Abstract
The mechanical properties of SAN/PB-g-SAN blends of different compositions under uniaxial tensile tests were studied. Matrix ligament thickness (MLT) concept was employed to correlate microscopic deformations with macroscopic mechanical response. It was found that, the experimental values of the blends moduli are in a good agreement with the theoretical values obtained from Takayanagi and mixture rules in parallel models. The MLTs in which transition from brittle-to-ductile and from ductile-to-rubbery occur were determined according to interparticle distance model. Fractography studies of the samples with MLT values greater than brittle to ductile transition showed that rubber particles act as craze initiators rather than craze terminators. Due to poor overlapping of stress fields around the particles, no extensive shear yielding took place during the fracture process, leading to unstable macroscopic behavior. For the samples with MLTs smaller than brittle-ductile transition, a necked region developed. The stability of necked region increased with PB-g-SAN content, which resulted in improved post yield deformation stability. This process was accompanied by the participation of larger volume of material in the deformation process and strong overlapping of the stress field around the particles, which facilitated matrix shear yielding. Based on macroscopic response, this delocalized deformation manifested itself by a gradual decrease in load drop after yielding point. For the samples with PB-g-SAN content higher than 75 wt%, the great reduction in MLT and direct interconnection between the neighbor rubber particles caused the appearance of rubbery behavior. These results were also confirmed by analyzing of the fractured surfaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Van Melick HGH, Govaert LE, Meijer HEH (2003) Polymer 44:3579–3591
Donald AM, Kramer EJ (1982) J Mater Sci 17:2351
Donald AM, Kramer EJ (1982) J Polym Sci part B 20:1129–1141
Haward RN, Hay JN, Parsons IW, Adam G, Owadh AAK, Boxnyak CP, Aref-Azaf A, Cross A (1980) Colloid Polym Sci 258(6):643–62
Tervoort TA, Govaert LE (2000) J Rheol 44(6):1263–77
Aboulfaraj M, G’Sell C, Mangelinck D, McKenna GB (1994) J Non-Crystalline Solids 172–174:615–21
G’Sell C (1986) Plastic deformation of glassy polymers: constitutive equations and macromolecular mechanisms. In: McQueen H (ed) Strength of metals and alloys. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 1943–82
Bauwens JC (1978) J Mater Sci 13(7):1443–8
Govaert LE, Timmermans PHM, Brekelmans WAM (2000) J Eng Mater Technol 122(2):177–85
Govaert LE, van Melick HGH, Meijer HEH (2001) Polymer 42(3):1271–4
Van Melick HGH et al (2003) Polymer 44:1171–1179
G’Sell C, Hiver JM, Dahouin A, Souahi A (1992) J Mater Sci 27(18):5031–9
Spitzig WA, Richmond O (1979) Polym Eng Sci 19:1129–39
Boyce MC, Arruda EM, Jayachandran R (1994) Polym Eng Sci 34(9):716–25
Zaroulis JS, Boyce MC (1997) Polymer 38(6):1303–15
Govaert LE et al (2001) Polymer 42:1271–1274
Kierkels JTA, Dona CL, Tervoort TA, Govaert LE (2008) Kinetics of Re-embrittlement of (Anti)plasticized Glassy Polymers After Mechanical Rejuvenation”. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 46:134–147
Kinloch AJ, Young RJ (1983) Fracture Behavior of Polymers. Applied Science, London
Walker I, Collyer AA (1994) Rubber Toughened Engineering Plastics Chapman & Hall, London
Bucknall CB (1977) Toughened Plastics Applied Science. Materials Science Series, London
Kramer EJ (1983) Adv Polym Sci 52/53:1–56
Bucknall CB, Karpodinis A, Zhang XC (1994) J Mater Sci 29:3377–3383
Okubo M (1990) Makromol Chem Macromol Symp 35/36:307
Rios L, Hidalgo M, Cavaille JY, Guillot J, Guyot A, Pichot C (1991) Colloid Polym Sci 269:812
Stutman DR, Klien A, El-Aasser MS, Vanderhoff JW (1985) Ind Eng Chem Perod Res Dev 24:404
Donald AM, Kramer EJ (1982) J Apply Polym Sci 27:3729
Bucknall CB, Cote FFP, Partridge IK (1986) J Mater Sci 21:301
Bucknall CB, Davies P, Partridge IK (1986) J Mater Sci 21:307
Mirmohseni A, Zavareh S (2010) J Polym Res 17:191
Mirmohseni A, Zavareh S (2011) J Polym Res 18:509
Singh H, Gupta NK (2011) J Polym Res 18:1365
Chiu FC, Lai SM, Li HC, Chen CC (2011) J Polym Res 18:627
Kramer EJ (1982) Polymer Compatibility and Incompatibility: Principles and Practices MMI Press. Midland, MI, USA
Lauterwasser BD & Kramer EJ (1979) Phill Mag 39A
Beahan P, Thomas A, Bevis M (1976) J Apply Mater Sci 11:1207–1214
Nielsen LE (1978) Predicting the Properties of Mixture: Mixture rules in Science and Technology. Dekker, New York
Nielsen LE (1974) Particulate filled polymers. In: Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 377–450
Dickie RA (1978) In: Paul DR (ed) Polymer Blends, vol. 2. Academic, New York
Lewis TB, Nielsen LE (1970) J Appl Polym Sci 14:1449
Vemura S, Takayanagi M (1966) J Apply Polym Sci 10:113
Martino RJ (ed) (1987) Modern Plastics Encyclopedia. McGrawHill Inc., New York, p 609
Kim H, Keskkula H, Paul DR (1991) polymer Vol 32 Number 13
Wu S (1985) Polymer 26:1855
Wu S (1988) J Apply Polym Sci 35:549
de Gennes PG (1980) Macromolecules 13:1069
Riatsuo M, Wang T, Kwei TK (1972) Crazing of Polystyrene Containing Two Rubber Balls: A Model for ABS Plastics. J Polym Sci Part A 10:1085–1095
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehrabi Mazidi, M., Razavi Aghjeh, M.K. & Abbasi, F. Relationship between microscopic deformations and macroscopic mechanical response of SAN/PB-g-SAN blends via interparticle distance concept. J Polym Res 19, 9928 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-012-9928-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-012-9928-z