Adams, J. A., & Link, A. L. (2017). The structure and performance of U.S. research joint ventures: Inferences and implications from the Advanced Technology Program. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1376169.
Albats, E., Fiegenbaum, I., & Cunningham, J. A. (2017). A micro level study of university industry collaborative lifecycle key performance indicators. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9555-2.
Algieri, B., Aquino, A., & Succurro, M. (2013). Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: The case of Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 382–400.
Amesse, F., & Cohendet, P. (2001). Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy. Research Policy, 30(9), 1459–1478.
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051.
Autio, E., & Laamanen, T. (1995). Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: Review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(7–8), 643–664.
Baba, Y., Shichijo, N., & Sedita, S. R. (2009). How do collaborations with universities affect firms’ innovative performance? The role of “Pasteur scientists” in the advanced materials field. Research Policy, 38(5), 756–764.
Barnes, T., Pashby, I., & Gibbons, A. (2002). Effective university–industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D Projects. European Management Journal, 20(3), 272–285.
Becher, G., & Kuhlmann, S. (Eds.). (2012). Evaluation of technology policy programmes in Germany (Vol. 4). Berlin: Springer.
Ben-Hafaïedh, C., Micozzi, A., & Pattitoni, P. (2017). Academic spin-offs’ entrepreneurial teams and performance: A subgroups approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9623-7.
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89.
Birch, C., Lichy, J., Mulholland, G., & Kachour, M. (2017). An enquiry into potential graduate entrepreneurship: Is higher education turning off the pipeline of graduate entrepreneurs? Journal of Management Development, 36(6), 743–760.
Bjerregaard, T. (2010). Industry and academia in convergence: Microinstitutional dimensions of R&D collaboration. Technovation, 30(2), 100–108.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4), 627–655.
Bradley, S. R., Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2013). Models and methods of university technology transfer. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 571–650.
Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2007). The scientific productivity of academic inventors: New evidence from Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 101–118.
Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: An exploratory theory-building study of regional co-opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Management, 48(1), 148–162.
Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 369–384.
Contractor, F. J., & Sagafi-Nejad, T. (1981). International technology transfer: Major issues and policy responses. Journal of International Business Studies, 12(2), 113–135.
Cunningham, J. A., & Link, A. N. (2015). Fostering university–industry R&D collaborations in European Union countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 849–860.
Cunningham, J. A., & Link, A. N. (2016a). Exploring the effectiveness of research and innovation policies among European Union countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 415–425.
Cunningham, J. A., Mangematin, V., O’Kane, C., & O’Reilly, P. (2016b). At the frontiers of scientific advancement: The factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded principal investigators. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 778–797.
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & O’Kane, C. (2018). Value creation in the quadruple helix: A micro level conceptual model of principal investigators as value creators. R&D Management, 48(1), 136–147.
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Wirsching, K. (2017a). Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: A principal investigator-centered governance framework. Small Business Economics, 1–18.
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & Young, C. (2017b). A review of qualitative case methods trends and themes used in technology transfer research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 923–956.
Cunningham, J., O’Reilly, P., O’Kane, C., & Mangematin, V. (2014). The inhibiting factors that principal investigators experience in leading publicly funded research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 93–110.
Cusumano, M. A., & Elenkov, D. (1994). Linking international technology transfer with strategy and management: A literature commentary. Research Policy, 23(2), 195–215.
Cutler, R. S. (1988). Survey of high-technology-transfer mechanisms in Japan and the USA. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 13(1), 42–48.
Cutler, R. S. (1989). A comparison of Japanese and US high-technology transfer practices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36(1), 17–24.
D’este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339.
Del Giudice, M., Nicotra, M., Romano, M., & Schillaci, C. E. (2017). Entrepreneurial performance of principal investigators and country culture: Relations and influences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 320–337.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Evers, N., Cunningham, J., & Hoholm, T. (2014). Technology entrepreneurship: Bringing innovation to the marketplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Geoghegan, W., O’Kane, C., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). Technology transfer offices as a nexus within the triple helix: The progression of the university’s role. International Journal of Technology Management, 68(3–4), 255–277.
Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2011). Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Research Policy, 40(8), 1068–1076.
Gilsing, V., Bekkers, R., Freitas, I. M. B., & Van der Steen, M. (2011). Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development-based industries: Transfer mechanisms and barriers. Technovation, 31(12), 638–647.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.
Grimpe, C., & Fier, H. (2010). Informal university technology transfer: A comparison between the United States and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 637–650.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Cunningham, J. A., & Gajón, E. (2018). Determinants of graduates’ start-ups creation across a Multi-campus Entrepreneurial University: The case of Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(1), 150–178.
Haeussler, C., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Breaking the ivory tower: Academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy, 40(1), 41–54.
Hall, M. J., & Link, A. N. (2015). Technology-based state growth policies: The case of North Carolina’s Green Business Fund. The Annals of Regional Science, 54(2), 437–449.
Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2001). Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from the advanced technology program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 87–98.
Hayter, C. S., Lubynsky, R., & Maroulis, S. (2017). Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(6), 1237–1254.
Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2017). Science and technology parks: An annotated and analytical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 957–976.
Hülsbeck, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Starnecker, A. (2013). Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany. The journal of technology transfer, 38(3), 199–215.
Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555–1568.
Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2009). Reconsidering the Bayh–Dole Act and the current university invention ownership model. Research Policy, 38(9), 1407–1422.
Kolb, C., & Wagner, M. (2017). How university spin-offs differ in composition and interaction: A qualitative approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9629-1.
Kolympiris, C., & Klein, P. G. (2017). The effects of academic incubators on university innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(2), 145–179.
Larsson, J. P., Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., & Wright, M. (2017). Location choices of graduate entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 46(8), 1490–1504.
Lee, J., & Win, H. N. (2004). Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore. Technovation, 24(5), 433–442.
Lehmann, E. E., & Menter, M. (2017). Public cluster policy and performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9626-4.
Leyden, D. P. (2016). Public-sector entrepreneurship and the creation of a sustainable innovative economy. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 553–564.
Leyden, D. P., & Link, A. N. (2015). Public sector entrepreneurship: US technology and innovation policy. Oxford: OUP Us.
Lin, B. W., & Berg, D. (2001). Effects of cultural difference on technology transfer projects: An empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturing companies. International Journal of Project Management, 19(5), 287–293.
Lindholm Dahlstrand, Å., & Politis, D. (2013). Women business ventures in Swedish University incubators. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 78–96.
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2013). Public R&D subsidies, outside private support, and employment growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(6), 537–550.
Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641–655.
McAdam, M., & Debackere, K. (2018). Beyond ‘triple helix’ toward ‘quadruple helix’ models in regional innovation systems: Implications for theory and practice. R&D Management, 48(1), 3–6.
McAdam, M., Galbraith, B., McAdam, R., & Humphreys, P. (2006). Business processes and networks in university incubators: A review and research agendas. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(5), 451–472.
Menter, M. (2016). Principal investigators and the commercialization of knowledge. In D. Audretsch, E. Lehmann, M. Meoli, & S. Vismara (Eds.), University evolution, entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness (pp. 193–203). Berlin: Springer.
Meyer, M. (2006). Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy, 35(10), 1646–1662.
Mian, S. A. (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy, 25(3), 325–335.
Miller, K., Alexander, A., Cunningham J. A., & Albats, E. (2017). Entrepreneurial academics and academic entrepreneurs: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology Management (forthcoming).
Miller, K., McAdam, R., & McAdam, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: Toward a research agenda. R&D Management, 48(1), 7–24.
Molas-Gallart, J. (1997). Which way to go? Defence technology and the diversity of ‘dual-use’technology transfer. Research Policy, 26(3), 367–385.
Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2007). From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 909–935.
Mowery, D. C. (2005). The Bayh–Dole Act and high-technology entrepreneurship in US universities: Chicken, egg, or something else? In G. D. Libecap (Ed.), University entrepreneurship and technology transfer (pp. 39–68). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Mowery, D. C. (2011). Learning from one another? International policy “emulation” and university–industry technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1827–1853.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1), 99–119.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2004). The Bayh–Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1–2), 115–127.
Muscio, A. (2010). What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(2), 181–202.
Nelson, R. R. (2001). Observations on the post-Bayh–Dole rise of patenting at American universities. The Journal of Technology transfer, 26(1), 13–19.
Nepelski, D., & Piroli, G. (2017). Organizational diversity and innovation potential of EU-funded research projects. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9624-6.
Nicotra, M., Romano, M., Del Giudice, M., & Schillaci, C. E. (2017). The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: A measurement framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9628-2.
O’Kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44(2), 421–437.
O’Kane, C., Zhang, J. A., Cunningham, J. A., & O’Reilly, P. (2017). What factors inhibit publicly funded principal investigators’ commercialization activities? Small Enterprise Research, 24(3), 215–232.
O’Reilly, P., & Cunningham, J. A. (2017). Enablers and barriers to university technology transfer engagements with small-and medium-sized enterprises: Perspectives of Principal Investigators. Small Enterprise Research, 24(3), 274–289.
Phillips, R. G. (2002). Technology business incubators: How effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society, 24(3), 299–316.
Pitelis, C. (2012). Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: A conceptual framework. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6), 1359–1388.
Plewa, C., Korff, N., Johnson, C., Macpherson, G., Baaken, T., & Rampersad, G. C. (2013). The evolution of university–industry linkages—A framework. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30(1), 21–44.
Ponomariov, B., & Boardman, P. C. (2008). The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 301–313.
Rasmussen, E., & Rice, M. P. (2011). A framework for government support mechanisms aimed at enhancing university technology transfer: The Norwegian case. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 11(1–2), 1–25.
Ratzinger, D., Amess, K., Greenman, A., & Mosey, S. (2017). The impact of digital start-up founders’ higher education on reaching equity investment milestones. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9627-3.
Redondo, M., Redondo, M., Camarero, C., & Camarero, C. (2017). Dominant logics and the manager’s role in university business incubators. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(2), 282–294.
RezaeiZadeh, M., Hogan, M., O’Reilly, J., Cunningham, J., & Murphy, E. (2017). Core entrepreneurial competencies and their interdependencies: Insights from a study of Irish and Iranian entrepreneurs, university students and academics. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 35–73.
Rocha, H. O. (2004). Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. Small Business Economics, 23(5), 363–400.
Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1992). European technology policy evolution: Convergence towards SMEs and regional technology transfer. Technovation, 12(4), 223–238.
Secundo, G., De Beer, C., Schutte, C. S., & Passiante, G. (2017). Mobilising intellectual capital to improve European universities’ competitiveness: The technology transfer offices’ role. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(3), 607–624.
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640–660.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48.
Smith, D., Feldman, M., & Anderson, G. (2017). The longer term effects of federal subsidies on firm survival: Evidence from the advanced technology program. The Journal of Technology Transfer https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9633-5.
Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.
Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2017). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sej.1268/full.
van Stijn, N., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & van Veelen, M. (2017). Exploring the motives and practices of university–start-up interaction: Evidence from Route 128. The Journal of Technology Transfer https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9625-5.
Watson, K., & McGowan, P. (2017). Technology nascent entrepreneur experiences of start-up competition participation. In J. A. Cunningham & C. O’Kane (Eds.), Technology-based nascent entrepreneurship (pp. 279–308). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Watson, K., McGowan, P., & Cunningham, J. A. (2018). An exploration of the Business Plan Competition as a methodology for effective nascent entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(1), 121–146.
Winebrake, J. J. (1992). A study of technology-transfer mechanisms for federally funded R&D. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 17(4), 54–61.
Worrell, E., Van Berkel, R., Fengqi, Z., Menke, C., Schaeffer, R., & Williams, R. O. (2001). Technology transfer of energy efficient technologies in industry: A review of trends and policy issues. Energy Policy, 29(1), 29–43.
Wright, M., Siegel, D. S., & Mustar, P. (2017). An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1–14.