Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New initiatives in student entrepreneurship programs are moving rapidly beyond traditional classroom teaching to experiential learning, which is associated with improved employment outcomes for students (Gosen and Washbush in Simul Gaming, 35:270–293, 2004). Unfortunately, we lack a framework to understand the ecosystem required to enable our students to launch successful startups. In this article, we develop such a framework. The elements of this framework include university mechanisms to facilitate student entrepreneurship, along with a continuum of involvement from pre-accelerators through to accelerators; the involvement of a variety of entrepreneurs, support actors and investors; the particular nature of the university environment and the external context; and their evolution over time. We also consider the important issue of funding mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amezcua, A. S., Grimes, M. G., Bradley, S. W., & Wiklund, J. (2013). Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1628–1654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astebro, T., Bazzazian, N., & Braguinsky, S. (2012). Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Research Policy, 41, 663–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43, 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backes-Gellner, U., & Moog, P. (2007) Who chooses to become an entrepreneur? The jacks-of-all-trades in social and human capital. Institute for Strategy and Business Economics. University of Zurich, Working Paper No. 76.

  • Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 217–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Wright, M., & Garcia, A. R. (2014). Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19, 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, H., Hundt, C., & Sternberg, R. (2016). What makes student entrepreneurs? On the relevance (and irrelevance) of the university and the regional context for student start-ups. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9700-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The evolution of business incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation, 32, 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G., Khavul, S., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfinance, crowdfunding, and peer-to-peer innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, A., Fraser, S., & Greene, F. (2010). Multiple effects of business plans on new ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 391–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning off new ventures: A typology of facilitating services. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne, D. R., & Chandler, G. N. (2004). Opportunity identification and its role in the entrepreneurial classroom: A pedagogical approach and empirical test. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., & Khavul, S. (2016). Equity crowd funding and the socialization of entrepreneurial finance. Working Paper.

  • Fini, R., Fu, K., Rasmussen, E., Mathison, M., & Wright, M. (2016a). Determinants of university spin-off quantity and quality in Italy, Norway and the UK. ERC Working Paper.

  • Fini, R., Meoli, A., Sobrero, M., Ghiselli, S., & Ferrante, F. (2016b). Student entrepreneurship: Demographics, competences and obstacles. Bologna: Consorzio Interuniversitario AlmaLaurea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S., Bhaumik, S., & Wright, M. (2015). What do we know about the relationship between entrepreneurial finance and growth? International Small Business Journal, 33, 70–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosen, J., & Washbush, J. (2004). A review of scholarship on assessing experiential learning effectiveness. Simulation and Gaming, 35, 270–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after bayh-dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40, 1045–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, C. S. (2016). Constraining entrepreneurial development: A knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 45, 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, C. S., Lubynski, R., & Maroulis, S. (2017). Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs. Journal of Technology Transfer, forthcoming.

  • Holstein, J., Starkey, K., & Wright, M. (2016). Strategy and narrative in higher education. Strategic Organization, forthcoming.

  • Honig, B., & Karlsson, T. (2013). An institutional perspective on business planning activities for nascent entrepreneurs in Sweden and the US. Administrative Sciences, 3, 266–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. (2010). The big idea: How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88, 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. & Patton, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial geographies: Support networks in three high-Tech industries. Economic Geography, 81, 201–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri, N. (2015). Success of crowd-based online technology in fundraising: An institutional perspective. Journal of International Management, 21, 100–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J., Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., & Wright, M. (2016). Location choices of graduate entrepreneurs. Working Paper.

  • Lerner, J., & Malmendier, U. (2013). With a little help from my (random) friends: Success and failure in post-business school entrepreneurship. Review of Financial Studies, 26, 2411–2452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34, 1043–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Wild, A. (2015). The institutionalization of third stream activities in UK higher education: The role of discourse and metrics. British Journal of Management, 26, 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massolution. (2013). 2013CF: The crowdfunding industry report. Los Angeles: Crowdsourcing LLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2007). From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 909–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P., et al. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, 35, 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesta (2016). Pushing boundaries: The 2015 UK alternative finance industry report. London: Nesta. http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/pushing-boundaries-2015-uk-alternative-finance-industry-report#sthash.25nEjUTq.dpuf. Accessed 14 June 2016.

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50–51, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan, P., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigneur, Y., & Osterwalder, A. (2010). The business model generation. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25, 479–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business Publishing.

  • Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., & Link, A. N. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26, 582–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, U., & Uhlaner, L. M. (2010). Performance-based vs. socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1347–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. W., Tihanyi, L., Ireland, R. D., & Sirmon, D. G. (2009). You say illegal, I say legitimate: entrepreneurship in the informal economy. Academy of Management Review, 34, 492–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. (2014). Academic entrepreneurship, technology transfer and society: Where next? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., & Knockaert, M. (2008). Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries. Research Policy, 37, 1205–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Hart, M., & Fu, K. (2015). A nation of angels: Assessing the impact of business angels. UKBAA/CFE/ERC.

  • Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35, 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Piva, E., Mosey, S., & Lockett, A. (2009). Business schools and academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 560–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Management Buy-Out Research, Imperial College Business School, London, UK

    Mike Wright

  2. ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Mike Wright

  3. School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    Donald S. Siegel

  4. MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University Paris, 60, boulevard Saint Michel, 75006, Paris, France

    Philippe Mustar

Authors
  1. Mike Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donald S. Siegel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philippe Mustar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald S. Siegel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wright, M., Siegel, D.S. & Mustar, P. An emerging ecosystem for student start-ups. J Technol Transf 42, 909–922 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9558-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9558-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation