Yim SHL, Wang M, Gu Y, Yang Y, Dong G, Li Q (2019) Effect of urbanization on ozone and resultant health effects in the Pearl River Delta region of China. J Geophys Res Atmos 124:11568–11579. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030562
Zhang X, Friedl MA, Schaaf CB, Strahler AH, Schneider A (2004) The footprint of urban climates on vegetation phenology. Geophys Res Lett 31:10–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020137
Zhang F, Huang G, Hou Q, Liu C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q (2019) Groundwater quality in the Pearl River Delta after the rapid expansion of industrialization and urbanization: distributions, main impact indicators, and driving forces. J Hydrol (amst) 577:124004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124004
Zhang X, Liu L, Chen X, Gao Y, Xie S, Mi J (2021) GLC_FCS30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery. Earth Syst Sci Data. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2753-2021
Zhao Y, Lee CKF, Wang Z, Wang J, Gu Y, Xie J, Law YK, Song G, Bonebrake TC, Yang X, Nelson BW, Wu J (2022) Evaluating fine-scale phenology from PlanetScope satellites with ground observations across temperate forests in eastern North America. Remote Sens Environ 283:113310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113310
Zhou D, Zhao S, Zhang L, Liu S (2016) Remotely sensed assessment of urbanization effects on vegetation phenology in China’s 32 major cities. Remote Sens Environ 176:272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.010
Zipper SC, Schatz J, Singh A, Kucharik CJ, Townsend PA, Loheide II SP (2016) Urban heat island impacts on plant phenology: intra-urban variability and response to land cover. Environ Res Lett 11:054023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/5/054023
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42301208, The response of vegetation phenology to surface thermal environments in fast-urbanizing regions: a case study in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area, China) and Internal Funding from the Faculty of Architecture of the University of Hong Kong and 2016/17 General Research Fund of Hong Kong Research Grant Council (14643816), A Study of “Local Climate Zone (LCZ)” of Sub-tropical China’s Pearl River Delta (PRD) region by using The World Urban Database and Access Portal Tools (WUDAPT) Method for Better Comfortable Living and Sustainable Urban Planning).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no commercial or associative interests that represent a conflict of interest in connection with the article submitted.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Informed consent
The authors declare that they have consented to the publication of this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, J., Li, X., Chung, L.C.H. et al. Effects of land surface temperatures on vegetation phenology along urban–rural local climate zone gradients. Landsc Ecol 39, 62 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01856-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01856-6