Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation and measurement of crude oil heat transfer coefficient in forced convection and subcooled flow boiling heat transfer

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, forced convection and subcooled flow boiling heat transfer coefficients of crude oil from southern oil fields of Iran were experimentally measured under different operating conditions. Despite the little data available on the heat transfer coefficient of crude oil at different operating conditions, there is an urgent need for precise and sufficient information about the status and mechanism of crude oil heat transfer for design and economic optimization of equipment such as crude oil preheaters in production units and oil refineries. The experiments were carried out in a constant heat flux heat exchanger heated by an electric heater equipped with adjustable heat flux in the range of 40–90 \({\text{kW}}\;{\text{m}}^{ - 2}\). Firstly, in order to ensure the quality of obtained data, the heat transfer coefficients of distilled water were measured and compared with the available literature data. The experimental results indicated that the heat transfer coefficient of crude oil is relatively 31% less than that of distilled water; so, the ability of crude oil in heat transfer is less than distilled water, and the temperature of the heated surface in the crude oil experiment is higher than that of distilled water. Furthermore, enhancement of fluid flow rate and heat flux increases the heat transfer coefficient. It is very difficult to distinguish the transition from forced convective heat transfer to boiling of crude oil by enhancement of heat flux. For this purpose, (Tw–Tb) was plotted against heat flux, and the obtained results indicated that the subcooled flow boiling of crude oil starts in the range of 41.9–51.3 \({\text{kW}}\;{\text{m}}^{ - 2}\). Finally, the convective heat transfer coefficients were correlated in dimensionless Nusselt form as a function of dimensionless numbers Re and Pr.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(A\) :

Heat transfer surface, \({\mathrm{m}}^{2}\)

\({C}_{\mathrm{p}}\) :

Heat capacity, \({\text{J}}\;{\text{kg}}^{ - 1} \;{\text{K}}^{ - 1}\)

\(d\) :

Diameter, \(\mathrm{m}\)

\({d}_{\mathrm{h}}\) :

Hydraulic diameter, \(\mathrm{m}\)

\(f\) :

Friction factor

\(h\) :

Heat transfer coefficient, \({\text{W}}\;{\text{m}}^{ - 2} \;{\text{K}}^{ - 1}\)

\(k\) :

Thermal conductivity of heater, \({\text{W}}\;{\text{m}}^{ - 1} \;{\text{K}}^{ - 1}\)

\(L\) :

Length of heater, \(\mathrm{m}\)

\(M\) :

Molecular weight, \({\text{kg}}\;{\text{kmole}}^{ - 1}\)

m :

A constant in Eq. (12)

\(\dot{m}\) :

Mass flow rate of fluid, \({\text{kg}}\;{\text{s}}^{ - 1}\)

n :

A constant in Eq. (12)

\(\mathrm{Nu}\) :

Nusselt number

\(\mathrm{Pr}\) :

Prandtl number

\(P\) :

Pressure, \(\mathrm{Pa}\)

\(Q\) :

Volume flow rate, \({\text{m}}^{3} \;{\text{s}}^{ - 1}\)

\(q\) :

Heat flux, \({\text{W}}\;{\text{m}}^{ - 2}\)

\(\mathrm{Re}\) :

Reynolds number

\(S\) :

Distance between thermocouple location and heat transfer surface, \(m\)

\(T\) :

Temperature, \(\mathrm{K}\)

\({T}_{\mathrm{bp}0.5}\) :

Temperature at 50 cumulative volume percent recovery \(\mathrm{K}\)

\(U\) :

Overall heat transfer coefficient, \({\text{W}}\;{\text{m}}^{ - 2} \;{\text{K}}^{ - 1}\)

\(V\) :

Fluid velocity, \({\text{m}}\;{\text{s}}^{ - 1}\)

\(\mathrm{b}\) :

Bulk

\(\mathrm{Exp}\) :

Experimental

i:

Inside

\(\mathrm{o}\) :

Outside

\(\mathrm{max}\) :

Maximum

\(\mathrm{th}\) :

Thermocouples

\(\mathrm{w}\) :

Wall

\(\beta\) :

A constant in Eq. (8)

\(\rho\) :

Density, \({\text{kg}}\;{\text{m}}^{ - 3}\)

\(\mu\) :

Viscosity, \({\text{kg}}\;{\text{m}}^{ - 1} \;{\text{s}}^{ - 1}\)

References

  1. Bussman WR, Baukal CE. Ambient condition effects on process heater efficiency. Energy. 2009;34(10):1624–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mostafavi SA, Rezaei A. Modeling of the fired preheater of crude oil considering the effect of geometrical parameters on fuel consumption. Heat Transf. 2022;51(2):1425–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.22358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kundnaney ND, Kushwaha DK, editors. A critical review on heat exchangers used in oil refinery. In: 3rd Afro-Asian International Conference on Science, Engineering and Technology, Bharuch, India (2015); 2015

  4. Shah RK, Sekulic DP. Fundamentals of heat exchanger design. Heidelberg: Wiley; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Ali H. Process simulation for crude oil stabilization by using Aspen Hysys. Upstream Oil Gas Technol. 2021;7:100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishiyama EM, Pugh SJ. Considering in-tube crude oil boiling in assessing performance of preheat trains subject to fouling. Heat Trans Eng. 2015;36(7–8):632–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang J. Optimize crude preheat train to balance efficiency and operability. Hydrocarbon Process 2013;92(6):91–6

  8. Harris JS, Lane MR, Smith AD. Investigating the impact of boiling conditions on the fouling of a crude oil. Heat Transf Eng. 2017;38(7–8):703–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gungor KE, Winterton R. A general correlation for flow boiling in tubes and annuli. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1986;29(3):351–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gungor K, Winterton RS. Simplified general correlation for saturated flow boiling and comparisons of correlations with data. Chem Eng Res Des. 1987;65(2):148–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah MM. A general correlation for heat transfer during saturated boiling with flow across tube bundles. HVAC&R Res. 2007;13(5):749–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah MM. Improved general correlation for subcooled boiling heat transfer during flow across tubes and tube bundles. HVAC&R Res. 2005;11(2):285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kandlikar SG. A general correlation for saturated two-phase flow boiling heat transfer inside horizontal and vertical tubes. 1990;112:219–28.

  14. Kandlikar SG, Balasubramanian P. An extension of the flow boiling correlation to transition, laminar, and deep laminar flows in minichannels and microchannels. Heat Transf Eng. 2004;25(3):86–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarafraz M, Peyghambarzadeh S, Vaeli N. Subcooled flow boiling heat transfer of ethanol aqueous solutions in vertical annulus space. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q. 2012;18(2):315–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Peyghambarzadeh S, Sarafraz MM, Vaeli N, Ameri E, Vatani A, Jamialahmadi M. Forced convective and subcooled flow boiling heat transfer to pure water and n-heptane in an annular heat exchanger. Ann Nucl Energy. 2013;53:401–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarafraz M, Peyghambarzadeh S. Experimental study on subcooled flow boiling heat transfer to water–diethylene glycol mixtures as a coolant inside a vertical annulus. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2013;50:154–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zangeneh A, Vatani A, Fakhroeian Z, Peyghambarzadeh S. Experimental study of forced convection and subcooled flow boiling heat transfer in a vertical annulus using different novel functionalized ZnO nanoparticles. Appl Therm Eng. 2016;109:789–802.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abdolhossein Zadeh MA, Nakhjavani S. Subcooled flow boiling of a citric acid aqueous mixture. Arch Thermodyn. 2020;41(1):193–217.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sarafraz M, Arya H. Convective flow boiling heat transfer in an annular space: N-heptane/water case in a bubbly sub-cooled flow. Appl Chem Eng. 2020;3(2):33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu B, Wang Y, Zhang J, Liu X, Zhang Z, Wang K. Thermal impact of the products pipeline on the crude oil pipeline laid in one ditch–The effect of pipeline interval. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2008;51(3–4):597–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Na T, Baodong C, Limin H, Qisheng C, Qi W. Research on the overall heat transfer coefficients of crude oil pipeline and product pipeline laid in one ditch. Pet Sci Technol. 2012;30(3):247–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Rawahi MSS, Rao DG. Studies on unsteady state heat transfer to petroleum crude oil. CTAIJ. 2016;11(3):114–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohammadzaheri M, Tafreshi R, Khan Z, Franchek M, Grigoriadis K. Analytical-numerical Investigation of Factors Influencing Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient of Multiphase Petroleum Fluids in Horizontal Subsea Pipelines. Int J Petrol Sci Technol. 2017;11(1):23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Noorizam NZ. Estimation & comparison of heat transfer coefficient of crude oil using various correlations: Bachelor Dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Petronas. 2011.

  26. Deshannavar UB, Ramasamy M. A model to determine maximum heat flux under forced convective heat transfer regime for crude oil fouling studies. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;156:485–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. ur Rehman O, Ramasamy MG, Rozali NEM, Deshannavar UB. Determination of limiting heat flux for the inception of nucleate boiling regime for crude oils. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci. 2021;85(2):115–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao J, Liu J, Dong H, Zhao W, Wei L. Numerical investigation on the flow and heat transfer characteristics of waxy crude oil during the tubular heating. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2020;161:120239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Amrouche F, Xu D, Short M, Iglauer S, Vinogradov J, Blunt MJ. Experimental study of electrical heating to enhance oil production from oil-wet carbonate reservoirs. Fuel. 2022;324:124559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar K, El Mohtar C, Gilbert R. Conductive and convective heat transfer in inductive heating of subsea buried pipelines. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract. 2022;13(4):04022031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Peyghambarzadeh S, Vatani A, Jamialahmadi M. Application of asymptotic model for the prediction of fouling rate of calcium sulfate under subcooled flow boiling. Appl Therm Eng. 2012;39:105–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Peyghambarzadeh S, Vatani A, Jamialahmadi M. Experimental study of micro-particle fouling under forced convective heat transfer. Braz J Chem Eng. 2012;29:713–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vosough A, Peyghambarzadeh S, Assari M. Influence of thermal shock on the mitigation of calcium sulfate crystallization fouling under subcooled flow boiling condition. Appl Therm Eng. 2020;164:114434.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fernández-Seara J, Uhia F, Sieres J. Laboratory practices with the Wilson plot method. Experimental Heat Transf. 2007;20(2):123–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Massey BS. Mechanics of Fluids. Heidelberg: Taylor; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Moffat R. Using uncertainty analysis in the planning of an experiment. Trans ASME J Fluid Eng. 1985;107:173–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen JC. Correlation for boiling heat transfer to saturated fluids in convective flow. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev. 1966;5(3):322–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. ASTM D86–20b, Standard Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products and Liquid Fuels at Atmospheric Pressure. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA; 2020

  39. Huang C-K, Lee C-W, Wang C-K. Boiling enhancement by TiO2 nanoparticle deposition. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2011;54(23–24):4895–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rana K, Rajvanshi A, Agrawal G. A visualization study of flow boiling heat transfer with nanofluids. J Visual. 2013;16(2):133–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kang M-G. Effects of pool subcooling on boiling heat transfer in a vertical annulus with closed bottom. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2005;48(2):255–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sieder EN, Tate GE. Heat transfer and pressure drop of liquids in tubes. Ind Eng Chem. 1936;28(12):1429–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Mahshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mahshahr, Iran

    Seyed Ali Majedi, Shima Azizi & S. M. Peyghambarzadeh

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

    Ashkan Ghafouri

Authors
  1. Seyed Ali Majedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shima Azizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. M. Peyghambarzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ashkan Ghafouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Peyghambarzadeh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Majedi, S.A., Azizi, S., Peyghambarzadeh, S.M. et al. Investigation and measurement of crude oil heat transfer coefficient in forced convection and subcooled flow boiling heat transfer. J Therm Anal Calorim 148, 5805–5818 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12065-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12065-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation