Abstract
A pilot study investigating the possible role of desferrioxamine B (DFOB) to prevent UVI precipitation in alkaline NaCl solutions was carried out. Desferrioxamine B is a hydroxamate siderophore occurring naturally in the environment. The siderophore can possibly mobilize UVI from a wide range of sources such as mine tailings, contaminated land and radioactive waste storage and disposal facilities. The results from a series of batch experiments covering a wide range of naturally occurring concentrations over relevant time scales (3 days and 2 months) show that DFOB can quantitatively prevent UVI precipitation as ≥ 0.2 μm precipitates when 130 µM and 420 µM of the DFOB is present in solution. The impact is minimized as its concentration decrease to below 10 µM, suggesting these ligands will have a less mobilizing effect on uranium from a geological disposal facility if present in its VI oxidation state.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Uranium (U) is a toxic element that threatens groundwater quality if mobilized from a solid-phase source. Uranium is present in alkaline (pH above 9) solutions in a variety of scenarios. Surface, near surface, and deep geological disposal facilities for radioactive waste often grout the waste and use cement to backfill the facility [1, 2]. Groundwater leaching of the grout waste form and cement backfill leads to alkaline (pH 9–14) and saline solutions [3]. Radioactive waste is also stored in high pH conditions free of cement and grout. For example, at Sellafield in the UK, spent fuel rods are stored in pH > 10 solutions adjusted with NaOH [4]. Tailings from U mining can contain saline solutions of pH 10 [5]. Alkaline conditions can also occur in natural systems such as at Maqarin, Jordan (pH 12.5) [6,7,8] and the Allas Springs, Cyprus (pH 9.25–11.71) [9].
In alkaline solutions, UVI precipitates from solution, limiting its mobility. This is a key advantage of storing nuclear waste in cementitious wasteforms and backfills. Precipitation has been observed even at the low UVI concentrations of interest in the present study (42 µM). Batch experiments conducted at pH ≥ 10 in solutions containing 28.5 µM UVI and 0.01 to 0.05 M NaClO4 showed precipitates attaching to mineral surfaces, therefore significantly reducing UVI mobility [10,11,12]. This process was studied in greater detail recently in a series of batch experiments with UVI and quartz, an iron-coated sandstone and a volcanic rock in solution [13]. The authors found 42 µM UVI precipitated from 0.1 M NaCl solutions and was immobilized on the iron-coated sandstone and volcanic rock between pH 10 and 12. While UVI was not immobilized chemically on quartz sand, it was physically in quartz sand columns under the same chemical conditions [14].
The above studies suggest that UVI mobility is limited under alkaline and saline conditions. However, these studies were conducted in inorganic systems, while in the natural environment organic molecules will be prevalent. These organic molecules potentially form aqueous complexes with UVI, limiting precipitation. If these complexes form, then uranium mobility from contaminated land and radioactive waste storage and disposal facilities could be enhanced. One such class of organic molecules are siderophores. These are multidentate organic molecules released by plants, fungi, and bacteria in alkaline, oxygenated conditions to solubilize iron [15, 16]. Concentrations of these molecules vary with depth in the geosphere, varying from below 10 µM in rocks up to several mM in the rhizosphere [16,17,18].
Desferrioxamine B (DFOB) is a (tris)hydroxamate siderophore widely present in groundwater [19, 20]. Its structure is provided in Fig. 1 A. DFOB enhances the solubility of UIV minerals between pH 3 and 8 under reducing conditions [21], and complexes with UVI between pH 4 and 10 with stability constant (log β) between 17.12 and 22.93 [22,23,24,25]. A recent study focused on the ability of DFOB to leach U from contaminated soils in PH circumneutral solutions and complexation studies indicated the formation of mononuclear U-DFOB complexes with log β between 29.0 and 38.8 across a broad pH range [26]. To the best of our knowledge, there is a limited number of studies that have investigated UVI interactions with DFOB above pH 10, the region where U precipitation happens. For example, a recent study grafted DFOB onto microparticles and investigated the ability of the DFOB-modified microparticles to extract UVI from wastewater through batch and column experiments [27]. The pH of the batch experiments varied between pH 2 to 12 and peak absorption of UVI was observed at ca. pH 9 (97% absorption), decreasing to approximately 80% at pH 12. The authors attributed this to the formation of a tertiary UVI-DFOB-microparticle surface complex, with the DFOB and a carbonyl group on the surface of the microparticle material contributing to the complex. Multi-dentate organic molecules produced from cellulose degradation (α-isosaccharinic) and cement degradation (D-gluconate) inhibit also the precipitation of UIV at pH 13.5 [28, 29] and UVI at pH 12–13 [30,31,32]. However, these ligands contain the carboxylate functional group rather than the hydroxomate functional group found in DFOB.
The aim of this pilot study was to study whether DFOB, a siderophore typically found in the environment, prevents the UVI precipitation in alkaline NaCl solutions observed during previous studies [13, 14, 33] and to determine the possible controls of concentration and reaction time. Three types of experiments were conducted: a control experiment, a precipitation inhibition experiment, and a dissolution experiment. Stirred batch experiments were performed with 0.1 M NaCl solutions at pH 11.5 containing 42 µM of UVI and DFOB concentrations ranging between 10 and 420 µM, studying thus a concentration range typically present in the environment. Stirred batch reactor experiments were conducted for up to three days to test the short-term effect of DFOB on UVI particle formation. To test the long-term effects of DFOB on UVI precipitate formation and ligand promoted dissolution/disaggregation, solutions were placed in a shaking tray for 56 days. Two types of long-term tests were conducted, firstly the DFOB was added at the same time as UVI to see if the siderophore could prevent UVI from precipitating, and secondly UVI was precipitated from solution before then adding DFOB to see if the siderophore could dissolve the UVI. Previous studies of our group demonstrated significant precipitations of U-Na minerals from these solutions [13, 14, 33]. Samples were filtered through 0.2, 0.45 and 1 μm Whatman nylon filter membranes to get a constrain on the particle size. The amount of UVI removed was determined in the filtrates using ICP-MS.
Experimental
All chemicals were analytical-grade, and all solutions were prepared with 15 MΩ.cm de-ionized water (Merck Millipore). NaOH pellets (VWR) and distilled 6 M HCl were used to prepare 1 M NaOH and HCl solutions for pH adjustment. NaCl (VWR) was used to control ionic strength. A 4.2 mM (1000 mg/L) U PerkinElmer Pure Plus standard solution was used to prepare all UVI solutions and Induced Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) standards. Desferrioxamine mesylate salt powder (≥ 92.5%) from Sigma-Aldrich was used as is.
Stirred batch reactor experiments were conducted at room temperature for up to three days to test the short-term effect of DFOB on UVI particle formation. All batch experiments were repeated at least twice. The experiments were conducted in 250 mL amber bottles to prevent photo-oxidation of DFOB. Solutions with a volume of 250 mL containing 0.1 M NaCl and various DFOB concentrations (4.2, 42, 130 and 420 µM) were prepared. An approximately 180 mL solution containing the NaCl and DFOB was initially created and adjusted to pH 11.5 so that a 5 mL representative blank could be collected. The DFOB was added in a powder form to prepare the 130 and 420 µM DFOB solutions. A 4.2 mM DFOB stock solution was prepared and diluted to produce the 4.2 and 42 µM DFOB solutions. The 4.2 mM DFOB stock solution was freshly prepared before each experiment to minimize ligand degradation. The DFOB was added and collected as part of the representative blank. 42 µM UVI was then added to the solution by diluting the 4.2 mM UVI standard solution. The pH was re-adjusted to 11.5 and volume increased to 195 mL. The pH was periodically measured and adjusted throughout the experiment with 1 M NaOH and 1 M HCl to maintain the pH at 11.5. The pH was measured on collection of a sample and was adjusted if the pH changed more than ± 0.05 pH units of the target value. Approximately 5 mL samples were collected and filtered through Whatman nylon membranes (0.2, 0.45, and 0.8 or 1 μm pore diameter), diluted 10 times in 2% (v/v) nitric acid and analyzed using ICP-MS. During two of the three repeats of the 420 µM DFOB experiment, samples were only filtered with a 0.2 μm nylon filter membrane.
To test the long-term effects of DFOB on UVI precipitate formation and ligand promoted dissolution/disaggregation, 250 mL solutions containing 42 µM UVI, 130 µM DFOB and 0.1 M NaCl adjusted to pH 11.5 were placed in a shaking tray for 56 days (T = 25˚C, 130 rpm). Three types of experiments were conducted: a control experiment; a precipitation inhibition experiment (see three-day batch experiments method); and a dissolution experiment. At the start of the dissolution experiment, 42 µM UVI was precipitated for 48 h, and then 130 µM DFOB was added to solution. 5 mL samples were collected and filtered through 0.2, 0.45 and 1 μm Whatman nylon filter membranes, diluted 10 times in 2% (v/v) nitric acid and analyzed using ICP-MS.
Results and discussion
Three-day batch experiments
We first conducted control experiments with no DFOB added to reproduce the UVI precipitation observed in previous research at pH 11.5 and ionic strength of 0.1 M [13, 14, 33]. At equilibrium, we observed that only 4 to 5% of UVI was present in the solution after it was filtered through 0.2, 0.45 and 1 μm nylon filter membranes (Fig. 2a). This means that 95 to 96% of UVI formed precipitates with diameter ≥ 1 μm, similar to the previous research where 88 to 100% of UVI precipitated from solution. The reaction occurred rapidly with more than 90% UVI precipitating from solution in approximately 8 h.
When 4.2 µM DFOB was added to solution, approximately 6 to 12% of UVI passed through the filter membrane after the reaction reaches equilibrium, suppressing precipitate formation by up to 8% (Fig. 2b). This indicates that siderophores will have a small effect on aqueous UVI chemistry when they are available in the concentration range expected in rocks (below 10 µM) [16, 18, 34].
Increasing DFOB concentration into the range found for siderophores in soils leads to significant suppression of UVI precipitate formation. When the DFOB concentration was increased to 42 µM (1:1 molar ratio with UVI), 41 to 53% of UVI passed through the filter membranes (Fig. 2c). When 130 µM DFOB was present, 89 to 96% of UVI passed through the filter membranes indicating up to 11% of UVI formed ≥ 1 μm diameter precipitates (Fig. 2d). Finally, 100% of UVI passed through the filter membranes when the DFOB concentration was increased to 420 µM (Fig. 2e), in the upper range of soil concentrations representative of the rhizosphere.
Our previous research showed that in the absence of ≥ 0.2 μm diameter precipitates, UVI was highly mobile through quartz sand [14], suggesting DFOB could have a mobilizing effect on UVI.
The effect of DFOB concentration on UVI precipitation up to 3 days. Parts a), b), c), d) and e) are the results from 0, 4.2, 42, 130, and 420 µM DFOB respectively. The first, second and third experiments are shown as blue, green and orange circles respectively. The darkest shade of colour represents the smallest filter (0.2 μm) while the lightest shade represents the biggest filter (1 μm). A comparison is provided in part f) where the blue circles, green bars, orange diamonds, red triangles and grey squares represent 0, 4.2, 42, 130 and 420 µM DFOB, respectively
Two-month batch experiments
A series of batch experiments were conducted to determine how long the UVI -DFOB interactions were stable following a spike addition of DFOB. The batch experiments were conducted over a 56-day (two-month) period, at the end of which a new equilibrium appeared to have been reached. During these experiments 130 µM DFOB was added to the pH 11.5, 0.1 M NaCl solution before addition of UVI. These 250 mL samples were placed on a shaker tray at 25 ˚C and 130 rpm, and 5 mL samples were filtered through 0.2, 0.45 and 1 μm filter membranes typically once a week.
Dissolution experiments were conducted where 250 mL solutions containing 42 µM UVI and 0.1 M NaCl at pH 11.5 were placed on the shaker trays for 48 h to allow UVI to precipitate from solution. After 48 h, 130 µM DFOB was added to the solution. Control experiments were conducted in the absence of 130 µM DFOB to determine whether UVI precipitation remained stable over the two-month timeframe. The results are presented in Fig. 3.
The two control experiments show that up to 2% of UVI passed through the filter members over the two-month period, indicating virtually all UVI had precipitated from solution (Fig. 3a). This shows that in the absence of DFOB, the UVI precipitate remains stable in solution, and should be highly immobile in porous media, as observed in our previous research [14].
During the inhibition experiments, approximately 6% of UVI was removed by all filter membranes sizes in the first week, suggesting that precipitate formation was inhibited by 94% (Fig. 3b). This means DFOB could potentially enhance the mobility of UVI in porous media such as quartz sand. However, as time progressed, the amount of UVI removed by the filters increased. The change in UVI concentration in the filtrate was greatest between day 14 and 35. On day 14, between 85 and 93% of UVI passed through the filters while by day 35, between 40 and 45% passed through the filter membranes. After day 49, equilibrium appeared to have been reached and between 28 and 34% UVI passed through the filter membranes.
One possible mechanism responsible for increased UVI precipitation is the degradation of DFOB [35] as has been observed for other organics such as cellulose [36]. The UVI remaining in solution once ligand degradation had stabilized could be the result of UVI complexes forming with the degradation products of the siderophore. Desferrioxamine B was observed to degrade to mono-hydroxamates with mass to charge (m/z) ratios of 219 and 161 in the presence of Mesorhizobium loti [37]. From our preliminary investigations it is unclear whether 100% of the DFOB degrades or whether some DFOB remains intact in solution.
The dissolution experiments indicate that 130 µM DFOB solubilized approximately 20% of the UVI precipitates (Fig. 3c). This was stable for approximately five weeks before the particles started to reaggregate or re-precipitate. Only 12% of UVI remained in solution after two months. This demonstrates that DFOB dissolves UVI after it has precipitated. The reaggregation or re-precipitation may be due to the degradation of DFOB as discussed for the long-term inhibition experiments.
Note that the increased UVI precipitation observed over the longer timescales may not be relevant in natural environments as new DFOB will likely be continually produced by plants or bacteria which may then continuously interact with UVI preventing it from precipitating and/or enhancing dissolution of UVI mineral phases.
Results of batch experiments at pH 11.5 containing 42 µM UVI, 130 µM DFOB and 0.1 M NaCl which were conducted over a two-month period. The results from the control experiment containing 42 µM UVI and 0 µM DFOB are presented in part a), the results from the precipitation inhibition experiments are presented in part b) and the results from the dissolution experiments are presented in part c). The blue data points are the results from experiment 1 and the red points are results from experiment 2. Different shades represent the different filter sizes (0.2, 0.45 and 1 μm filter membrane pore size) where the darkest shade is 0.2 μm and lightest shade is 1 μm
Formation of UVI complexes with DFOB the likely mechanism preventing precipitation
The experiments show that DFOB significantly reduces the amount of UVI precipitation at pH 11.5. The likely mechanism responsible for these observations is the formation of UVI-DFOB complexes, as has been experimentally observed to form between pH 4 and 10 [24]. Multidentate ligands such as α-isosaccharinic and D-gluconate complex with UVI at pH 12–13 [29,30,31,32], therefore it is possible for UVI to complex with negatively charged multidentate organic ligands at such a high pH. A key challenge with characterizing stability constants at high pH and ionic strengths is the alkaline errors in glass electrodes, and the formation of UVI precipitates hindering their experimental determination [31, 38]. Further studies using a combined experimental (e.g., EXAFS, UV/VIS spectrometry) and computational (e.g., Density Functional Theory) approach are warranted.
Conclusions
The aim of this pilot study was to test the hypothesis that DFOB in alkaline and saline solutions inhibit UVI precipitation and to constrain possible controls of ligand concentration and reaction time. Developing a qualitative and quantitative understanding of this geochemical process is of great importance because DFOB ligands as well as other siderophores occur naturally in the environment and potentially mobilize UVI from a wide range of sources such as mine tailings, contaminated land and radioactive waste storage and disposal facilities. The results from a series of batch experiments show that DFOB can prevent almost 100% UVI precipitation as ≥ 0.2 μm precipitates for two weeks and dissolve up to 20% UVI between two and five weeks, when 130 µM DFOB is initially present. We have previously observed that UVI is highly mobile in porous media when UVI is not present as ≥ 0.2 μm precipitates. As UVI precipitation is prevented by addition of DFOB, and UVI dissolution is enhanced, DFOB could have a significant impact on the mobility of UVI in soil environments where siderophore concentrations can reach 1 mM. Further research is now required to determine the effects of different mineralogy, organic matter, and competitive cations on UVI mobility in the presence of DFOB. The formation of a UVI-DFOB siderophore complex is a likely mechanism based on previous experimental and theoretical work, and can be explored in the future through a variety of experimental and modelling techniques including UV/Vis spectrometry, EXAFS and DFT.
References
DECC, Implementing geological disposal: A framework for the long term management of higher activity radioactive waste, D.o.E.a.C. Change, Editor. 2014, Department of Energy and Climate Change: London, SW1A 2AW. p. 55
SCE, Implementation strategy for Scotland’s policy on higher activity radioactive waste (2016) Scottish Government: Edinburgh, EH1 3DG
Stockdale A, Bryan ND (2013) The influence of natural organic matter on radionuclide mobility under conditions relevant to cementitious disposal of radioactive wastes: A review of direct evidence. Earth Sci Rev 121:1–17
Parry SA et al (2011) Plutonium behaviour in nuclear fuel storage pond effluents. Energy and Environmental Science 4(4):1457–1464
Bondici VF et al (2013) Microbial communities in low permeability, high pH uranium mine tailings: Characterization and potential effects. J Appl Microbiol 114(6):1671–1686
Alexander WR et al (1992) A natural analogue of high pH cement pore waters from the Maqarin area of northern Jordan. II: results of predictive geochemical calculations. J Geochem Explor 46(1):133–146
Alexander WR, McKinley IG (1992) A review of the application of natural analogues in performance assessment: improving models of radionuclide transport in groundwaters. J Geochem Explor 46(1):83–115
Khoury HN et al (1992) A natural analogue of high pH cement pore waters from the Maqarin area of northern Jordan. I: introduction to the site. J Geochem Explor 46(1):117–132
Rizoulis A et al (2016) Bacterial Diversity in the Hyperalkaline Allas Springs (Cyprus), a Natural Analogue for Cementitious Radioactive Waste Repository. Geomicrobiol J 33(2):73–84
Kaplan DI, Gervais TL, Krupka KM (1998) Uranium(VI) Sorption to Sediments under High pH and Ionic Strength Conditions. Radiochim Acta 80(4):201–211
Zhang Y et al (2011) Sorption of U(VI) onto a decarbonated calcareous soil. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 288(2):395–404
Fan QH et al (2014) The adsorption behavior of U(VI) on granite. Environ Sciences: Processes Impacts 16(3):534–541
Kenney JPL et al (2017) A conceptual model to predict uranium removal from aqueous solutions in water-rock systems associated with low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste disposal. RSC Adv 7(13):7876–7884
Kirby ME et al (2020) Experimental study of pH effect on uranium (UVI) particle formation and transport through quartz sand in alkaline 0.1 M sodium chloride solutions.Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 592
Hider RC, Kong X (2010) Chemistry and biology of siderophores. Nat Prod Rep 27(5):637–657
Kraemer SM et al (2015) Metallophores and Trace Metal Biogeochemistry. Aquat Geochem 21(2–4):159–195
Kraemer SM (2011) Siderophores, in Encyclopedia of Geobiology. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 793–796. J. Reitner and V. Thiel, Editors
Powell PE et al (1980) Occurrence of hydroxamate siderophore iron chelators in soils. Nature 287(5785):833–834
Northover GHR et al (2021) Effect of salinity on the zinc(II) binding efficiency of siderophore functional groups and implications for salinity tolerance mechanisms in barley. Sci Rep 11(1):16704
Kiss T, Farkas E (1998) Metal-binding ability of Desferrioxamine B. J Inclusion Phenom Mol Recognit Chem 32(2–3):385–403
Frazier SW, Kretzschmar R, Kraemer SM (2005) Bacterial siderophores promote dissolution of UO2 under reducing conditions. Environ Sci Technol 39(15):5709–5715
Kirby ME et al (2018) Computational Tools for Calculating log β Values of Geochemically Relevant Uranium Organometallic Complexes. J Phys Chem A 122(40):8007–8019
Kirby ME et al (2020) Stability Series for the Complexation of Six Key Siderophore Functional Groups with Uranyl Using Density Functional Theory. J Phys Chem A 124(12):2460–2472
Mullen L, Gong C, Czerwinski K (2007) Complexation of uranium (VI) with the siderophore desferrioxamine B. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 273(3):683–688
Anderson C et al (2011) Radionuclide geomicrobiology of the deep biosphere. Geomicrobiol J 28(5–6):540–561
Février L et al (2021) Efficiency of dihydroxamic and trihydroxamic siderochelates to extract uranium and plutonium from contaminated soils. J Environ Radioact 235–236:106645
Takagai Y et al (2019) Synthesis and Evaluation of Reusable Desferrioxamine B Immobilized on Polymeric Spherical Microparticles for Uranium Recovery. Ind Eng Chem Res 58(38):17928–17936
Gaona X et al Review of the complexation of tetravalent actinides by ISA and gluconate under alkaline to hyperalkaline conditions.Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2008.102(3–4): p.217–227
Warwick P et al (2004) Stability constants of uranium(IV)-α-isosaccharinic acid and gluconic acid complexes. Radiochim Acta 92(12):897–902
Warwick P, Evans N, Vines S (2006) Studies on some divalent metal α-isosaccharinic acid complexes. Radiochim Acta 94(6–7):363–368
Colàs E, Grivé M, Rojo I (2013) Complexation of uranium(VI) by gluconate in alkaline solutions. J Solution Chem 42(7):1545–1557
Sawyer DT, Kula RJ (1962) Uranium(VI) Gluconate Complexes. Inorg Chem 1(2):303–309
Kenney JPL et al (2018) The effect of bacterial growth phase and culture concentration on U(VI) removal from aqueous solution. Chem Geol 482:61–71
Kraemer SM, Hering JG (2004) Biogeochemical controls on the mobility and bioavailability of metals in soils and groundwater. Aquat Sci 66(1):1–2
Sigma-Aldrich (2020) Desferrioxamine mesylate material data safety sheet. Saint Louis, MO 63103 USA, Sigma-Aldrich
Van Loon LR et al (1999) Degradation of cellulosic materials under the alkaline conditions of a cementitious repository for low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste. II. Degradation kinetics. J Environ Polym Degrad 7(1):41–51
Pierwola A et al (2004) Degradation Pathway and Generation of Monohydroxamic Acids from the Trihydroxamate Siderophore Deferrioxamine B. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(2):831–836
Harris DC (2016) Quantitative chemical analysis. Freemann
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), Radioactive Waste Management Limited (RWM), Environment Agency (EA) and Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) for the funding received for this project through the Hydroframe consortium, part of the Radioactivity and the Environment (RATE) program (NE/ L000660/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kirby, M., Weiss, D.J. A pilot study on the effect of desferrioxamine B on uranium VI precipitation and dissolution in pH 11.5, 0.1 M NaCl solutions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 1779–1784 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08245-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08245-w