Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comprehensive review on radioactive waste cycle from generation to disposal

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 June 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Radioactive wastes are the byproduct of nuclear technology and industrial processes. Unlike any other waste stream, radioactive wastes are hazardous to living beings and the environment. Due to the harmful effect of radioactivity, radioactive wastes are governed and regulated by the government authority for the safety of the people and the environment. According to the waste generation and the intensity of hazardous content, countries classified their radioactive waste and implemented a management policy for each category. These strategies vary for different types of radioactive wastes and the actual radioactive contents. Mostly, at first radioactive wastes are collected and segregated into categories. Some wastes are stored in a temporary storage facility before going to the treatment phase of volume reduction, waste immunization and shielding. The majority of the waste volume after the treatment phase goes directly into long term geological disposal at ground level up to 100 m depth. Highly radioactive spent fuel and reprocessing wastes are currently stored in temporary storage facilities until a long-term disposal solution is built. This study aims to provide an overall review of the radioactive wastes and the management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2017) Radiation and its health effects: radiation basics

  2. The Geological Society (2020) Geological disposal of radioactive waste. London

  3. ENERGY.GOV (2020) Nuclear power is the most reliable energy source and it’s not even close. Department of Energy. Office of Nuclear Energy

  4. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2020) Nuclear explained: The nuclear fuel cycle

  5. Diehl (2011) Uranium mining and milling wastes: an introduction. World Information Service on Energy

  6. World Nuclear Association (2018) Processing of used nuclear fuel. London

  7. World Nuclear Association (2017) Mixed Oxide (MOX) fuel. London

  8. Moyer BA (2017) Ion exchange and solvent extraction: a series of advances, vol 19. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chiba S et al (2017) Method to reduce long-lived fission products by nuclear transmutations with fast spectrum reactors. Sci Rep 7(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14319-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Editorial, (2009) Adieu to Nuclear Recycling. Nature 460(7252):152. https://doi.org/10.1038/460152b

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. IAEA (1998) Joint US/Russian study on the development of a decommissioning strategy plan for RBMK-1000 Unit No. 1 at the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant. Richland, WA. https://doi.org/10.2172/574167.

  12. World Nuclear Association (2020) Nuclear decommissioning: decommission nuclear facilities. London

  13. IAEA (2018) Decommissioning of nuclear power plants, research reactors and other nuclear fuel cycle facilities. IAEA Safety Standards for Protecting People and the Environment Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-47

  14. Langton C, Serrato M, Blankenship J, Griffin W (2010) Savannah river site R-reactor disassembly basin in situ decommissioning

  15. World Nuclear Association (2020) Radioactive waste management. London

  16. B. Ripper (2015) Understanding activities that produce radioactive wastes in the UK

  17. US Department of Energy (1997) Reactor-grade and weapons-grade plutonium in nuclear explosives

  18. Sutcliffe WG, Trapp TJ (1994) Extraction and utility of reactor-grade plutonium for weapons. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

  19. Prüss A, Giroult E, Rushbrook P (1999) Safe management of wastes from health-care activities. Geneva

  20. World Nuclear Association (2020) Radioisotopes in medicine: nuclear medicine. London

  21. IAEA TECDOC No. 1183 (2000) Management of radioactive waste from the use of radionuclides in medicine. Vienna

  22. Iaea Technical Reports Series No. 402 (2001) Handling and processing of radioactive waste from nuclear applications

  23. Doyi I, Essumang DK, Dampare S, Glover ET (2016) Technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials (TENORM) in the oil and gas industry: a review. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, vol 238. Springer, New York, pp 107–119

    Google Scholar 

  24. Karam PA, Vetter BJ (2009) Naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) and technologically enhanced NORM (TENORM). Medical Physics Publishing

  25. World Nuclear Association (2020) Naturally occurring radioactive materials NORM. London

  26. Thompson J et al (2015) E-42 task force report: review of tenorm in the oil & gas industry

  27. Martin JE, Lee C (2000) The legacy and future of radioactive waste management at the millennium. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 243(1):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006739918954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. US Department of Energy (2006) Department of Energy Five Year Plan FY 2007- FY 2011 Volume II: Environmental Management

  29. IAEA (2018) STI/PUB/1799, Nuclear Energy Series NW-T-1.14, Status and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management

  30. Yun JI, Jeong YH, Kim JH (2013) Republic of Korea: experience of radioactive waste (raw) management and contaminated site clean-up. Radioactive waste management and contaminated site clean-up: processes. Elsevier Inc., Technologies and International Experience, pp 673–696

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Shestopalov V, Shybetskyi I (2013) Ukraine: experience of radioactive waste (RAW) management and contaminated site clean-up. In: Radioactive waste management and contaminated site clean-up: processes, technologies and international experience. Elsevier Inc., pp 386–414

  32. Dlouhý Z (1982) 5 Processing gaseous radioactive wastes. In: Studies in environmental science, vol 15: Disposal of radioactive wastes. Elsevier, pp 107–129

  33. U.S. NRC (2012) Radioactive waste management technology chapter 7: gaseous radioactive wastes. In: Radioactive Waste Management Self Study, p 46

  34. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) (2012) Radon in Canada’s uranium industry

  35. IAEA (2009) IAEA safety standards series no. GSG-1: classification of radioactive waste. Vienna. ISBN 978–92–0–109209–0.

  36. Ojovan MI, Lee WE (2014) 17 - Immobilisation of radioactive waste in glass. In: An introduction to nuclear waste immobilisation, 2nd ed. Elsevier, pp 245–282

  37. Radioactivity.Eu.Com, High-level waste (HLW): Spent nuclear fuels and vitrified waste. https://www.radioactivity.eu.com/site/pages/HLW_Waste.htm

  38. IAEA-TECDOC-1591 (2008) Estimation of global inventories of radioactive waste and other radioactive materials. Vienna

  39. IAEA STI/PUB/889 (2002) Radioactive waste management, an IAEA source book. Vienna.

  40. Bonin B (2010) The scientific basis of nuclear waste management. In: Bonin B (ed) Handbook of nuclear engineering, vol 1, 1st edn. Springer, Gif-sur-Yvette, pp 3253–3419

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. World Nuclear Association (2018) Physics of uranium and nuclear energy. London

  42. U.S. NRC Document Library (2019) Backgrounder on radioactive waste: high level waste

  43. King M (2002) Radioactive waste: production, storage, disposal, revision 2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Maryland

  44. Speight JG (2019) 5. Sources of water pollution: sources. In: Natural water remediation: chemistry and technology, 1st ed., Elsevier, pp 186–187

  45. World Nuclear Association (2020) World nuclear power reactors & uranium requirements. London

  46. Gospodarczyk MM, Fisher MN (2020) IAEA 2019 Released data on nuclear power plants operating experience. Vienna

  47. World Nuclear Association (2020) Nuclear research reactors. London

  48. Jeffs E (2009) 5: A nuclear energy revival. In: Green energy: sustainable electricity supply with low environmental impact, 1st ed. CRC Press, pp. 152–157

  49. World Nuclear Association (2020) Radioactive wastes: myths and realities. London

  50. Humber Y, Suga M, Urabe E (2015) Japan’s 17,000 tons of nuclear waste in search of a home. Bloomberg

  51. J. Vidal (2019) Nuclear power offers an abundant supply of low-carbon energy: But what to do with the deadly radioactive waste? Ensia

  52. James M, Rann A (2011) Radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel management in Russia. Sci Technol Environ Resources Sect 1:1–59

    Google Scholar 

  53. Connolly KJ, Pope RB (2016) A historical review of the safe transport of spent nuclear fuel, fuel cycle research & development, vol 1st, pp 5–6

  54. Radioactivity.Eu.Com, Radioactivity: Intermediate-level waste (ILW-LL). https://www.radioactivity.eu.com/site/pages/ML_LLW.htm

  55. U.S. NRC Document Library (2017) Radioactive Waste: Low-Level Waste. Maryland

  56. W. Lee, M. Ojovan, and C. Jantzen, Radioactive Waste Management and Contaminated Site Clean-Up Processes, Technologies and International Experience, 1st Editio. Woodhead Publishing, 2013.

  57. Factsheets and Radioactive Waste (2012) Classifications of Nuclear Waste, What’s high? What’s low? How are classifications decided? Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. http://ieer.org/wp.

  58. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSR-5 (2011) Disposal of Radioactive Waste for Protecting People and the Environment. Vianna. ISBN: 9789201056085

  59. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Document Library (2018) Low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste: Low Level Radioactive Waste

  60. IAEA-TECDOC-855 (1996) Clearance levels for radionuclides in solid materials, application of exemption principles, interim report for comment. Vienna. ISSN 1011–4289.

  61. Ojovan MI, Lee WE, Kalmykov SN (2019) Nuclear Waste Regulations. In: An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation, 3rd ed., vol. 1, Elsevier Science, pp 81–106

  62. Fisher RS (1998) Geologic and geochemical controls on naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in produced water from oil, gas, and geothermal operations. Environ Geosci 5(3):139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. World Nuclear Association (2020) Naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM). London

  64. IAEA (2007) Naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM V). ISBN 9789201015082.

  65. Marra JE, Palmer RA (2011) Radioactive waste management. In: Waste: a handbook for management. Elsevier Inc., pp 101–108

  66. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NW-G-1.1 (2009) Policies and Strategies for Radioactive Waste Management

  67. World Nuclear Association (2020) Storage and Disposal Options for Radioactive Waste. London

  68. Radioactivity.Eu.Com, Radioactivity : Waste management. https://www.radioactivity.eu.com/site/pages/Waste_Management.htm

  69. Council NR (1999) Disposition of high-level radioactive waste through geological isolation: development, current status, and technical and policy challenges. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  70. Gen M, Kumar A, Avsm C (2004) Nuclear energy in India’s energy security matrix: an appraisal. Reprint. Vij Books, India

  71. World Nuclear Association (2020) Radioactive Wastes: Myths and Realities. London, 2020. Accessed June 27 2020

  72. World Nuclear Association (2017) Treatment and Conditioning of Nuclear Wastes. London

  73. M. I. Ojovan and W. E. Lee, “Management and Characterisation of Radioactive Wastes,” in An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation, 1st, Ed. Elsevier, 2005, pp. 125–134.

  74. Ojovan MI, Lee WE (2005) Sources and Characteristics of Nuclear Wastes. In: An Introduction to Nuclear Waste Immobilisation, 1st ed. Elsevier Science, pp 81–103.

  75. Factsheets and Radioactive Waste (2012) Incineration of radioactive and mixed waste. Institute for Energy and Environmental Research. http://ieer.org/wp.

  76. IAEA Safety Series No. 108 (2020) Design and operation of radioactive waste incineration facilities. Vienna. Accessed August 29, 2020

  77. Garamszeghy M (2011) Compaction processes and technology for treatment and conditioning of radioactive waste. In: Handbook of Advanced Radioactive Waste Conditioning Technologies. Elsevier Inc., pp 19–42

  78. Benitez-Navarro JC, Salgado-Mojena M (2002) IAEA-CN-90/30 XA0300159 Compaction of solid wastes in countries without disposal facility: a prelude of future troubles. Havana, 2002. Accessed August 29 2020

  79. ENERGY.GOV (2014) Section two packaging, transportation and storage of radioactive materials. https://www.energy.gov/.

  80. IAEA-TECDOC-1515 (2006) Development of specifications for radioactive waste packages. Vienna

  81. IAEA-Technical Reports Series No. 390 (1998) Interim storage of radioactive waste packages. Vienna, ISBN 92-0-103698-1

  82. Sukhanov LP, High (2013) Methods and production of cementation materials for immobilisation into waste form. research of cementation processes for specific liquid radioactive waste streams of radiochemical plants. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TE-1701_addCD/PDF/RussianFederationVNIINM.pdf.

  83. IAEA-TECDOC-655 (1992) Treatment and conditioning of radioactive solid wastes. Vienna. ISSN 1011–4289.

  84. U.S. NRC (2020) Liquid Radioactive Wastes. In: Radioactive Waste Technology, 0311. 4.0., Maryland: U.S. NRC, 2020, pp 1–6

  85. Zdeněk D (1982) 7 Solidification of High-Level Radioactive Wastes. In: Studies in environmental science volume, vol 15. pp 155–179

  86. Vienna JD (2010) Nuclear waste vitrification in the united states: recent developments and future options. Int J Appl Glas Sci 1(3):309–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00023.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Ojovan MI, Lee WE (2011) Glassy wasteforms for nuclear waste immobilization. Metall Mater Trans A 42(4):837–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-010-0525-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Gregg DJ, Farzana R, Dayal P, Holmes R, Triani G (2020) Synroc technology: perspectives and current status (Review). J Am Ceram Soc 103(10):5424–5441. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Synroc-Progress and Future Prospects ADAMJOSTSONS Materials Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, ANSTO PMB 1 Menai NSW 2234 Australia (2020) Accessed July 01 2020

  90. World Nuclear Association (2019) Synroc wasteform: radioactive waste management appendix 1. London

  91. Ionescu M (2020) Synroc Waste Treatment Technology, Nuclear Fuel Cycle. ANSTO. https://www.ansto.gov.au/products-services/ansto-synroc-waste-treatment-technology.

  92. Kok KD (2009) Spent fuel storage: neutron absorbing materials. In: Kok KD (ed) Nuclear engineering handbook, 1st ed. CRC Press, 2009, p 302

  93. IAEA Safety Standards No. SSG-15: Specific Safety Guide (2012) Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel for protecting people and the environment. Vienna. ISBN 978–92–0–115110–0

  94. Westinghouse Technology Systems Manual (2020) Section 14.4: Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleanup System. Maryland, 2020 (Online). https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1122/ML11223A323.pdf

  95. Nechaev A, Onufriev V, Thomas KT (1986) IAEA Bulletin: Spent-fuel cask at the nuclear research center in Karlsruhe, FRG. (Credit: KFZ)_Long-term storage and disposal of spent fuel. Vienna

  96. U.S. NRC Document Library (2020) NRC: Dry Cask Storage. U.S. NRC, 2020. https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage/dry-cask-storage.html

  97. OECD Publishing OECD/NEA (2007) Management of recyclable fissile and fertile materials. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264032583-en

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. World Nuclear News (2017) Areva’s space-saving solution for used fuel storage. World Nuclear News

  99. IAEA (2014) IAEA Safety Standards_Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-29 for protecting people and the environment: Near Surface Disposal Facilities for Radioactive Waste. Vianna, 2014. ISBN 978-92-0-114313-6

  100. IAEA-TECDOC-909 (1996) Issues in radioactive waste disposal: Second report of the Working Group on Principles and Criteria for Radioactive Waste Disposal. Vienna

  101. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (2011) SKB Turns in Application for Permit to Build a Final Repository in Forsmark. PR Newswire Association LLC, Stockholm

  102. World Nuclear News (2015) Licence granted for Finnish used fuel repository. World Nuclear News

  103. Butler D (2010) France digs deep for nuclear waste. Nature 466(7308):804–805. https://doi.org/10.1038/466804a.

  104. Nagra (2002) Opalinus Clay Project: Demonstration of feasibility of disposal (‘Entsorgungsnachweis’) for spent fuel, vitrified high-level waste and long-lived intermediate-level waste, Summary Overview. https://www.nagra.ch/

  105. Johnson LH, Schneider JW, Zuidema P, Gribi P, Mayer G, Smith PA (2003) Project opalinus clay (Entsorgungsnachweis)—illustrating the safety and robustness of the proposed disposal system for SF, HLW and long-lived ILW. MRS Proc 807:899. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-807-899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. IAEA Technical Reports Series No.436 (2005) Disposal Options for Disused Radioactive Sources. Vienna. ISBN 92-0-100305-6

  107. News@prairiebizmag.com (2016) Officials raise ‘deep concern’ that proposed drilling project near Rugby could lead to nuclear waste disposal in N.D. Grand Forks Herald and Forum Communications Company

  108. U.S. NRC. NUREG-1949 (2014) Safety Evaluation Report Related to Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, vol 3: Repository safety after permanent closure. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. Washington, DC, 2014 (Online). http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html

  109. World Nuclear Association (2020) International Nuclear Waste Disposal Concept. London

  110. Simpson MF, Law JD (2010) Nuclear fuel reprocessing. In: Tsoulfanidis N (eds) Nuclear Energy. Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology Series. Springer, New York

  111. IAEA-TECDOC-CD-1630 (2007) Use of Reprocessed Uranium: Proceedings of a Technical Committee Meeting held in Vienna, August 2007. IAEA, Vianna. ISBN 978-92-0-157109-0.

  112. Hansen J (2009) Strategies to address global warming & is sundance kid a criminal? (Online). http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2009/20090713_Strategies.pdf

  113. James H (2008) 4th Generation Nuclear Power. Open Source System, Science, Solutions. http://www.ossfoundation.us/projects/energy/nuclear

  114. Locatelli G, Mancini M, Todeschini N (2013) Generation IV nuclear reactors: Current status and future prospects. Energy Policy 61:1503–1520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. World Nuclear Association (2019) Generation IV Nuclear Reactors. London

  116. Raskach A (2000) Fuel component of electricity generation cost for the BN-800 REACTOR WITH MOX FUEL AND URANIUM OXIDE FUEL WITH INCREASING OF FUEL BURNUP AND REMOVING OF RADIAL BREEDING BLANKET,” 2000. [Online]. Available: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/33/011/33011298.pdf.

  117. Lehmann WM (2000) Transmutation in der Kerntechnik. Elektrizitaetswirtschaft 99(1–2):2000

  118. Chiba S et al (2017) Method to reduce long-lived fission products by nuclear transmutations with fast spectrum reactors. Sci Rep 7(1):13961. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14319-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Leray S (1996) Nuclear waste transmutation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B 113(1–4):495–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(95)01402-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. IAEA-TECDOC-693 (1992) Use of fast reactors for actiniae transmutation: Proceedings of a Specialists Meeting held in Obninsk, Russian Federation, 22–24 September, 1992. Vienna. ISSN 1011–4289.

  121. Forsberg CW (1993) Strategies for Radwaste Management. Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  122. Fetterman AJ, Fisch NJ, Based S, Ion E, Diagnostic L (2007) Plasma mass filters for nuclear waste reprocessing. Energy

  123. Freeman R et al (2003) Archimedes plasma mass filter. In: AIP Conference Proceedings 694:403–410

  124. Zweben SJ, Gueroult R, Fisch NJ (2018) Plasma mass separation. Citat Phys Plasmas 25(9):90901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5042845.

  125. Gueroult R, Rax J-M, Fisch NJ (2010) Plasma separation for rare earth elements recycling. Accessed August 31 2020

  126. Tzeng CC, Kuo YY, Huang TF, Lin DL, Yu YJ (1998) Treatment of radioactive wastes by plasma incineration and vitrification for final disposal. J Hazard Mater 58(1–3):207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(97)00132-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. WNA Report. Comparison of Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Various Electricity Generation Sources. London (Online). http://www.world-nuclear.org/

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank ProFlange Inc. and Mitacs for their support to of this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Energy Systems and Nuclear Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada

    Sharif Abu Darda, Hossam A. Gabbar, Vahid Damideh, Mohamed Aboughaly & Isaac Hassen

  2. Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada

    Hossam A. Gabbar

Authors
  1. Sharif Abu Darda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hossam A. Gabbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vahid Damideh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohamed Aboughaly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Isaac Hassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossam A. Gabbar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: The fourth author’s name was misspelt. The correct name is updated in the article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darda, S.A., Gabbar, H.A., Damideh, V. et al. A comprehensive review on radioactive waste cycle from generation to disposal. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 329, 15–31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07764-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07764-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation