Skip to main content
Log in

Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a micro-combined polygeneration system coupled with solar energy and fuels for distributed applications

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel micro-combined polygeneration system based on solar energy and fuels is designed with aim to simultaneously satisfy energy demands of electricity, heating and cooling in distributed areas. Integration solar radiation with conventional natural gas-fired power systems is conceived to eliminate existing disadvantages of low efficiency and high cost for fuel-only and solar-only plants. Thermodynamic and economic analyses are evaluated to explore performance of proposed systems with three working fluids. Energetic and exergic efficiencies are individually 0.839 and 0.4536, 0.8721 and 0.5852, and 0.8656 and 0.5825 for N2-, He- and Ar-based micro-combined systems under specified power capacity of 100 kW. Solar collector field, compressor, turbine and combustion chamber exhibit four largest exergy destruction, followed orderly by heat exchanger, generator, condenser, evaporator, throttling valve and pump. Preliminary economic analysis indicates that levelized electricity costs of N2-, He- and Ar-based micro-combined systems are 0.112, 0.103 and 0.101 $ kWh−1 with corresponding payback periods of 4.563, 5.090 and 5.138 years. Parametric analysis reveals that five operating parameters (compression ratio, turbine inlet temperature, solar collector field outlet temperature, generator outlet temperature and split ratio) exert noticeable influence on thermal efficiency of micro-combined systems. In conclusion, proposed micro-combined polygeneration system achieves efficient conversation of thermal energy into electricity, heating and cooling at a rational energy utilization for distributed areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ABS:

Absorber

CC:

Combustion chamber

COMP:

Compressor

COND:

Condenser

EVAP:

Evaporator

GEN:

Generator

HX:

Heat exchanger

LEC:

Levelized electricity cost

LHV:

Low heating value

MIX:

Mixer

PBP:

Payback period

PUMP:

Pump

SCF:

Solar collector field

SP:

Splitter

TES:

Thermal energy storage

TURB:

Turbine

TV:

Throttling valve

α :

Absorptivity

ε :

Emissivity

η :

Efficiency

ρ :

Reflectivity

σ :

Stefan–Boltzmann constant

ψ :

Flow exergy

ζ :

Chemical exergy index

0:

Dead state

a:

Ambient

c:

Cooling

C:

Convention

dest:

Destroyed

el:

Electricity

ex:

Exergy

h:

Heating

L:

Loss

NG:

Natural gas

R:

Radiation

T:

Total

U:

Useful

A :

Area

C :

Cost

E :

Power

f :

Fixed charge rate

m :

Mass flow rate

n :

Concentration

i :

Debt interest

I :

Incident intensity

Q :

Heat capacity

References

  1. Akbarzadeh M, Rashidi S, Karimi N, Omar N. First and second laws of thermodynamics analysis of nanofluid flow inside a heat exchanger duct with wavy walls and a porous insert. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;135(1):177–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuntal J, Avishek R, Mohammad MM, Mohsen A, Sudipta D. Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution—a comprehensive review. Appl Energy. 2017;202:88–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amir A, Roghayeh G, Alibakhsh K, Mohammad HA. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a transcritical CO2 power cycle driven by solar energy based on nanofluid with liquefied natural gas as its heat sink. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;139(1):451–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmadi MH, Ahmadi MA, Sadatsakkak SA. Thermodynamic analysis and performance optimization of irreversible Carnot refrigerator by using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs). Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;51:1055–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Javadi MA, Hoseinzadeh S, Ghasemiasl R, Heyns PS, Chamkha AJ. Sensitivity analysis of combined cycle parameters on exergy, economic, and environmental of a power plant. Energy and exergy analysis on variable compression ratio multi-fuel engine. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;139(1):519–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Manjunath K, Sharma OP, Tyagi SK, Kaushik SC. Thermodynamic analysis of a supercritical/transcritical CO2 based waste heat recovery cycle for shipboard power and cooling applications. Energy Convers Manag. 2018;155:262–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Arshad MU, Ghani MU, Ullah A, Güngör A, Zaman M. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of double effect absorption refrigeration system using genetic algorithm. Energy Convers Manag. 2019;192:292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaeta A, Reale F, Chiariello F, Massoli P. A dynamic model of a 100 kW micro gas turbine fuelled with natural gas and hydrogen blends and its application in a hybrid energy grid. Energy. 2017;129:299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Namar MM, Jahanian O. Energy and exergy analysis of a hydrogen-fueled HCCI engine. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;137(1):205–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadeghi S, Maghsoudi P, Shabani B, Gorgani HH, Shabani N. Performance analysis and multi-objective optimization of an organic Rankine cycle with binary zeotropic working fluid employing modified artificial bee colony algorithm. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;136(4):1645–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rong A, Su Y. Polygeneration systems in buildings: a survey on optimization approaches. Energy Build. 2017;151:439–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seckin C. Thermodynamic analysis of a combined power/refrigeration cycle: combination of Kalina cycle and ejector refrigeration cycle. Energy Convers Manage. 2018;157:631–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Z, Alelyani S, Nan Z, Chao Z, Yuan Y, Phelan PE. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel sodium hydroxide-water solution absorption refrigeration, heating and power system for low-temperature heat sources. Appl Energy. 2018;222:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen W, Li Z, Sun Q, Zhang B. Energy and exergy analysis of proposed compression-absorption refrigeration assisted by a heat-driven turbine at low evaporating temperature. Energy Convers Manag. 2019;191:55–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakthivel TG, Arjunan TV. Thermodynamic performance comparison of single slope solar stills with and without cotton cloth energy storage medium. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;137(1):351–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh G, Singh PJ, Tyagi VV, Pandey AK. Thermal and exergoeconomic analysis of a dairy food processing plant. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;136(3):1365–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elakhdar M, Tashtoush B, Nehdi E, Kairouani L. Thermodynamic analysis of a novel Ejector Enhanced Vapor Compression Refrigeration (EEVCR) cycle. Energy. 2018;163:1217–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang S, Chen Y, Wu J, Zhu Z. Thermodynamic analysis on a modified Kalina cycle with parallel cogeneration of power and refrigeration. Energy Convers Manag. 2018;163:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sadeghi M, Yari M, Mahmoudi S, Jafari M. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a novel combined power and ejector refrigeration cycle-Desalination system. Appl Energy. 2017;208:239–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ehsan MM, Wang X, Guan Z, Klimenko AY. Design and performance study of dry cooling system for 25 MW solar power plant operated with supercritical CO2 cycle. Int J Therm Sci. 2018;132:398–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rostamnejad H, Zare V. Performance improvement of ejector expansion refrigeration cycles employing a booster compressor using different refrigerants: thermodynamic analysis and optimization. Int J Refrig. 2019;101:56–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bao J, Lin Y, He G. Working fluids comparison and thermodynamic analysis of a transcritical power and ejector refrigeration cycle (TPERC). Int J Refrig. 2017;82:262–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rashidi M, Aghagoli A, Raoofi R. Thermodynamic analysis of the ejector refrigeration cycle using the artificial neural network. Energy. 2017;129:201–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Y, Xiong Y. Thermo-economic analysis of a novel cascade integrated solar combined cycle system. Energy. 2018;145:116–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramos A, Chatzopoulou MA, Freeman J, Markides CN. Optimisation of a high-efficiency solar-driven organic Rankine cycle for applications in the built environment. Appl Energy. 2018;228:755–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Z, NanXie N, Yang S. Thermodynamic and parametric analysis of a coupled LiBr/H2O absorption chiller/Kalina cycle for cascade utilization of low-grade waste heat. Energy Convers Manag. 2020;205:112370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Javidmehr M, Joda F, Mohammadi A. Thermodynamic and economic analyses and optimization of a multi-generation system composed by a compressed air storage, solar dish collector, micro gas turbine, organic Rankine cycle, and desalination system. Energy Convers Manag. 2018;168:467–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Roberto LI, Rodrigo E, José MC, Diego CA. Comparison of the levelized cost and thermoeconomic methodologies—cost allocation in a solar polygeneration plant to produce power, desalted water, cooling and process heat. Energy Convers Manag. 2018;168:215–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang X, Yang C, Huang M, Ma X. Multi-objective optimization of a gas turbine-based CCHP combined with solar and compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manag. 2018;164:93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garcia-Saez I, Méndez J, Ortiz C, Loncar D, Becerra JA, Chacartegui R. Energy and economic assessment of solar Organic Rankine Cycle for combined heat and power generation in residential applications. Renew Energy. 2019;140:461–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Behzadi A, Gholamian E, Ahmadi P, Habibollahzade A, Ashjaee M. Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic (3E) analyses and multi-objective optimization of a solar and geothermal based integrated energy system. Appl Therm Eng. 2018;143:1011–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Y, Deng S, Zhao L, Lin S, Ni J, Ma M, Xu W. Optimization and multi-time scale modeling of pilot solar driven polygeneration system based on organic Rankine cycle. Appl Energy. 2018;222:396–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Roy P, Désilets M, Galanis N, Nesreddine H, Cayer E. Thermodynamic analysis of a power cycle using a low-temperature source and a binary NH3–H2O mixture as working fluid. Int J Therm Sci. 2010;49(1):48–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Su W, Zhang X. Thermodynamic analysis of a compression-absorption refrigeration air-conditioning system coupled with liquid desiccant dehumidification. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;115:575–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ahmadi MH, Ahmadi M-A, Pourfayaz F, Bidi M. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization for an irreversible heat pump working on reversed Brayton cycle. Energy Convers Manag. 2016;110:260–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Calise F, d’Accadia MD, Libertini L, Vicidomini M. Thermoeconomic analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle power plant. Energy Convers Manag. 2018;171:1038–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ameri M, Mohammadzadeh M. Thermodynamic, thermoeconomic and life cycle assessment of a novel integrated solar combined cycle (ISCC) power plant. Sustain Energy Technol. 2018;27:192–205.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Alelyani SM, Fette NW, Stechel EB, Doron P, Phelan PE. Techno-economic analysis of combined ammonia-water absorption refrigeration and desalination. Energy Convers Manag. 2017;143:493–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kahraman M, Olcay AB, Sorgüven E. Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of a 21 MW binary type air-cooled geothermal power plant and determination of the effect of ambient temperature variation on the plant performance. Energy Convers Manag. 2019;192:308–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kang Q, Dewil R, Degrève J, Baeyens J, Zhang H. Energy analysis of a particle suspension solar combined cycle power plant. Energy Convers Manag. 2018;163:292–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51808262 and 51806088) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Nos. BK20190860 and BK20170554).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaoli Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, H., Zhang, Z., Hu, Z. et al. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a micro-combined polygeneration system coupled with solar energy and fuels for distributed applications. J Therm Anal Calorim 145, 581–595 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09799-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09799-1

Keywords

Navigation