Skip to main content
Log in

From Choice to Necessity: Putting Politics in Command

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  • 1 Altmetric

Abstract

This paper attempts to explore the effects of the political developments that followed the financial crisis of 2008, particularly after the uprisings of 2011, on the field of philosophy and more specifically on philosophical practice. Philosophical practice concerns not only methodology and forms of argumentation but also and mainly the dispositive of the philosopher him/herself, that is the place he/she occupies and from which h/she speaks. Drawing from Gramsci’s and Althusser’s reading of Machiavelli an argument is developed according to which certain conjunctures produce the possibility of a void both at the political and the philosophical level; a void which can disrupt the normal reproduction of political relations of power and of the dominant philosophical discourse. The task of materialist philosophy, which in those circumstances becomes even more urgent, is not to devote itself in securing the piece on the field of the philosophical and political battle but in contrast to point out the possibility of the emergence of the void and articulate philosophical positions aimed to intensify the rupture and thus to produce effects tending to realise the possibility of radical change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The concept of paradigm is usually used in order to describe theoretical/scientific systems and not social modes of regulation. A possible change in the mode of regulation does not necessarily lead to a relevant change in the theoretical paradigm. The term is used here in search of a better one.

  2. The new regulatory paradigm was captured by the concept of biolitics. On biopolitics see Foucault (2008).

  3. For an analysis referring to the way that a pacifying and universalising moral discourse substituted political conflicts see Douzinas (2007) pp. 51–89 and Loizidou (2007) pp. 45 –87.

  4. The otherwise diverging works of intellectuals such as Judith Butler or Jan Luc Nancy are exemplary of this tendency towards the exploration of ethical themes. For an analysis of the theoretical tendencies which depart from the political in order to ascribe to an ethical critique inside the CLS movement see Douzinas (2005) pp. 47–69.

  5. According to Louis Althusser the concept of history in the materialist perspective has to be constructed as a process without a subject and/or End(s). Althusser suggests that this is the concept of history that Marx ascribes to after his split from the humanist philosophy of Ludwig Feurbach. (See Althusser 1976).

  6. In his later work, only posthumously published, Althusser invents the notion of aleatory materialism or materialism of the Encounter to describe an underground and repressed philosophical tradition undermining the dominant idealist tendencies of western philosophy. This was an anti-teleological materialism not only of the contingency of necessity but also of the necessity of contingency. See Althusser (2006).

References

  • Althusser, Louis. 1976. Essays in self-criticism. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, Louis. 1994. Philosophica (trans: Elefantis, Angelos). Athens: O Politis (in Greek).

  • Althusser, Louis. 2000. Machiavelli and US (trans: Elliot, Gregory). London, New York: Verso.

  • Althusser, Louis. 2006. Philosophy of the encounter (trans: Goshgarian, G.M.). London, New York: Verso.

  • Douzinas, Costas. 2005. Oubliez critique. Law and Critique 16(1): 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas, Costas. 2007. Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Routledge-Cavendish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2008. The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France (trans: Burchell, Graham). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Gramsci, Antonio. 1957. The modern prince and other writings (trans: Marks, Louis). New York: International Publishers.

  • Loizidou, Elena. 2007. Judith Butler: Ethics, law, politics. Oxford: Routledge-Cavendish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, Niccolo. 2004. The prince (trans: George Bull). London: Penguin Books.

  • Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978. Political power and social classes (trans: O’Hagan, T.). London, New York: Verso.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Tzanakopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tzanakopoulos, D. From Choice to Necessity: Putting Politics in Command. Law Critique 23, 271–281 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-012-9106-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-012-9106-9

Keywords

Navigation